* Re: [RFC PATCH] mm/mempolicy: Weighted interleave auto-tuning
[not found] <20241210215439.94819-1-joshua.hahnjy@gmail.com>
@ 2024-12-11 11:39 ` kernel test robot
0 siblings, 0 replies; only message in thread
From: kernel test robot @ 2024-12-11 11:39 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Joshua Hahn; +Cc: llvm, oe-kbuild-all
Hi Joshua,
[This is a private test report for your RFC patch.]
kernel test robot noticed the following build warnings:
[auto build test WARNING on akpm-mm/mm-everything]
url: https://github.com/intel-lab-lkp/linux/commits/Joshua-Hahn/mm-mempolicy-Weighted-interleave-auto-tuning/20241211-055713
base: https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/akpm/mm.git mm-everything
patch link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20241210215439.94819-1-joshua.hahnjy%40gmail.com
patch subject: [RFC PATCH] mm/mempolicy: Weighted interleave auto-tuning
config: i386-buildonly-randconfig-001-20241211 (https://download.01.org/0day-ci/archive/20241211/202412111959.U5DOpNXr-lkp@intel.com/config)
compiler: clang version 19.1.3 (https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project ab51eccf88f5321e7c60591c5546b254b6afab99)
reproduce (this is a W=1 build): (https://download.01.org/0day-ci/archive/20241211/202412111959.U5DOpNXr-lkp@intel.com/reproduce)
If you fix the issue in a separate patch/commit (i.e. not just a new version of
the same patch/commit), kindly add following tags
| Reported-by: kernel test robot <lkp@intel.com>
| Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/oe-kbuild-all/202412111959.U5DOpNXr-lkp@intel.com/
All warnings (new ones prefixed by >>):
In file included from mm/mempolicy.c:80:
In file included from include/linux/mempolicy.h:16:
In file included from include/linux/pagemap.h:8:
In file included from include/linux/mm.h:2287:
include/linux/vmstat.h:504:43: warning: arithmetic between different enumeration types ('enum zone_stat_item' and 'enum numa_stat_item') [-Wenum-enum-conversion]
504 | return vmstat_text[NR_VM_ZONE_STAT_ITEMS +
| ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ ^
505 | item];
| ~~~~
include/linux/vmstat.h:511:43: warning: arithmetic between different enumeration types ('enum zone_stat_item' and 'enum numa_stat_item') [-Wenum-enum-conversion]
511 | return vmstat_text[NR_VM_ZONE_STAT_ITEMS +
| ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ ^
512 | NR_VM_NUMA_EVENT_ITEMS +
| ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
include/linux/vmstat.h:518:36: warning: arithmetic between different enumeration types ('enum node_stat_item' and 'enum lru_list') [-Wenum-enum-conversion]
518 | return node_stat_name(NR_LRU_BASE + lru) + 3; // skip "nr_"
| ~~~~~~~~~~~ ^ ~~~
In file included from mm/mempolicy.c:108:
include/linux/mm_inline.h:47:41: warning: arithmetic between different enumeration types ('enum node_stat_item' and 'enum lru_list') [-Wenum-enum-conversion]
47 | __mod_lruvec_state(lruvec, NR_LRU_BASE + lru, nr_pages);
| ~~~~~~~~~~~ ^ ~~~
include/linux/mm_inline.h:49:22: warning: arithmetic between different enumeration types ('enum zone_stat_item' and 'enum lru_list') [-Wenum-enum-conversion]
49 | NR_ZONE_LRU_BASE + lru, nr_pages);
| ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ ^ ~~~
>> mm/mempolicy.c:227:13: warning: result of comparison of constant 1844674407370955161 with expression of type 'unsigned long' is always false [-Wtautological-constant-out-of-range-compare]
227 | if (bw_val > (U64_MAX / 10))
| ~~~~~~ ^ ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
6 warnings generated.
vim +227 mm/mempolicy.c
79
80 #include <linux/mempolicy.h>
81 #include <linux/pagewalk.h>
82 #include <linux/highmem.h>
83 #include <linux/hugetlb.h>
84 #include <linux/kernel.h>
85 #include <linux/sched.h>
86 #include <linux/sched/mm.h>
87 #include <linux/sched/numa_balancing.h>
88 #include <linux/sched/task.h>
89 #include <linux/nodemask.h>
90 #include <linux/cpuset.h>
91 #include <linux/slab.h>
92 #include <linux/string.h>
93 #include <linux/export.h>
94 #include <linux/nsproxy.h>
95 #include <linux/interrupt.h>
96 #include <linux/init.h>
97 #include <linux/compat.h>
98 #include <linux/ptrace.h>
99 #include <linux/swap.h>
100 #include <linux/seq_file.h>
101 #include <linux/proc_fs.h>
102 #include <linux/migrate.h>
103 #include <linux/ksm.h>
104 #include <linux/rmap.h>
105 #include <linux/security.h>
106 #include <linux/syscalls.h>
107 #include <linux/ctype.h>
> 108 #include <linux/mm_inline.h>
109 #include <linux/mmu_notifier.h>
110 #include <linux/printk.h>
111 #include <linux/swapops.h>
112 #include <linux/gcd.h>
113
114 #include <asm/tlbflush.h>
115 #include <asm/tlb.h>
116 #include <linux/uaccess.h>
117
118 #include "internal.h"
119
120 /* Internal flags */
121 #define MPOL_MF_DISCONTIG_OK (MPOL_MF_INTERNAL << 0) /* Skip checks for continuous vmas */
122 #define MPOL_MF_INVERT (MPOL_MF_INTERNAL << 1) /* Invert check for nodemask */
123 #define MPOL_MF_WRLOCK (MPOL_MF_INTERNAL << 2) /* Write-lock walked vmas */
124
125 static struct kmem_cache *policy_cache;
126 static struct kmem_cache *sn_cache;
127
128 /* Highest zone. An specific allocation for a zone below that is not
129 policied. */
130 enum zone_type policy_zone = 0;
131
132 /*
133 * run-time system-wide default policy => local allocation
134 */
135 static struct mempolicy default_policy = {
136 .refcnt = ATOMIC_INIT(1), /* never free it */
137 .mode = MPOL_LOCAL,
138 };
139
140 static struct mempolicy preferred_node_policy[MAX_NUMNODES];
141
142 /*
143 * iw_table is the sysfs-set interleave weight table, a value of 0 denotes
144 * system-default value should be used. A NULL iw_table also denotes that
145 * system-default values should be used. Until the system-default table
146 * is implemented, the system-default is always 1.
147 *
148 * iw_table is RCU protected
149 */
150 static unsigned long *node_bw_table;
151 static u8 __rcu *default_iw_table;
152 static DEFINE_MUTEX(default_iwt_lock);
153
154 static u8 __rcu *iw_table;
155 static DEFINE_MUTEX(iw_table_lock);
156
157 static int max_node_weight = 32;
158
159 static u8 get_il_weight(int node)
160 {
161 u8 *table, *defaults;
162 u8 weight;
163
164 rcu_read_lock();
165 defaults = rcu_dereference(default_iw_table);
166 table = rcu_dereference(iw_table);
167 /* if no iw_table, use system default - if no default, use 1 */
168 weight = table ? table[node] : 0;
169 weight = weight ? weight : (defaults ? defaults[node] : 1);
170 rcu_read_unlock();
171 return weight;
172 }
173
174 /*
175 * Convert ACPI-reported bandwidths into weighted interleave weights for
176 * informed page allocation.
177 * Call with default_iwt_lock held
178 */
179 static void reduce_interleave_weights(unsigned long *bw, u8 *new_iw)
180 {
181 uint64_t ttl_bw = 0, ttl_iw = 0, scaling_factor = 1;
182 unsigned int iw_gcd = 1, i = 0;
183
184 /* Recalculate the bandwidth distribution given the new info */
185 for (i = 0; i < nr_node_ids; i++)
186 ttl_bw += bw[i];
187
188 /* If node is not set or has < 1% of total bw, use minimum value of 1 */
189 for (i = 0; i < nr_node_ids; i++) {
190 if (bw[i]) {
191 scaling_factor = 100 * bw[i];
192 new_iw[i] = max(scaling_factor / ttl_bw, 1);
193 } else {
194 new_iw[i] = 1;
195 }
196 ttl_iw += new_iw[i];
197 }
198
199 /*
200 * Scale each node's share of the total bandwidth from percentages
201 * to whole numbers in the range [1, max_node_weight]
202 */
203 for (i = 0; i < nr_node_ids; i++) {
204 scaling_factor = max_node_weight * new_iw[i];
205 new_iw[i] = max(scaling_factor / ttl_iw, 1);
206 if (unlikely(i == 0))
207 iw_gcd = new_iw[0];
208 iw_gcd = gcd(iw_gcd, new_iw[i]);
209 }
210
211 /* 1:2 is strictly better than 16:32. Reduce by the weights' GCD. */
212 for (i = 0; i < nr_node_ids; i++)
213 new_iw[i] /= iw_gcd;
214 }
215
216 int mempolicy_set_node_perf(unsigned int node, struct access_coordinate *coords)
217 {
218 unsigned long *old_bw, *new_bw;
219 unsigned long bw_val;
220 u8 *old_iw, *new_iw;
221
222 /*
223 * Bandwidths above this limit causes rounding errors when reducing
224 * weights. This value is ~16 exabytes, which is unreasonable anyways.
225 */
226 bw_val = min(coords->read_bandwidth, coords->write_bandwidth);
> 227 if (bw_val > (U64_MAX / 10))
228 return -EINVAL;
229
230 new_bw = kcalloc(nr_node_ids, sizeof(unsigned long), GFP_KERNEL);
231 if (!new_bw)
232 return -ENOMEM;
233
234 new_iw = kzalloc(nr_node_ids, GFP_KERNEL);
235 if (!new_iw) {
236 kfree(new_bw);
237 return -ENOMEM;
238 }
239
240 mutex_lock(&default_iwt_lock);
241 old_bw = node_bw_table;
242 old_iw = rcu_dereference_protected(default_iw_table,
243 lockdep_is_held(&default_iwt_lock));
244
245 if (old_bw)
246 memcpy(new_bw, old_bw, nr_node_ids*sizeof(unsigned long));
247 new_bw[node] = bw_val;
248 node_bw_table = new_bw;
249
250 reduce_interleave_weights(new_bw, new_iw);
251 rcu_assign_pointer(default_iw_table, new_iw);
252
253 mutex_unlock(&default_iwt_lock);
254 synchronize_rcu();
255 kfree(old_bw);
256 kfree(old_iw);
257 return 0;
258 }
259
--
0-DAY CI Kernel Test Service
https://github.com/intel/lkp-tests/wiki
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] only message in thread
only message in thread, other threads:[~2024-12-11 11:39 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: (only message) (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
[not found] <20241210215439.94819-1-joshua.hahnjy@gmail.com>
2024-12-11 11:39 ` [RFC PATCH] mm/mempolicy: Weighted interleave auto-tuning kernel test robot
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox