Linux Test Project
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Xiao Yang <yangx.jy@cn.fujitsu.com>
To: ltp@lists.linux.it
Subject: [LTP] [PATCH] controllers/cpuset_base_ops_testset.sh: Accept either 0 or -EINVAL when passing '0-'
Date: Wed, 30 Sep 2020 20:27:59 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <5F7479CF.4090007@cn.fujitsu.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20200930104709.GC6611@yuki.lan>

On 2020/9/30 18:47, Cyril Hrubis wrote:
> Hi!
>> When we write '0-' to cpuset.cpus/cpuset.mems, new bitmap_parselist()
>> in kernel(e.g. newer than v4.2) treats it as an invalid value and old
>> one treats it as a valid '0':
>> -------------------------------------------
>> on v5.8.0:
>>   # echo 0->  cpuset.cpus
>>   -bash: echo: write error: Invalid argument
>>   # echo 0->  cpuset.mems
>>   -bash: echo: write error: Invalid argument
>>
>> on v4.0.0:
>>   # echo '0-'>cpuset.cpus
>>   # cat cpuset.cpus
>>   0
>>   # echo '0-'>cpuset.mems
>>   # cat cpuset.cpus
>>   0
>> -------------------------------------------
>> Note: commit d9282cb66353b changes the behavior.
>>
>> Drop the check of kernel version and accept either 0 or -EINVAL
>> because the change of behavior can be backported into old kernel.
> Why can't we just simply adjust the kernel check, it looks like the
> commit you mentioned was added to 4.3 so it should be fixed by changing
> the line to:
>
> 	if tst_kvcmp -lt "4.3 RHEL6:2.6.32"; then
>
> We want to at least keep the check for kernels newer than 4.3 just to
> make sure that kernel keeps rejecting the '0-' invalid value.
Hi Cyril,

Thanks for your reply. :-)
1) I still got '0' value instead of -EINVAL on Centos 6.10(2.6.32-754) 
so not sure why we have the wrong kernel check before.
     Perhaps, is there anothe older kernel commit to change the behavior 
as well?
2) I don't think that kernel check is enough because  the change of 
behavior may be backported into old kernel.

How about removing the combination directly as Richard suggested on #695.

Best Regards,
Xiao Yang


-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.linux.it/pipermail/ltp/attachments/20200930/d1be3b57/attachment-0001.htm>

  reply	other threads:[~2020-09-30 12:27 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2020-09-29  2:56 [LTP] [PATCH] controllers/cpuset_base_ops_testset.sh: Accept either 0 or -EINVAL when passing '0-' Xiao Yang
2020-09-30 10:47 ` Cyril Hrubis
2020-09-30 12:27   ` Xiao Yang [this message]
2020-09-30 12:40     ` Cyril Hrubis
2020-09-30 12:58       ` Xiao Yang

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=5F7479CF.4090007@cn.fujitsu.com \
    --to=yangx.jy@cn.fujitsu.com \
    --cc=ltp@lists.linux.it \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox