public inbox for ltp@lists.linux.it
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Mitani" <mitani@ryobi.co.jp>
To: ltp-list@lists.sourceforge.net
Subject: [LTP] rt_sigaction{02-03} tests validation
Date: Mon, 1 Feb 2010 17:31:55 +0900	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <000001caa319$039c8660$0ad59320$@co.jp> (raw)

Hi,

I understood that rt_sigaction01, rt_sigprocmask01 and rt_sigsuspend01 
tests failure is architecture(x86_64) specific issues. 
Sorry, I don't know how do I fix it, yet.

But when I examined these issues, I noticed that rt_sigaction's test
also has rt_sigaction{02-03} tests.
Currently, rt_sigaction{02-03} are not run.
I think that it's also necessary to run rt_sigaction{02-03} tests 
because rt_sigaction01 test well running at x86 architecture. 
How about add rt_sigaction{02-03} to the test case?

If "./runtest/syscalls" is fixed, these tests succeed as follows:

------------

Test Start Time: Mon Feb  1 16:38:37 2010
-----------------------------------------
Testcase                       Result     Exit Value
--------                       ------     ----------
rt_sigaction01                 PASS       0
rt_sigaction02                 PASS       0
rt_sigaction03                 PASS       0
-----------------------------------------------
Total Tests: 3
Total Failures: 0
Kernel Version: 2.6.18-164.el5
Machine Architecture: i686
Hostname: 5-4.localdomain

------------

Index: 
./runtest/syscalls
============
--- runtest/syscalls.org        2009-12-16 04:32:18.000000000 +0900
+++ runtest/syscalls    2010-02-01 16:48:43.000000000 +0900
@@ -801,6 +801,8 @@
 rmdir05 rmdir05

 rt_sigaction01 rt_sigaction01
+rt_sigaction02 rt_sigaction02
+rt_sigaction03 rt_sigaction03
 rt_sigprocmask01 rt_sigprocmask01
 rt_sigprocmask02 rt_sigprocmask02
 rt_sigqueueinfo01 rt_sigqueueinfo01
============


Regards--

-Tomonori Mitani



------------------------------------------------------------------------------
The Planet: dedicated and managed hosting, cloud storage, colocation
Stay online with enterprise data centers and the best network in the business
Choose flexible plans and management services without long-term contracts
Personal 24x7 support from experience hosting pros just a phone call away.
http://p.sf.net/sfu/theplanet-com
_______________________________________________
Ltp-list mailing list
Ltp-list@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/ltp-list

             reply	other threads:[~2010-02-01  8:32 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2010-02-01  8:31 Mitani [this message]
2010-02-01  8:46 ` [LTP] rt_sigaction{02-03} tests validation Garrett Cooper
2010-02-10  1:21   ` Mitani
2010-02-10  1:28     ` Garrett Cooper

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to='000001caa319$039c8660$0ad59320$@co.jp' \
    --to=mitani@ryobi.co.jp \
    --cc=ltp-list@lists.sourceforge.net \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox