* Re: [PATCH] rapidio: rio-access: remove unused macros
[not found] <20241015000207.5047-1-bajing@cmss.chinamobile.com>
@ 2024-10-20 6:23 ` kernel test robot
0 siblings, 0 replies; only message in thread
From: kernel test robot @ 2024-10-20 6:23 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Ba Jing, mporter; +Cc: llvm, oe-kbuild-all, alex.bou9, linux-kernel, Ba Jing
Hi Ba,
kernel test robot noticed the following build errors:
[auto build test ERROR on linus/master]
[also build test ERROR on v6.12-rc3 next-20241018]
[If your patch is applied to the wrong git tree, kindly drop us a note.
And when submitting patch, we suggest to use '--base' as documented in
https://git-scm.com/docs/git-format-patch#_base_tree_information]
url: https://github.com/intel-lab-lkp/linux/commits/Ba-Jing/rapidio-rio-access-remove-unused-macros/20241017-152330
base: linus/master
patch link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20241015000207.5047-1-bajing%40cmss.chinamobile.com
patch subject: [PATCH] rapidio: rio-access: remove unused macros
config: i386-buildonly-randconfig-002-20241020 (https://download.01.org/0day-ci/archive/20241020/202410201348.MoFc4X0v-lkp@intel.com/config)
compiler: clang version 18.1.8 (https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project 3b5b5c1ec4a3095ab096dd780e84d7ab81f3d7ff)
reproduce (this is a W=1 build): (https://download.01.org/0day-ci/archive/20241020/202410201348.MoFc4X0v-lkp@intel.com/reproduce)
If you fix the issue in a separate patch/commit (i.e. not just a new version of
the same patch/commit), kindly add following tags
| Reported-by: kernel test robot <lkp@intel.com>
| Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/oe-kbuild-all/202410201348.MoFc4X0v-lkp@intel.com/
All errors (new ones prefixed by >>):
>> drivers/rapidio/rio-access.c:52:1: error: use of undeclared identifier 'RIO_8_BAD'
52 | RIO_LOP_READ(8, u8, 1)
| ^
drivers/rapidio/rio-access.c:29:6: note: expanded from macro 'RIO_LOP_READ'
29 | if (RIO_##size##_BAD) return RIO_BAD_SIZE; \
| ^
<scratch space>:171:1: note: expanded from here
171 | RIO_8_BAD
| ^
>> drivers/rapidio/rio-access.c:53:1: error: use of undeclared identifier 'RIO_16_BAD'
53 | RIO_LOP_READ(16, u16, 2)
| ^
drivers/rapidio/rio-access.c:29:6: note: expanded from macro 'RIO_LOP_READ'
29 | if (RIO_##size##_BAD) return RIO_BAD_SIZE; \
| ^
<scratch space>:174:1: note: expanded from here
174 | RIO_16_BAD
| ^
>> drivers/rapidio/rio-access.c:54:1: error: use of undeclared identifier 'RIO_32_BAD'
54 | RIO_LOP_READ(32, u32, 4)
| ^
drivers/rapidio/rio-access.c:29:6: note: expanded from macro 'RIO_LOP_READ'
29 | if (RIO_##size##_BAD) return RIO_BAD_SIZE; \
| ^
<scratch space>:177:1: note: expanded from here
177 | RIO_32_BAD
| ^
drivers/rapidio/rio-access.c:55:1: error: use of undeclared identifier 'RIO_8_BAD'
55 | RIO_LOP_WRITE(8, u8, 1)
| ^
drivers/rapidio/rio-access.c:48:6: note: expanded from macro 'RIO_LOP_WRITE'
48 | if (RIO_##size##_BAD) return RIO_BAD_SIZE; \
| ^
<scratch space>:180:1: note: expanded from here
180 | RIO_8_BAD
| ^
drivers/rapidio/rio-access.c:56:1: error: use of undeclared identifier 'RIO_16_BAD'
56 | RIO_LOP_WRITE(16, u16, 2)
| ^
drivers/rapidio/rio-access.c:48:6: note: expanded from macro 'RIO_LOP_WRITE'
48 | if (RIO_##size##_BAD) return RIO_BAD_SIZE; \
| ^
<scratch space>:183:1: note: expanded from here
183 | RIO_16_BAD
| ^
drivers/rapidio/rio-access.c:57:1: error: use of undeclared identifier 'RIO_32_BAD'
57 | RIO_LOP_WRITE(32, u32, 4)
| ^
drivers/rapidio/rio-access.c:48:6: note: expanded from macro 'RIO_LOP_WRITE'
48 | if (RIO_##size##_BAD) return RIO_BAD_SIZE; \
| ^
<scratch space>:186:1: note: expanded from here
186 | RIO_32_BAD
| ^
drivers/rapidio/rio-access.c:105:1: error: use of undeclared identifier 'RIO_8_BAD'
105 | RIO_OP_READ(8, u8, 1)
| ^
drivers/rapidio/rio-access.c:81:6: note: expanded from macro 'RIO_OP_READ'
81 | if (RIO_##size##_BAD) return RIO_BAD_SIZE; \
| ^
<scratch space>:25:1: note: expanded from here
25 | RIO_8_BAD
| ^
drivers/rapidio/rio-access.c:106:1: error: use of undeclared identifier 'RIO_16_BAD'
106 | RIO_OP_READ(16, u16, 2)
| ^
drivers/rapidio/rio-access.c:81:6: note: expanded from macro 'RIO_OP_READ'
81 | if (RIO_##size##_BAD) return RIO_BAD_SIZE; \
| ^
<scratch space>:28:1: note: expanded from here
28 | RIO_16_BAD
| ^
drivers/rapidio/rio-access.c:107:1: error: use of undeclared identifier 'RIO_32_BAD'
107 | RIO_OP_READ(32, u32, 4)
| ^
drivers/rapidio/rio-access.c:81:6: note: expanded from macro 'RIO_OP_READ'
81 | if (RIO_##size##_BAD) return RIO_BAD_SIZE; \
| ^
<scratch space>:31:1: note: expanded from here
31 | RIO_32_BAD
| ^
drivers/rapidio/rio-access.c:108:1: error: use of undeclared identifier 'RIO_8_BAD'
108 | RIO_OP_WRITE(8, u8, 1)
| ^
drivers/rapidio/rio-access.c:100:6: note: expanded from macro 'RIO_OP_WRITE'
100 | if (RIO_##size##_BAD) return RIO_BAD_SIZE; \
| ^
<scratch space>:34:1: note: expanded from here
34 | RIO_8_BAD
| ^
drivers/rapidio/rio-access.c:109:1: error: use of undeclared identifier 'RIO_16_BAD'
109 | RIO_OP_WRITE(16, u16, 2)
| ^
drivers/rapidio/rio-access.c:100:6: note: expanded from macro 'RIO_OP_WRITE'
100 | if (RIO_##size##_BAD) return RIO_BAD_SIZE; \
| ^
<scratch space>:37:1: note: expanded from here
37 | RIO_16_BAD
| ^
drivers/rapidio/rio-access.c:110:1: error: use of undeclared identifier 'RIO_32_BAD'
110 | RIO_OP_WRITE(32, u32, 4)
| ^
drivers/rapidio/rio-access.c:100:6: note: expanded from macro 'RIO_OP_WRITE'
100 | if (RIO_##size##_BAD) return RIO_BAD_SIZE; \
| ^
<scratch space>:40:1: note: expanded from here
40 | RIO_32_BAD
| ^
12 errors generated.
vim +/RIO_8_BAD +52 drivers/rapidio/rio-access.c
394b701ce4fbfd Matt Porter 2005-11-07 51
394b701ce4fbfd Matt Porter 2005-11-07 @52 RIO_LOP_READ(8, u8, 1)
394b701ce4fbfd Matt Porter 2005-11-07 @53 RIO_LOP_READ(16, u16, 2)
394b701ce4fbfd Matt Porter 2005-11-07 @54 RIO_LOP_READ(32, u32, 4)
394b701ce4fbfd Matt Porter 2005-11-07 55 RIO_LOP_WRITE(8, u8, 1)
394b701ce4fbfd Matt Porter 2005-11-07 56 RIO_LOP_WRITE(16, u16, 2)
394b701ce4fbfd Matt Porter 2005-11-07 57 RIO_LOP_WRITE(32, u32, 4)
394b701ce4fbfd Matt Porter 2005-11-07 58
--
0-DAY CI Kernel Test Service
https://github.com/intel/lkp-tests/wiki
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] only message in thread