* Re: [PATCH 3/5] sched/fair: Rework feec() to use cost instead of spare capacity
[not found] <20240830130309.2141697-4-vincent.guittot@linaro.org>
@ 2024-09-02 9:11 ` kernel test robot
0 siblings, 0 replies; only message in thread
From: kernel test robot @ 2024-09-02 9:11 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Vincent Guittot, mingo, peterz, juri.lelli, dietmar.eggemann,
rostedt, bsegall, mgorman, vschneid, lukasz.luba,
rafael.j.wysocki, linux-kernel
Cc: llvm, oe-kbuild-all, qyousef, hongyan.xia2, Vincent Guittot
Hi Vincent,
kernel test robot noticed the following build errors:
[auto build test ERROR on tip/sched/core]
[also build test ERROR on peterz-queue/sched/core linus/master v6.11-rc6 next-20240830]
[If your patch is applied to the wrong git tree, kindly drop us a note.
And when submitting patch, we suggest to use '--base' as documented in
https://git-scm.com/docs/git-format-patch#_base_tree_information]
url: https://github.com/intel-lab-lkp/linux/commits/Vincent-Guittot/sched-fair-Filter-false-overloaded_group-case-for-EAS/20240830-210826
base: tip/sched/core
patch link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20240830130309.2141697-4-vincent.guittot%40linaro.org
patch subject: [PATCH 3/5] sched/fair: Rework feec() to use cost instead of spare capacity
config: s390-allnoconfig (https://download.01.org/0day-ci/archive/20240902/202409021606.CwIU0HB8-lkp@intel.com/config)
compiler: clang version 20.0.0git (https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project 6f682c26b04f0b349c4c473756cb8625b4f37c6d)
reproduce (this is a W=1 build): (https://download.01.org/0day-ci/archive/20240902/202409021606.CwIU0HB8-lkp@intel.com/reproduce)
If you fix the issue in a separate patch/commit (i.e. not just a new version of
the same patch/commit), kindly add following tags
| Reported-by: kernel test robot <lkp@intel.com>
| Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/oe-kbuild-all/202409021606.CwIU0HB8-lkp@intel.com/
All errors (new ones prefixed by >>):
In file included from kernel/sched/fair.c:23:
In file included from include/linux/energy_model.h:5:
In file included from include/linux/device.h:32:
In file included from include/linux/device/driver.h:21:
In file included from include/linux/module.h:19:
In file included from include/linux/elf.h:6:
In file included from arch/s390/include/asm/elf.h:181:
In file included from arch/s390/include/asm/mmu_context.h:11:
In file included from arch/s390/include/asm/pgalloc.h:18:
In file included from include/linux/mm.h:2228:
include/linux/vmstat.h:514:36: warning: arithmetic between different enumeration types ('enum node_stat_item' and 'enum lru_list') [-Wenum-enum-conversion]
514 | return node_stat_name(NR_LRU_BASE + lru) + 3; // skip "nr_"
| ~~~~~~~~~~~ ^ ~~~
In file included from kernel/sched/fair.c:38:
In file included from include/linux/sched/isolation.h:7:
In file included from include/linux/tick.h:8:
In file included from include/linux/clockchips.h:14:
In file included from include/linux/clocksource.h:22:
In file included from arch/s390/include/asm/io.h:93:
include/asm-generic/io.h:548:31: warning: performing pointer arithmetic on a null pointer has undefined behavior [-Wnull-pointer-arithmetic]
548 | val = __raw_readb(PCI_IOBASE + addr);
| ~~~~~~~~~~ ^
include/asm-generic/io.h:561:61: warning: performing pointer arithmetic on a null pointer has undefined behavior [-Wnull-pointer-arithmetic]
561 | val = __le16_to_cpu((__le16 __force)__raw_readw(PCI_IOBASE + addr));
| ~~~~~~~~~~ ^
include/uapi/linux/byteorder/big_endian.h:37:59: note: expanded from macro '__le16_to_cpu'
37 | #define __le16_to_cpu(x) __swab16((__force __u16)(__le16)(x))
| ^
include/uapi/linux/swab.h:102:54: note: expanded from macro '__swab16'
102 | #define __swab16(x) (__u16)__builtin_bswap16((__u16)(x))
| ^
In file included from kernel/sched/fair.c:38:
In file included from include/linux/sched/isolation.h:7:
In file included from include/linux/tick.h:8:
In file included from include/linux/clockchips.h:14:
In file included from include/linux/clocksource.h:22:
In file included from arch/s390/include/asm/io.h:93:
include/asm-generic/io.h:574:61: warning: performing pointer arithmetic on a null pointer has undefined behavior [-Wnull-pointer-arithmetic]
574 | val = __le32_to_cpu((__le32 __force)__raw_readl(PCI_IOBASE + addr));
| ~~~~~~~~~~ ^
include/uapi/linux/byteorder/big_endian.h:35:59: note: expanded from macro '__le32_to_cpu'
35 | #define __le32_to_cpu(x) __swab32((__force __u32)(__le32)(x))
| ^
include/uapi/linux/swab.h:115:54: note: expanded from macro '__swab32'
115 | #define __swab32(x) (__u32)__builtin_bswap32((__u32)(x))
| ^
In file included from kernel/sched/fair.c:38:
In file included from include/linux/sched/isolation.h:7:
In file included from include/linux/tick.h:8:
In file included from include/linux/clockchips.h:14:
In file included from include/linux/clocksource.h:22:
In file included from arch/s390/include/asm/io.h:93:
include/asm-generic/io.h:585:33: warning: performing pointer arithmetic on a null pointer has undefined behavior [-Wnull-pointer-arithmetic]
585 | __raw_writeb(value, PCI_IOBASE + addr);
| ~~~~~~~~~~ ^
include/asm-generic/io.h:595:59: warning: performing pointer arithmetic on a null pointer has undefined behavior [-Wnull-pointer-arithmetic]
595 | __raw_writew((u16 __force)cpu_to_le16(value), PCI_IOBASE + addr);
| ~~~~~~~~~~ ^
include/asm-generic/io.h:605:59: warning: performing pointer arithmetic on a null pointer has undefined behavior [-Wnull-pointer-arithmetic]
605 | __raw_writel((u32 __force)cpu_to_le32(value), PCI_IOBASE + addr);
| ~~~~~~~~~~ ^
include/asm-generic/io.h:693:20: warning: performing pointer arithmetic on a null pointer has undefined behavior [-Wnull-pointer-arithmetic]
693 | readsb(PCI_IOBASE + addr, buffer, count);
| ~~~~~~~~~~ ^
include/asm-generic/io.h:701:20: warning: performing pointer arithmetic on a null pointer has undefined behavior [-Wnull-pointer-arithmetic]
701 | readsw(PCI_IOBASE + addr, buffer, count);
| ~~~~~~~~~~ ^
include/asm-generic/io.h:709:20: warning: performing pointer arithmetic on a null pointer has undefined behavior [-Wnull-pointer-arithmetic]
709 | readsl(PCI_IOBASE + addr, buffer, count);
| ~~~~~~~~~~ ^
include/asm-generic/io.h:718:21: warning: performing pointer arithmetic on a null pointer has undefined behavior [-Wnull-pointer-arithmetic]
718 | writesb(PCI_IOBASE + addr, buffer, count);
| ~~~~~~~~~~ ^
include/asm-generic/io.h:727:21: warning: performing pointer arithmetic on a null pointer has undefined behavior [-Wnull-pointer-arithmetic]
727 | writesw(PCI_IOBASE + addr, buffer, count);
| ~~~~~~~~~~ ^
include/asm-generic/io.h:736:21: warning: performing pointer arithmetic on a null pointer has undefined behavior [-Wnull-pointer-arithmetic]
736 | writesl(PCI_IOBASE + addr, buffer, count);
| ~~~~~~~~~~ ^
>> kernel/sched/fair.c:8183:6: error: call to undeclared function 'em_pd_get_efficient_state'; ISO C99 and later do not support implicit function declarations [-Wimplicit-function-declaration]
8183 | i = em_pd_get_efficient_state(em_table->state, pd->nr_perf_states,
| ^
>> kernel/sched/fair.c:8190:6: error: call to undeclared function 'em_pd_get_previous_state'; ISO C99 and later do not support implicit function declarations [-Wimplicit-function-declaration]
8190 | i = em_pd_get_previous_state(em_table->state, pd->nr_perf_states,
| ^
13 warnings and 2 errors generated.
vim +/em_pd_get_efficient_state +8183 kernel/sched/fair.c
8168
8169 /* Find the cost of a performance domain for the estimated utilization */
8170 static inline void find_pd_cost(struct em_perf_domain *pd,
8171 unsigned long max_util,
8172 struct energy_cpu_stat *stat)
8173 {
8174 struct em_perf_table *em_table;
8175 struct em_perf_state *ps;
8176 int i;
8177
8178 /*
8179 * Find the lowest performance state of the Energy Model above the
8180 * requested performance.
8181 */
8182 em_table = rcu_dereference(pd->em_table);
> 8183 i = em_pd_get_efficient_state(em_table->state, pd->nr_perf_states,
8184 max_util, pd->flags);
8185 ps = &em_table->state[i];
8186
8187 /* Save the cost and performance range of the OPP */
8188 stat->max_perf = ps->performance;
8189 stat->cost = ps->cost;
> 8190 i = em_pd_get_previous_state(em_table->state, pd->nr_perf_states,
8191 i, pd->flags);
8192 if (i < 0)
8193 stat->min_perf = 0;
8194 else {
8195 ps = &em_table->state[i];
8196 stat->min_perf = ps->performance;
8197 }
8198 }
8199
--
0-DAY CI Kernel Test Service
https://github.com/intel/lkp-tests/wiki
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] only message in thread
only message in thread, other threads:[~2024-09-02 9:11 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: (only message) (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
[not found] <20240830130309.2141697-4-vincent.guittot@linaro.org>
2024-09-02 9:11 ` [PATCH 3/5] sched/fair: Rework feec() to use cost instead of spare capacity kernel test robot
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox