From: linuxtestproject.agent@gmail.com
To: XiaoLei Wu <wxl18715129466@gmail.com>
Cc: ltp@lists.linux.it
Subject: Re: [LTP] syscalls/unlink09: report unsupported inode flags as TCONF
Date: Tue, 2 Jun 2026 11:23:45 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260602112345.4019-1-linuxtestproject.agent@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260602061441.718227-1-wxl18715129466@gmail.com>
Hi XiaoLei Wu,
On Tue, Jun 2, 2026 at 14:14:41 +0800, XiaoLei Wu wrote:
> syscalls/unlink09: report unsupported inode flags as TCONF
>
> If FS_IOC_GETFLAGS fails with ENOTTY, the filesystem does not support
> inode flags. This is an unsupported test configuration rather than a
> broken test setup, so report TCONF instead of TBROK.
The change is correct. ENOTTY from FS_IOC_GETFLAGS means the kernel/
filesystem does not implement the ioctl at all, which is definitionally
an unsupported test configuration, not a broken test environment. TCONF
is the right result code.
Commit message is accurate and well-structured.
> diff --git a/testcases/kernel/syscalls/unlink/unlink09.c b/testcases/kernel/syscalls/unlink/unlink09.c
> @@ -63,7 +63,7 @@ static void setup(void)
> if (TST_RET == -1 && TST_ERR == ENOTTY) {
> SAFE_CLOSE(fd_immutable);
>
> - tst_brk(TBROK, "Inode attributes not supported by '%s'",
> + tst_brk(TCONF, "Inode attributes not supported by '%s'",
> tst_device->fs_type);
> }
LGTM. When FS_IOC_GETFLAGS returns ENOTTY the filesystem does not
support inode attribute flags; the test cannot run on such a
filesystem so TCONF is correct.
---
Pre-existing issues (informational, do not affect verdict):
In setup(), after SAFE_CLOSE(fd_immutable), fd_immutable still holds
its non-(-1) value when tst_brk() is called. Because tst_brk() invokes
cleanup(), and cleanup() checks `if (fd_immutable != -1)`, it will call
setup_inode_flag() (which does FS_IOC_GETFLAGS+FS_IOC_SETFLAGS) and
SAFE_CLOSE() on an already-closed descriptor.
Fix:
SAFE_CLOSE(fd_immutable);
+ fd_immutable = -1;
tst_brk(TCONF, "Inode attributes not supported by '%s'",
tst_device->fs_type);
---
Reviewed-by: LTP AI Reviewer
LTP AI Reviewer
--
Mailing list info: https://lists.linux.it/listinfo/ltp
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-06-02 11:24 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-06-02 6:14 [LTP] [PATCH] syscalls/unlink09: report unsupported inode flags as TCONF XiaoLei Wu
2026-06-02 11:23 ` linuxtestproject.agent [this message]
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2026-06-02 6:44 XiaoLei Wu
2026-06-02 11:23 ` [LTP] " linuxtestproject.agent
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20260602112345.4019-1-linuxtestproject.agent@gmail.com \
--to=linuxtestproject.agent@gmail.com \
--cc=ltp@lists.linux.it \
--cc=wxl18715129466@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox