From: Ricardo Branco <rbranco@suse.de>
To: ltp@lists.linux.it
Subject: [LTP] [PATCH v3 2/2] userfaultfd: Use two-step handshake to probe features
Date: Thu, 7 May 2026 10:31:24 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260507083131.28197-2-rbranco@suse.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260507083131.28197-1-rbranco@suse.de>
userfaultfd05 and userfaultfd06 assume that
UFFD_FEATURE_PAGEFAULT_FLAG_WP and UFFD_FEATURE_POISON are available
when setting up userfaultfd.
On kernels where either feature is unavailable at runtime,
UFFDIO_API fails with EINVAL and the tests end up as TBROK instead of
being skipped.
Fix this by using the required two-step handshake and skip with TCONF
if the required feature bit is absent.
Fixes: 1840ee23d172b5ab04cca7c2acfa48755b041911
Link: https://github.com/linux-test-project/ltp/issues/1289
Signed-off-by: Ricardo Branco <rbranco@suse.de>
---
testcases/kernel/syscalls/userfaultfd/userfaultfd05.c | 4 +++-
testcases/kernel/syscalls/userfaultfd/userfaultfd06.c | 6 +++---
2 files changed, 6 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
diff --git a/testcases/kernel/syscalls/userfaultfd/userfaultfd05.c b/testcases/kernel/syscalls/userfaultfd/userfaultfd05.c
index 59956d85d..55ddc1a69 100644
--- a/testcases/kernel/syscalls/userfaultfd/userfaultfd05.c
+++ b/testcases/kernel/syscalls/userfaultfd/userfaultfd05.c
@@ -87,10 +87,12 @@ static void *handle_thread(void *arg LTP_ATTRIBUTE_UNUSED)
static void run(void)
{
pthread_t thr;
- struct uffdio_api uffdio_api;
+ struct uffdio_api uffdio_api = {};
struct uffdio_register uffdio_register;
struct uffdio_writeprotect uffdio_writeprotect;
+ CHECK_UFFD_FEATURE(UFFD_FEATURE_PAGEFAULT_FLAG_WP);
+
set_pages();
uffd = SAFE_USERFAULTFD(O_CLOEXEC | O_NONBLOCK, false);
diff --git a/testcases/kernel/syscalls/userfaultfd/userfaultfd06.c b/testcases/kernel/syscalls/userfaultfd/userfaultfd06.c
index ec93d8ad6..c06de4ca2 100644
--- a/testcases/kernel/syscalls/userfaultfd/userfaultfd06.c
+++ b/testcases/kernel/syscalls/userfaultfd/userfaultfd06.c
@@ -99,6 +99,9 @@ static void run(void)
poison_fault_seen = 0;
sigbus_seen = 0;
+
+ CHECK_UFFD_FEATURE(UFFD_FEATURE_POISON);
+
set_pages();
uffd = SAFE_USERFAULTFD(O_CLOEXEC | O_NONBLOCK, false);
@@ -108,9 +111,6 @@ static void run(void)
SAFE_IOCTL(uffd, UFFDIO_API, &uffdio_api);
- if (!(uffdio_api.features & UFFD_FEATURE_POISON))
- tst_brk(TCONF, "UFFD_FEATURE_POISON not supported");
-
uffdio_register.range.start = (unsigned long) page;
uffdio_register.range.len = page_size;
uffdio_register.mode = UFFDIO_REGISTER_MODE_MISSING;
--
2.54.0
--
Mailing list info: https://lists.linux.it/listinfo/ltp
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-05-07 8:32 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-05-07 8:31 [LTP] [PATCH v3 1/2] userfaultfd: Add helper for checking UFFD feature support Ricardo Branco
2026-05-07 8:31 ` Ricardo Branco [this message]
2026-05-07 8:34 ` [LTP] [PATCH v3 2/2] userfaultfd: Use two-step handshake to probe features Cyril Hrubis
2026-05-07 8:33 ` [LTP] [PATCH v3 1/2] userfaultfd: Add helper for checking UFFD feature support Cyril Hrubis
2026-05-07 9:40 ` [LTP] " linuxtestproject.agent
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20260507083131.28197-2-rbranco@suse.de \
--to=rbranco@suse.de \
--cc=ltp@lists.linux.it \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox