From: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
To: Brian Norris <briannorris@chromium.org>
Cc: llvm@lists.linux.dev, oe-kbuild-all@lists.linux.dev,
Tsai Sung-Fu <danielsftsai@google.com>,
Douglas Anderson <dianders@chromium.org>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, kernel test robot <lkp@intel.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 2/2] genirq: Add kunit tests for depth counts
Date: Fri, 16 May 2025 00:24:52 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <87ldqxikaz.ffs@tglx> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <aCYit48N85WpjmiN@google.com>
On Thu, May 15 2025 at 10:21, Brian Norris wrote:
> On Thu, May 15, 2025 at 10:01:18PM +0800, kernel test robot wrote:
>> patch link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20250514201353.3481400-3-briannorris%40chromium.org
>> patch subject: [PATCH v2 2/2] genirq: Add kunit tests for depth counts
>
> First of all, thanks for the help, and for applying patch 1. I see that:
> 1) this bot noticed a trivial problem with patch 2; and
> 2) I received notification that patch 2 was applied to tip/irq/core, but
> 3) I can't find it there any more.
>
> I'm not sure if #3 is because you dropped it (e.g., due to #1's report)
> or some other reason, so I'm not sure what to do next. Possibilities:
#3 because I dropped it.
> (a) send the trivial fix separately, as a fixup (against what tree?)
> (b) resend an improved patch 2 on its own, against tip/irq/core
> (c) just drop it, because you have deeper reasons to not want these
> tests.
#b please
Thanks,
tglx
prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-05-15 22:24 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <20250514201353.3481400-3-briannorris@chromium.org>
2025-05-15 14:01 ` [PATCH v2 2/2] genirq: Add kunit tests for depth counts kernel test robot
2025-05-15 17:21 ` Brian Norris
2025-05-15 22:24 ` Thomas Gleixner [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=87ldqxikaz.ffs@tglx \
--to=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=briannorris@chromium.org \
--cc=danielsftsai@google.com \
--cc=dianders@chromium.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=lkp@intel.com \
--cc=llvm@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=oe-kbuild-all@lists.linux.dev \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox