From: Subrata Modak <subrata@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
To: rohit verma <rohit.170309@gmail.com>, Marc Gauthier <marc@tensilica.com>
Cc: LTP List <ltp-list@lists.sourceforge.net>
Subject: Re: [LTP] [PATCH] Detect test results more accurately when generating HTML
Date: Mon, 25 May 2009 21:42:57 +0530 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1243267979.6752.17.camel@subratamodak.linux.ibm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <d51f89b0905220225u4cc3d98dsc9b402b1bd11a772@mail.gmail.com>
On Fri, 2009-05-22 at 14:55 +0530, rohit verma wrote:
> Hi,
>
>
> There is no problem with the genhtml.pl script. The real problem is in
> the pan driver (ltp/pan/pan.c). This seems to be a problem of race
> condition after going through the code.
>
I would rather want to get this guy fixed inside pan.c. See, if there is
a way so that the concerned test is provisioned by pan:
1) Only after <<test_output>>
2) Pan must flush out everything for writing tags before the actual test
is provisioned
3) The test must have written/flushed everything before Pan started
writing <<test_end>>
Regards--
Subrata
>
> My suggestion was to use the buffered mode as default. This can be
> done with the -O option followed by a directory name where the
> buffered data can be stored. But, there is a problem - the -O option
> has no effect unless the -x option with an argument greater than 1 is
> used.
>
>
> In your test runs you can add the options " -O <dirname> -x 2" and
> find out if the problem with logging still persists.
>
>
> Regards,
> rohit
>
>
>
>
>
>
> On Fri, May 22, 2009 at 2:43 PM, Marc Gauthier <marc@tensilica.com>
> wrote:
> Hi Rohit,
>
> I guess we've each observed output that the other has
> not :-)
>
> Per your (1): I've seen a few cases where lines between
> test_end and test_start do belong to the preceding one, though
> they are indeed the exception, not the rule. Looking at the
> name to assign to previous seems to catch the proper ones in
> all the cases I've seen (default test lists don't repeat the
> same test twice in a row).
>
> Per your (2): Haven't seen that, interesting. That's a bit
> harder to sort out, but the script could at least catch the
> lines that report PASS/FAIL/BROK etc. And perhaps lines that
> don't look like a collection of var=value. Hmmm.... maybe all
> it needs is another regexp test, see patch below (against the
> genhtml.pl file I posted, which btw was against its latest
> version, 1.3).
>
> I haven't taken time to look at why things get out of order in
> the first place, which seems like the correct thing to fix
> (well, I looked enough to notice that fflush(stdout) was
> really there :-). Though making the script handle it doesn't
> hurt, and I've simply been trying to get an accurate look at
> test results, this was the quickest way to do it.
>
> -Marc
>
> --- genhtml-v4.pl 2009-05-21 01:08:14.747493000 -0700
> +++ genhtml.pl 2009-05-22 02:07:47.756226000 -0700
> @@ -116,18 +116,18 @@
> }
>
> # Read test result parameters and test output
> - while ($line !~ /$end_tag/) {
> + while (1) {
> + get_line(\$line) or last TEST;
> + last if $line =~ /$end_tag/;
> ($read_output = 1, next) if $line
> =~ /$output_tag/;
> ($read_output = 0, next) if $line
> =~ /$execution_tag/;
> - if ($read_output) {
> + if ($read_output or $line !~ /^(\s*\w
> +=(".*"|\S*))+\s*$/) {
> push @output_lines, $line;
> } else {
> while ($line =~ s/^\s*(\w+)=(".*"|
> \S*)//) {
> $values{$1} = $2;
> }
> }
> - } continue {
> - get_line(\$line) or last TEST;
> }
>
> # Treat lines that follow <<<end_test>>> as
> output lines
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> ______________________________________________________
>
> From: rohit verma [mailto:rohit.170309@gmail.com]
> Sent: Friday, May 22, 2009 00:13
> To: subrata@linux.vnet.ibm.com
> Cc: Marc Gauthier; LTP List
> Subject: Re: [LTP] [PATCH] Detect test results more
> accurately when generating HTML
>
>
>
>
> Hi,
>
>
> The suggestion to - "Process test output lines that
> appear between <<<test_end>>>
> and the following <<<test_start>>>. Assign to the
> preceding test where the name matches, else to the
> following test." does not solve the problem
> completely.
>
>
> My observation is:
>
>
> 1. Lines between <<<test_end>>> and <<<test_start>>>
> belongs to the following test case and not to the
> preceding one.
> 2. Also, at times I have observed the test output is
> spread in such a way that few lines of the test output
> fall between <<<test_end>>> and <<<test_start>>> and
> rest of lines appear between the <<<test_start>>> and
> <<<test_output>>> of the corresponding testcase.
>
>
> Regards,
> rohit
>
> On Fri, May 22, 2009 at 12:22 PM, Subrata Modak
> <subrata@linux.vnet.ibm.com> wrote:
> On Thu, 2009-05-21 at 01:13 -0700, Marc
> Gauthier wrote:
> > Hi, my first patch to this list. Actually
> not a patch,
> > but the files themselves, to avoid
> line-wrapping issues
> > and because the diff is twice the size of
> the new file.
> >
> > -Marc
>
> Thanks Marc.
>
> Rohit,
>
> Can you test this and see if these solves the
> problem that you were
> discussing for long ?
>
> Regards--
> Subrata
>
> >
> >
> > -----------
> > Detect test results more accurately when
> generating HTML
> >
> > Process test output lines that appear
> between <<<test_end>>>
> > and the following <<<test_start>>>. Assign
> to the preceding
> > test where the name matches, else to the
> following test.
> >
> > If a single test has multiple types of
> results (e.g. both
> > FAIL and WARN), report only the most
> significant one, to
> > avoid mis-computing the total number of PASS
> tests or
> > total counts that don't add up to the number
> of tests.
> >
> > If a test's output has no explicit result
> (PASS, FAIL, etc),
> > look at the exit value to determine whether
> it passed.
> >
> > Setting the SHOW_UNRESOLVED environment
> variable to 1
> > classifies as UNRESOLVED any test with no
> explicit result
> > and a zero exit code.
> >
> > Setting the SUMMARY_OUTPUT environment
> variable to 1
> > causes only one line of output per test to
> be shown, for a
> > tighter page that allows quickly scanning
> the results.
> >
> > Show percentage of each result type in
> summary section.
> >
> > Simplify parsing a bit.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Marc Gauthier
> <marc@tensilica.com>
> >
> >
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> > Register Now for Creativity and Technology
> (CaT), June 3rd, NYC. CaT
> > is a gathering of tech-side developers &
> brand creativity professionals. Meet
> > the minds behind Google Creative Lab, Visual
> Complexity, Processing, &
> > iPhoneDevCamp asthey present alongside
> digital heavyweights like Barbarian
> > Group, R/GA, & Big Spaceship.
> http://www.creativitycat.com
> >
> _______________________________________________ Ltp-list mailing list Ltp-list@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/ltp-list
>
>
>
>
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Register Now for Creativity and Technology (CaT), June 3rd, NYC. CaT
is a gathering of tech-side developers & brand creativity professionals. Meet
the minds behind Google Creative Lab, Visual Complexity, Processing, &
iPhoneDevCamp asthey present alongside digital heavyweights like Barbarian
Group, R/GA, & Big Spaceship. http://www.creativitycat.com
_______________________________________________
Ltp-list mailing list
Ltp-list@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/ltp-list
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2009-05-25 16:13 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 18+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2009-05-21 8:13 [LTP] [PATCH] Detect test results more accurately when generating HTML Marc Gauthier
2009-05-22 6:52 ` Subrata Modak
2009-05-22 7:13 ` rohit verma
2009-05-22 9:13 ` Marc Gauthier
2009-05-22 9:25 ` rohit verma
2009-05-25 16:12 ` Subrata Modak [this message]
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2009-05-26 14:27 Subrata Modak
2009-05-26 20:14 ` Marc Gauthier
2009-05-27 6:44 ` rohit verma
2009-05-27 12:05 ` Marc Gauthier
2009-05-27 14:24 ` Subrata Modak
2009-05-27 14:58 ` Marc Gauthier
2009-05-29 12:54 ` Subrata Modak
2009-06-01 12:47 ` rohit verma
2009-06-02 12:33 ` rohit verma
2009-06-04 9:27 ` Subrata Modak
2009-06-09 18:24 ` Subrata Modak
2009-05-27 14:23 ` Subrata Modak
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1243267979.6752.17.camel@subratamodak.linux.ibm.com \
--to=subrata@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=ltp-list@lists.sourceforge.net \
--cc=marc@tensilica.com \
--cc=rohit.170309@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox