[LTP] [PATCH] lib: tst_test: Clarify the .needs_abi_bit TCONF message

[LTP] [PATCH] lib: tst_test: Clarify the .needs_abi_bit TCONF message

[Cyril Hrubis]

The previous message was confusing. On 32bit machine sendfile09 tests
that has .needs_abi_bits = 64 produced this message:

tst_test.c:1493: TCONF: 64bit ABI is not supported

This message is a bit confusing, since on 32bit x86 machine 64bit ABI
is, of course, not supported, so why do we skip the test?

After this patch the message is:

tst_test.c:1493: Test needs 64bit ABI

Which is, as far as I can tell, more clear.

Fixes: 56f63e54e5a3 ("lib: Add .needs_abi_bits")
Signed-off-by: Cyril Hrubis <chrubis@suse.cz>
---
 lib/tst_test.c | 2 +-
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/lib/tst_test.c b/lib/tst_test.c
index ed3d26cad..e27a24c24 100644
--- a/lib/tst_test.c
+++ b/lib/tst_test.c
@@ -1490,7 +1490,7 @@ static void do_setup(int argc, char *argv[])
 		tst_brk(TCONF, "Not supported in 32-bit compat mode");
 
 	if (tst_test->needs_abi_bits && !tst_abi_bits(tst_test->needs_abi_bits))
-		tst_brk(TCONF, "%dbit ABI is not supported", tst_test->needs_abi_bits);
+		tst_brk(TCONF, "Test needs %dbit ABI", tst_test->needs_abi_bits);
 
 	if (tst_test->needs_cmds) {
 		struct tst_cmd *pcmd = tst_test->needs_cmds;
-- 
2.54.0


-- 
Mailing list info: https://lists.linux.it/listinfo/ltp

Re: [LTP] [PATCH] lib: tst_test: Clarify the .needs_abi_bit TCONF message

[Andrea Cervesato via ltp]

Reviewed-by: Andrea Cervesato <andrea.cervesato@suse.com>

--
Andrea Cervesato
SUSE QE Automation Engineer Linux
andrea.cervesato@suse.com

-- 
Mailing list info: https://lists.linux.it/listinfo/ltp

Re: [LTP] [PATCH] lib: tst_test: Clarify the .needs_abi_bit TCONF message

[Petr Vorel]

Hi Cyril,

> The previous message was confusing. On 32bit machine sendfile09 tests
> that has .needs_abi_bits = 64 produced this message:

> tst_test.c:1493: TCONF: 64bit ABI is not supported

> This message is a bit confusing, since on 32bit x86 machine 64bit ABI
> is, of course, not supported, so why do we skip the test?

> After this patch the message is:

> tst_test.c:1493: Test needs 64bit ABI

> Which is, as far as I can tell, more clear.

+1, sure, merge before release.

Reviewed-by: Petr Vorel <pvorel@suse.cz>

Kind regards,
Petr

> Fixes: 56f63e54e5a3 ("lib: Add .needs_abi_bits")
> Signed-off-by: Cyril Hrubis <chrubis@suse.cz>
> ---
>  lib/tst_test.c | 2 +-
>  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)

> diff --git a/lib/tst_test.c b/lib/tst_test.c
> index ed3d26cad..e27a24c24 100644
> --- a/lib/tst_test.c
> +++ b/lib/tst_test.c
> @@ -1490,7 +1490,7 @@ static void do_setup(int argc, char *argv[])
>  		tst_brk(TCONF, "Not supported in 32-bit compat mode");

>  	if (tst_test->needs_abi_bits && !tst_abi_bits(tst_test->needs_abi_bits))
> -		tst_brk(TCONF, "%dbit ABI is not supported", tst_test->needs_abi_bits);
> +		tst_brk(TCONF, "Test needs %dbit ABI", tst_test->needs_abi_bits);

>  	if (tst_test->needs_cmds) {
>  		struct tst_cmd *pcmd = tst_test->needs_cmds;

-- 
Mailing list info: https://lists.linux.it/listinfo/ltp

Re: [LTP] lib: tst_test: Clarify the .needs_abi_bit TCONF message

[linuxtestproject.agent]

Hi Cyril,

On Thu Sep 24 11:59:33 2026 +0200, Cyril Hrubis wrote:
> lib: tst_test: Clarify the .needs_abi_bit TCONF message

Verdict - Reviewed

---
Note:

The agent can sometimes produce false positives although often its
findings are genuine. If you find issues with the review, please
comment this email or ignore the suggestions.

Regards,
LTP AI Reviewer

-- 
Mailing list info: https://lists.linux.it/listinfo/ltp

Re: [LTP] [PATCH] lib: tst_test: Clarify the .needs_abi_bit TCONF message

[Petr Vorel]

Hi Cyril,

I dared to merge this simple fix.
Thanks!

Kind regards,
Petr

-- 
Mailing list info: https://lists.linux.it/listinfo/ltp