Re: [PATCH 6.13 00/23] 6.13.10-rc1 review

public inbox for llvm@lists.linux.dev
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed

* Re: [PATCH 6.13 00/23] 6.13.10-rc1 review
       [not found] <20250403151622.273788569@linuxfoundation.org>
@ 2025-04-05  6:20 ` Naresh Kamboju
  2025-04-05 10:24   ` Greg Kroah-Hartman
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 2+ messages in thread
From: Naresh Kamboju @ 2025-04-05  6:20 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Greg Kroah-Hartman
  Cc: stable, patches, linux-kernel, torvalds, akpm, linux, shuah,
	patches, lkft-triage, pavel, jonathanh, f.fainelli,
	sudipm.mukherjee, srw, rwarsow, conor, hargar, broonie,
	clang-built-linux, Nathan Chancellor,
	open list:KERNEL SELFTEST FRAMEWORK, Anders Roxell, Dan Carpenter,
	Arnd Bergmann

On Thu, 3 Apr 2025 at 20:56, Greg Kroah-Hartman
<gregkh@linuxfoundation.org> wrote:
>
> This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 6.13.10 release.
> There are 23 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
> to this one.  If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
> let me know.
>
> Responses should be made by Sat, 05 Apr 2025 15:16:11 +0000.
> Anything received after that time might be too late.
>
> The whole patch series can be found in one patch at:
>         https://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v6.x/stable-review/patch-6.13.10-rc1.gz
> or in the git tree and branch at:
>         git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.git linux-6.13.y
> and the diffstat can be found below.
>
> thanks,
>
> greg k-h


Regressions on arm, arm64 and x86_64.

1)
The selftests rseq failed across the boards and virtual environments.
These test failures were also noticed on Linux mainline and next.

We will bisect these lists of regressions and get back to you.

* kselftest-rseq
  - rseq_basic_percpu_ops_mm_cid_test
  - rseq_basic_percpu_ops_test
  - rseq_basic_test
  - rseq_param_test
  - rseq_param_test_benchmark
  - rseq_param_test_compare_twice
  - rseq_param_test_mm_cid
  - rseq_param_test_mm_cid_benchmark
  - rseq_param_test_mm_cid_compare_twice

2)
 The clang-nightly build issues reported on mainline and next.

* S390, powerpc, build
  - clang-nightly-defconfig
  - clang-nightly-lkftconfig-hardening
  - clang-nightly-lkftconfig-lto-full
  - clang-nightly-lkftconfig-lto-thing

 clang-nightly: ERROR: modpost: "wcslen" [fs/smb/client/cifs.ko] undefined!
  - https://lore.kernel.org/all/CA+G9fYuQHeGicnEx1d=XBC0p1LCsndi5q0p86V7pCZ02d8Fv_w@mail.gmail.com/

3)
 The clang-nightly boot regressions with no console output have been
 reported on mainline and next.

* boot
  - clang-nightly-lkftconfig-hardening
  - clang-nightly-lkftconfig-kselftest
  - clang-nightly-lkftconfig-lto-full
  - clang-nightly-lkftconfig-lto-thing
  - gcc-13-lkftconfig-debug

  v6.14-12245-g91e5bfe317d8: Boot regression: rk3399-rock-pi-4b
dragonboard-410c dragonboard-845c no console output
  - https://lore.kernel.org/all/CA+G9fYve7+nXJNoV48TksXoMeVjgJuP8Gs=+1br+Qur1DPWV4A@mail.gmail.com/

Reported-by: Linux Kernel Functional Testing <lkft@linaro.org>

## Build
* kernel: 6.13.10-rc1
* git: https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.git
* git commit: 8cbfaadfa0ec371208123554d6ad9994433929bb
* git describe: v6.13.7-385-g8cbfaadfa0ec
* test details:
https://qa-reports.linaro.org/lkft/linux-stable-rc-linux-6.13.y/build/v6.13.7-385-g8cbfaadfa0ec

## Test Regressions (compared to v6.13.7-362-g3d21aad34dfa)
* arm, build
  - clang-nightly-nhk8815_defconfig

* arm64, build
  - clang-nightly-allyesconfig

* dragonboard-410c, boot
  - clang-nightly-lkftconfig-hardening
  - clang-nightly-lkftconfig-kselftest
  - clang-nightly-lkftconfig-lto-full
  - clang-nightly-lkftconfig-lto-thing

* dragonboard-845c, boot
  - clang-nightly-lkftconfig-hardening
  - clang-nightly-lkftconfig-kselftest
  - clang-nightly-lkftconfig-lto-full
  - clang-nightly-lkftconfig-lto-thing
  - gcc-13-lkftconfig-debug

* e850-96, boot
  - clang-nightly-lkftconfig-kselftest

* fvp-aemva, boot
  - clang-nightly-lkftconfig-kselftest

* juno-r2, boot
  - clang-nightly-lkftconfig-kselftest

* dragonboard-410c, kselftest-rseq
  - rseq_basic_percpu_ops_mm_cid_test
  - rseq_basic_percpu_ops_test
  - rseq_basic_test
  - rseq_param_test
  - rseq_param_test_benchmark
  - rseq_param_test_compare_twice
  - rseq_param_test_mm_cid
  - rseq_param_test_mm_cid_benchmark
  - rseq_param_test_mm_cid_compare_twice

* dragonboard-845c, kselftest-rseq
  - rseq_basic_percpu_ops_mm_cid_test
  - rseq_basic_percpu_ops_test
  - rseq_basic_test
  - rseq_param_test
  - rseq_param_test_benchmark
  - rseq_param_test_compare_twice
  - rseq_param_test_mm_cid
  - rseq_param_test_mm_cid_benchmark
  - rseq_param_test_mm_cid_compare_twice

* e850-96, kselftest-rseq
  - rseq_basic_percpu_ops_mm_cid_test
  - rseq_basic_percpu_ops_test
  - rseq_basic_test
  - rseq_param_test
  - rseq_param_test_benchmark
  - rseq_param_test_compare_twice
  - rseq_param_test_mm_cid
  - rseq_param_test_mm_cid_benchmark
  - rseq_param_test_mm_cid_compare_twice

* powerpc, build
  - clang-nightly-defconfig
  - clang-nightly-lkftconfig-hardening
  - clang-nightly-lkftconfig-lto-full
  - clang-nightly-lkftconfig-lto-thing
  - clang-nightly-ppc64e_defconfig

* qemu-arm64, kselftest-rseq
  - rseq_basic_percpu_ops_mm_cid_test
  - rseq_basic_percpu_ops_test
  - rseq_basic_test
  - rseq_param_test
  - rseq_param_test_benchmark
  - rseq_param_test_compare_twice
  - rseq_param_test_mm_cid
  - rseq_param_test_mm_cid_benchmark
  - rseq_param_test_mm_cid_compare_twice

* qemu-i386, kselftest-rseq
  - rseq_basic_percpu_ops_mm_cid_test
  - rseq_basic_percpu_ops_test
  - rseq_param_test
  - rseq_param_test_benchmark
  - rseq_param_test_compare_twice
  - rseq_param_test_mm_cid
  - rseq_param_test_mm_cid_benchmark
  - rseq_param_test_mm_cid_compare_twice
  - shardfile-rseq

* qemu-x86_64, kselftest-rseq
  - rseq_basic_percpu_ops_mm_cid_test
  - rseq_basic_percpu_ops_test
  - rseq_basic_test
  - rseq_param_test
  - rseq_param_test_benchmark
  - rseq_param_test_compare_twice
  - rseq_param_test_mm_cid
  - rseq_param_test_mm_cid_benchmark
  - rseq_param_test_mm_cid_compare_twice

* rk3399-rock-pi-4b, boot
  - clang-nightly-lkftconfig-hardening
  - clang-nightly-lkftconfig-kselftest
  - clang-nightly-lkftconfig-lto-full
  - clang-nightly-lkftconfig-lto-thing

* s390, build
  - clang-nightly-defconfig
  - clang-nightly-lkftconfig-hardening
  - clang-nightly-lkftconfig-lto-full
  - clang-nightly-lkftconfig-lto-thing

* x86, kselftest-rseq
  - rseq_basic_percpu_ops_mm_cid_test
  - rseq_basic_percpu_ops_test
  - rseq_basic_test
  - rseq_param_test
  - rseq_param_test_benchmark
  - rseq_param_test_compare_twice
  - rseq_param_test_mm_cid
  - rseq_param_test_mm_cid_benchmark
  - rseq_param_test_mm_cid_compare_twice

* x86_64, build
  - clang-nightly-allyesconfig

## Metric Regressions (compared to v6.13.7-362-g3d21aad34dfa)

## Test Fixes (compared to v6.13.7-362-g3d21aad34dfa)

## Metric Fixes (compared to v6.13.7-362-g3d21aad34dfa)

## Test result summary
total: 125983, pass: 99795, fail: 7289, skip: 18899, xfail: 0

## Build Summary
* arc: 5 total, 5 passed, 0 failed
* arm: 139 total, 136 passed, 3 failed
* arm64: 57 total, 56 passed, 1 failed
* i386: 18 total, 18 passed, 0 failed
* mips: 34 total, 33 passed, 1 failed
* parisc: 4 total, 3 passed, 1 failed
* powerpc: 40 total, 35 passed, 5 failed
* riscv: 25 total, 23 passed, 2 failed
* s390: 22 total, 18 passed, 4 failed
* sh: 5 total, 5 passed, 0 failed
* sparc: 4 total, 3 passed, 1 failed
* x86_64: 49 total, 48 passed, 1 failed

## Test suites summary
* boot
* commands
* kselftest-arm64
* kselftest-breakpoints
* kselftest-capabilities
* kselftest-cgroup
* kselftest-clone3
* kselftest-core
* kselftest-cpu-hotplug
* kselftest-cpufreq
* kselftest-efivarfs
* kselftest-exec
* kselftest-fpu
* kselftest-futex
* kselftest-gpio
* kselftest-intel_pstate
* kselftest-ipc
* kselftest-kcmp
* kselftest-kvm
* kselftest-livepatch
* kselftest-membarrier
* kselftest-memfd
* kselftest-mincore
* kselftest-mqueue
* kselftest-net
* kselftest-net-mptcp
* kselftest-openat2
* kselftest-ptrace
* kselftest-rseq
* kselftest-rtc
* kselftest-rust
* kselftest-seccomp
* kselftest-sigaltstack
* kselftest-size
* kselftest-tc-testing
* kselftest-timers
* kselftest-tmpfs
* kselftest-tpm2
* kselftest-user_events
* kselftest-vDSO
* kselftest-x86
* kunit
* kvm-unit-tests
* libgpiod
* libhugetlbfs
* log-parser-boot
* log-parser-build-clang
* log-parser-build-gcc
* log-parser-test
* ltp-capability
* ltp-commands
* ltp-containers
* ltp-controllers
* ltp-cpuhotplug
* ltp-crypto
* ltp-cve
* ltp-dio
* ltp-fcntl-locktests
* ltp-fs
* ltp-fs_bind
* ltp-fs_perms_simple
* ltp-hugetlb
* ltp-ipc
* ltp-math
* ltp-mm
* ltp-nptl
* ltp-pty
* ltp-sched
* ltp-smoke
* ltp-syscalls
* ltp-tracing
* perf
* rcutorture

--
Linaro LKFT
https://lkft.linaro.org

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread

* Re: [PATCH 6.13 00/23] 6.13.10-rc1 review
  2025-04-05  6:20 ` [PATCH 6.13 00/23] 6.13.10-rc1 review Naresh Kamboju
@ 2025-04-05 10:24   ` Greg Kroah-Hartman
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 2+ messages in thread
From: Greg Kroah-Hartman @ 2025-04-05 10:24 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Naresh Kamboju
  Cc: stable, patches, linux-kernel, torvalds, akpm, linux, shuah,
	patches, lkft-triage, pavel, jonathanh, f.fainelli,
	sudipm.mukherjee, srw, rwarsow, conor, hargar, broonie,
	clang-built-linux, Nathan Chancellor,
	open list:KERNEL SELFTEST FRAMEWORK, Anders Roxell, Dan Carpenter,
	Arnd Bergmann

On Sat, Apr 05, 2025 at 11:50:59AM +0530, Naresh Kamboju wrote:
> On Thu, 3 Apr 2025 at 20:56, Greg Kroah-Hartman
> <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org> wrote:
> >
> > This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 6.13.10 release.
> > There are 23 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
> > to this one.  If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
> > let me know.
> >
> > Responses should be made by Sat, 05 Apr 2025 15:16:11 +0000.
> > Anything received after that time might be too late.
> >
> > The whole patch series can be found in one patch at:
> >         https://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v6.x/stable-review/patch-6.13.10-rc1.gz
> > or in the git tree and branch at:
> >         git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.git linux-6.13.y
> > and the diffstat can be found below.
> >
> > thanks,
> >
> > greg k-h
> 
> 
> Regressions on arm, arm64 and x86_64.
> 
> 1)
> The selftests rseq failed across the boards and virtual environments.
> These test failures were also noticed on Linux mainline and next.
> 
> We will bisect these lists of regressions and get back to you.

Thanks, this I'll care about, but:

> * kselftest-rseq
>   - rseq_basic_percpu_ops_mm_cid_test
>   - rseq_basic_percpu_ops_test
>   - rseq_basic_test
>   - rseq_param_test
>   - rseq_param_test_benchmark
>   - rseq_param_test_compare_twice
>   - rseq_param_test_mm_cid
>   - rseq_param_test_mm_cid_benchmark
>   - rseq_param_test_mm_cid_compare_twice
> 
> 2)
>  The clang-nightly build issues reported on mainline and next.
> 
> * S390, powerpc, build
>   - clang-nightly-defconfig
>   - clang-nightly-lkftconfig-hardening
>   - clang-nightly-lkftconfig-lto-full
>   - clang-nightly-lkftconfig-lto-thing
> 
>  clang-nightly: ERROR: modpost: "wcslen" [fs/smb/client/cifs.ko] undefined!
>   - https://lore.kernel.org/all/CA+G9fYuQHeGicnEx1d=XBC0p1LCsndi5q0p86V7pCZ02d8Fv_w@mail.gmail.com/
> 
> 3)
>  The clang-nightly boot regressions with no console output have been
>  reported on mainline and next.

These 2 I don't, as that's a mainline issue first.

thanks,

greg k-h

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread

end of thread, other threads:[~2025-04-05 10:25 UTC | newest]

Thread overview: 2+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
     [not found] <20250403151622.273788569@linuxfoundation.org>
2025-04-05  6:20 ` [PATCH 6.13 00/23] 6.13.10-rc1 review Naresh Kamboju
2025-04-05 10:24   ` Greg Kroah-Hartman

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox