From: Disha Goel <disgoel@linux.ibm.com>
To: ltp@lists.linux.it
Cc: Disha Goel <disgoel@linux.ibm.com>
Subject: [LTP] [PATCH 2/2] memcg/memcontrol03-04: fix typos, redundant define and format specifiers
Date: Fri, 7 Aug 2026 18:35:22 +0530 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260807130523.49068-2-disgoel@linux.ibm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260807130523.49068-1-disgoel@linux.ibm.com>
Fix typos in doc comments ('tempfs' -> 'tmpfs', 'becaue' -> 'because',
'dont not' -> 'do not'), remove '#define TMPDIR "mntdir"' which
duplicates the definition already in memcontrol_common.h, replace
PRIdPTR with %zu for size_t arguments (PRIdPTR is for signed intptr_t),
and fix continuation line indentation in tst_res() calls.
Signed-off-by: Disha Goel <disgoel@linux.ibm.com>
---
testcases/kernel/controllers/memcg/memcontrol03.c | 12 +++++-------
testcases/kernel/controllers/memcg/memcontrol04.c | 10 ++++------
2 files changed, 9 insertions(+), 13 deletions(-)
diff --git a/testcases/kernel/controllers/memcg/memcontrol03.c b/testcases/kernel/controllers/memcg/memcontrol03.c
index 493e970ab..42298e5f0 100644
--- a/testcases/kernel/controllers/memcg/memcontrol03.c
+++ b/testcases/kernel/controllers/memcg/memcontrol03.c
@@ -27,8 +27,8 @@
* pagecache even in this case."
*
* memory.min doesn't appear to exist on V1 so we only test on V2 like
- * the selftest. We do test on more file systems, but not tempfs
- * becaue it can't evict the page cache without swap. Also we avoid
+ * the selftest. We do test on more file systems, but not tmpfs
+ * because it can't evict the page cache without swap. Also we avoid
* filesystems which allocate extra memory for buffer heads.
*
* The tolerances have been increased from the self tests.
@@ -40,8 +40,6 @@
#include "memcontrol_common.h"
-#define TMPDIR "mntdir"
-
static struct tst_cg_group *trunk_cg[3];
static struct tst_cg_group *leaf_cg[4];
static int fd = -1;
@@ -105,8 +103,8 @@ static void alloc_anon_in_child(const struct tst_cg_group *const cg,
SAFE_CG_SCANF(cg, "memory.current", "%zu", &cgmem);
size = size > cgmem ? size - cgmem : 0;
- tst_res(TINFO, "Child %d in %s: Allocating anon: %"PRIdPTR,
- getpid(), tst_cg_group_name(cg), size);
+ tst_res(TINFO, "Child %d in %s: Allocating anon: %zu",
+ getpid(), tst_cg_group_name(cg), size);
if (size)
alloc_anon(size);
@@ -148,7 +146,7 @@ static void alloc_pagecache_in_child(const struct tst_cg_group *const cg,
SAFE_CG_SCANF(cg, "memory.current", "%zu", &cgmem);
size = size > cgmem ? size - cgmem : 0;
- tst_res(TINFO, "Child %d in %s: Allocating pagecache: %"PRIdPTR,
+ tst_res(TINFO, "Child %d in %s: Allocating pagecache: %zu",
getpid(), tst_cg_group_name(cg), size);
if (size)
diff --git a/testcases/kernel/controllers/memcg/memcontrol04.c b/testcases/kernel/controllers/memcg/memcontrol04.c
index 15d8f891c..d448478d6 100644
--- a/testcases/kernel/controllers/memcg/memcontrol04.c
+++ b/testcases/kernel/controllers/memcg/memcontrol04.c
@@ -28,7 +28,7 @@
* The closest thing to memory.low on V1 is soft_limit_in_bytes which
* uses a different mechanism and has different semantics. So we only
* test on V2 like the selftest. We do test on more file systems, but
- * not tempfs becaue it can't evict the page cache without swap. Also
+ * not tmpfs because it can't evict the page cache without swap. Also
* we avoid filesystems which allocate extra memory for buffer heads.
*
* The tolerances have been increased from the self tests.
@@ -40,8 +40,6 @@
#include "memcontrol_common.h"
-#define TMPDIR "mntdir"
-
static struct tst_cg_group *trunk_cg[3];
static struct tst_cg_group *leaf_cg[4];
static int fd = -1;
@@ -102,7 +100,7 @@ static void alloc_anon_in_child(const struct tst_cg_group *const cg,
SAFE_CG_PRINTF(cg, "cgroup.procs", "%d", getpid());
- tst_res(TINFO, "Child %d in %s: Allocating anon: %"PRIdPTR,
+ tst_res(TINFO, "Child %d in %s: Allocating anon: %zu",
getpid(), tst_cg_group_name(cg), size);
alloc_anon(size);
@@ -122,7 +120,7 @@ static void alloc_pagecache_in_child(const struct tst_cg_group *const cg,
SAFE_CG_PRINTF(cg, "cgroup.procs", "%d", getpid());
- tst_res(TINFO, "Child %d in %s: Allocating pagecache: %"PRIdPTR,
+ tst_res(TINFO, "Child %d in %s: Allocating pagecache: %zu",
getpid(), tst_cg_group_name(cg), size);
alloc_pagecache(fd, size);
@@ -227,7 +225,7 @@ static void test_memcg_low(void)
TST_EXP_EXPR(low == 0,
"(%c low events=%ld) == 0", id, low);
} else if (!tst_cg_memory_recursiveprot(leaf_cg[F])) {
- /* dont not check F when recursive_protection enabled */
+ /* do not check F when recursive_protection enabled */
TST_EXP_EXPR(low == 0,
"(%c low events=%ld) == 0", id, low);
}
--
2.45.1
--
Mailing list info: https://lists.linux.it/listinfo/ltp
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-08-07 13:06 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-08-07 13:05 [LTP] [PATCH 1/2] memcg/memcontrol02: fix fd leak in cleanup path Disha Goel
2026-08-07 13:05 ` Disha Goel [this message]
2026-08-07 14:18 ` [LTP] " linuxtestproject.agent
2026-08-10 9:41 ` Andrea Cervesato via ltp
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20260807130523.49068-2-disgoel@linux.ibm.com \
--to=disgoel@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=ltp@lists.linux.it \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox