* Re: [PATCH v8 03/12] NFSD: Implement NFSD_IO_DIRECT for NFS WRITE [not found] <20251027154630.1774-4-cel@kernel.org> @ 2025-10-28 22:56 ` kernel test robot 2025-10-29 14:10 ` Chuck Lever 0 siblings, 1 reply; 3+ messages in thread From: kernel test robot @ 2025-10-28 22:56 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Chuck Lever; +Cc: llvm, oe-kbuild-all Hi Chuck, kernel test robot noticed the following build errors: [auto build test ERROR on v6.18-rc3] [also build test ERROR on linus/master next-20251028] [cannot apply to brauner-vfs/vfs.all] [If your patch is applied to the wrong git tree, kindly drop us a note. And when submitting patch, we suggest to use '--base' as documented in https://git-scm.com/docs/git-format-patch#_base_tree_information] url: https://github.com/intel-lab-lkp/linux/commits/Chuck-Lever/NFSD-Make-FILE_SYNC-WRITEs-comply-with-spec/20251028-000506 base: v6.18-rc3 patch link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20251027154630.1774-4-cel%40kernel.org patch subject: [PATCH v8 03/12] NFSD: Implement NFSD_IO_DIRECT for NFS WRITE config: x86_64-kexec (https://download.01.org/0day-ci/archive/20251029/202510290603.8VO4qUQT-lkp@intel.com/config) compiler: clang version 20.1.8 (https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project 87f0227cb60147a26a1eeb4fb06e3b505e9c7261) reproduce (this is a W=1 build): (https://download.01.org/0day-ci/archive/20251029/202510290603.8VO4qUQT-lkp@intel.com/reproduce) If you fix the issue in a separate patch/commit (i.e. not just a new version of the same patch/commit), kindly add following tags | Reported-by: kernel test robot <lkp@intel.com> | Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/oe-kbuild-all/202510290603.8VO4qUQT-lkp@intel.com/ All errors (new ones prefixed by >>): >> fs/nfsd/vfs.c:1455:7: error: use of undeclared identifier 'NFSD_IO_DIRECT' 1455 | case NFSD_IO_DIRECT: | ^ 1 error generated. -- >> fs/nfsd/debugfs.c:109:7: error: use of undeclared identifier 'NFSD_IO_DIRECT' 109 | case NFSD_IO_DIRECT: | ^ 1 error generated. vim +/NFSD_IO_DIRECT +1455 fs/nfsd/vfs.c 1374 1375 /** 1376 * nfsd_vfs_write - write data to an already-open file 1377 * @rqstp: RPC execution context 1378 * @fhp: File handle of file to write into 1379 * @nf: An open file matching @fhp 1380 * @offset: Byte offset of start 1381 * @payload: xdr_buf containing the write payload 1382 * @cnt: IN: number of bytes to write, OUT: number of bytes actually written 1383 * @stable_how: IN: Client's requested stable_how, OUT: Actual stable_how 1384 * @verf: NFS WRITE verifier 1385 * 1386 * Upon return, caller must invoke fh_put on @fhp. 1387 * 1388 * Return values: 1389 * An nfsstat value in network byte order. 1390 */ 1391 __be32 1392 nfsd_vfs_write(struct svc_rqst *rqstp, struct svc_fh *fhp, 1393 struct nfsd_file *nf, loff_t offset, 1394 const struct xdr_buf *payload, unsigned long *cnt, 1395 u32 *stable_how, __be32 *verf) 1396 { 1397 struct nfsd_net *nn = net_generic(SVC_NET(rqstp), nfsd_net_id); 1398 struct file *file = nf->nf_file; 1399 struct super_block *sb = file_inode(file)->i_sb; 1400 u32 stable = *stable_how; 1401 struct kiocb kiocb; 1402 struct svc_export *exp; 1403 errseq_t since; 1404 __be32 nfserr; 1405 int host_err; 1406 unsigned long exp_op_flags = 0; 1407 unsigned int pflags = current->flags; 1408 bool restore_flags = false; 1409 unsigned int nvecs; 1410 1411 trace_nfsd_write_opened(rqstp, fhp, offset, *cnt); 1412 1413 if (sb->s_export_op) 1414 exp_op_flags = sb->s_export_op->flags; 1415 1416 if (test_bit(RQ_LOCAL, &rqstp->rq_flags) && 1417 !(exp_op_flags & EXPORT_OP_REMOTE_FS)) { 1418 /* 1419 * We want throttling in balance_dirty_pages() 1420 * and shrink_inactive_list() to only consider 1421 * the backingdev we are writing to, so that nfs to 1422 * localhost doesn't cause nfsd to lock up due to all 1423 * the client's dirty pages or its congested queue. 1424 */ 1425 current->flags |= PF_LOCAL_THROTTLE; 1426 restore_flags = true; 1427 } 1428 1429 exp = fhp->fh_export; 1430 1431 if (!EX_ISSYNC(exp)) 1432 stable = NFS_UNSTABLE; 1433 init_sync_kiocb(&kiocb, file); 1434 kiocb.ki_pos = offset; 1435 if (likely(!fhp->fh_use_wgather)) { 1436 switch (stable) { 1437 case NFS_FILE_SYNC: 1438 /* persist data and timestamps */ 1439 kiocb.ki_flags |= IOCB_DSYNC | IOCB_SYNC; 1440 break; 1441 case NFS_DATA_SYNC: 1442 /* persist data only */ 1443 kiocb.ki_flags |= IOCB_DSYNC; 1444 break; 1445 } 1446 } 1447 1448 nvecs = xdr_buf_to_bvec(rqstp->rq_bvec, rqstp->rq_maxpages, payload); 1449 1450 since = READ_ONCE(file->f_wb_err); 1451 if (verf) 1452 nfsd_copy_write_verifier(verf, nn); 1453 1454 switch (nfsd_io_cache_write) { > 1455 case NFSD_IO_DIRECT: 1456 host_err = nfsd_direct_write(rqstp, fhp, nf, stable_how, 1457 nvecs, cnt, &kiocb); 1458 stable = *stable_how; 1459 break; 1460 case NFSD_IO_DONTCACHE: 1461 if (file->f_op->fop_flags & FOP_DONTCACHE) 1462 kiocb.ki_flags |= IOCB_DONTCACHE; 1463 fallthrough; /* must call nfsd_buffered_write */ 1464 case NFSD_IO_BUFFERED: 1465 host_err = nfsd_buffered_write(rqstp, file, 1466 nvecs, cnt, &kiocb); 1467 break; 1468 } 1469 if (host_err < 0) { 1470 commit_reset_write_verifier(nn, rqstp, host_err); 1471 goto out_nfserr; 1472 } 1473 nfsd_stats_io_write_add(nn, exp, *cnt); 1474 fsnotify_modify(file); 1475 host_err = filemap_check_wb_err(file->f_mapping, since); 1476 if (host_err < 0) 1477 goto out_nfserr; 1478 1479 if (stable && fhp->fh_use_wgather) { 1480 host_err = wait_for_concurrent_writes(file); 1481 if (host_err < 0) 1482 commit_reset_write_verifier(nn, rqstp, host_err); 1483 } 1484 1485 out_nfserr: 1486 if (host_err >= 0) { 1487 trace_nfsd_write_io_done(rqstp, fhp, offset, *cnt); 1488 nfserr = nfs_ok; 1489 } else { 1490 trace_nfsd_write_err(rqstp, fhp, offset, host_err); 1491 nfserr = nfserrno(host_err); 1492 } 1493 if (restore_flags) 1494 current_restore_flags(pflags, PF_LOCAL_THROTTLE); 1495 return nfserr; 1496 } 1497 -- 0-DAY CI Kernel Test Service https://github.com/intel/lkp-tests/wiki ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH v8 03/12] NFSD: Implement NFSD_IO_DIRECT for NFS WRITE 2025-10-28 22:56 ` [PATCH v8 03/12] NFSD: Implement NFSD_IO_DIRECT for NFS WRITE kernel test robot @ 2025-10-29 14:10 ` Chuck Lever 2025-10-30 1:29 ` Philip Li 0 siblings, 1 reply; 3+ messages in thread From: Chuck Lever @ 2025-10-29 14:10 UTC (permalink / raw) To: kernel test robot; +Cc: llvm, oe-kbuild-all On 10/28/25 6:56 PM, kernel test robot wrote: > Hi Chuck, > > kernel test robot noticed the following build errors: > > [auto build test ERROR on v6.18-rc3] > [also build test ERROR on linus/master next-20251028] > [cannot apply to brauner-vfs/vfs.all] > [If your patch is applied to the wrong git tree, kindly drop us a note. > And when submitting patch, we suggest to use '--base' as documented in > https://git-scm.com/docs/git-format-patch#_base_tree_information] > > url: https://github.com/intel-lab-lkp/linux/commits/Chuck-Lever/NFSD-Make-FILE_SYNC-WRITEs-comply-with-spec/20251028-000506 > base: v6.18-rc3 > patch link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20251027154630.1774-4-cel%40kernel.org > patch subject: [PATCH v8 03/12] NFSD: Implement NFSD_IO_DIRECT for NFS WRITE > config: x86_64-kexec (https://download.01.org/0day-ci/archive/20251029/202510290603.8VO4qUQT-lkp@intel.com/config) > compiler: clang version 20.1.8 (https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project 87f0227cb60147a26a1eeb4fb06e3b505e9c7261) > reproduce (this is a W=1 build): (https://download.01.org/0day-ci/archive/20251029/202510290603.8VO4qUQT-lkp@intel.com/reproduce) > > If you fix the issue in a separate patch/commit (i.e. not just a new version of > the same patch/commit), kindly add following tags > | Reported-by: kernel test robot <lkp@intel.com> > | Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/oe-kbuild-all/202510290603.8VO4qUQT-lkp@intel.com/ > > All errors (new ones prefixed by >>): > >>> fs/nfsd/vfs.c:1455:7: error: use of undeclared identifier 'NFSD_IO_DIRECT' > 1455 | case NFSD_IO_DIRECT: > | ^ > 1 error generated. > -- >>> fs/nfsd/debugfs.c:109:7: error: use of undeclared identifier 'NFSD_IO_DIRECT' > 109 | case NFSD_IO_DIRECT: > | ^ > 1 error generated. > > > vim +/NFSD_IO_DIRECT +1455 fs/nfsd/vfs.c I'm truly at a loss. Why is the robot attempting to apply this patch to a tree that does not also have 46c42fad83f5 ("NFSD: Implement NFSD_IO_DIRECT for NFS READ")? These patches are in the same branch. > 1374 > 1375 /** > 1376 * nfsd_vfs_write - write data to an already-open file > 1377 * @rqstp: RPC execution context > 1378 * @fhp: File handle of file to write into > 1379 * @nf: An open file matching @fhp > 1380 * @offset: Byte offset of start > 1381 * @payload: xdr_buf containing the write payload > 1382 * @cnt: IN: number of bytes to write, OUT: number of bytes actually written > 1383 * @stable_how: IN: Client's requested stable_how, OUT: Actual stable_how > 1384 * @verf: NFS WRITE verifier > 1385 * > 1386 * Upon return, caller must invoke fh_put on @fhp. > 1387 * > 1388 * Return values: > 1389 * An nfsstat value in network byte order. > 1390 */ > 1391 __be32 > 1392 nfsd_vfs_write(struct svc_rqst *rqstp, struct svc_fh *fhp, > 1393 struct nfsd_file *nf, loff_t offset, > 1394 const struct xdr_buf *payload, unsigned long *cnt, > 1395 u32 *stable_how, __be32 *verf) > 1396 { > 1397 struct nfsd_net *nn = net_generic(SVC_NET(rqstp), nfsd_net_id); > 1398 struct file *file = nf->nf_file; > 1399 struct super_block *sb = file_inode(file)->i_sb; > 1400 u32 stable = *stable_how; > 1401 struct kiocb kiocb; > 1402 struct svc_export *exp; > 1403 errseq_t since; > 1404 __be32 nfserr; > 1405 int host_err; > 1406 unsigned long exp_op_flags = 0; > 1407 unsigned int pflags = current->flags; > 1408 bool restore_flags = false; > 1409 unsigned int nvecs; > 1410 > 1411 trace_nfsd_write_opened(rqstp, fhp, offset, *cnt); > 1412 > 1413 if (sb->s_export_op) > 1414 exp_op_flags = sb->s_export_op->flags; > 1415 > 1416 if (test_bit(RQ_LOCAL, &rqstp->rq_flags) && > 1417 !(exp_op_flags & EXPORT_OP_REMOTE_FS)) { > 1418 /* > 1419 * We want throttling in balance_dirty_pages() > 1420 * and shrink_inactive_list() to only consider > 1421 * the backingdev we are writing to, so that nfs to > 1422 * localhost doesn't cause nfsd to lock up due to all > 1423 * the client's dirty pages or its congested queue. > 1424 */ > 1425 current->flags |= PF_LOCAL_THROTTLE; > 1426 restore_flags = true; > 1427 } > 1428 > 1429 exp = fhp->fh_export; > 1430 > 1431 if (!EX_ISSYNC(exp)) > 1432 stable = NFS_UNSTABLE; > 1433 init_sync_kiocb(&kiocb, file); > 1434 kiocb.ki_pos = offset; > 1435 if (likely(!fhp->fh_use_wgather)) { > 1436 switch (stable) { > 1437 case NFS_FILE_SYNC: > 1438 /* persist data and timestamps */ > 1439 kiocb.ki_flags |= IOCB_DSYNC | IOCB_SYNC; > 1440 break; > 1441 case NFS_DATA_SYNC: > 1442 /* persist data only */ > 1443 kiocb.ki_flags |= IOCB_DSYNC; > 1444 break; > 1445 } > 1446 } > 1447 > 1448 nvecs = xdr_buf_to_bvec(rqstp->rq_bvec, rqstp->rq_maxpages, payload); > 1449 > 1450 since = READ_ONCE(file->f_wb_err); > 1451 if (verf) > 1452 nfsd_copy_write_verifier(verf, nn); > 1453 > 1454 switch (nfsd_io_cache_write) { >> 1455 case NFSD_IO_DIRECT: > 1456 host_err = nfsd_direct_write(rqstp, fhp, nf, stable_how, > 1457 nvecs, cnt, &kiocb); > 1458 stable = *stable_how; > 1459 break; > 1460 case NFSD_IO_DONTCACHE: > 1461 if (file->f_op->fop_flags & FOP_DONTCACHE) > 1462 kiocb.ki_flags |= IOCB_DONTCACHE; > 1463 fallthrough; /* must call nfsd_buffered_write */ > 1464 case NFSD_IO_BUFFERED: > 1465 host_err = nfsd_buffered_write(rqstp, file, > 1466 nvecs, cnt, &kiocb); > 1467 break; > 1468 } > 1469 if (host_err < 0) { > 1470 commit_reset_write_verifier(nn, rqstp, host_err); > 1471 goto out_nfserr; > 1472 } > 1473 nfsd_stats_io_write_add(nn, exp, *cnt); > 1474 fsnotify_modify(file); > 1475 host_err = filemap_check_wb_err(file->f_mapping, since); > 1476 if (host_err < 0) > 1477 goto out_nfserr; > 1478 > 1479 if (stable && fhp->fh_use_wgather) { > 1480 host_err = wait_for_concurrent_writes(file); > 1481 if (host_err < 0) > 1482 commit_reset_write_verifier(nn, rqstp, host_err); > 1483 } > 1484 > 1485 out_nfserr: > 1486 if (host_err >= 0) { > 1487 trace_nfsd_write_io_done(rqstp, fhp, offset, *cnt); > 1488 nfserr = nfs_ok; > 1489 } else { > 1490 trace_nfsd_write_err(rqstp, fhp, offset, host_err); > 1491 nfserr = nfserrno(host_err); > 1492 } > 1493 if (restore_flags) > 1494 current_restore_flags(pflags, PF_LOCAL_THROTTLE); > 1495 return nfserr; > 1496 } > 1497 > -- Chuck Lever ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH v8 03/12] NFSD: Implement NFSD_IO_DIRECT for NFS WRITE 2025-10-29 14:10 ` Chuck Lever @ 2025-10-30 1:29 ` Philip Li 0 siblings, 0 replies; 3+ messages in thread From: Philip Li @ 2025-10-30 1:29 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Chuck Lever; +Cc: kernel test robot, llvm, oe-kbuild-all On Wed, Oct 29, 2025 at 10:10:46AM -0400, Chuck Lever wrote: > On 10/28/25 6:56 PM, kernel test robot wrote: > > Hi Chuck, > > > > kernel test robot noticed the following build errors: > > > > [auto build test ERROR on v6.18-rc3] > > [also build test ERROR on linus/master next-20251028] > > [cannot apply to brauner-vfs/vfs.all] > > [If your patch is applied to the wrong git tree, kindly drop us a note. > > And when submitting patch, we suggest to use '--base' as documented in > > https://git-scm.com/docs/git-format-patch#_base_tree_information] > > > > url: https://github.com/intel-lab-lkp/linux/commits/Chuck-Lever/NFSD-Make-FILE_SYNC-WRITEs-comply-with-spec/20251028-000506 > > base: v6.18-rc3 > > patch link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20251027154630.1774-4-cel%40kernel.org > > patch subject: [PATCH v8 03/12] NFSD: Implement NFSD_IO_DIRECT for NFS WRITE > > config: x86_64-kexec (https://download.01.org/0day-ci/archive/20251029/202510290603.8VO4qUQT-lkp@intel.com/config) > > compiler: clang version 20.1.8 (https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project 87f0227cb60147a26a1eeb4fb06e3b505e9c7261) > > reproduce (this is a W=1 build): (https://download.01.org/0day-ci/archive/20251029/202510290603.8VO4qUQT-lkp@intel.com/reproduce) > > > > If you fix the issue in a separate patch/commit (i.e. not just a new version of > > the same patch/commit), kindly add following tags > > | Reported-by: kernel test robot <lkp@intel.com> > > | Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/oe-kbuild-all/202510290603.8VO4qUQT-lkp@intel.com/ > > > > All errors (new ones prefixed by >>): > > > >>> fs/nfsd/vfs.c:1455:7: error: use of undeclared identifier 'NFSD_IO_DIRECT' > > 1455 | case NFSD_IO_DIRECT: > > | ^ > > 1 error generated. > > -- > >>> fs/nfsd/debugfs.c:109:7: error: use of undeclared identifier 'NFSD_IO_DIRECT' > > 109 | case NFSD_IO_DIRECT: > > | ^ > > 1 error generated. > > > > > > vim +/NFSD_IO_DIRECT +1455 fs/nfsd/vfs.c > > I'm truly at a loss. Why is the robot attempting to apply this patch > to a tree that does not also have 46c42fad83f5 ("NFSD: Implement > NFSD_IO_DIRECT for NFS READ")? These patches are in the same branch. Sorry about this for the wrong report, the bot fails to recognize the info in the cover letter to use [1] as the correct base. [1] https://lore.kernel.org/linux-nfs/aPAci7O_XK1ljaum@kernel.org/ > > > > 1374 > > 1375 /** > > 1376 * nfsd_vfs_write - write data to an already-open file > > 1377 * @rqstp: RPC execution context > > 1378 * @fhp: File handle of file to write into > > 1379 * @nf: An open file matching @fhp > > 1380 * @offset: Byte offset of start > > 1381 * @payload: xdr_buf containing the write payload > > 1382 * @cnt: IN: number of bytes to write, OUT: number of bytes actually written > > 1383 * @stable_how: IN: Client's requested stable_how, OUT: Actual stable_how > > 1384 * @verf: NFS WRITE verifier > > 1385 * > > 1386 * Upon return, caller must invoke fh_put on @fhp. > > 1387 * > > 1388 * Return values: > > 1389 * An nfsstat value in network byte order. > > 1390 */ > > 1391 __be32 > > 1392 nfsd_vfs_write(struct svc_rqst *rqstp, struct svc_fh *fhp, > > 1393 struct nfsd_file *nf, loff_t offset, > > 1394 const struct xdr_buf *payload, unsigned long *cnt, > > 1395 u32 *stable_how, __be32 *verf) > > 1396 { > > 1397 struct nfsd_net *nn = net_generic(SVC_NET(rqstp), nfsd_net_id); > > 1398 struct file *file = nf->nf_file; > > 1399 struct super_block *sb = file_inode(file)->i_sb; > > 1400 u32 stable = *stable_how; > > 1401 struct kiocb kiocb; > > 1402 struct svc_export *exp; > > 1403 errseq_t since; > > 1404 __be32 nfserr; > > 1405 int host_err; > > 1406 unsigned long exp_op_flags = 0; > > 1407 unsigned int pflags = current->flags; > > 1408 bool restore_flags = false; > > 1409 unsigned int nvecs; > > 1410 > > 1411 trace_nfsd_write_opened(rqstp, fhp, offset, *cnt); > > 1412 > > 1413 if (sb->s_export_op) > > 1414 exp_op_flags = sb->s_export_op->flags; > > 1415 > > 1416 if (test_bit(RQ_LOCAL, &rqstp->rq_flags) && > > 1417 !