* [LTP] POSIX "aio_return/2-1" failed. @ 2010-10-08 5:29 ` Mitani 2010-10-12 20:23 ` Garrett Cooper 2010-10-18 12:00 ` Garrett Cooper 0 siblings, 2 replies; 7+ messages in thread From: Mitani @ 2010-10-08 5:29 UTC (permalink / raw) To: ltp-list Hi, "conformance/interfaces/aio_return/2-1" failed with following message: ------------ conformance/interfaces/aio_return/2-1: execution: FAILED: Output: aio_return/2-1.c Second call to aio_return() should return -1 : 111 ------------ Same problem occurs in "aio_return/3-2.c" and "aio_return/4-1". Environment is as follows: - RHEL5.5 --- (x86, x86_64, ia64) - RHEL4.8 --- (x86, x86_64, ia64) This testset seems to be the error root test for "aio_return()". First "aio_return()" returned with 111. This return value is the length of buffer of "aio_write()". But second "aio_return()" returned with 111, too. It's unexpected result for this test set. Therefore, this test failed. Man page says that "This function should be called only once for any given request, after aio_error(2) returns something other than EINPROGRESS.": ------------ # LANG=C man 3 aio_return AIO_RETURN(3) Linux Programmer's Manual AIO_RETURN(3) NAME aio_return - get return status of asynchronous I/O operation SYNOPSIS #include <aio.h> ssize_t aio_return(struct aiocb *aiocbp); DESCRIPTION The aio_return function returns the final return status for the asynchronous I/O request with control block pointed to by aiocbp. This function should be called only once for any given request, after aio_error(2) returns something other than EINPROGRESS. RETURN VALUE If the asynchronous I/O operation has completed, this function returns the value that would have been returned in case of a synchronous read, write, or fsync request. Otherwise the return value is undefined. On error, the error value is returned. ERRORS EINVAL aiocbp does not point at a control block for an asynchronous I/O request of which the return status has not been retrieved yet. CONFORMING TO POSIX 1003.1-2003 SEE ALSO aio_cancel(3), aio_error(3), aio_fsync(3), aio_read(3), aio_suspend(3), aio_write(3) 2003-11-14 AIO_RETURN(3) # ------------ And, it says that "If the asynchronous I/O operation has completed, this function returns the value that would have been returned in case of a synchronous read, write, or fsync request. Otherwise the return value is undefined. On error, the error value is returned.". It can be supposed that the return value of second "aio_return()" is undefined. Therefore, it is not mistake that return value of the second "aio_return()" is one at success, I think. And, I think that "UNTESTED" or "UNRESOLVED" may be is more appropriate for this test. How does that look? Regards-- -Tomonori Mitani ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Beautiful is writing same markup. Internet Explorer 9 supports standards for HTML5, CSS3, SVG 1.1, ECMAScript5, and DOM L2 & L3. Spend less time writing and rewriting code and more time creating great experiences on the web. Be a part of the beta today. http://p.sf.net/sfu/beautyoftheweb _______________________________________________ Ltp-list mailing list Ltp-list@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/ltp-list ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread
* Re: [LTP] POSIX "aio_return/2-1" failed. 2010-10-08 5:29 ` [LTP] POSIX "aio_return/2-1" failed Mitani @ 2010-10-12 20:23 ` Garrett Cooper 2010-10-18 12:00 ` Garrett Cooper 1 sibling, 0 replies; 7+ messages in thread From: Garrett Cooper @ 2010-10-12 20:23 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Mitani; +Cc: ltp-list On Thu, Oct 7, 2010 at 10:29 PM, Mitani <mitani@ryobi.co.jp> wrote: > Hi, > > > "conformance/interfaces/aio_return/2-1" failed with following message: > ------------ > conformance/interfaces/aio_return/2-1: execution: FAILED: Output: > aio_return/2-1.c Second call to aio_return() should return -1 : 111 > ------------ > > Same problem occurs in "aio_return/3-2.c" and "aio_return/4-1". > > Environment is as follows: > - RHEL5.5 --- (x86, x86_64, ia64) > - RHEL4.8 --- (x86, x86_64, ia64) > > > This testset seems to be the error root test for "aio_return()". > > First "aio_return()" returned with 111. This return value is the length > of buffer of "aio_write()". > But second "aio_return()" returned with 111, too. It's unexpected > result for this test set. > Therefore, this test failed. > > Man page says that > "This function should be called only once for any given request, after > aio_error(2) returns something other than EINPROGRESS.": > ------------ > # LANG=C man 3 aio_return > > AIO_RETURN(3) Linux Programmer's Manual > AIO_RETURN(3) > > NAME > aio_return - get return status of asynchronous I/O operation > > SYNOPSIS > #include <aio.h> > > ssize_t aio_return(struct aiocb *aiocbp); > > DESCRIPTION > The aio_return function returns the final return status for the > asynchronous I/O > request with control block pointed to by aiocbp. > > This function should be called only once for any given > request, after > aio_error(2) returns something other than EINPROGRESS. > > RETURN VALUE > If the asynchronous I/O operation has completed, this function > returns the value > that would have been returned in case of a synchronous read, write, > or fsync > request. Otherwise the return value is undefined. On error, the > error value is > returned. > > ERRORS > EINVAL aiocbp does not point at a control block for an asynchronous > I/O request > of which the return status has not been retrieved yet. > > CONFORMING TO > POSIX 1003.1-2003 > > SEE ALSO > aio_cancel(3), aio_error(3), aio_fsync(3), aio_read(3), > aio_suspend(3), > aio_write(3) > > 2003-11-14 > AIO_RETURN(3) > # > ------------ > > And, it says that > "If the asynchronous I/O operation has completed, this function returns > the value that would have been returned in case of a synchronous read, > write, or fsync request. Otherwise the return value is undefined. On > error, the error value is returned.". > > > It can be supposed that the return value of second "aio_return()" is > undefined. > Therefore, it is not mistake that return value of the second "aio_return()" > is one at success, I think. > And, I think that "UNTESTED" or "UNRESOLVED" may be is more appropriate > for this test. I'll respond to this sometime in the next couple of days after I do some more investigation on the issue. Thanks, -Garrett ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Beautiful is writing same markup. Internet Explorer 9 supports standards for HTML5, CSS3, SVG 1.1, ECMAScript5, and DOM L2 & L3. Spend less time writing and rewriting code and more time creating great experiences on the web. Be a part of the beta today. http://p.sf.net/sfu/beautyoftheweb _______________________________________________ Ltp-list mailing list Ltp-list@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/ltp-list ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread
* Re: [LTP] POSIX "aio_return/2-1" failed. 2010-10-08 5:29 ` [LTP] POSIX "aio_return/2-1" failed Mitani 2010-10-12 20:23 ` Garrett Cooper @ 2010-10-18 12:00 ` Garrett Cooper 2010-10-21 9:41 ` Garrett Cooper 1 sibling, 1 reply; 7+ messages in thread From: Garrett Cooper @ 2010-10-18 12:00 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Mitani; +Cc: ltp-list On Thu, Oct 7, 2010 at 10:29 PM, Mitani <mitani@ryobi.co.jp> wrote: > Hi, > > > "conformance/interfaces/aio_return/2-1" failed with following message: > ------------ > conformance/interfaces/aio_return/2-1: execution: FAILED: Output: > aio_return/2-1.c Second call to aio_return() should return -1 : 111 > ------------ > > Same problem occurs in "aio_return/3-2.c" and "aio_return/4-1". > > Environment is as follows: > - RHEL5.5 --- (x86, x86_64, ia64) > - RHEL4.8 --- (x86, x86_64, ia64) > > > This testset seems to be the error root test for "aio_return()". > > First "aio_return()" returned with 111. This return value is the length > of buffer of "aio_write()". > But second "aio_return()" returned with 111, too. It's unexpected > result for this test set. > Therefore, this test failed. > > Man page says that > "This function should be called only once for any given request, after > aio_error(2) returns something other than EINPROGRESS.": > ------------ > # LANG=C man 3 aio_return > > AIO_RETURN(3) Linux Programmer's Manual > AIO_RETURN(3) > > NAME > aio_return - get return status of asynchronous I/O operation > > SYNOPSIS > #include <aio.h> > > ssize_t aio_return(struct aiocb *aiocbp); > > DESCRIPTION > The aio_return function returns the final return status for the > asynchronous I/O > request with control block pointed to by aiocbp. > > This function should be called only once for any given > request, after > aio_error(2) returns something other than EINPROGRESS. > > RETURN VALUE > If the asynchronous I/O operation has completed, this function > returns the value > that would have been returned in case of a synchronous read, write, > or fsync > request. Otherwise the return value is undefined. On error, the > error value is > returned. > > ERRORS > EINVAL aiocbp does not point at a control block for an asynchronous > I/O request > of which the return status has not been retrieved yet. > > CONFORMING TO > POSIX 1003.1-2003 > > SEE ALSO > aio_cancel(3), aio_error(3), aio_fsync(3), aio_read(3), > aio_suspend(3), > aio_write(3) > > 2003-11-14 > AIO_RETURN(3) > # > ------------ > > And, it says that > "If the asynchronous I/O operation has completed, this function returns > the value that would have been returned in case of a synchronous read, > write, or fsync request. Otherwise the return value is undefined. On > error, the error value is returned.". > > > It can be supposed that the return value of second "aio_return()" is > undefined. > Therefore, it is not mistake that return value of the second "aio_return()" > is one at success, I think. > And, I think that "UNTESTED" or "UNRESOLVED" may be is more appropriate > for this test. No. POSIX clearly states: "If the asynchronous I/O operation has completed, then the return status, as described for read(), write(), and fsync(), shall be returned. If the asynchronous I/O operation has not yet completed, the results of aio_return() are undefined. If the aio_return() function fails, it shall return -1 and set errno to indicate the error." ERRORS "The aio_return() function may fail if: [EINVAL] The aiocbp argument does not refer to an asynchronous operation whose return status has not yet been retrieved." What the test implementers were looking to do was test out that -1 / EINVAL were returned, and maybe that fact that they were testing was in fact implementation defined, as opposed to what's stated in the standard, as the spec doesn't state that the behavior for aio_return would be s.t. the state of the AIO stream is reset when aio_return is called. So yes, I agree this should be fixed, but let me check with the POSIX folks what the best course of action is. Thanks, -Garrett ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Download new Adobe(R) Flash(R) Builder(TM) 4 The new Adobe(R) Flex(R) 4 and Flash(R) Builder(TM) 4 (formerly Flex(R) Builder(TM)) enable the development of rich applications that run across multiple browsers and platforms. Download your free trials today! http://p.sf.net/sfu/adobe-dev2dev _______________________________________________ Ltp-list mailing list Ltp-list@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/ltp-list ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread
* Re: [LTP] POSIX "aio_return/2-1" failed. 2010-10-18 12:00 ` Garrett Cooper @ 2010-10-21 9:41 ` Garrett Cooper 2010-10-21 11:50 ` Mitani 0 siblings, 1 reply; 7+ messages in thread From: Garrett Cooper @ 2010-10-21 9:41 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Mitani; +Cc: ltp-list [-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 4491 bytes --] On Mon, Oct 18, 2010 at 5:00 AM, Garrett Cooper <yanegomi@gmail.com> wrote: > On Thu, Oct 7, 2010 at 10:29 PM, Mitani <mitani@ryobi.co.jp> wrote: >> Hi, >> >> >> "conformance/interfaces/aio_return/2-1" failed with following message: >> ------------ >> conformance/interfaces/aio_return/2-1: execution: FAILED: Output: >> aio_return/2-1.c Second call to aio_return() should return -1 : 111 >> ------------ >> >> Same problem occurs in "aio_return/3-2.c" and "aio_return/4-1". >> >> Environment is as follows: >> - RHEL5.5 --- (x86, x86_64, ia64) >> - RHEL4.8 --- (x86, x86_64, ia64) >> >> >> This testset seems to be the error root test for "aio_return()". >> >> First "aio_return()" returned with 111. This return value is the length >> of buffer of "aio_write()". >> But second "aio_return()" returned with 111, too. It's unexpected >> result for this test set. >> Therefore, this test failed. >> >> Man page says that >> "This function should be called only once for any given request, after >> aio_error(2) returns something other than EINPROGRESS.": >> ------------ >> # LANG=C man 3 aio_return >> >> AIO_RETURN(3) Linux Programmer's Manual >> AIO_RETURN(3) >> >> NAME >> aio_return - get return status of asynchronous I/O operation >> >> SYNOPSIS >> #include <aio.h> >> >> ssize_t aio_return(struct aiocb *aiocbp); >> >> DESCRIPTION >> The aio_return function returns the final return status for the >> asynchronous I/O >> request with control block pointed to by aiocbp. >> >> This function should be called only once for any given >> request, after >> aio_error(2) returns something other than EINPROGRESS. >> >> RETURN VALUE >> If the asynchronous I/O operation has completed, this function >> returns the value >> that would have been returned in case of a synchronous read, write, >> or fsync >> request. Otherwise the return value is undefined. On error, the >> error value is >> returned. >> >> ERRORS >> EINVAL aiocbp does not point at a control block for an asynchronous >> I/O request >> of which the return status has not been retrieved yet. >> >> CONFORMING TO >> POSIX 1003.1-2003 >> >> SEE ALSO >> aio_cancel(3), aio_error(3), aio_fsync(3), aio_read(3), >> aio_suspend(3), >> aio_write(3) >> >> 2003-11-14 >> AIO_RETURN(3) >> # >> ------------ >> >> And, it says that >> "If the asynchronous I/O operation has completed, this function returns >> the value that would have been returned in case of a synchronous read, >> write, or fsync request. Otherwise the return value is undefined. On >> error, the error value is returned.". >> >> >> It can be supposed that the return value of second "aio_return()" is >> undefined. >> Therefore, it is not mistake that return value of the second "aio_return()" >> is one at success, I think. >> And, I think that "UNTESTED" or "UNRESOLVED" may be is more appropriate >> for this test. > > No. POSIX clearly states: > > "If the asynchronous I/O operation has completed, then the return > status, as described for read(), write(), and fsync(), shall be > returned. If the asynchronous I/O operation has not yet completed, the > results of aio_return() are undefined. > > If the aio_return() function fails, it shall return -1 and set errno > to indicate the error." > > ERRORS > > "The aio_return() function may fail if: > > [EINVAL] > The aiocbp argument does not refer to an asynchronous operation > whose return status has not yet been retrieved." > > What the test implementers were looking to do was test out that -1 > / EINVAL were returned, and maybe that fact that they were testing was > in fact implementation defined, as opposed to what's stated in the > standard, as the spec doesn't state that the behavior for aio_return > would be s.t. the state of the AIO stream is reset when aio_return is > called. > So yes, I agree this should be fixed, but let me check with the > POSIX folks what the best course of action is. I've read into this a bit more, and I think that the aio_return testcases were written incorrectly. Please try out this testcase... if it works for you, then I'll apply necessary logic to other testcases as well. It worked for me at least on FreeBSD. Thanks, -Garrett [-- Attachment #2: fixup-aio_return-1-1.diff --] [-- Type: application/octet-stream, Size: 1268 bytes --] diff --git a/testcases/open_posix_testsuite/conformance/interfaces/aio_return/1-1.c b/testcases/open_posix_testsuite/conformance/interfaces/aio_return/1-1.c index bfc8e12..090387c 100644 --- a/testcases/open_posix_testsuite/conformance/interfaces/aio_return/1-1.c +++ b/testcases/open_posix_testsuite/conformance/interfaces/aio_return/1-1.c @@ -43,8 +43,10 @@ int main(void) struct aiocb aiocb; int fd, retval; +#if 0 if (sysconf(_SC_ASYNCHRONOUS_IO) != 200112L) return PTS_UNSUPPORTED; +#endif snprintf(tmpfname, sizeof(tmpfname), "/tmp/pts_aio_return_1_1_%d", getpid()); @@ -73,26 +75,18 @@ int main(void) exit(PTS_FAIL); } - do { - retval = aio_error(&aiocb); - if (retval == -1) { - close(fd); - printf(TNAME " Error at aio_error(): %s\n", - strerror(errno)); - exit(PTS_FAIL); - } - } while (retval == EINPROGRESS); - + while (aio_error(&aiocb) == EINPROGRESS) + sleep(1); retval = aio_return(&aiocb); - if (retval != BUF_SIZE) { - close(fd); + if (retval == -1) { printf(TNAME " Error at aio_return(): %s\n", - strerror(errno)); + strerror(aio_error(&aiocb))); exit(PTS_FAIL); } - + close(fd); + printf("aio_return(&aiocb) = %d\n", retval); printf("Test PASSED\n"); exit(PTS_PASS); } [-- Attachment #3: Type: text/plain, Size: 415 bytes --] ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Nokia and AT&T present the 2010 Calling All Innovators-North America contest Create new apps & games for the Nokia N8 for consumers in U.S. and Canada $10 million total in prizes - $4M cash, 500 devices, nearly $6M in marketing Develop with Nokia Qt SDK, Web Runtime, or Java and Publish to Ovi Store http://p.sf.net/sfu/nokia-dev2dev [-- Attachment #4: Type: text/plain, Size: 155 bytes --] _______________________________________________ Ltp-list mailing list Ltp-list@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/ltp-list ^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread
* Re: [LTP] POSIX "aio_return/2-1" failed. 2010-10-21 9:41 ` Garrett Cooper @ 2010-10-21 11:50 ` Mitani 2010-10-21 11:59 ` Garrett Cooper 0 siblings, 1 reply; 7+ messages in thread From: Mitani @ 2010-10-21 11:50 UTC (permalink / raw) To: 'Garrett Cooper'; +Cc: ltp-list > -----Original Message----- > From: Garrett Cooper [mailto:yanegomi@gmail.com] > Sent: Thursday, October 21, 2010 6:42 PM > To: Mitani > Cc: ltp-list@lists.sourceforge.net > Subject: Re: [LTP] POSIX "aio_return/2-1" failed. > > On Mon, Oct 18, 2010 at 5:00 AM, Garrett Cooper <yanegomi@gmail.com> > wrote: > > On Thu, Oct 7, 2010 at 10:29 PM, Mitani <mitani@ryobi.co.jp> wrote: > >> Hi, > >> > >> > >> "conformance/interfaces/aio_return/2-1" failed with following > message: > >> ------------ > >> conformance/interfaces/aio_return/2-1: execution: FAILED: Output: > >> aio_return/2-1.c Second call to aio_return() should return -1 : 111 > >> ------------ > >> > >> Same problem occurs in "aio_return/3-2.c" and "aio_return/4-1". > >> > >> Environment is as follows: > >> - RHEL5.5 --- (x86, x86_64, ia64) > >> - RHEL4.8 --- (x86, x86_64, ia64) > >> > >> > >> This testset seems to be the error root test for "aio_return()". > >> > >> First "aio_return()" returned with 111. This return value is the > >> length of buffer of "aio_write()". > >> But second "aio_return()" returned with 111, too. It's unexpected > >> result for this test set. > >> Therefore, this test failed. > >> > >> Man page says that > >> "This function should be called only once for any given request, > >> after > >> aio_error(2) returns something other than EINPROGRESS.": > >> ------------ > >> # LANG=C man 3 aio_return > >> > >> AIO_RETURN(3) Linux Programmer's Manual > >> AIO_RETURN(3) > >> > >> NAME > >> aio_return - get return status of asynchronous I/O operation > >> > >> SYNOPSIS > >> #include <aio.h> > >> > >> ssize_t aio_return(struct aiocb *aiocbp); > >> > >> DESCRIPTION > >> The aio_return function returns the final return status for > the > >> asynchronous I/O > >> request with control block pointed to by aiocbp. > >> > >> This function should be called only once for an > y given > >> request, after > >> aio_error(2) returns something other than EINPROGRESS. > >> > >> RETURN VALUE > >> If the asynchronous I/O operation has completed, this > function > >> returns the value > >> that would have been returned in case of a > synchronous read, > >> write, or fsync > >> request. Otherwise the return value is undefined. On > error, > >> the error value is > >> returned. > >> > >> ERRORS > >> EINVAL aiocbp does not point at a control block for an > >> asynchronous I/O request > >> of which the return status has not been retrieved > yet. > >> > >> CONFORMING TO > >> POSIX 1003.1-2003 > >> > >> SEE ALSO > >> aio_cancel(3), aio_error(3), aio_fsync(3), aio_r > ead(3), > >> aio_suspend(3), > >> aio_write(3) > >> > >> 2003-11-14 > >> AIO_RETURN(3) > >> # > >> ------------ > >> > >> And, it says that > >> "If the asynchronous I/O operation has completed, this function > >> returns the value that would have been returned in case of a > >> synchronous read, write, or fsync request. Otherwise the return > >> value is undefined. On error, the error value is returned.". > >> > >> > >> It can be supposed that the return value of second "aio_return()" > is > >> undefined. > >> Therefore, it is not mistake that return value of the second > "aio_return()" > >> is one at success, I think. > >> And, I think that "UNTESTED" or "UNRESOLVED" may be is more > >> appropriate for this test. > > > > No. POSIX clearly states: > > > > "If the asynchronous I/O operation has completed, then the return > > status, as described for read(), write(), and fsync(), shall be > > returned. If the asynchronous I/O operation has not yet completed, > the > > results of aio_return() are undefined. > > > > If the aio_return() function fails, it shall return -1 and set errno > > to indicate the error." > > > > ERRORS > > > > "The aio_return() function may fail if: > > > > [EINVAL] > > The aiocbp argument does not refer to an asynchronous operation > > whose return status has not yet been retrieved." > > > > What the test implementers were looking to do was test out that > -1 > > / EINVAL were returned, and maybe that fact that they were testing > was > > in fact implementation defined, as opposed to what's stated in the > > standard, as the spec doesn't state that the behavior for aio_return > > would be s.t. the state of the AIO stream is reset when aio_return > is > > called. > > So yes, I agree this should be fixed, but let me check with the > > POSIX folks what the best course of action is. > > I've read into this a bit more, and I think that the aio_return > testcases were written incorrectly. Please try out this testcase... > if it works for you, then I'll apply necessary logic to other testcases > as well. > It worked for me at least on FreeBSD. > Thanks, > -Garrett I confirmed that your revision worked in my environment. I also look forward to other testcases (2-1, 3-2, 4-1) being revised. Thank you-- -Tomonori Mitani ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Nokia and AT&T present the 2010 Calling All Innovators-North America contest Create new apps & games for the Nokia N8 for consumers in U.S. and Canada $10 million total in prizes - $4M cash, 500 devices, nearly $6M in marketing Develop with Nokia Qt SDK, Web Runtime, or Java and Publish to Ovi Store http://p.sf.net/sfu/nokia-dev2dev _______________________________________________ Ltp-list mailing list Ltp-list@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/ltp-list ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread
* Re: [LTP] POSIX "aio_return/2-1" failed. 2010-10-21 11:50 ` Mitani @ 2010-10-21 11:59 ` Garrett Cooper 2010-10-27 3:58 ` Mitani 0 siblings, 1 reply; 7+ messages in thread From: Garrett Cooper @ 2010-10-21 11:59 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Mitani; +Cc: ltp-list On Thu, Oct 21, 2010 at 4:50 AM, Mitani <mitani@ryobi.co.jp> wrote: >> -----Original Message----- >> From: Garrett Cooper [mailto:yanegomi@gmail.com] >> Sent: Thursday, October 21, 2010 6:42 PM >> To: Mitani >> Cc: ltp-list@lists.sourceforge.net >> Subject: Re: [LTP] POSIX "aio_return/2-1" failed. >> >> On Mon, Oct 18, 2010 at 5:00 AM, Garrett Cooper <yanegomi@gmail.com> >> wrote: >> > On Thu, Oct 7, 2010 at 10:29 PM, Mitani <mitani@ryobi.co.jp> wrote: >> >> Hi, >> >> >> >> >> >> "conformance/interfaces/aio_return/2-1" failed with following >> message: >> >> ------------ >> >> conformance/interfaces/aio_return/2-1: execution: FAILED: Output: >> >> aio_return/2-1.c Second call to aio_return() should return -1 : 111 >> >> ------------ >> >> >> >> Same problem occurs in "aio_return/3-2.c" and "aio_return/4-1". >> >> >> >> Environment is as follows: >> >> - RHEL5.5 --- (x86, x86_64, ia64) >> >> - RHEL4.8 --- (x86, x86_64, ia64) >> >> >> >> >> >> This testset seems to be the error root test for "aio_return()". >> >> >> >> First "aio_return()" returned with 111. This return value is the >> >> length of buffer of "aio_write()". >> >> But second "aio_return()" returned with 111, too. It's unexpected >> >> result for this test set. >> >> Therefore, this test failed. >> >> >> >> Man page says that >> >> "This function should be called only once for any given request, >> >> after >> >> aio_error(2) returns something other than EINPROGRESS.": >> >> ------------ >> >> # LANG=C man 3 aio_return >> >> >> >> AIO_RETURN(3) Linux Programmer's Manual >> >> AIO_RETURN(3) >> >> >> >> NAME >> >> aio_return - get return status of asynchronous I/O operation >> >> >> >> SYNOPSIS >> >> #include <aio.h> >> >> >> >> ssize_t aio_return(struct aiocb *aiocbp); >> >> >> >> DESCRIPTION >> >> The aio_return function returns the final return status for >> the >> >> asynchronous I/O >> >> request with control block pointed to by aiocbp. >> >> >> >> This function should be called only once for an >> y given >> >> request, after >> >> aio_error(2) returns something other than EINPROGRESS. >> >> >> >> RETURN VALUE >> >> If the asynchronous I/O operation has completed, this >> function >> >> returns the value >> >> that would have been returned in case of a >> synchronous read, >> >> write, or fsync >> >> request. Otherwise the return value is undefined. On >> error, >> >> the error value is >> >> returned. >> >> >> >> ERRORS >> >> EINVAL aiocbp does not point at a control block for an >> >> asynchronous I/O request >> >> of which the return status has not been retrieved >> yet. >> >> >> >> CONFORMING TO >> >> POSIX 1003.1-2003 >> >> >> >> SEE ALSO >> >> aio_cancel(3), aio_error(3), aio_fsync(3), aio_r >> ead(3), >> >> aio_suspend(3), >> >> aio_write(3) >> >> >> >> 2003-11-14 >> >> AIO_RETURN(3) >> >> # >> >> ------------ >> >> >> >> And, it says that >> >> "If the asynchronous I/O operation has completed, this function >> >> returns the value that would have been returned in case of a >> >> synchronous read, write, or fsync request. Otherwise the return >> >> value is undefined. On error, the error value is returned.". >> >> >> >> >> >> It can be supposed that the return value of second "aio_return()" >> is >> >> undefined. >> >> Therefore, it is not mistake that return value of the second >> "aio_return()" >> >> is one at success, I think. >> >> And, I think that "UNTESTED" or "UNRESOLVED" may be is more >> >> appropriate for this test. >> > >> > No. POSIX clearly states: >> > >> > "If the asynchronous I/O operation has completed, then the return >> > status, as described for read(), write(), and fsync(), shall be >> > returned. If the asynchronous I/O operation has not yet completed, >> the >> > results of aio_return() are undefined. >> > >> > If the aio_return() function fails, it shall return -1 and set errno >> > to indicate the error." >> > >> > ERRORS >> > >> > "The aio_return() function may fail if: >> > >> > [EINVAL] >> > The aiocbp argument does not refer to an asynchronous operation >> > whose return status has not yet been retrieved." >> > >> > What the test implementers were looking to do was test out that >> -1 >> > / EINVAL were returned, and maybe that fact that they were testing >> was >> > in fact implementation defined, as opposed to what's stated in the >> > standard, as the spec doesn't state that the behavior for aio_return >> > would be s.t. the state of the AIO stream is reset when aio_return >> is >> > called. >> > So yes, I agree this should be fixed, but let me check with the >> > POSIX folks what the best course of action is. >> >> I've read into this a bit more, and I think that the aio_return >> testcases were written incorrectly. Please try out this testcase... >> if it works for you, then I'll apply necessary logic to other testcases >> as well. >> It worked for me at least on FreeBSD. >> Thanks, >> -Garrett > > > I confirmed that your revision worked in my environment. > I also look forward to other testcases (2-1, 3-2, 4-1) being revised. Please update your git, rebuild, and test :). Let me know if you run into any issues. Cheers, -Garrett ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Nokia and AT&T present the 2010 Calling All Innovators-North America contest Create new apps & games for the Nokia N8 for consumers in U.S. and Canada $10 million total in prizes - $4M cash, 500 devices, nearly $6M in marketing Develop with Nokia Qt SDK, Web Runtime, or Java and Publish to Ovi Store http://p.sf.net/sfu/nokia-dev2dev _______________________________________________ Ltp-list mailing list Ltp-list@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/ltp-list ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread
* Re: [LTP] POSIX "aio_return/2-1" failed. 2010-10-21 11:59 ` Garrett Cooper @ 2010-10-27 3:58 ` Mitani 0 siblings, 0 replies; 7+ messages in thread From: Mitani @ 2010-10-27 3:58 UTC (permalink / raw) To: 'Garrett Cooper'; +Cc: ltp-list > -----Original Message----- > From: Garrett Cooper [mailto:yanegomi@gmail.com] > Sent: Thursday, October 21, 2010 9:00 PM > To: Mitani > Cc: ltp-list@lists.sourceforge.net > Subject: Re: [LTP] POSIX "aio_return/2-1" failed. > > On Thu, Oct 21, 2010 at 4:50 AM, Mitani <mitani@ryobi.co.jp> wrote: > >> -----Original Message----- > >> From: Garrett Cooper [mailto:yanegomi@gmail.com] > >> Sent: Thursday, October 21, 2010 6:42 PM > >> To: Mitani > >> Cc: ltp-list@lists.sourceforge.net > >> Subject: Re: [LTP] POSIX "aio_return/2-1" failed. > >> > >> On Mon, Oct 18, 2010 at 5:00 AM, Garrett Cooper <yanegomi@gmail.com> > >> wrote: > >> > On Thu, Oct 7, 2010 at 10:29 PM, Mitani <mitani@ryobi.co.jp> wrote: > >> >> Hi, > >> >> > >> >> > >> >> "conformance/interfaces/aio_return/2-1" failed with following > >> message: > >> >> ------------ > >> >> conformance/interfaces/aio_return/2-1: execution: FAILED: > Output: > >> >> aio_return/2-1.c Second call to aio_return() should return -1 : > 111 > >> >> ------------ > >> >> > >> >> Same problem occurs in "aio_return/3-2.c" and "aio_return/4-1". > >> >> > >> >> Environment is as follows: > >> >> - RHEL5.5 --- (x86, x86_64, ia64) > >> >> - RHEL4.8 --- (x86, x86_64, ia64) > >> >> > >> >> > >> >> This testset seems to be the error root test for "aio_return()". > >> >> > >> >> First "aio_return()" returned with 111. This return value is the > >> >> length of buffer of "aio_write()". > >> >> But second "aio_return()" returned with 111, too. It's unexpected > >> >> result for this test set. > >> >> Therefore, this test failed. > >> >> > >> >> Man page says that > >> >> "This function should be called only once for any given request, > >> >> after > >> >> aio_error(2) returns something other than EINPROGRESS.": > >> >> ------------ > >> >> # LANG=C man 3 aio_return > >> >> > >> >> AIO_RETURN(3) Linux Programmer's Manual > >> >> AIO_RETURN(3) > >> >> > >> >> NAME > >> >> aio_return - get return status of asynchronous I/O > operation > >> >> > >> >> SYNOPSIS > >> >> #include <aio.h> > >> >> > >> >> ssize_t aio_return(struct aiocb *aiocbp); > >> >> > >> >> DESCRIPTION > >> >> The aio_return function returns the final return status > for > >> the > >> >> asynchronous I/O > >> >> request with control block pointed to by aiocbp. > >> >> > >> > >> This function should be called only once for an > >> y given > >> >> request, after > >> >> aio_error(2) returns something other than EINPROGRESS. > >> >> > >> >> RETURN VALUE > >> >> If the asynchronous I/O operation has completed, this > >> function > >> >> returns the value > >> >> that would have been returned in case of a > >> synchronous read, > >> >> write, or fsync > >> >> request. Otherwise the return value is undefined. On > >> error, > >> >> the error value is > >> >> returned. > >> >> > >> >> ERRORS > >> >> EINVAL aiocbp does not point at a control block for an > >> >> asynchronous I/O request > >> >> of which the return status has not been retrieved > >> yet. > >> >> > >> >> CONFORMING TO > >> >> POSIX 1003.1-2003 > >> >> > >> >> SEE ALSO > >> > >> aio_cancel(3), aio_error(3), aio_fsync(3), aio_r > >> ead(3), > >> >> aio_suspend(3), > >> >> aio_write(3) > >> >> > >> >> 2003-11-14 > >> >> AIO_RETURN(3) > >> >> # > >> >> ------------ > >> >> > >> >> And, it says that > >> >> "If the asynchronous I/O operation has completed, this function > >> >> returns the value that would have been returned in case of a > >> >> synchronous read, write, or fsync request. Otherwise the return > >> >> value is undefined. On error, the error value is returned.". > >> >> > >> >> > >> >> It can be supposed that the return value of second "aio_return()" > >> is > >> >> undefined. > >> >> Therefore, it is not mistake that return value of the second > >> "aio_return()" > >> >> is one at success, I think. > >> >> And, I think that "UNTESTED" or "UNRESOLVED" may be is more > >> >> appropriate for this test. > >> > > >> > No. POSIX clearly states: > >> > > >> > "If the asynchronous I/O operation has completed, then the return > >> > status, as described for read(), write(), and fsync(), shall be > >> > returned. If the asynchronous I/O operation has not yet completed, > >> the > >> > results of aio_return() are undefined. > >> > > >> > If the aio_return() function fails, it shall return -1 and set > errno > >> > to indicate the error." > >> > > >> > ERRORS > >> > > >> > "The aio_return() function may fail if: > >> > > >> > [EINVAL] > >> > The aiocbp argument does not refer to an asynchronous > operation > >> > whose return status has not yet been retrieved." > >> > > >> > What the test implementers were looking to do was test out > that > >> -1 > >> > / EINVAL were returned, and maybe that fact that they were testing > >> was > >> > in fact implementation defined, as opposed to what's stated in > the > >> > standard, as the spec doesn't state that the behavior for > aio_return > >> > would be s.t. the state of the AIO stream is reset when aio_return > >> is > >> > called. > >> > So yes, I agree this should be fixed, but let me check with > the > >> > POSIX folks what the best course of action is. > >> > >> I've read into this a bit more, and I think that the aio_return > >> testcases were written incorrectly. Please try out this testcase... > >> if it works for you, then I'll apply necessary logic to other > testcases > >> as well. > >> It worked for me at least on FreeBSD. > >> Thanks, > >> -Garrett > > > > > > I confirmed that your revision worked in my environment. > > I also look forward to other testcases (2-1, 3-2, 4-1) being revised. > > Please update your git, rebuild, and test :). > Let me know if you run into any issues. > Cheers, > -Garrett I tried to run "aio_return" tests, but some of them failed with following message: ------------ conformance/interfaces/aio_return/3-2: execution: FAILED: Output: aio_return/3-2.c aio_return() should fail with (-1, 22); failed with (4096, 0) instead conformance/interfaces/aio_return/2-1: execution: FAILED: Output: aio_return/2-1.c Second call to aio_return() should return -1; aio_return() returned 111 ------------ Environment is as follows: - RHEL4.8 --- (x86, x86_64, ia64) - RHEL5.5 --- (x86, x86_64, ia64) - kernel --- kernel-2.6.9-89.EL - glibc --- glibc-2.3.4-2.43 The reason of above failures is that second "aio_return()" doesn't return "-1". The manpage of "aio_return()" of "FreeBSD 9-current" says: -------------------- RETURN VALUES If the asynchronous I/O request has completed, the status is returned as described in read(2), write(2), or fsync(2). Otherwise, aio_return() returns -1 and sets errno to indicate the error condition. -------------------- http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/man.cgi?query=aio_return&apropos=0&sektion=0&manp ath=FreeBSD+9-current&format=html On the other hand, the manpage of RHEL4.8/RHEL5.5 says: -------------------- RETURN VALUE If the asynchronous I/O operation has completed, this function returns the value that would have been returned in case of a synchronous read, write, or fsync request. Otherwise the return value is undefined. On error, the error value is returned. -------------------- According to this manual, the return value may not be "-1" in Redhat systems. Perhaps "aio_return()" doesn't have guarantee to return "-1" even in other Linux systems, I think. Regards-- -Tomonori Mitani ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Nokia and AT&T present the 2010 Calling All Innovators-North America contest Create new apps & games for the Nokia N8 for consumers in U.S. and Canada $10 million total in prizes - $4M cash, 500 devices, nearly $6M in marketing Develop with Nokia Qt SDK, Web Runtime, or Java and Publish to Ovi Store http://p.sf.net/sfu/nokia-dev2dev _______________________________________________ Ltp-list mailing list Ltp-list@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/ltp-list ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2010-10-27 3:59 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
[not found] <ActmqbqJnH8VAq0bTbe+8e3aEkHF9Q==>
2010-10-08 5:29 ` [LTP] POSIX "aio_return/2-1" failed Mitani
2010-10-12 20:23 ` Garrett Cooper
2010-10-18 12:00 ` Garrett Cooper
2010-10-21 9:41 ` Garrett Cooper
2010-10-21 11:50 ` Mitani
2010-10-21 11:59 ` Garrett Cooper
2010-10-27 3:58 ` Mitani
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox