From: linuxtestproject.agent@gmail.com
To: XiaoLei Wu <wxl18715129466@gmail.com>
Cc: ltp@lists.linux.it
Subject: Re: [LTP] syscalls/unlink09: report unsupported inode flags as TCONF
Date: Tue, 2 Jun 2026 11:23:35 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260602112335.4032-1-linuxtestproject.agent@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260602064442.718507-1-wxl18715129466@gmail.com>
Hi XiaoLei,
On Tue, Jun 02, 2026 at 02:44:42PM +0800, XiaoLei Wu wrote:
> syscalls/unlink09: report unsupported inode flags as TCONF
>
> If FS_IOC_GETFLAGS fails with ENOTTY, the filesystem does not support
> inode flags. This is an unsupported test configuration rather than a
> broken test setup, so report TCONF instead of TBROK.
>
> Signed-off-by: XiaoLei Wu <wxl18715129466@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: LTP AI Reviewer <ltp@lists.linux.it>
The fix is correct. ENOTTY from FS_IOC_GETFLAGS means the filesystem
does not support inode attribute ioctls, which is a missing feature, not
a broken test. TCONF is the right result code, and this is consistent
with how statx08.c and statx09.c handle the same ioctl failure:
tst_brk(TCONF | TERRNO, "FS_IOC_GETFLAGS not supported");
The patch is a one-line change and the commit message accurately
describes both what changed and why.
---
Pre-existing issues (not introduced by this patch, informational only):
1. testcases/kernel/syscalls/unlink/unlink09.c: After the ENOTTY branch
in setup() closes fd_immutable and calls tst_brk(TCONF, ...), the
variable fd_immutable still holds the (now-closed) file descriptor
value — it is never reset to -1. When cleanup() later runs, the
guard "if (fd_immutable != -1)" is true, so setup_inode_flag() is
called on the already-closed fd, producing an EBADF error via
SAFE_IOCTL, followed by a second SAFE_CLOSE on the same fd. Both
statx08.c and statx09.c avoid this by not caching the fd in a
global until after the FS_IOC_GETFLAGS probe succeeds.
LTP AI Reviewer
--
Mailing list info: https://lists.linux.it/listinfo/ltp
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-06-02 11:24 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-06-02 6:44 [LTP] [PATCH] syscalls/unlink09: report unsupported inode flags as TCONF XiaoLei Wu
2026-06-02 11:23 ` linuxtestproject.agent [this message]
2026-06-03 9:59 ` Cyril Hrubis
2026-06-04 8:05 ` xl wu
2026-06-04 8:36 ` Cyril Hrubis
2026-06-04 10:00 ` xl wu
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2026-06-02 6:14 XiaoLei Wu
2026-06-02 11:23 ` [LTP] " linuxtestproject.agent
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20260602112335.4032-1-linuxtestproject.agent@gmail.com \
--to=linuxtestproject.agent@gmail.com \
--cc=ltp@lists.linux.it \
--cc=wxl18715129466@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox