[LTP] [PATCH v2] syscalls/pipe12: add new test for pipe when write bytes > PIPE_BUF

[LTP] [PATCH v2] syscalls/pipe12: add new test for pipe when write bytes > PIPE_BUF

[Yang Xu]

A pipe has a limited capacity. If the pipe with non block mode is full,
then a write(2) will fail and get EAGAIN error. Otherwise, from 1 to
PIPE_BUF bytes may be written.

Signed-off-by: Yang Xu <xuyang2018.jy@cn.fujitsu.com>

---------------
v1->v2:
1)add missing lapi/fcntl.h
2)remove useless return
---------------
---
 runtest/syscalls                          |   1 +
 testcases/kernel/syscalls/pipe/.gitignore |   1 +
 testcases/kernel/syscalls/pipe/pipe12.c   | 106 ++++++++++++++++++++++
 3 files changed, 108 insertions(+)
 create mode 100644 testcases/kernel/syscalls/pipe/pipe12.c

diff --git a/runtest/syscalls b/runtest/syscalls
index fa87ef63f..92a9ae636 100644
--- a/runtest/syscalls
+++ b/runtest/syscalls
@@ -861,6 +861,7 @@ pipe08 pipe08
 pipe09 pipe09
 pipe10 pipe10
 pipe11 pipe11
+pipe12 pipe12
 
 pipe2_01 pipe2_01
 pipe2_02 pipe2_02
diff --git a/testcases/kernel/syscalls/pipe/.gitignore b/testcases/kernel/syscalls/pipe/.gitignore
index ee2974ca8..90b502547 100644
--- a/testcases/kernel/syscalls/pipe/.gitignore
+++ b/testcases/kernel/syscalls/pipe/.gitignore
@@ -9,3 +9,4 @@
 /pipe09
 /pipe10
 /pipe11
+/pipe12
diff --git a/testcases/kernel/syscalls/pipe/pipe12.c b/testcases/kernel/syscalls/pipe/pipe12.c
new file mode 100644
index 000000000..926e03f56
--- /dev/null
+++ b/testcases/kernel/syscalls/pipe/pipe12.c
@@ -0,0 +1,106 @@
+// SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0-or-later
+/*
+ * Copyright (c) 2020 FUJITSU LIMITED. All rights reserved.
+ * Author: Yang Xu <xuyang2018.jy@cn.fujitsu.com>
+ *
+ * Test Description:
+ * A pipe has a limited capacity. If the pipe with non block mode is full,
+ * then a write(2) will fail and get EAGAIN error. Otherwise, from 1 to
+ * PIPE_BUF bytes may be written.
+ */
+#define _GNU_SOURCE
+#include <unistd.h>
+#include <stdlib.h>
+#include <fcntl.h>
+#include "tst_test.h"
+#include "lapi/fcntl.h"
+
+static int fds[2];
+static char *wrbuf;
+static char *rdbuf;
+static ssize_t max_size, invalid_size;
+
+static struct tcase {
+	int full_flag;
+	int need_offset;
+	char *message;
+} tcases[] = {
+	{1, 0, "Test on full pipe"},
+	{0, 1, "Test on non full pipe from 1 offset"},
+	{0, 0, "Test on non full pipe from 0 offset"},
+};
+
+static void verify_pipe(unsigned int n)
+{
+	struct tcase *tc = &tcases[n];
+
+	memset(rdbuf, 0, max_size);
+
+	tst_res(TINFO, "%s", tc->message);
+	if (tc->full_flag) {
+		SAFE_WRITE(1, fds[1], wrbuf, max_size);
+		TEST(write(fds[1], "x", 1));
+		if (TST_RET == 0) {
+			tst_res(TFAIL, "write succeeded unexpectedly");
+			goto clean_pipe_buf;
+		}
+		if (TST_ERR == EAGAIN)
+			tst_res(TPASS | TTERRNO, "write failed as expected");
+		else
+			tst_res(TFAIL | TTERRNO, "write failed, expected EAGAIN but got");
+	} else {
+		if (tc->need_offset)
+			SAFE_WRITE(1, fds[1], "x", 1);
+		TEST(write(fds[1], wrbuf, invalid_size));
+		if (TST_RET == -1) {
+			tst_res(TFAIL, "write failed unexpectedly");
+			goto clean_pipe_buf;
+		}
+		if (TST_RET == invalid_size)
+			tst_res(TFAIL, "write size %ld larger than PIPE_BUF %ld", TST_RET, max_size);
+		else
+			tst_res(TPASS, "write size %ld between [1, %ld]", TST_RET, max_size);
+	}
+
+clean_pipe_buf:
+	SAFE_READ(0, fds[0], rdbuf, max_size);
+}
+
+
+static void cleanup(void)
+{
+	if (fds[0] > 0)
+		SAFE_CLOSE(fds[0]);
+	if (fds[1] > 0)
+		SAFE_CLOSE(fds[1]);
+	if (wrbuf)
+		free(wrbuf);
+	if (rdbuf)
+		free(rdbuf);
+}
+
+static void setup(void)
+{
+
+	TEST(pipe(fds));
+	if (TST_RET == -1) {
+		tst_brk(TBROK | TTERRNO, "pipe");
+		return;
+	}
+
+	max_size = SAFE_FCNTL(fds[1], F_GETPIPE_SZ);
+	invalid_size = max_size + 4096;
+	wrbuf = SAFE_MALLOC(invalid_size);
+	rdbuf = SAFE_MALLOC(max_size);
+	memset(wrbuf, 'x', invalid_size);
+
+	SAFE_FCNTL(fds[1], F_SETFL, O_NONBLOCK);
+	SAFE_FCNTL(fds[0], F_SETFL, O_NONBLOCK);
+}
+
+static struct tst_test test = {
+	.test = verify_pipe,
+	.setup = setup,
+	.cleanup = cleanup,
+	.tcnt = ARRAY_SIZE(tcases),
+};
-- 
2.18.0

[LTP] [PATCH v2] syscalls/pipe12: add new test for pipe when write bytes > PIPE_BUF

[Cyril Hrubis]

Hi!
> --- /dev/null
> +++ b/testcases/kernel/syscalls/pipe/pipe12.c
> @@ -0,0 +1,106 @@
> +// SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0-or-later
> +/*
> + * Copyright (c) 2020 FUJITSU LIMITED. All rights reserved.
> + * Author: Yang Xu <xuyang2018.jy@cn.fujitsu.com>
> + *
> + * Test Description:
> + * A pipe has a limited capacity. If the pipe with non block mode is full,
> + * then a write(2) will fail and get EAGAIN error. Otherwise, from 1 to
> + * PIPE_BUF bytes may be written.
> + */
> +#define _GNU_SOURCE
> +#include <unistd.h>
> +#include <stdlib.h>
> +#include <fcntl.h>
> +#include "tst_test.h"
> +#include "lapi/fcntl.h"
> +
> +static int fds[2];
> +static char *wrbuf;
> +static char *rdbuf;
> +static ssize_t max_size, invalid_size;
> +
> +static struct tcase {
> +	int full_flag;
> +	int need_offset;

This could be called just offset, it does not have to be boolean either,
we just need to write offset bytes from a buffer before we attempt to
write to the pipe.

> +	char *message;
> +} tcases[] = {
> +	{1, 0, "Test on full pipe"},
                 "Write to full pipe"
> +	{0, 1, "Test on non full pipe from 1 offset"},
		 "Write to non-empty pipe"
> +	{0, 0, "Test on non full pipe from 0 offset"},
                      "Write to empty pipe"
> +};
> +
> +static void verify_pipe(unsigned int n)
> +{
> +	struct tcase *tc = &tcases[n];
> +
> +	memset(rdbuf, 0, max_size);
> +
> +	tst_res(TINFO, "%s", tc->message);
> +	if (tc->full_flag) {
> +		SAFE_WRITE(1, fds[1], wrbuf, max_size);
> +		TEST(write(fds[1], "x", 1));
> +		if (TST_RET == 0) {
			write is required to return -1 here which is
			what we have to check against i.e, TST_RET != -1
			means fail
> +			tst_res(TFAIL, "write succeeded unexpectedly");
> +			goto clean_pipe_buf;
> +		}
> +		if (TST_ERR == EAGAIN)
> +			tst_res(TPASS | TTERRNO, "write failed as expected");
> +		else
> +			tst_res(TFAIL | TTERRNO, "write failed, expected EAGAIN but got");
> +	} else {
> +		if (tc->need_offset)
> +			SAFE_WRITE(1, fds[1], "x", 1);
> +		TEST(write(fds[1], wrbuf, invalid_size));
> +		if (TST_RET == -1) {
> +			tst_res(TFAIL, "write failed unexpectedly");
> +			goto clean_pipe_buf;
> +		}
> +		if (TST_RET == invalid_size)
> +			tst_res(TFAIL, "write size %ld larger than PIPE_BUF %ld", TST_RET, max_size);
> +		else
> +			tst_res(TPASS, "write size %ld between [1, %ld]", TST_RET, max_size);

		Here as well, write is supposed to return the number of
		bytes written so in this case the TST_RET must be
		max_size - tcase->offset which is all we have to check
		for, anything else than that means failure.

> +	}
> +
> +clean_pipe_buf:
> +	SAFE_READ(0, fds[0], rdbuf, max_size);
> +}
> +
> +
> +static void cleanup(void)
> +{
> +	if (fds[0] > 0)
> +		SAFE_CLOSE(fds[0]);
> +	if (fds[1] > 0)
> +		SAFE_CLOSE(fds[1]);
> +	if (wrbuf)
> +		free(wrbuf);
> +	if (rdbuf)
> +		free(rdbuf);
> +}
> +
> +static void setup(void)
> +{
> +
> +	TEST(pipe(fds));
> +	if (TST_RET == -1) {
> +		tst_brk(TBROK | TTERRNO, "pipe");
> +		return;
> +	}

This is exactly what SAFE_PIPE() does.

> +	max_size = SAFE_FCNTL(fds[1], F_GETPIPE_SZ);
> +	invalid_size = max_size + 4096;
> +	wrbuf = SAFE_MALLOC(invalid_size);
> +	rdbuf = SAFE_MALLOC(max_size);
> +	memset(wrbuf, 'x', invalid_size);
> +
> +	SAFE_FCNTL(fds[1], F_SETFL, O_NONBLOCK);
> +	SAFE_FCNTL(fds[0], F_SETFL, O_NONBLOCK);
> +}
> +
> +static struct tst_test test = {
> +	.test = verify_pipe,
> +	.setup = setup,
> +	.cleanup = cleanup,
> +	.tcnt = ARRAY_SIZE(tcases),
> +};
> -- 
> 2.18.0
> 
> 
> 
> 
> -- 
> Mailing list info: https://lists.linux.it/listinfo/ltp

-- 
Cyril Hrubis
chrubis@suse.cz

[LTP] [PATCH v2] syscalls/pipe12: add new test for pipe when write bytes > PIPE_BUF

[Yang Xu]

Hi?
> Hi!
>> --- /dev/null
>> +++ b/testcases/kernel/syscalls/pipe/pipe12.c
>> @@ -0,0 +1,106 @@
>> +// SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0-or-later
>> +/*
>> + * Copyright (c) 2020 FUJITSU LIMITED. All rights reserved.
>> + * Author: Yang Xu <xuyang2018.jy@cn.fujitsu.com>
>> + *
>> + * Test Description:
>> + * A pipe has a limited capacity. If the pipe with non block mode is full,
>> + * then a write(2) will fail and get EAGAIN error. Otherwise, from 1 to
>> + * PIPE_BUF bytes may be written.
>> + */
>> +#define _GNU_SOURCE
>> +#include <unistd.h>
>> +#include <stdlib.h>
>> +#include <fcntl.h>
>> +#include "tst_test.h"
>> +#include "lapi/fcntl.h"
>> +
>> +static int fds[2];
>> +static char *wrbuf;
>> +static char *rdbuf;
>> +static ssize_t max_size, invalid_size;
>> +
>> +static struct tcase {
>> +	int full_flag;
>> +	int need_offset;
> 
> This could be called just offset, it does not have to be boolean either,
> we just need to write offset bytes from a buffer before we attempt to
> write to the pipe.
OK.
> 
>> +	char *message;
>> +} tcases[] = {
>> +	{1, 0, "Test on full pipe"},
>                   "Write to full pipe"
>> +	{0, 1, "Test on non full pipe from 1 offset"},
> 		 "Write to non-empty pipe"
>> +	{0, 0, "Test on non full pipe from 0 offset"},
>                        "Write to empty pipe"
>> +};
>> +
OK.
>> +static void verify_pipe(unsigned int n)
>> +{
>> +	struct tcase *tc = &tcases[n];
>> +
>> +	memset(rdbuf, 0, max_size);
>> +
>> +	tst_res(TINFO, "%s", tc->message);
>> +	if (tc->full_flag) {
>> +		SAFE_WRITE(1, fds[1], wrbuf, max_size);
>> +		TEST(write(fds[1], "x", 1));
>> +		if (TST_RET == 0) {
> 			write is required to return -1 here which is
> 			what we have to check against i.e, TST_RET != -1
> 			means fail
>> +			tst_res(TFAIL, "write succeeded unexpectedly");
>> +			goto clean_pipe_buf;
>> +		}
>> +		if (TST_ERR == EAGAIN)
>> +			tst_res(TPASS | TTERRNO, "write failed as expected");
>> +		else
>> +			tst_res(TFAIL | TTERRNO, "write failed, expected EAGAIN but got");
>> +	} else {
>> +		if (tc->need_offset)
>> +			SAFE_WRITE(1, fds[1], "x", 1);
>> +		TEST(write(fds[1], wrbuf, invalid_size));
>> +		if (TST_RET == -1) {
>> +			tst_res(TFAIL, "write failed unexpectedly");
>> +			goto clean_pipe_buf;
>> +		}
>> +		if (TST_RET == invalid_size)
>> +			tst_res(TFAIL, "write size %ld larger than PIPE_BUF %ld", TST_RET, max_size);
>> +		else
>> +			tst_res(TPASS, "write size %ld between [1, %ld]", TST_RET, max_size);
> 
> 		Here as well, write is supposed to return the number of
> 		bytes written so in this case the TST_RET must be
> 		max_size - tcase->offset which is all we have to check
> 		for, anything else than that means failure.
I have seen pipe_write kernel code[1], it only merged small size write 
but not large size write(large size write will still page-align size, in 
other word, it uses new page). So, I think it is why man-pages said 
"from 1 to n bytes may be written". It may exist a hole when we use a 
unalign offset and the sequent align-page write. I think it is normal 
and don't need to mean failure.  "TST_RET is max_size - tcase->offset" 
is ok when we use [0,N*page_size-1] [page_size,page_buf-1] write or 
[0,a-1] [a, page_buf-1] write.

The other reason for it I guess beacause looking for a hole  may drop 
peformance when pipe buf is large.

Also, we can print write btyes by ioctl(fd, FIONREAD, &nbytes) command
(cover this ioctl test point).

[1]https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux.git/tree/fs/pipe.c#n431
> 
>> +	}
>> +
>> +clean_pipe_buf:
>> +	SAFE_READ(0, fds[0], rdbuf, max_size);
>> +}
>> +
>> +
>> +static void cleanup(void)
>> +{
>> +	if (fds[0] > 0)
>> +		SAFE_CLOSE(fds[0]);
>> +	if (fds[1] > 0)
>> +		SAFE_CLOSE(fds[1]);
>> +	if (wrbuf)
>> +		free(wrbuf);
>> +	if (rdbuf)
>> +		free(rdbuf);
>> +}
>> +
>> +static void setup(void)
>> +{
>> +
>> +	TEST(pipe(fds));
>> +	if (TST_RET == -1) {
>> +		tst_brk(TBROK | TTERRNO, "pipe");
>> +		return;
>> +	}
> 
> This is exactly what SAFE_PIPE() does.
> 
OK.
>> +	max_size = SAFE_FCNTL(fds[1], F_GETPIPE_SZ);
>> +	invalid_size = max_size + 4096;
>> +	wrbuf = SAFE_MALLOC(invalid_size);
>> +	rdbuf = SAFE_MALLOC(max_size);
>> +	memset(wrbuf, 'x', invalid_size);
>> +
>> +	SAFE_FCNTL(fds[1], F_SETFL, O_NONBLOCK);
>> +	SAFE_FCNTL(fds[0], F_SETFL, O_NONBLOCK);
>> +}
>> +
>> +static struct tst_test test = {
>> +	.test = verify_pipe,
>> +	.setup = setup,
>> +	.cleanup = cleanup,
>> +	.tcnt = ARRAY_SIZE(tcases),
>> +};
>> -- 
>> 2.18.0
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> -- 
>> Mailing list info: https://lists.linux.it/listinfo/ltp
> 

[LTP] [PATCH v2] syscalls/pipe12: add new test for pipe when write bytes > PIPE_BUF

[Cyril Hrubis]

Hi!
> > 		Here as well, write is supposed to return the number of
> > 		bytes written so in this case the TST_RET must be
> > 		max_size - tcase->offset which is all we have to check
> > 		for, anything else than that means failure.
> I have seen pipe_write kernel code[1], it only merged small size write 
> but not large size write(large size write will still page-align size, in 
> other word, it uses new page). So, I think it is why man-pages said 
> "from 1 to n bytes may be written". It may exist a hole when we use a 
> unalign offset and the sequent align-page write. I think it is normal 
> and don't need to mean failure.  "TST_RET is max_size - tcase->offset" 
> is ok when we use [0,N*page_size-1] [page_size,page_buf-1] write or 
> [0,a-1] [a, page_buf-1] write.
> 
> The other reason for it I guess beacause looking for a hole  may drop 
> peformance when pipe buf is large.
> 
> Also, we can print write btyes by ioctl(fd, FIONREAD, &nbytes) command
> (cover this ioctl test point).

Okay, I see that we merge only if the write fits into the free space in
the current head in the right buffer. Which means that we may write less
than max pipe size if we do not write in page aligned chunks.

-- 
Cyril Hrubis
chrubis@suse.cz

[LTP] [PATCH v3] syscalls/pipe12: add new test for pipe when write bytes > pipe size

[Yang Xu]

A pipe has a limited capacity. If the pipe with non block mode is full,
then a write(2) will fail and get EAGAIN error. Otherwise, from 1 to
PIPE_BUF bytes may be written.

Signed-off-by: Yang Xu <xuyang2018.jy@cn.fujitsu.com>

---------------
v2->v3:
1)check write return value for align page-size write
2)use ioctl(fd, FIONREAD, &nbytes)
3)use SAFE_PIPE
---------------
---
 runtest/syscalls                          |   1 +
 testcases/kernel/syscalls/pipe/.gitignore |   1 +
 testcases/kernel/syscalls/pipe/pipe12.c   | 113 ++++++++++++++++++++++
 3 files changed, 115 insertions(+)
 create mode 100644 testcases/kernel/syscalls/pipe/pipe12.c

diff --git a/runtest/syscalls b/runtest/syscalls
index fa87ef63f..92a9ae636 100644
--- a/runtest/syscalls
+++ b/runtest/syscalls
@@ -861,6 +861,7 @@ pipe08 pipe08
 pipe09 pipe09
 pipe10 pipe10
 pipe11 pipe11
+pipe12 pipe12
 
 pipe2_01 pipe2_01
 pipe2_02 pipe2_02
diff --git a/testcases/kernel/syscalls/pipe/.gitignore b/testcases/kernel/syscalls/pipe/.gitignore
index ee2974ca8..90b502547 100644
--- a/testcases/kernel/syscalls/pipe/.gitignore
+++ b/testcases/kernel/syscalls/pipe/.gitignore
@@ -9,3 +9,4 @@
 /pipe09
 /pipe10
 /pipe11
+/pipe12
diff --git a/testcases/kernel/syscalls/pipe/pipe12.c b/testcases/kernel/syscalls/pipe/pipe12.c
new file mode 100644
index 000000000..ac17fb0a4
--- /dev/null
+++ b/testcases/kernel/syscalls/pipe/pipe12.c
@@ -0,0 +1,113 @@
+// SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0-or-later
+/*
+ * Copyright (c) 2020 FUJITSU LIMITED. All rights reserved.
+ * Author: Yang Xu <xuyang2018.jy@cn.fujitsu.com>
+ *
+ * Test Description:
+ * A pipe has a limited capacity. If the pipe with non block mode is full,
+ * then a write(2) will fail and get EAGAIN error. Otherwise, from 1 to
+ * PIPE_BUF bytes may be written.
+ */
+#define _GNU_SOURCE
+#include <unistd.h>
+#include <stdlib.h>
+#include <fcntl.h>
+#include "tst_test.h"
+#include "lapi/fcntl.h"
+
+static int fds[2];
+static char *wrbuf;
+static char *rdbuf;
+static ssize_t max_size, invalid_size;
+
+static struct tcase {
+	int full_flag;
+	int offset;
+	char *message;
+	int check_flag;
+} tcases[] = {
+	{1, 0, "Write to full pipe", 1},
+	/*
+	 * For a non-empty(unaligned page size) pipe, the sequent large size
+	 * write(>page_size)will use new pages. So it may exist a hole in
+	 * page and we print this value instead of checking it.
+	 */
+	{0, 1, "Write to non-empty pipe", 0},
+	{0, 0, "Write to empty pipe", 1},
+};
+
+static void verify_pipe(unsigned int n)
+{
+	struct tcase *tc = &tcases[n];
+	int nbytes;
+
+	memset(rdbuf, 0, max_size);
+
+	tst_res(TINFO, "%s", tc->message);
+	if (tc->full_flag) {
+		SAFE_WRITE(1, fds[1], wrbuf, max_size);
+		TEST(write(fds[1], "x", 1));
+		if (TST_RET != -1) {
+			tst_res(TFAIL, "write succeeded unexpectedly");
+			goto clean_pipe_buf;
+		}
+		if (TST_ERR == EAGAIN)
+			tst_res(TPASS | TTERRNO, "write failed as expected");
+		else
+			tst_res(TFAIL | TTERRNO, "write failed, expected EAGAIN but got");
+	} else {
+		SAFE_WRITE(1, fds[1], "x", tc->offset);
+		TEST(write(fds[1], wrbuf, invalid_size));
+		if (TST_RET == -1) {
+			tst_res(TFAIL, "write failed unexpectedly");
+			goto clean_pipe_buf;
+		}
+		tst_res(TPASS, "write succeeded as expectedly");
+	}
+	SAFE_IOCTL(fds[1], FIONREAD, &nbytes);
+	if (tc->check_flag) {
+		if (nbytes == max_size - tc->offset)
+			tst_res(TPASS, "write %d bytes", nbytes);
+		else
+			tst_res(TFAIL, "write expected %ld bytes, got %d bytes",
+					max_size, nbytes);
+	} else
+		tst_res(TPASS, "write %d bytes", nbytes);
+
+clean_pipe_buf:
+	SAFE_READ(0, fds[0], rdbuf, max_size);
+}
+
+
+static void cleanup(void)
+{
+	if (fds[0] > 0)
+		SAFE_CLOSE(fds[0]);
+	if (fds[1] > 0)
+		SAFE_CLOSE(fds[1]);
+	if (wrbuf)
+		free(wrbuf);
+	if (rdbuf)
+		free(rdbuf);
+}
+
+static void setup(void)
+{
+	SAFE_PIPE(fds);
+
+	max_size = SAFE_FCNTL(fds[1], F_GETPIPE_SZ);
+	invalid_size = max_size + 4096;
+	wrbuf = SAFE_MALLOC(invalid_size);
+	rdbuf = SAFE_MALLOC(max_size);
+	memset(wrbuf, 'x', invalid_size);
+
+	SAFE_FCNTL(fds[1], F_SETFL, O_NONBLOCK);
+	SAFE_FCNTL(fds[0], F_SETFL, O_NONBLOCK);
+}
+
+static struct tst_test test = {
+	.test = verify_pipe,
+	.setup = setup,
+	.cleanup = cleanup,
+	.tcnt = ARRAY_SIZE(tcases),
+};
-- 
2.18.0