Linux Test Project
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Petr Vorel <pvorel@suse.cz>
To: Andrea Cervesato <andrea.cervesato@suse.com>
Cc: ltp@lists.linux.it
Subject: Re: [LTP] [PATCH v4 1/9] tst_kvercmp: Factor out error handling
Date: Mon, 10 Aug 2026 13:33:00 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260810113300.GD918586@pevik> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <6a74317f.5b42f266.2b3442.f731@mx.google.com>

Hi Andrea,

> Hi Petr,

> We got 4 reviews..it seems like there's a problem with the CI
> and the new instance is not setting the state correctly, which
> is used by the script to recognize if patch was already reviewed
> or not. I will fix it.

Thanks for your time and effort to fix it.

> Anyway, we can say you had enough material to fix the series :-)

If you mean agent complains [1] they are mostly wrong. (The only correct one is
for 9th commit which I'm going to drop).

Anyway, I'll send next version without last 3 commits (2 of them RFC), because
only that part was problematic (even v3 was ready and could have been merged
with 2 minor fixes changed before merge).

I'll reply to agent objections [1] before sending and I guess I'll have to do it
again in next version, unless there is some shared context between patchsets.
But I'm getting to understand Wei's frustration to fight against agent's false
positives :).

Kind regards,
Petr

[1] https://lore.kernel.org/ltp/20260805173540.9276-1-linuxtestproject.agent@gmail.com/

-- 
Mailing list info: https://lists.linux.it/listinfo/ltp

  reply	other threads:[~2026-08-10 11:33 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 20+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2026-08-05 15:14 [LTP] [PATCH v4 0/6] Add support for .max_kver Petr Vorel
2026-08-05 15:14 ` [LTP] [PATCH v4 1/9] tst_kvercmp: Factor out error handling Petr Vorel
2026-08-05 17:33   ` [LTP] " linuxtestproject.agent
2026-08-05 17:33   ` linuxtestproject.agent
2026-08-05 17:34   ` linuxtestproject.agent
2026-08-05 17:35   ` linuxtestproject.agent
2026-08-10 12:02     ` Petr Vorel
2026-08-06  7:02   ` [LTP] [PATCH v4 1/9] " Andrea Cervesato via ltp
2026-08-10 11:33     ` Petr Vorel [this message]
2026-08-05 15:14 ` [LTP] [PATCH v4 2/9] lib: Rename function check_kver() => check_min_kver() Petr Vorel
2026-08-05 15:14 ` [LTP] [PATCH v4 3/9] lib: Add support for max_kver to struct tst_test and tst_fs Petr Vorel
2026-08-05 15:14 ` [LTP] [PATCH v4 4/9] creat07: execve04: Remove version check, add linux-git Petr Vorel
2026-08-05 15:14 ` [LTP] [PATCH v4 5/9] fanotify20: Skip on v7.2 Petr Vorel
2026-08-05 15:14 ` [LTP] [PATCH v4 6/9] lib: Add basic test for .min_kver && .max_kver Petr Vorel
2026-08-05 15:14 ` [LTP] [PATCH v4 7/9] tst_kvercmp: Factor out 2 kernels integer comparison Petr Vorel
2026-08-05 15:14 ` [LTP] [PATCH v4 8/9] [RFC] make: Allow to add LTP library as a dependency for host Petr Vorel
2026-08-05 15:14 ` [LTP] [PATCH v4 9/9] [RFC] metaparse: Check {min, max}_kver validity Petr Vorel
2026-08-06  5:37   ` Petr Vorel
2026-08-06  7:23   ` Cyril Hrubis
2026-08-10 11:23     ` Petr Vorel

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20260810113300.GD918586@pevik \
    --to=pvorel@suse.cz \
    --cc=andrea.cervesato@suse.com \
    --cc=ltp@lists.linux.it \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox