public inbox for ltp@lists.linux.it
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* [LTP] rt_sigaction{02-03} tests validation
@ 2010-02-01  8:31 Mitani
  2010-02-01  8:46 ` Garrett Cooper
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 4+ messages in thread
From: Mitani @ 2010-02-01  8:31 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: ltp-list

Hi,

I understood that rt_sigaction01, rt_sigprocmask01 and rt_sigsuspend01 
tests failure is architecture(x86_64) specific issues. 
Sorry, I don't know how do I fix it, yet.

But when I examined these issues, I noticed that rt_sigaction's test
also has rt_sigaction{02-03} tests.
Currently, rt_sigaction{02-03} are not run.
I think that it's also necessary to run rt_sigaction{02-03} tests 
because rt_sigaction01 test well running at x86 architecture. 
How about add rt_sigaction{02-03} to the test case?

If "./runtest/syscalls" is fixed, these tests succeed as follows:

------------

Test Start Time: Mon Feb  1 16:38:37 2010
-----------------------------------------
Testcase                       Result     Exit Value
--------                       ------     ----------
rt_sigaction01                 PASS       0
rt_sigaction02                 PASS       0
rt_sigaction03                 PASS       0
-----------------------------------------------
Total Tests: 3
Total Failures: 0
Kernel Version: 2.6.18-164.el5
Machine Architecture: i686
Hostname: 5-4.localdomain

------------

Index: 
./runtest/syscalls
============
--- runtest/syscalls.org        2009-12-16 04:32:18.000000000 +0900
+++ runtest/syscalls    2010-02-01 16:48:43.000000000 +0900
@@ -801,6 +801,8 @@
 rmdir05 rmdir05

 rt_sigaction01 rt_sigaction01
+rt_sigaction02 rt_sigaction02
+rt_sigaction03 rt_sigaction03
 rt_sigprocmask01 rt_sigprocmask01
 rt_sigprocmask02 rt_sigprocmask02
 rt_sigqueueinfo01 rt_sigqueueinfo01
============


Regards--

-Tomonori Mitani



------------------------------------------------------------------------------
The Planet: dedicated and managed hosting, cloud storage, colocation
Stay online with enterprise data centers and the best network in the business
Choose flexible plans and management services without long-term contracts
Personal 24x7 support from experience hosting pros just a phone call away.
http://p.sf.net/sfu/theplanet-com
_______________________________________________
Ltp-list mailing list
Ltp-list@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/ltp-list

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread

* Re: [LTP] rt_sigaction{02-03} tests validation
  2010-02-01  8:31 [LTP] rt_sigaction{02-03} tests validation Mitani
@ 2010-02-01  8:46 ` Garrett Cooper
  2010-02-10  1:21   ` Mitani
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 4+ messages in thread
From: Garrett Cooper @ 2010-02-01  8:46 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Mitani; +Cc: ltp-list

On Mon, Feb 1, 2010 at 12:31 AM, Mitani <mitani@ryobi.co.jp> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I understood that rt_sigaction01, rt_sigprocmask01 and rt_sigsuspend01
> tests failure is architecture(x86_64) specific issues.
> Sorry, I don't know how do I fix it, yet.
>
> But when I examined these issues, I noticed that rt_sigaction's test
> also has rt_sigaction{02-03} tests.
> Currently, rt_sigaction{02-03} are not run.
> I think that it's also necessary to run rt_sigaction{02-03} tests
> because rt_sigaction01 test well running at x86 architecture.
> How about add rt_sigaction{02-03} to the test case?
>
> If "./runtest/syscalls" is fixed, these tests succeed as follows:
>
> ------------
>
> Test Start Time: Mon Feb  1 16:38:37 2010
> -----------------------------------------
> Testcase                       Result     Exit Value
> --------                       ------     ----------
> rt_sigaction01                 PASS       0
> rt_sigaction02                 PASS       0
> rt_sigaction03                 PASS       0
> -----------------------------------------------
> Total Tests: 3
> Total Failures: 0
> Kernel Version: 2.6.18-164.el5
> Machine Architecture: i686
> Hostname: 5-4.localdomain
>
> ------------
>
> Index:
> ./runtest/syscalls
> ============
> --- runtest/syscalls.org        2009-12-16 04:32:18.000000000 +0900
> +++ runtest/syscalls    2010-02-01 16:48:43.000000000 +0900
> @@ -801,6 +801,8 @@
>  rmdir05 rmdir05
>
>  rt_sigaction01 rt_sigaction01
> +rt_sigaction02 rt_sigaction02
> +rt_sigaction03 rt_sigaction03
>  rt_sigprocmask01 rt_sigprocmask01
>  rt_sigprocmask02 rt_sigprocmask02
>  rt_sigqueueinfo01 rt_sigqueueinfo01
> ============

Sounds like a plan. Will be committed in a few mins.
Thanks!
-Garrett

------------------------------------------------------------------------------
The Planet: dedicated and managed hosting, cloud storage, colocation
Stay online with enterprise data centers and the best network in the business
Choose flexible plans and management services without long-term contracts
Personal 24x7 support from experience hosting pros just a phone call away.
http://p.sf.net/sfu/theplanet-com
_______________________________________________
Ltp-list mailing list
Ltp-list@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/ltp-list

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread

* Re: [LTP] rt_sigaction{02-03} tests validation
  2010-02-01  8:46 ` Garrett Cooper
@ 2010-02-10  1:21   ` Mitani
  2010-02-10  1:28     ` Garrett Cooper
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 4+ messages in thread
From: Mitani @ 2010-02-10  1:21 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: 'Garrett Cooper'; +Cc: ltp-list



> -----Original Message-----
> From: Garrett Cooper [mailto:yanegomi@gmail.com]
> Sent: Monday, February 01, 2010 5:46 PM
> To: Mitani
> Cc: ltp-list@lists.sourceforge.net
> Subject: Re: [LTP] rt_sigaction{02-03} tests validation
> 
> On Mon, Feb 1, 2010 at 12:31 AM, Mitani <mitani@ryobi.co.jp> wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > I understood that rt_sigaction01, rt_sigprocmask01 and rt_sigsuspend01
> > tests failure is architecture(x86_64) specific issues.
> > Sorry, I don't know how do I fix it, yet.
> >
> > But when I examined these issues, I noticed that rt_sigaction's test
> > also has rt_sigaction{02-03} tests.
> > Currently, rt_sigaction{02-03} are not run.
> > I think that it's also necessary to run rt_sigaction{02-03} tests
> > because rt_sigaction01 test well running at x86 architecture.
> > How about add rt_sigaction{02-03} to the test case?
> >
> > If "./runtest/syscalls" is fixed, these tests succeed as follows:
> >
> > ------------
> >
> > Test Start Time: Mon Feb  1 16:38:37 2010
> > -----------------------------------------
> > Testcase                       Result     Exit Value
> > --------                       ------     ----------
> > rt_sigaction01                 PASS       0
> > rt_sigaction02                 PASS       0
> > rt_sigaction03                 PASS       0
> > -----------------------------------------------
> > Total Tests: 3
> > Total Failures: 0
> > Kernel Version: 2.6.18-164.el5
> > Machine Architecture: i686
> > Hostname: 5-4.localdomain
> >
> > ------------
> >
> > Index:
> > ./runtest/syscalls
> > ============
> > --- runtest/syscalls.org        2009-12-16 04:32:18.000000000 +0900
> > +++ runtest/syscalls    2010-02-01 16:48:43.000000000 +0900
> > @@ -801,6 +801,8 @@
> >  rmdir05 rmdir05
> >
> >  rt_sigaction01 rt_sigaction01
> > +rt_sigaction02 rt_sigaction02
> > +rt_sigaction03 rt_sigaction03
> >  rt_sigprocmask01 rt_sigprocmask01
> >  rt_sigprocmask02 rt_sigprocmask02
> >  rt_sigqueueinfo01 rt_sigqueueinfo01
> > ============
> 
> Sounds like a plan. Will be committed in a few mins.
> Thanks!
> -Garrett



Hi, Garrett,

I tested it in x86 systems, but it seems still not fixed yet.
Is there some problems? 
If it needs further revision, I'm glad when I get your help.

I'm sorry for troubling you when you are busy.


Thank you--


-Tomonori Mitani



------------------------------------------------------------------------------
SOLARIS 10 is the OS for Data Centers - provides features such as DTrace,
Predictive Self Healing and Award Winning ZFS. Get Solaris 10 NOW
http://p.sf.net/sfu/solaris-dev2dev
_______________________________________________
Ltp-list mailing list
Ltp-list@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/ltp-list

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread

* Re: [LTP] rt_sigaction{02-03} tests validation
  2010-02-10  1:21   ` Mitani
@ 2010-02-10  1:28     ` Garrett Cooper
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 4+ messages in thread
From: Garrett Cooper @ 2010-02-10  1:28 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Mitani; +Cc: ltp-list

On Tue, Feb 9, 2010 at 5:21 PM, Mitani <mitani@ryobi.co.jp> wrote:
>
>
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: Garrett Cooper [mailto:yanegomi@gmail.com]
>> Sent: Monday, February 01, 2010 5:46 PM
>> To: Mitani
>> Cc: ltp-list@lists.sourceforge.net
>> Subject: Re: [LTP] rt_sigaction{02-03} tests validation
>>
>> On Mon, Feb 1, 2010 at 12:31 AM, Mitani <mitani@ryobi.co.jp> wrote:
>> > Hi,
>> >
>> > I understood that rt_sigaction01, rt_sigprocmask01 and rt_sigsuspend01
>> > tests failure is architecture(x86_64) specific issues.
>> > Sorry, I don't know how do I fix it, yet.
>> >
>> > But when I examined these issues, I noticed that rt_sigaction's test
>> > also has rt_sigaction{02-03} tests.
>> > Currently, rt_sigaction{02-03} are not run.
>> > I think that it's also necessary to run rt_sigaction{02-03} tests
>> > because rt_sigaction01 test well running at x86 architecture.
>> > How about add rt_sigaction{02-03} to the test case?
>> >
>> > If "./runtest/syscalls" is fixed, these tests succeed as follows:
>> >
>> > ------------
>> >
>> > Test Start Time: Mon Feb  1 16:38:37 2010
>> > -----------------------------------------
>> > Testcase                       Result     Exit Value
>> > --------                       ------     ----------
>> > rt_sigaction01                 PASS       0
>> > rt_sigaction02                 PASS       0
>> > rt_sigaction03                 PASS       0
>> > -----------------------------------------------
>> > Total Tests: 3
>> > Total Failures: 0
>> > Kernel Version: 2.6.18-164.el5
>> > Machine Architecture: i686
>> > Hostname: 5-4.localdomain
>> >
>> > ------------
>> >
>> > Index:
>> > ./runtest/syscalls
>> > ============
>> > --- runtest/syscalls.org        2009-12-16 04:32:18.000000000 +0900
>> > +++ runtest/syscalls    2010-02-01 16:48:43.000000000 +0900
>> > @@ -801,6 +801,8 @@
>> >  rmdir05 rmdir05
>> >
>> >  rt_sigaction01 rt_sigaction01
>> > +rt_sigaction02 rt_sigaction02
>> > +rt_sigaction03 rt_sigaction03
>> >  rt_sigprocmask01 rt_sigprocmask01
>> >  rt_sigprocmask02 rt_sigprocmask02
>> >  rt_sigqueueinfo01 rt_sigqueueinfo01
>> > ============
>>
>> Sounds like a plan. Will be committed in a few mins.
>> Thanks!
>> -Garrett
>
>
>
> Hi, Garrett,
>
> I tested it in x86 systems, but it seems still not fixed yet.
> Is there some problems?
> If it needs further revision, I'm glad when I get your help.
>
> I'm sorry for troubling you when you are busy.

    Done. Thanks for the reminder :).
-Garrett

------------------------------------------------------------------------------
SOLARIS 10 is the OS for Data Centers - provides features such as DTrace,
Predictive Self Healing and Award Winning ZFS. Get Solaris 10 NOW
http://p.sf.net/sfu/solaris-dev2dev
_______________________________________________
Ltp-list mailing list
Ltp-list@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/ltp-list

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread

end of thread, other threads:[~2010-02-10  1:28 UTC | newest]

Thread overview: 4+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2010-02-01  8:31 [LTP] rt_sigaction{02-03} tests validation Mitani
2010-02-01  8:46 ` Garrett Cooper
2010-02-10  1:21   ` Mitani
2010-02-10  1:28     ` Garrett Cooper

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox