* Re: [PATCH v2 2/2] fuse: add default_request_timeout and max_request_timeout sysctls
[not found] <20240730002348.3431931-3-joannelkoong@gmail.com>
@ 2024-07-30 9:14 ` kernel test robot
0 siblings, 0 replies; only message in thread
From: kernel test robot @ 2024-07-30 9:14 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Joanne Koong, miklos, linux-fsdevel
Cc: llvm, oe-kbuild-all, josef, bernd.schubert, laoar.shao,
kernel-team
Hi Joanne,
kernel test robot noticed the following build errors:
[auto build test ERROR on mszeredi-fuse/for-next]
[also build test ERROR on linus/master v6.11-rc1 next-20240730]
[If your patch is applied to the wrong git tree, kindly drop us a note.
And when submitting patch, we suggest to use '--base' as documented in
https://git-scm.com/docs/git-format-patch#_base_tree_information]
url: https://github.com/intel-lab-lkp/linux/commits/Joanne-Koong/fuse-add-optional-kernel-enforced-timeout-for-requests/20240730-085106
base: https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/mszeredi/fuse.git for-next
patch link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20240730002348.3431931-3-joannelkoong%40gmail.com
patch subject: [PATCH v2 2/2] fuse: add default_request_timeout and max_request_timeout sysctls
config: i386-buildonly-randconfig-006-20240730 (https://download.01.org/0day-ci/archive/20240730/202407301619.Mja5LwBe-lkp@intel.com/config)
compiler: clang version 18.1.5 (https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project 617a15a9eac96088ae5e9134248d8236e34b91b1)
reproduce (this is a W=1 build): (https://download.01.org/0day-ci/archive/20240730/202407301619.Mja5LwBe-lkp@intel.com/reproduce)
If you fix the issue in a separate patch/commit (i.e. not just a new version of
the same patch/commit), kindly add following tags
| Reported-by: kernel test robot <lkp@intel.com>
| Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/oe-kbuild-all/202407301619.Mja5LwBe-lkp@intel.com/
All errors (new ones prefixed by >>):
>> fs/fuse/sysctl.c:30:26: error: too many arguments provided to function-like macro invocation
30 | int fuse_sysctl_register(void)
| ^
fs/fuse/fuse_i.h:1501:9: note: macro 'fuse_sysctl_register' defined here
1501 | #define fuse_sysctl_register() (0)
| ^
>> fs/fuse/sysctl.c:30:25: error: expected ';' after top level declarator
30 | int fuse_sysctl_register(void)
| ^
| ;
fs/fuse/sysctl.c:38:29: error: too many arguments provided to function-like macro invocation
38 | void fuse_sysctl_unregister(void)
| ^
fs/fuse/fuse_i.h:1502:9: note: macro 'fuse_sysctl_unregister' defined here
1502 | #define fuse_sysctl_unregister() do { } while (0)
| ^
>> fs/fuse/sysctl.c:38:6: error: variable has incomplete type 'void'
38 | void fuse_sysctl_unregister(void)
| ^
fs/fuse/sysctl.c:38:28: error: expected ';' after top level declarator
38 | void fuse_sysctl_unregister(void)
| ^
| ;
5 errors generated.
vim +30 fs/fuse/sysctl.c
29
> 30 int fuse_sysctl_register(void)
31 {
32 fuse_table_header = register_sysctl("fs/fuse", fuse_sysctl_table);
33 if (!fuse_table_header)
34 return -ENOMEM;
35 return 0;
36 }
37
> 38 void fuse_sysctl_unregister(void)
--
0-DAY CI Kernel Test Service
https://github.com/intel/lkp-tests/wiki
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] only message in thread