(exp_op_flags & EXPORT_OP_REMOTE_FS)) { > > 1418 /* > > 1419 * We want throttling in balance_dirty_pages() > > 1420 * and shrink_inactive_list() to only consider > > 1421 * the backingdev we are writing to, so that nfs to > > 1422 * localhost doesn't cause nfsd to lock up due to all > > 1423 * the client's dirty pages or its congested queue. > > 1424 */ > > 1425 current->flags |= PF_LOCAL_THROTTLE; > > 1426 restore_flags = true; > > 1427 } > > 1428 > > 1429 exp = fhp->fh_export; > > 1430 > > 1431 if (!EX_ISSYNC(exp)) > > 1432 stable = NFS_UNSTABLE; > > 1433 init_sync_kiocb(&kiocb, file); > > 1434 kiocb.ki_pos = offset; > > 1435 if (likely(!fhp->fh_use_wgather)) { > > 1436 switch (stable) { > > 1437 case NFS_FILE_SYNC: > > 1438 /* persist data and timestamps */ > > 1439 kiocb.ki_flags |= IOCB_DSYNC | IOCB_SYNC; > > 1440 break; > > 1441 case NFS_DATA_SYNC: > > 1442 /* persist data only */ > > 1443 kiocb.ki_flags |= IOCB_DSYNC; > > 1444 break; > > 1445 } > > 1446 } > > 1447 > > 1448 nvecs = xdr_buf_to_bvec(rqstp->rq_bvec, rqstp->rq_maxpages, payload); > > 1449 > > 1450 since = READ_ONCE(file->f_wb_err); > > 1451 if (verf) > > 1452 nfsd_copy_write_verifier(verf, nn); > > 1453 > > 1454 switch (nfsd_io_cache_write) { > >> 1455 case NFSD_IO_DIRECT: > > 1456 host_err = nfsd_direct_write(rqstp, fhp, nf, stable_how, > > 1457 nvecs, cnt, &kiocb); > > 1458 stable = *stable_how; > > 1459 break; > > 1460 case NFSD_IO_DONTCACHE: > > 1461 if (file->f_op->fop_flags & FOP_DONTCACHE) > > 1462 kiocb.ki_flags |= IOCB_DONTCACHE; > > 1463 fallthrough; /* must call nfsd_buffered_write */ > > 1464 case NFSD_IO_BUFFERED: > > 1465 host_err = nfsd_buffered_write(rqstp, file, > > 1466 nvecs, cnt, &kiocb); > > 1467 break; > > 1468 } > > 1469 if (host_err < 0) { > > 1470 commit_reset_write_verifier(nn, rqstp, host_err); > > 1471 goto out_nfserr; > > 1472 } > > 1473 nfsd_stats_io_write_add(nn, exp, *cnt); > > 1474 fsnotify_modify(file); > > 1475 host_err = filemap_check_wb_err(file->f_mapping, since); > > 1476 if (host_err < 0) > > 1477 goto out_nfserr; > > 1478 > > 1479 if (stable && fhp->fh_use_wgather) { > > 1480 host_err = wait_for_concurrent_writes(file); > > 1481 if (host_err < 0) > > 1482 commit_reset_write_verifier(nn, rqstp, host_err); > > 1483 } > > 1484 > > 1485 out_nfserr: > > 1486 if (host_err >= 0) { > > 1487 trace_nfsd_write_io_done(rqstp, fhp, offset, *cnt); > > 1488 nfserr = nfs_ok; > > 1489 } else { > > 1490 trace_nfsd_write_err(rqstp, fhp, offset, host_err); > > 1491 nfserr = nfserrno(host_err); > > 1492 } > > 1493 if (restore_flags) > > 1494 current_restore_flags(pflags, PF_LOCAL_THROTTLE); > > 1495 return nfserr; > > 1496 } > > 1497 > > > > > -- > Chuck Lever > ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2025-10-30 1:29 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
[not found] <20251027154630.1774-4-cel@kernel.org>
2025-10-28 22:56 ` [PATCH v8 03/12] NFSD: Implement NFSD_IO_DIRECT for NFS WRITE kernel test robot
2025-10-29 14:10 ` Chuck Lever
2025-10-30 1:29 ` Philip Li
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox