From: Andrea Cervesato via ltp <ltp@lists.linux.it>
To: "Wei Gao via ltp" <ltp@lists.linux.it>
Cc: ltp@lists.linux.it
Subject: Re: [LTP] [PATCH v9] connect03: New test case for EPROTOTYPE and EACCES errors
Date: Thu, 09 Jul 2026 16:43:06 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <6a4fcf9c.795e137c.249a98.9ebd@mx.google.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260706234000.23719-1-wegao@suse.com>
Hi Wei,
we can remove privileged user needs for this test.
> +static int sys_connect(int sockfd, const struct sockaddr *addr,
> + socklen_t addrlen)
> +{
> + return tst_syscall(__NR_connect, sockfd, addr, addrlen);
> +}
we should probably use connect() here instead of raw syscall.
> +
> +static void setup(void)
> +{
> + sock_un.sun_family = AF_UNIX;
> + strncpy(sock_un.sun_path, SOCK_FILE, sizeof(sock_un.sun_path));
> +
> + fd_unix_server = SAFE_SOCKET(AF_UNIX, SOCK_STREAM, 0);
> + SAFE_BIND(fd_unix_server, (struct sockaddr *)&sock_un, sizeof(sock_un));
> + SAFE_CHMOD(SOCK_FILE, 0700);
> + SAFE_LISTEN(fd_unix_server, 5);
> +
> + fd_unix_dgram = SAFE_SOCKET(AF_UNIX, SOCK_DGRAM, 0);
> + fd_unix_stream = SAFE_SOCKET(AF_UNIX, SOCK_STREAM, 0);
> +
> + pw = SAFE_GETPWNAM("nobody");
we only need this to trigger EACCES, so probably chmod(0500) is enough.
Read below.
> +}
> +
> +static void cleanup(void)
> +{
> + if (fd_unix_dgram != -1)
> + SAFE_CLOSE(fd_unix_dgram);
> + if (fd_unix_stream != -1)
> + SAFE_CLOSE(fd_unix_stream);
> + if (fd_unix_server != -1)
> + SAFE_CLOSE(fd_unix_server);
> +}
> +
> +static void verify_connect(unsigned int i)
> +{
> + struct test_case_t *tc = &tcases[i];
> +
> + if (tc->exp_errno == EACCES) {
> + if (!SAFE_FORK()) {
> + SAFE_SETUID(pw->pw_uid);
> + TST_EXP_FAIL(sys_connect(*tc->fd, (const struct sockaddr *)tc->addr, tc->salen),
> + tc->exp_errno, "%s", tc->desc);
> + exit(0);
> + }
> + tst_reap_children();
> + } else {
> + TST_EXP_FAIL(sys_connect(*tc->fd, (const struct sockaddr *)tc->addr, tc->salen),
> + tc->exp_errno, "%s", tc->desc);
> + }
This can easily become:
SAFE_CHMOD(SOCK_FILE, tc->mode);
TST_EXP_FAIL(connect(*tc->fd, (struct sockaddr *)&sock_un, sizeof(sock_un)),
tc->exp_errno, "%s", tc->desc);
To make it works, we need a mode attribute in the tcase struct:
- 0700 for EPROTOTYPE
- 0500 for EACCES
> +}
> +
> +static struct tst_test test = {
> + .setup = setup,
> + .cleanup = cleanup,
> + .tcnt = ARRAY_SIZE(tcases),
> + .test = verify_connect,
> + .forks_child = 1,
this is not needed anymore.
> + .needs_root = 1,
And root can go away.
> + .needs_tmpdir = 1,
> +};
> --
> 2.54.0
>
>
> --
> Mailing list info: https://lists.linux.it/listinfo/ltp
Regards,
--
Andrea Cervesato
SUSE QE Automation Engineer Linux
andrea.cervesato@suse.com
--
Mailing list info: https://lists.linux.it/listinfo/ltp
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-07-09 16:43 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 34+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-05-14 4:51 [LTP] [PATCH v2 1/2] connect01: Convert to new API Yang Xu via ltp
2024-05-14 4:51 ` [LTP] [PATCH v2 2/2] connect01: Add negative tests Yang Xu via ltp
2024-07-17 12:30 ` [LTP] [PATCH v2 1/2] connect01: Convert to new API Cyril Hrubis
2026-05-25 9:02 ` [LTP] [PATCH v3 0/2] " Wei Gao via ltp
2026-05-25 9:02 ` [LTP] [PATCH v3 1/2] " Wei Gao via ltp
2026-05-25 10:12 ` [LTP] " linuxtestproject.agent
2026-05-28 4:43 ` Wei Gao via ltp
2026-06-04 4:49 ` [LTP] [PATCH v4 0/2] " Wei Gao via ltp
2026-06-04 4:49 ` [LTP] [PATCH v4 1/2] " Wei Gao via ltp
2026-06-04 7:15 ` [LTP] " linuxtestproject.agent
2026-06-16 1:47 ` [LTP] [PATCH v5 0/2] " Wei Gao via ltp
2026-06-16 1:47 ` [LTP] [PATCH v5 1/2] " Wei Gao via ltp
2026-06-16 4:07 ` [LTP] " linuxtestproject.agent
2026-06-16 5:24 ` [LTP] [PATCH v6 0/2] " Wei Gao via ltp
2026-06-16 5:24 ` [LTP] [PATCH v6 1/2] " Wei Gao via ltp
2026-06-16 8:35 ` [LTP] " linuxtestproject.agent
2026-06-16 9:31 ` [LTP] [PATCH v7 0/2] " Wei Gao via ltp
2026-06-16 9:31 ` [LTP] [PATCH v7 1/2] " Wei Gao via ltp
2026-06-16 10:12 ` [LTP] " linuxtestproject.agent
2026-07-01 8:34 ` [LTP] [PATCH v7 1/2] " Petr Vorel
2026-06-16 9:31 ` [LTP] [PATCH v7 2/2] connect01: Add negative tests Wei Gao via ltp
2026-07-01 8:38 ` Petr Vorel
2026-07-06 6:02 ` [LTP] [PATCH v8] connect03: New test case for EPROTOTYPE and EACCES errors Wei Gao via ltp
2026-07-06 8:22 ` [LTP] " linuxtestproject.agent
2026-07-06 23:39 ` [LTP] [PATCH v9] " Wei Gao via ltp
2026-07-07 3:25 ` [LTP] " linuxtestproject.agent
2026-07-09 16:43 ` Andrea Cervesato via ltp [this message]
2026-07-10 5:13 ` [LTP] [PATCH v10] " Wei Gao via ltp
2026-07-10 8:31 ` [LTP] " linuxtestproject.agent
2026-07-13 7:52 ` [LTP] [PATCH v10] " Andrea Cervesato via ltp
2026-06-16 5:24 ` [LTP] [PATCH v6 2/2] connect01: Add negative tests Wei Gao via ltp
2026-06-16 1:47 ` [LTP] [PATCH v5 " Wei Gao via ltp
2026-06-04 4:49 ` [LTP] [PATCH v4 " Wei Gao via ltp
2026-05-25 9:02 ` [LTP] [PATCH v3 " Wei Gao via ltp
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=6a4fcf9c.795e137c.249a98.9ebd@mx.google.com \
--to=ltp@lists.linux.it \
--cc=andrea.cervesato@suse.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox