Linux Test Project
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: SF Markus Elfring <elfring@users.sourceforge.net>
To: ltp@lists.linux.it
Subject: [LTP] MD-RAID: Use seq_putc() in three status functions?
Date: Mon, 17 Oct 2016 16:30:43 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <cb9beadc-3ea2-c09c-f621-a54cd73e3647@users.sourceforge.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <57299b72-8e6b-0b92-4374-1b7a0907e810@suse.de>

>> Am I the only software developer so far who would dare to reconsider
>> implementation details from three status functions?
>>
> No.

Thanks for this kind of promising feedback.


> But we're waiting for you showing is that it is an improvement.

Can this aspect also be clarified to some degree from a logical point of view?

* Would you really like to know under which circumstances data processing
  will be faster for a single character instead of using a string pointer
  and corresponding two characters?

* Do you care for a changed memory allocation characteristic?

* Will it occasionally be useful to avoid the storage for another string literal?

Regards,
Markus

  reply	other threads:[~2016-10-17 14:30 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
     [not found] <566ABCD9.1060404@users.sourceforge.net>
     [not found] ` <786843ef-4b6f-eb04-7326-2f6f5b408826@users.sourceforge.net>
     [not found]   ` <92c52f1d-d151-cea6-e9ac-31378e6862d0@users.sourceforge.net>
     [not found]     ` <1475771699.1914.10.camel@perches.com>
     [not found]       ` <77fb6fdc-7480-8607-0af1-42f73c125b9d@users.sourceforge.net>
     [not found]         ` <688764a4-072d-2faf-37ba-a222b190a5d9@suse.de>
     [not found]           ` <59d71170-c48d-a084-c748-b6ab74a2bee4@users.sourceforge.net>
     [not found]             ` <1e151094-e228-5307-ae2f-b376b31f5628@suse.de>
     [not found]               ` <83e720c6-9037-a3c1-6e83-27505805f37f@users.sourceforge.net>
     [not found]                 ` <2cc42b2f-1f1a-e95c-91fa-54e1dd3b6d49@suse.de>
2016-10-17  9:00                   ` [LTP] MD-RAID: Use seq_putc() in three status functions? SF Markus Elfring
2016-10-17  9:50                     ` Hannes Reinecke
2016-10-17 11:10                       ` SF Markus Elfring
2016-10-17 11:32                         ` Bernd Petrovitsch
2016-10-17 11:43                           ` SF Markus Elfring
2016-10-17 14:01                             ` Hannes Reinecke
2016-10-17 14:30                               ` SF Markus Elfring [this message]
2016-10-17 15:33                                 ` Hannes Reinecke
2016-10-17 16:08                                   ` SF Markus Elfring
2016-10-17 17:18                                     ` Hannes Reinecke
2016-10-18 18:20                                       ` SF Markus Elfring
2016-10-20 12:24                                         ` SF Markus Elfring
2016-10-28 20:04                                           ` SF Markus Elfring
2016-10-17 14:00                         ` Hannes Reinecke

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=cb9beadc-3ea2-c09c-f621-a54cd73e3647@users.sourceforge.net \
    --to=elfring@users.sourceforge.net \
    --cc=ltp@lists.linux.it \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body. 
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox