From: Bernd Petrovitsch <bernd@petrovitsch.priv.at>
To: ltp@lists.linux.it
Subject: [LTP] MD-RAID: Use seq_putc() in three status functions?
Date: Mon, 17 Oct 2016 13:32:00 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1476703920.2520.105.camel@petrovitsch.priv.at> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <a0f96e19-fa24-8507-2b77-344a342113aa@users.sourceforge.net>
On Mon, 2016-10-17 at 13:10 +0200, SF Markus Elfring wrote:
[...]
> > (Which up to now I thought was basic programming knowledge...)
>
> By the way:
> Run time environments still exist where the size of a pointer can
> be also just one byte, don't they?
In the context of the Linux kernel: No.
[ Side note: there might be some DSP out there with a running Linux
kernel which cannot really address a "byte" (meaning 8bits) but only in
register sized quantities (and also aligned for that). But no one cares
here really deeply as that is a so fundamental difference that the C-
compiler must cope with that anyways in the first place. ]
[...]
> > See above. At the moment _any_ test result from your side would do.
>
> I imagine that another single result might not be representative.
Publish not only results but also everything (complete!) so that anyone
can *easily* follow it to check and reproduce the results - especially
if you want people with knowledge of other architectures to comment
(otherwise they probably won't bother).
Kind regards,
Bernd
--
Bernd Petrovitsch Email : bernd@petrovitsch.priv.at
LUGA : http://www.luga.at
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2016-10-17 11:32 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <566ABCD9.1060404@users.sourceforge.net>
[not found] ` <786843ef-4b6f-eb04-7326-2f6f5b408826@users.sourceforge.net>
[not found] ` <92c52f1d-d151-cea6-e9ac-31378e6862d0@users.sourceforge.net>
[not found] ` <1475771699.1914.10.camel@perches.com>
[not found] ` <77fb6fdc-7480-8607-0af1-42f73c125b9d@users.sourceforge.net>
[not found] ` <688764a4-072d-2faf-37ba-a222b190a5d9@suse.de>
[not found] ` <59d71170-c48d-a084-c748-b6ab74a2bee4@users.sourceforge.net>
[not found] ` <1e151094-e228-5307-ae2f-b376b31f5628@suse.de>
[not found] ` <83e720c6-9037-a3c1-6e83-27505805f37f@users.sourceforge.net>
[not found] ` <2cc42b2f-1f1a-e95c-91fa-54e1dd3b6d49@suse.de>
2016-10-17 9:00 ` [LTP] MD-RAID: Use seq_putc() in three status functions? SF Markus Elfring
2016-10-17 9:50 ` Hannes Reinecke
2016-10-17 11:10 ` SF Markus Elfring
2016-10-17 11:32 ` Bernd Petrovitsch [this message]
2016-10-17 11:43 ` SF Markus Elfring
2016-10-17 14:01 ` Hannes Reinecke
2016-10-17 14:30 ` SF Markus Elfring
2016-10-17 15:33 ` Hannes Reinecke
2016-10-17 16:08 ` SF Markus Elfring
2016-10-17 17:18 ` Hannes Reinecke
2016-10-18 18:20 ` SF Markus Elfring
2016-10-20 12:24 ` SF Markus Elfring
2016-10-28 20:04 ` SF Markus Elfring
2016-10-17 14:00 ` Hannes Reinecke
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1476703920.2520.105.camel@petrovitsch.priv.at \
--to=bernd@petrovitsch.priv.at \
--cc=ltp@lists.linux.it \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox