* [PATCH RESEND] selftests/futex: Order calls in futex_requeue
@ 2024-09-03 20:39 Edward Liaw
2024-09-04 13:23 ` André Almeida
0 siblings, 1 reply; 2+ messages in thread
From: Edward Liaw @ 2024-09-03 20:39 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: linux-kselftest, Thomas Gleixner, Ingo Molnar, Peter Zijlstra,
Darren Hart, Davidlohr Bueso, André Almeida, Shuah Khan,
John Stultz, Stephen Boyd, Anna-Maria Behnsen,
Frederic Weisbecker, Nathan Chancellor, Nick Desaulniers,
Bill Wendling, Justin Stitt, Oleg Nesterov, Marco Elver,
Dmitry Vyukov
Cc: linux-kernel, kernel-team, Edward Liaw, Muhammad Usama Anjum,
Davidlohr Bueso, llvm
Similar to fbf4dec70277 ("selftests/futex: Order calls to
futex_lock_pi"), which fixed a flake in futex_lock_pi due to racing
between the parent and child threads.
The same issue can occur in the futex_requeue test, because it expects
waiterfn to make progress to futex_wait before the parent starts to
requeue. This is mitigated by the parent sleeping for WAKE_WAIT_US, but
it still fails occasionally. This can be reproduced by adding a sleep in
the waiterfn before futex_wait:
TAP version 13
1..2
not ok 1 futex_requeue simple returned: 0
not ok 2 futex_requeue simple returned: 0
not ok 3 futex_requeue many returned: 0
not ok 4 futex_requeue many returned: 0
Instead, replace the sleep with barriers to make the sequencing
explicit.
Fixes: 7cb5dd8e2c8c ("selftests: futex: Add futex compare requeue test")
Reviewed-by: Muhammad Usama Anjum <usama.anjum@collabora.com>
Signed-off-by: Edward Liaw <edliaw@google.com>
---
.../selftests/futex/functional/futex_requeue.c | 12 +++++++++---
1 file changed, 9 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/futex/functional/futex_requeue.c b/tools/testing/selftests/futex/functional/futex_requeue.c
index 51485be6eb2f..8f7d3e8bf32a 100644
--- a/tools/testing/selftests/futex/functional/futex_requeue.c
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/futex/functional/futex_requeue.c
@@ -12,9 +12,9 @@
#define TEST_NAME "futex-requeue"
#define timeout_ns 30000000
-#define WAKE_WAIT_US 10000
volatile futex_t *f1;
+static pthread_barrier_t barrier;
void usage(char *prog)
{
@@ -32,6 +32,8 @@ void *waiterfn(void *arg)
to.tv_sec = 0;
to.tv_nsec = timeout_ns;
+ pthread_barrier_wait(&barrier);
+
if (futex_wait(f1, *f1, &to, 0))
printf("waiter failed errno %d\n", errno);
@@ -70,13 +72,15 @@ int main(int argc, char *argv[])
ksft_print_msg("%s: Test futex_requeue\n",
basename(argv[0]));
+ pthread_barrier_init(&barrier, NULL, 2);
/*
* Requeue a waiter from f1 to f2, and wake f2.
*/
if (pthread_create(&waiter[0], NULL, waiterfn, NULL))
error("pthread_create failed\n", errno);
- usleep(WAKE_WAIT_US);
+ pthread_barrier_wait(&barrier);
+ pthread_barrier_destroy(&barrier);
info("Requeuing 1 futex from f1 to f2\n");
res = futex_cmp_requeue(f1, 0, &f2, 0, 1, 0);
@@ -99,6 +103,7 @@ int main(int argc, char *argv[])
ksft_test_result_pass("futex_requeue simple succeeds\n");
}
+ pthread_barrier_init(&barrier, NULL, 11);
/*
* Create 10 waiters at f1. At futex_requeue, wake 3 and requeue 7.
@@ -109,7 +114,8 @@ int main(int argc, char *argv[])
error("pthread_create failed\n", errno);
}
- usleep(WAKE_WAIT_US);
+ pthread_barrier_wait(&barrier);
+ pthread_barrier_destroy(&barrier);
info("Waking 3 futexes at f1 and requeuing 7 futexes from f1 to f2\n");
res = futex_cmp_requeue(f1, 0, &f2, 3, 7, 0);
--
2.46.0.469.g59c65b2a67-goog
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread* Re: [PATCH RESEND] selftests/futex: Order calls in futex_requeue
2024-09-03 20:39 [PATCH RESEND] selftests/futex: Order calls in futex_requeue Edward Liaw
@ 2024-09-04 13:23 ` André Almeida
0 siblings, 0 replies; 2+ messages in thread
From: André Almeida @ 2024-09-04 13:23 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Edward Liaw
Cc: linux-kernel, Frederic Weisbecker, Bill Wendling, Thomas Gleixner,
Ingo Molnar, Anna-Maria Behnsen, Shuah Khan, Peter Zijlstra,
Marco Elver, Nick Desaulniers, Davidlohr Bueso, Nathan Chancellor,
Stephen Boyd, Oleg Nesterov, Justin Stitt, Dmitry Vyukov,
Darren Hart, linux-kselftest, kernel-team, Muhammad Usama Anjum,
Davidlohr Bueso, llvm, John Stultz
Hi Edward,
Thanks for your patch!
Em 03/09/2024 17:39, Edward Liaw escreveu:
> Similar to fbf4dec70277 ("selftests/futex: Order calls to
> futex_lock_pi"), which fixed a flake in futex_lock_pi due to racing
> between the parent and child threads.
>
> The same issue can occur in the futex_requeue test, because it expects
> waiterfn to make progress to futex_wait before the parent starts to
> requeue. This is mitigated by the parent sleeping for WAKE_WAIT_US, but
> it still fails occasionally. This can be reproduced by adding a sleep in
> the waiterfn before futex_wait:
>
> TAP version 13
> 1..2
> not ok 1 futex_requeue simple returned: 0
> not ok 2 futex_requeue simple returned: 0
> not ok 3 futex_requeue many returned: 0
> not ok 4 futex_requeue many returned: 0
>
> Instead, replace the sleep with barriers to make the sequencing
> explicit.
>
Reviewed-by: André Almeida <andrealmeid@igalia.com>
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2024-09-04 13:23 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2024-09-03 20:39 [PATCH RESEND] selftests/futex: Order calls in futex_requeue Edward Liaw
2024-09-04 13:23 ` André Almeida
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox