Linux Test Project
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* [LTP] [PATCH v3 1/1] safe_macros.c: Fix missing ro flag for FUSE mounts
@ 2025-07-29 13:27 Jan Polensky
  2025-08-05 11:52 ` Petr Vorel
  2025-08-05 11:54 ` Petr Vorel
  0 siblings, 2 replies; 5+ messages in thread
From: Jan Polensky @ 2025-07-29 13:27 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Linux Test Project

The test incorrectly assumes that FUSE mounts are read-only, but the mount
command does not explicitly set the read-only flag. As a result, the test fails
when checking `sb_flags` against `MS_RDONLY`.

Old behavior:

    sudo LTP_SINGLE_FS_TYPE=ntfs strace -e trace=mount,statmount -o log.log -s 128 -f ./statmount02
    ...
    statmount02.c:47: TFAIL: st_mount->sb_flags (0) != MS_RDONLY (1)
    ...

Relevant log excerpt:

    3890601 mount("/dev/zero", "/tmp/mountBDSEqk", "ntfs", 0, NULL) = -1 ENOTBLK (Block device required)
    3890608 mount("/dev/loop0", "/tmp/LTP_staTPRruR/mntpoint", "fuseblk", 0, "allow_other,blksize=4096,fd=4,rootmode=40000,user_id=0,group_id=0") = 0
    3890607 statmount({size=24, mnt_id=0x80010957, param=STATMOUNT_SB_BASIC}, {size=512, mask=STATMOUNT_SB_BASIC, sb_dev_major=7, sb_dev_minor=0, sb_magic=FUSE_SUPER_MAGIC, sb_flags=0}, 512, 0) = 0

Reviewed-by: Avinesh Kumar <akumar@suse.de>
Reviewed-by: Petr Vorel <pvorel@suse.cz>
Signed-off-by: Jan Polensky <japo@linux.ibm.com>
---
Change since v1 (Thanks Cyril & thanks for the ping):
* Removed restriction for NTFS.
Change since v2 (Thanks Avinesh):
* Changed commit title from: "Fix missing ro flag for FUSE NTFS mounts"

 lib/safe_macros.c | 9 +++++++--
 1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/lib/safe_macros.c b/lib/safe_macros.c
index d52b55ab70fe..25fad4b7cae0 100644
--- a/lib/safe_macros.c
+++ b/lib/safe_macros.c
@@ -945,10 +945,15 @@ int safe_mount(const char *file, const int lineno, void (*cleanup_fn)(void),
 	tst_resm_(file, lineno, TINFO, "tst_is_fuse: %d", tst_is_fuse(source));
 	if (possibly_fuse(filesystemtype)) {
 		char buf[1024];
+		const char* mount_fmt;

 		tst_resm_(file, lineno, TINFO, "Trying FUSE...");
-		snprintf(buf, sizeof(buf), "mount.%s '%s' '%s'",
-			filesystemtype, source, target);
+		if (mountflags == MS_RDONLY)
+			mount_fmt = "mount.%s -o ro '%s' '%s'";
+		else
+			mount_fmt = "mount.%s '%s' '%s'";
+		snprintf(buf, sizeof(buf), mount_fmt, filesystemtype,
+				source, target);

 		rval = tst_system(buf);
 	tst_resm_(file, lineno, TINFO, "tst_is_fuse: %d", tst_is_fuse(source));
--
2.50.1


-- 
Mailing list info: https://lists.linux.it/listinfo/ltp

^ permalink raw reply related	[flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread

* Re: [LTP] [PATCH v3 1/1] safe_macros.c: Fix missing ro flag for FUSE mounts
  2025-07-29 13:27 [LTP] [PATCH v3 1/1] safe_macros.c: Fix missing ro flag for FUSE mounts Jan Polensky
@ 2025-08-05 11:52 ` Petr Vorel
  2025-08-05 11:57   ` Cyril Hrubis
  2025-08-05 11:54 ` Petr Vorel
  1 sibling, 1 reply; 5+ messages in thread
From: Petr Vorel @ 2025-08-05 11:52 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Jan Polensky; +Cc: Linux Test Project

Hi all,

> The test incorrectly assumes that FUSE mounts are read-only, but the mount
> command does not explicitly set the read-only flag. As a result, the test fails
> when checking `sb_flags` against `MS_RDONLY`.

@Cyril actually v3 is the final version to have a look.

Kind regards,
Petr

> Old behavior:

>     sudo LTP_SINGLE_FS_TYPE=ntfs strace -e trace=mount,statmount -o log.log -s 128 -f ./statmount02
>     ...
>     statmount02.c:47: TFAIL: st_mount->sb_flags (0) != MS_RDONLY (1)
>     ...

> Relevant log excerpt:

>     3890601 mount("/dev/zero", "/tmp/mountBDSEqk", "ntfs", 0, NULL) = -1 ENOTBLK (Block device required)
>     3890608 mount("/dev/loop0", "/tmp/LTP_staTPRruR/mntpoint", "fuseblk", 0, "allow_other,blksize=4096,fd=4,rootmode=40000,user_id=0,group_id=0") = 0
>     3890607 statmount({size=24, mnt_id=0x80010957, param=STATMOUNT_SB_BASIC}, {size=512, mask=STATMOUNT_SB_BASIC, sb_dev_major=7, sb_dev_minor=0, sb_magic=FUSE_SUPER_MAGIC, sb_flags=0}, 512, 0) = 0

> Reviewed-by: Avinesh Kumar <akumar@suse.de>
> Reviewed-by: Petr Vorel <pvorel@suse.cz>
> Signed-off-by: Jan Polensky <japo@linux.ibm.com>
> ---
> Change since v1 (Thanks Cyril & thanks for the ping):
> * Removed restriction for NTFS.
> Change since v2 (Thanks Avinesh):
> * Changed commit title from: "Fix missing ro flag for FUSE NTFS mounts"

>  lib/safe_macros.c | 9 +++++++--
>  1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

> diff --git a/lib/safe_macros.c b/lib/safe_macros.c
> index d52b55ab70fe..25fad4b7cae0 100644
> --- a/lib/safe_macros.c
> +++ b/lib/safe_macros.c
> @@ -945,10 +945,15 @@ int safe_mount(const char *file, const int lineno, void (*cleanup_fn)(void),
>  	tst_resm_(file, lineno, TINFO, "tst_is_fuse: %d", tst_is_fuse(source));
>  	if (possibly_fuse(filesystemtype)) {
>  		char buf[1024];
> +		const char* mount_fmt;

>  		tst_resm_(file, lineno, TINFO, "Trying FUSE...");
> -		snprintf(buf, sizeof(buf), "mount.%s '%s' '%s'",
> -			filesystemtype, source, target);
> +		if (mountflags == MS_RDONLY)
> +			mount_fmt = "mount.%s -o ro '%s' '%s'";
> +		else
> +			mount_fmt = "mount.%s '%s' '%s'";
> +		snprintf(buf, sizeof(buf), mount_fmt, filesystemtype,
> +				source, target);

>  		rval = tst_system(buf);
>  	tst_resm_(file, lineno, TINFO, "tst_is_fuse: %d", tst_is_fuse(source));

-- 
Mailing list info: https://lists.linux.it/listinfo/ltp

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread

* Re: [LTP] [PATCH v3 1/1] safe_macros.c: Fix missing ro flag for FUSE mounts
  2025-07-29 13:27 [LTP] [PATCH v3 1/1] safe_macros.c: Fix missing ro flag for FUSE mounts Jan Polensky
  2025-08-05 11:52 ` Petr Vorel
@ 2025-08-05 11:54 ` Petr Vorel
  1 sibling, 0 replies; 5+ messages in thread
From: Petr Vorel @ 2025-08-05 11:54 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Jan Polensky; +Cc: Linux Test Project

Hi all,

NOTE: v3 does not apply due wrong context.
I'm going to merge v2 with a fixed title (wait little longer to give Cyril
chance to review).

Kind regards,
Petr

-- 
Mailing list info: https://lists.linux.it/listinfo/ltp

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread

* Re: [LTP] [PATCH v3 1/1] safe_macros.c: Fix missing ro flag for FUSE mounts
  2025-08-05 11:52 ` Petr Vorel
@ 2025-08-05 11:57   ` Cyril Hrubis
  2025-08-06 11:38     ` Jan Polensky
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 5+ messages in thread
From: Cyril Hrubis @ 2025-08-05 11:57 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Petr Vorel; +Cc: Linux Test Project

Hi!
I've actually send a similar patch since Jan wasn't responding:

http://patchwork.ozlabs.org/project/ltp/patch/20250630122719.12948-1-chrubis@suse.cz/

That just adds '-o ro' or '' as '%s' to the original format.

-- 
Cyril Hrubis
chrubis@suse.cz

-- 
Mailing list info: https://lists.linux.it/listinfo/ltp

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread

* Re: [LTP] [PATCH v3 1/1] safe_macros.c: Fix missing ro flag for FUSE mounts
  2025-08-05 11:57   ` Cyril Hrubis
@ 2025-08-06 11:38     ` Jan Polensky
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 5+ messages in thread
From: Jan Polensky @ 2025-08-06 11:38 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Cyril Hrubis, Petr Vorel; +Cc: Linux Test Project

On Tue, Aug 05, 2025 at 01:57:32PM +0200, Cyril Hrubis wrote:
> Hi!
> I've actually send a similar patch since Jan wasn't responding:
>
> http://patchwork.ozlabs.org/project/ltp/patch/20250630122719.12948-1-chrubis@suse.cz/
>
> That just adds '-o ro' or '' as '%s' to the original format.
>
> --
> Cyril Hrubis
> chrubis@suse.cz
What matters most is that the issue gets resolved. I’d be very grateful
if a fix could be made available in the near future.

Thanks again for the helpful input and best regards!
Jan

-- 
Mailing list info: https://lists.linux.it/listinfo/ltp

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread

end of thread, other threads:[~2025-08-06 11:39 UTC | newest]

Thread overview: 5+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2025-07-29 13:27 [LTP] [PATCH v3 1/1] safe_macros.c: Fix missing ro flag for FUSE mounts Jan Polensky
2025-08-05 11:52 ` Petr Vorel
2025-08-05 11:57   ` Cyril Hrubis
2025-08-06 11:38     ` Jan Polensky
2025-08-05 11:54 ` Petr Vorel

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox