* [LTP] [PATCH 1/5] acpi_hotplug: Add library file for ACPI based cpu and memory hotplug
2018-08-20 19:49 [LTP] [PATCH 0/5] acpi_hotplug: Add new test for ACPI based cpu and memory hotplug Masayoshi Mizuma
@ 2018-08-20 19:49 ` Masayoshi Mizuma
2018-08-24 16:12 ` Cyril Hrubis
2018-08-20 19:49 ` [LTP] [PATCH 2/5] acpi_hotplug: Add ACPI based cpu and memory hotplug testing Masayoshi Mizuma
` (3 subsequent siblings)
4 siblings, 1 reply; 8+ messages in thread
From: Masayoshi Mizuma @ 2018-08-20 19:49 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: ltp
From: Masayoshi Mizuma <m.mizuma@jp.fujitsu.com>
This file includes some APIs to use ACPI based cpu and memory hotplug.
Signed-off-by: Masayoshi Mizuma <m.mizuma@jp.fujitsu.com>
---
.../hotplug/acpi_hotplug/ACPIHOTPLUG_lib.sh | 310 ++++++++++++++++++
1 file changed, 310 insertions(+)
create mode 100755 testcases/kernel/hotplug/acpi_hotplug/ACPIHOTPLUG_lib.sh
diff --git a/testcases/kernel/hotplug/acpi_hotplug/ACPIHOTPLUG_lib.sh b/testcases/kernel/hotplug/acpi_hotplug/ACPIHOTPLUG_lib.sh
new file mode 100755
index 000000000..8c5dc1d89
--- /dev/null
+++ b/testcases/kernel/hotplug/acpi_hotplug/ACPIHOTPLUG_lib.sh
@@ -0,0 +1,310 @@
+#!/bin/sh
+
+# SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0-or-later
+# Copyright (c) 2018, FUJITSU LIMITED. All rights reserved.
+
+export HOTPLUGABLE_CONTAINER=
+export HOTPLUGABLE_NODES=()
+RETRY=5
+RETRY_TIME=60
+
+# $1: node number
+is_memoryless_node()
+{
+ local node=$1
+
+ numactl -H | awk '
+ /node '$node' size:/ {
+ if ($4 == 0)
+ prine 1
+ else
+ print 0
+ }'
+}
+
+# $1: node number
+is_movable_node()
+{
+ local node=$1
+
+ awk '
+ BEGIN {
+ zone = ""
+ NotMovableFound = 0
+ nextnode = '$node' + 1
+ }
+ /^Node '$node'/{
+ zone = $4
+ }
+ /present/ {
+ if (zone != "") {
+ if ((zone != "Movable") && ($2 != 0)) {
+ NotMovableFound = 1
+ exit
+ }
+ }
+ }
+ match($0, "^Node " nextnode) {
+ exit
+ }
+
+ END {
+ if (NotMovableFound == 0)
+ print 1
+ else
+ print 0
+ }
+ ' /proc/zoneinfo
+}
+
+stop_udev()
+{
+ systemctl stop systemd-udevd-kernel.socket
+ systemctl stop systemd-udevd-control.socket
+ systemctl stop systemd-udevd.service
+}
+
+resume_udev()
+{
+ systemctl start systemd-udevd.service
+ systemctl start systemd-udevd-kernel.socket
+ systemctl start systemd-udevd-control.socket
+}
+
+_setup()
+{
+ local ACPI_CONTAINERS=()
+ local ONLINE_CONTAINERS=()
+ local CPUS=()
+ local tmp_NODES=()
+ local NODES=()
+ local movable_node=
+ local NOHP_NODES=0
+
+ ACPI_CONTAINERS=( $(find /sys/devices/LNXSYSTM\:00/ -name 'ACPI0004:*') )
+
+ ONLINE_CONTAINERS=()
+ for c in ${ACPI_CONTAINERS[@]}; do
+ status=$(cat $c/status)
+ if [[ $status -ne 0 ]]; then
+ ONLINE_CONTAINERS=( ${ONLINE_CONTAINERS[@]} $c )
+ fi
+ done
+
+ if [[ ${#ONLINE_CONTAINERS[@]} -lt 2 ]]; then
+ tst_brk TCONF "The number of online ACPI containers is not enough. 2 or more online ACPI containers are needed, but this system has ${#ONLINE_CONTAINERS[@]} contianers."
+ fi
+
+ for c in ${ONLINE_CONTAINERS[@]}; do
+ CPUS=( $(find $c -name 'ACPI0007:*' ) )
+ tmp_NODES=()
+ NODES=()
+ NOHP_NODES=0
+ for cpu in ${CPUS[@]}; do
+ tmp_NODES=( ${tmp_NODES[@]} $(ls $cpu/physical_node/ 2> /dev/null | grep ^node | sed -e 's/node//') )
+ done
+ NODES=( $(echo ${tmp_NODES[@]} | tr ' ' '\n' | sort | uniq ) )
+
+ # Memory device ID is PNP0C80, however, the memory ID is not used here
+ # but the node ID is used.
+ # The hotplugable memory section has ACPI_SRAT_MEM_HOT_PLUGGABLE flag
+ # and the zone is handled as Movable zone. Following assumes that
+ # the node has only Movable zone or it is memory less node.
+ # So using the node ID gets this test cleared rather than using memory ID.
+ for n in ${NODES[@]}; do
+ if [[ $(is_movable_node $n) -eq 0 ]] && [[ $(is_memoryless_node $n) -eq 0 ]]; then
+ NOHP_NODES=1
+ break
+ fi
+ done
+ if [[ $NOHP_NODES -eq 0 ]]; then
+ HOTPLUGABLE_CONTAINER=$(basename $c)
+ HOTPLUGABLE_NODES=( ${NODES[@]} )
+ break
+ fi
+ done
+
+ # Some hotplug udev rules may disturb for this test.
+ # Let's stop them.
+ stop_udev
+
+ tst_res TINFO "TARGET ACPI CONTANIER: $HOTPLUGABLE_CONTAINER"
+ tst_res TINFO "TARGET NODES: ${HOTPLUGABLE_NODES[@]}"
+}
+
+_cleanup()
+{
+ resume_udev
+}
+
+cpu_hp()
+{
+ local hpop=
+ local CPUS=( $(echo /sys/bus/acpi/devices/$HOTPLUGABLE_CONTAINER/ACPI0007:*/physical_node/online) )
+
+ local hp_cpus=${#CPUS[@]}
+ local current_cpus=$(nproc)
+ local expected_cpus=
+ local ACPI_CPU=
+ local force=0
+ local hotplugedcpus=0
+
+ if [[ $1 == "hotremove" ]]; then
+ hpop=0
+ else
+ hpop=1
+ fi
+ if [[ $2 == "force" ]]; then
+ force=1
+ fi
+
+ if [[ $hpop -eq 0 ]]; then
+ expected_cpus=$(( current_cpus - hp_cpus ))
+ else
+ expected_cpus=$(( current_cpus + hp_cpus ))
+ fi
+
+ for cpu in ${CPUS[@]}; do
+ echo -n $hpop > $cpu 2> /dev/null
+ ACPI_CPU=$( echo $cpu | sed -e 's#/sys/bus/acpi/devices/ACPI0004:[0-9a-f]\+/\(ACPI0007:.*\)/physical_node/online#\1#')
+ if [[ $? -ne 0 ]]; then
+ tst_res TINFO "CPU: $ACPI_CPU $1 failed."
+ if [[ $force -eq 0 ]]; then
+ return 1
+ fi
+ else
+ if [[ $force -ne 0 ]]; then
+ tst_res TINFO "CPU: $ACPI_CPU $1 successed."
+ fi
+ hotplugedcpus=$(( hotplugedcpus + 1 ))
+ fi
+ done
+
+ tst_res TINFO "CPU: current: $(nproc) hotpluged: $hotplugedcpus"
+ if [[ $(nproc) -eq $expected_cpus ]]; then
+ return 0
+ else
+ return 1
+ fi
+}
+
+# $1: node number
+# $2: expected memory size (MB)
+memhp_result()
+{
+ local node=$1
+ local expected=$2
+ local current=
+
+ current=$(numactl -H | awk '
+ /^node '$node' size/ {
+ print $4
+ }
+ ')
+
+ if [[ $current -eq $expected ]]; then
+ echo 1
+ else
+ echo 0
+ fi
+}
+
+memory_hp()
+{
+ local hpop=
+ local memory=()
+ local memhpdone=
+ local expected=
+ local block_size_bytes=$(cat /sys/devices/system/memory/block_size_bytes )
+ block_size_bytes=$(echo "obase=10;ibase=16;$block_size_bytes" | bc)
+ local result=0
+ local force=0
+ local hotplugedsections=
+ local removable=
+
+ declare -A mem_hotpluged
+
+ if [[ $1 == "hotremove" ]]; then
+ hpop="offline"
+ else
+ hpop="online_movable"
+ fi
+ if [[ $2 == "force" ]]; then
+ force=1
+ fi
+
+ for node in ${HOTPLUGABLE_NODES[@]}; do
+ memory=$(ls /sys/devices/system/node/node$node/ | grep memory | sort -n -r)
+ for mem in ${memory[@]}; do
+ if [[ $force -eq 1 ]]; then
+ echo -n $hpop > /sys/devices/system/node/node$node/$mem/state 2> /dev/null
+ mem_hotpluged[$node]=$(( mem_hotpluged[$node] + 1 ))
+ hotplugedsections=$(( hotplugedsections + 1 ))
+ else
+ memhpdone=0
+ for ((i = 1; i <= RETRY; i++)); do
+ echo -n $hpop > /sys/devices/system/node/node$node/$mem/state
+ if [[ $? -eq 0 ]]; then
+ memhpdone=1
+ break
+ else
+ removable=$(cat /sys/devices/system/node/node$node/$mem/removable)
+ if [[ $removable -ne 1 ]]; then
+ tst_res TINFO "memory: Node: $node section: $mem something wrong..."
+ return 1
+ fi
+ tst_res TINFO "memory: Node: $node section: $mem $1 failed ($i times). Retry..."
+ fi
+ sleep $RETRY_TIME
+ done
+ if [[ $memhpdone -eq 0 ]]; then
+ tst_res TINFO "memory: Node: $node section: $mem $1 failed."
+ return 1
+ else
+ tst_res TINFO "memory: Node: $node section: $mem $1 successed."
+ mem_hotpluged[$node]=$(( mem_hotpluged[$node] + 1 ))
+ hotplugedsections=$(( hotplugedsections + 1 ))
+ fi
+ fi
+ done
+ done
+
+ for node in ${HOTPLUGABLE_NODES[@]}; do
+ if [[ $hpop == "offline" ]]; then
+ expected=0
+ else
+ expected=$(echo "${mem_hotpluged[$node]} * $block_size_bytes/1024/1024" | bc)
+ fi
+ if [[ $(memhp_result $node $expected) -ne 1 ]]; then
+ result=$((result + 1))
+ fi
+ tst_res TINFO "Memory: Node: $node $hotplugedsections sections hotpluged."
+ done
+
+ return $result
+}
+
+container_hp()
+{
+ local hpop=
+ local online_ret=0
+
+ if [[ $1 == "hotremove" ]]; then
+ hpop=0
+ else
+ hpop=1
+ fi
+
+ echo $hpop > /sys/bus/acpi/devices/$HOTPLUGABLE_CONTAINER/physical_node/online
+ online_ret=$?
+
+ if [[ $online_ret -ne 0 ]]; then
+ tst_res TINFO "ACPI container: $HOTPLUGABLE_CONTAINER $1 failed."
+ numactl -H
+ return 1
+ else
+ tst_res TINFO "ACPI container: $HOTPLUGABLE_CONTAINER $1 successed."
+ fi
+
+ return 0
+}
--
2.18.0
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread* [LTP] [PATCH 1/5] acpi_hotplug: Add library file for ACPI based cpu and memory hotplug
2018-08-20 19:49 ` [LTP] [PATCH 1/5] acpi_hotplug: Add library file " Masayoshi Mizuma
@ 2018-08-24 16:12 ` Cyril Hrubis
2018-08-24 18:27 ` Masayoshi Mizuma
0 siblings, 1 reply; 8+ messages in thread
From: Cyril Hrubis @ 2018-08-24 16:12 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: ltp
Hi!
> +export HOTPLUGABLE_CONTAINER=
> +export HOTPLUGABLE_NODES=()
Arrays are bashism, the best we can do in portable shell is to emulate
arrays by appending the nodes into a variable and separate them by
spaces.
> +RETRY=5
> +RETRY_TIME=60
> +
> +# $1: node number
> +is_memoryless_node()
> +{
> + local node=$1
> +
> + numactl -H | awk '
> + /node '$node' size:/ {
> + if ($4 == 0)
> + prine 1
^
Typo?
> + else
> + print 0
> + }'
> +}
> +
> +# $1: node number
> +is_movable_node()
> +{
> + local node=$1
> +
> + awk '
> + BEGIN {
> + zone = ""
> + NotMovableFound = 0
> + nextnode = '$node' + 1
> + }
> + /^Node '$node'/{
> + zone = $4
> + }
> + /present/ {
> + if (zone != "") {
> + if ((zone != "Movable") && ($2 != 0)) {
> + NotMovableFound = 1
> + exit
> + }
> + }
> + }
> + match($0, "^Node " nextnode) {
> + exit
> + }
> +
> + END {
> + if (NotMovableFound == 0)
> + print 1
> + else
> + print 0
> + }
> + ' /proc/zoneinfo
This looks far to complex, what exactly are we trying to figure out here?
> +}
> +
> +stop_udev()
> +{
> + systemctl stop systemd-udevd-kernel.socket
> + systemctl stop systemd-udevd-control.socket
> + systemctl stop systemd-udevd.service
> +}
> +
> +resume_udev()
> +{
> + systemctl start systemd-udevd.service
> + systemctl start systemd-udevd-kernel.socket
> + systemctl start systemd-udevd-control.socket
> +}
You should at least check if we are running on systemd based
distribution before you attempt to blindly stop udev with systemctl.
> +_setup()
Why can't we call this lib_setup() or something like that?
> +{
> + local ACPI_CONTAINERS=()
> + local ONLINE_CONTAINERS=()
> + local CPUS=()
> + local tmp_NODES=()
> + local NODES=()
> + local movable_node=
> + local NOHP_NODES=0
Again heavy use of arrays.
> + ACPI_CONTAINERS=( $(find /sys/devices/LNXSYSTM\:00/ -name 'ACPI0004:*') )
I'm a bit confuse here about the ACPI0004:*, what exactly is that? Is
that a numa node or collection of numa nodes or something complete else?
I've tried to boot qemu x86_64 machine with numa emulation turned on but
these files are not present there so I suppose that I cannot really run
this test without specific hardware or ACPI emulation being added to
qemu.
> + ONLINE_CONTAINERS=()
> + for c in ${ACPI_CONTAINERS[@]}; do
> + status=$(cat $c/status)
> + if [[ $status -ne 0 ]]; then
The [[ ]] is bashism, you should really use [ ] instead in the whole
script.
> + ONLINE_CONTAINERS=( ${ONLINE_CONTAINERS[@]} $c )
> + fi
> + done
> +
> + if [[ ${#ONLINE_CONTAINERS[@]} -lt 2 ]]; then
> + tst_brk TCONF "The number of online ACPI containers is not enough. 2 or more online ACPI containers are needed, but this system has ${#ONLINE_CONTAINERS[@]} contianers."
This line is far too long. The result message has to be short and to the
point.
> + fi
> +
> + for c in ${ONLINE_CONTAINERS[@]}; do
> + CPUS=( $(find $c -name 'ACPI0007:*' ) )
> + tmp_NODES=()
> + NODES=()
> + NOHP_NODES=0
> + for cpu in ${CPUS[@]}; do
> + tmp_NODES=( ${tmp_NODES[@]} $(ls $cpu/physical_node/ 2> /dev/null | grep ^node | sed -e 's/node//') )
> + done
> + NODES=( $(echo ${tmp_NODES[@]} | tr ' ' '\n' | sort | uniq ) )
> +
> + # Memory device ID is PNP0C80, however, the memory ID is not used here
> + # but the node ID is used.
> + # The hotplugable memory section has ACPI_SRAT_MEM_HOT_PLUGGABLE flag
> + # and the zone is handled as Movable zone. Following assumes that
> + # the node has only Movable zone or it is memory less node.
> + # So using the node ID gets this test cleared rather than using memory ID.
> + for n in ${NODES[@]}; do
> + if [[ $(is_movable_node $n) -eq 0 ]] && [[ $(is_memoryless_node $n) -eq 0 ]]; then
> + NOHP_NODES=1
> + break
> + fi
> + done
> + if [[ $NOHP_NODES -eq 0 ]]; then
> + HOTPLUGABLE_CONTAINER=$(basename $c)
> + HOTPLUGABLE_NODES=( ${NODES[@]} )
> + break
> + fi
> + done
> +
> + # Some hotplug udev rules may disturb for this test.
> + # Let's stop them.
> + stop_udev
> +
> + tst_res TINFO "TARGET ACPI CONTANIER: $HOTPLUGABLE_CONTAINER"
> + tst_res TINFO "TARGET NODES: ${HOTPLUGABLE_NODES[@]}"
> +}
> +
> +_cleanup()
> +{
> + resume_udev
> +}
> +
> +cpu_hp()
> +{
> + local hpop=
> + local CPUS=( $(echo /sys/bus/acpi/devices/$HOTPLUGABLE_CONTAINER/ACPI0007:*/physical_node/online) )
> +
> + local hp_cpus=${#CPUS[@]}
> + local current_cpus=$(nproc)
> + local expected_cpus=
> + local ACPI_CPU=
> + local force=0
> + local hotplugedcpus=0
> +
> + if [[ $1 == "hotremove" ]]; then
> + hpop=0
> + else
> + hpop=1
> + fi
> + if [[ $2 == "force" ]]; then
> + force=1
> + fi
It does not seem to make any sense to conver the parametes to numbers
just to save a few characters in the ifs below.
> + if [[ $hpop -eq 0 ]]; then
> + expected_cpus=$(( current_cpus - hp_cpus ))
> + else
> + expected_cpus=$(( current_cpus + hp_cpus ))
> + fi
> +
> + for cpu in ${CPUS[@]}; do
> + echo -n $hpop > $cpu 2> /dev/null
> + ACPI_CPU=$( echo $cpu | sed -e 's#/sys/bus/acpi/devices/ACPI0004:[0-9a-f]\+/\(ACPI0007:.*\)/physical_node/online#\1#')
> + if [[ $? -ne 0 ]]; then
> + tst_res TINFO "CPU: $ACPI_CPU $1 failed."
> + if [[ $force -eq 0 ]]; then
> + return 1
> + fi
> + else
> + if [[ $force -ne 0 ]]; then
> + tst_res TINFO "CPU: $ACPI_CPU $1 successed."
> + fi
> + hotplugedcpus=$(( hotplugedcpus + 1 ))
> + fi
> + done
And actually the force parameter should have rather been
"ignore_failure" or something similar.
> + tst_res TINFO "CPU: current: $(nproc) hotpluged: $hotplugedcpus"
> + if [[ $(nproc) -eq $expected_cpus ]]; then
> + return 0
> + else
> + return 1
> + fi
Also why do we return result here instead of doing tst_res TPASS and
tst_res TFAIL directly?
> +}
> +
> +# $1: node number
> +# $2: expected memory size (MB)
> +memhp_result()
> +{
> + local node=$1
> + local expected=$2
> + local current=
> +
> + current=$(numactl -H | awk '
> + /^node '$node' size/ {
> + print $4
> + }
> + ')
> +
> + if [[ $current -eq $expected ]]; then
> + echo 1
> + else
> + echo 0
> + fi
> +}
> +
> +memory_hp()
> +{
> + local hpop=
> + local memory=()
> + local memhpdone=
> + local expected=
> + local block_size_bytes=$(cat /sys/devices/system/memory/block_size_bytes )
> + block_size_bytes=$(echo "obase=10;ibase=16;$block_size_bytes" | bc)
> + local result=0
> + local force=0
> + local hotplugedsections=
> + local removable=
> +
> + declare -A mem_hotpluged
Again heavy use of arrays, also declare is bashism as well.
> + if [[ $1 == "hotremove" ]]; then
> + hpop="offline"
> + else
> + hpop="online_movable"
> + fi
> + if [[ $2 == "force" ]]; then
> + force=1
> + fi
Again why do we convert the parameters? We should have passed the
hotremove and offlineremove in the tests instead of converting it here.
> + for node in ${HOTPLUGABLE_NODES[@]}; do
> + memory=$(ls /sys/devices/system/node/node$node/ | grep memory | sort -n -r)
> + for mem in ${memory[@]}; do
> + if [[ $force -eq 1 ]]; then
> + echo -n $hpop > /sys/devices/system/node/node$node/$mem/state 2> /dev/null
> + mem_hotpluged[$node]=$(( mem_hotpluged[$node] + 1 ))
> + hotplugedsections=$(( hotplugedsections + 1 ))
> + else
> + memhpdone=0
> + for ((i = 1; i <= RETRY; i++)); do
> + echo -n $hpop > /sys/devices/system/node/node$node/$mem/state
> + if [[ $? -eq 0 ]]; then
> + memhpdone=1
> + break
> + else
> + removable=$(cat /sys/devices/system/node/node$node/$mem/removable)
> + if [[ $removable -ne 1 ]]; then
> + tst_res TINFO "memory: Node: $node section: $mem something wrong..."
> + return 1
> + fi
> + tst_res TINFO "memory: Node: $node section: $mem $1 failed ($i times). Retry..."
> + fi
> + sleep $RETRY_TIME
> + done
> + if [[ $memhpdone -eq 0 ]]; then
> + tst_res TINFO "memory: Node: $node section: $mem $1 failed."
> + return 1
> + else
> + tst_res TINFO "memory: Node: $node section: $mem $1 successed."
> + mem_hotpluged[$node]=$(( mem_hotpluged[$node] + 1 ))
> + hotplugedsections=$(( hotplugedsections + 1 ))
> + fi
> + fi
> + done
> + done
> +
> + for node in ${HOTPLUGABLE_NODES[@]}; do
> + if [[ $hpop == "offline" ]]; then
> + expected=0
> + else
> + expected=$(echo "${mem_hotpluged[$node]} * $block_size_bytes/1024/1024" | bc)
> + fi
> + if [[ $(memhp_result $node $expected) -ne 1 ]]; then
> + result=$((result + 1))
> + fi
> + tst_res TINFO "Memory: Node: $node $hotplugedsections sections hotpluged."
> + done
> +
> + return $result
> +}
Does this function have anything to do with an ACPI? It looks to me like
we use just generic sysfs interface for hotplugging the memory.
> +container_hp()
> +{
> + local hpop=
> + local online_ret=0
> +
> + if [[ $1 == "hotremove" ]]; then
> + hpop=0
> + else
> + hpop=1
> + fi
> +
> + echo $hpop > /sys/bus/acpi/devices/$HOTPLUGABLE_CONTAINER/physical_node/online
> + online_ret=$?
> +
> + if [[ $online_ret -ne 0 ]]; then
> + tst_res TINFO "ACPI container: $HOTPLUGABLE_CONTAINER $1 failed."
> + numactl -H
> + return 1
> + else
> + tst_res TINFO "ACPI container: $HOTPLUGABLE_CONTAINER $1 successed."
> + fi
> +
> + return 0
> +}
All in all this code looks quite brittle to me, as we do parse procfs
files and output from numactl which may differ sligtly over different
distributions/kernel versions.
--
Cyril Hrubis
chrubis@suse.cz
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread* [LTP] [PATCH 1/5] acpi_hotplug: Add library file for ACPI based cpu and memory hotplug
2018-08-24 16:12 ` Cyril Hrubis
@ 2018-08-24 18:27 ` Masayoshi Mizuma
0 siblings, 0 replies; 8+ messages in thread
From: Masayoshi Mizuma @ 2018-08-24 18:27 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: ltp
Hi Cyril,
Thank you for your comments!
On 08/24/2018 12:12 PM, Cyril Hrubis wrote:
> Hi!
>> +export HOTPLUGABLE_CONTAINER=
>> +export HOTPLUGABLE_NODES=()
>
> Arrays are bashism, the best we can do in portable shell is to emulate
> arrays by appending the nodes into a variable and separate them by
> spaces.
Got it.
>
>> +RETRY=5
>> +RETRY_TIME=60
>> +
>> +# $1: node number
>> +is_memoryless_node()
>> +{
>> + local node=$1
>> +
>> + numactl -H | awk '
>> + /node '$node' size:/ {
>> + if ($4 == 0)
>> + prine 1
> ^
> Typo?
>> + else
>> + print 0
>> + }'
>> +}
>> +
>> +# $1: node number
>> +is_movable_node()
>> +{
>> + local node=$1
>> +
>> + awk '
>> + BEGIN {
>> + zone = ""
>> + NotMovableFound = 0
>> + nextnode = '$node' + 1
>> + }
>> + /^Node '$node'/{
>> + zone = $4
>> + }
>> + /present/ {
>> + if (zone != "") {
>> + if ((zone != "Movable") && ($2 != 0)) {
>> + NotMovableFound = 1
>> + exit
>> + }
>> + }
>> + }
>> + match($0, "^Node " nextnode) {
>> + exit
>> + }
>> +
>> + END {
>> + if (NotMovableFound == 0)
>> + print 1
>> + else
>> + print 0
>> + }
>> + ' /proc/zoneinfo
>
>
> This looks far to complex, what exactly are we trying to figure out here?
This code checks the node is movable node or not.
I will try to simplify this...
>
>> +}
>> +
>> +stop_udev()
>> +{
>> + systemctl stop systemd-udevd-kernel.socket
>> + systemctl stop systemd-udevd-control.socket
>> + systemctl stop systemd-udevd.service
>> +}
>> +
>> +resume_udev()
>> +{
>> + systemctl start systemd-udevd.service
>> + systemctl start systemd-udevd-kernel.socket
>> + systemctl start systemd-udevd-control.socket
>> +}
>
> You should at least check if we are running on systemd based
> distribution before you attempt to blindly stop udev with systemctl.
Got it.
>
>> +_setup()
>
> Why can't we call this lib_setup() or something like that?
Thanks. I will use lib_setup.
>
>> +{
>> + local ACPI_CONTAINERS=()
>> + local ONLINE_CONTAINERS=()
>> + local CPUS=()
>> + local tmp_NODES=()
>> + local NODES=()
>> + local movable_node=
>> + local NOHP_NODES=0
>
> Again heavy use of arrays.
>
>> + ACPI_CONTAINERS=( $(find /sys/devices/LNXSYSTM\:00/ -name 'ACPI0004:*') )
>
> I'm a bit confuse here about the ACPI0004:*, what exactly is that? Is
> that a numa node or collection of numa nodes or something complete else?
>
> I've tried to boot qemu x86_64 machine with numa emulation turned on but
> these files are not present there so I suppose that I cannot really run
> this test without specific hardware or ACPI emulation being added to
> qemu.
Actually, this test depends on the ACPI environment.
This test is useful for the specific system whose ACPI is implemented
such as the example of '9.12 Module Device; Advanced Configuration
and Power Interface (ACPI) Specification; Version 6.2 Errata A'.
I think the ACPI which qemu emulates isn't implemented such as
the example.
It is better if this test is useful in qemu, too.
So I will try to do so.
>
>> + ONLINE_CONTAINERS=()
>> + for c in ${ACPI_CONTAINERS[@]}; do
>> + status=$(cat $c/status)
>> + if [[ $status -ne 0 ]]; then
>
> The [[ ]] is bashism, you should really use [ ] instead in the whole
> script.
I see.
>
>> + ONLINE_CONTAINERS=( ${ONLINE_CONTAINERS[@]} $c )
>> + fi
>> + done
>> +
>> + if [[ ${#ONLINE_CONTAINERS[@]} -lt 2 ]]; then
>> + tst_brk TCONF "The number of online ACPI containers is not enough. 2 or more online ACPI containers are needed, but this system has ${#ONLINE_CONTAINERS[@]} contianers."
>
> This line is far too long. The result message has to be short and to the
> point.
Got it.
>
>> + fi
>> +
>> + for c in ${ONLINE_CONTAINERS[@]}; do
>> + CPUS=( $(find $c -name 'ACPI0007:*' ) )
>> + tmp_NODES=()
>> + NODES=()
>> + NOHP_NODES=0
>> + for cpu in ${CPUS[@]}; do
>> + tmp_NODES=( ${tmp_NODES[@]} $(ls $cpu/physical_node/ 2> /dev/null | grep ^node | sed -e 's/node//') )
>> + done
>> + NODES=( $(echo ${tmp_NODES[@]} | tr ' ' '\n' | sort | uniq ) )
>> +
>> + # Memory device ID is PNP0C80, however, the memory ID is not used here
>> + # but the node ID is used.
>> + # The hotplugable memory section has ACPI_SRAT_MEM_HOT_PLUGGABLE flag
>> + # and the zone is handled as Movable zone. Following assumes that
>> + # the node has only Movable zone or it is memory less node.
>> + # So using the node ID gets this test cleared rather than using memory ID.
>> + for n in ${NODES[@]}; do
>> + if [[ $(is_movable_node $n) -eq 0 ]] && [[ $(is_memoryless_node $n) -eq 0 ]]; then
>> + NOHP_NODES=1
>> + break
>> + fi
>> + done
>> + if [[ $NOHP_NODES -eq 0 ]]; then
>> + HOTPLUGABLE_CONTAINER=$(basename $c)
>> + HOTPLUGABLE_NODES=( ${NODES[@]} )
>> + break
>> + fi
>> + done
>> +
>> + # Some hotplug udev rules may disturb for this test.
>> + # Let's stop them.
>> + stop_udev
>> +
>> + tst_res TINFO "TARGET ACPI CONTANIER: $HOTPLUGABLE_CONTAINER"
>> + tst_res TINFO "TARGET NODES: ${HOTPLUGABLE_NODES[@]}"
>> +}
>> +
>> +_cleanup()
>> +{
>> + resume_udev
>> +}
>> +
>> +cpu_hp()
>> +{
>> + local hpop=
>> + local CPUS=( $(echo /sys/bus/acpi/devices/$HOTPLUGABLE_CONTAINER/ACPI0007:*/physical_node/online) )
>> +
>> + local hp_cpus=${#CPUS[@]}
>> + local current_cpus=$(nproc)
>> + local expected_cpus=
>> + local ACPI_CPU=
>> + local force=0
>> + local hotplugedcpus=0
>> +
>> + if [[ $1 == "hotremove" ]]; then
>> + hpop=0
>> + else
>> + hpop=1
>> + fi
>> + if [[ $2 == "force" ]]; then
>> + force=1
>> + fi
>
> It does not seem to make any sense to conver the parametes to numbers
> just to save a few characters in the ifs below.
>
>> + if [[ $hpop -eq 0 ]]; then
>> + expected_cpus=$(( current_cpus - hp_cpus ))
>> + else
>> + expected_cpus=$(( current_cpus + hp_cpus ))
>> + fi
>> +
>> + for cpu in ${CPUS[@]}; do
>> + echo -n $hpop > $cpu 2> /dev/null
>> + ACPI_CPU=$( echo $cpu | sed -e 's#/sys/bus/acpi/devices/ACPI0004:[0-9a-f]\+/\(ACPI0007:.*\)/physical_node/online#\1#')
>> + if [[ $? -ne 0 ]]; then
>> + tst_res TINFO "CPU: $ACPI_CPU $1 failed."
>> + if [[ $force -eq 0 ]]; then
>> + return 1
>> + fi
>> + else
>> + if [[ $force -ne 0 ]]; then
>> + tst_res TINFO "CPU: $ACPI_CPU $1 successed."
>> + fi
>> + hotplugedcpus=$(( hotplugedcpus + 1 ))
>> + fi
>> + done
>
> And actually the force parameter should have rather been
> "ignore_failure" or something similar.
>
>> + tst_res TINFO "CPU: current: $(nproc) hotpluged: $hotplugedcpus"
>> + if [[ $(nproc) -eq $expected_cpus ]]; then
>> + return 0
>> + else
>> + return 1
>> + fi
>
> Also why do we return result here instead of doing tst_res TPASS and
> tst_res TFAIL directly?
Thanks. I will use tst_res.
>
>> +}
>> +
>> +# $1: node number
>> +# $2: expected memory size (MB)
>> +memhp_result()
>> +{
>> + local node=$1
>> + local expected=$2
>> + local current=
>> +
>> + current=$(numactl -H | awk '
>> + /^node '$node' size/ {
>> + print $4
>> + }
>> + ')
>> +
>> + if [[ $current -eq $expected ]]; then
>> + echo 1
>> + else
>> + echo 0
>> + fi
>> +}
>> +
>> +memory_hp()
>> +{
>> + local hpop=
>> + local memory=()
>> + local memhpdone=
>> + local expected=
>> + local block_size_bytes=$(cat /sys/devices/system/memory/block_size_bytes )
>> + block_size_bytes=$(echo "obase=10;ibase=16;$block_size_bytes" | bc)
>> + local result=0
>> + local force=0
>> + local hotplugedsections=
>> + local removable=
>> +
>> + declare -A mem_hotpluged
>
> Again heavy use of arrays, also declare is bashism as well.
>
>> + if [[ $1 == "hotremove" ]]; then
>> + hpop="offline"
>> + else
>> + hpop="online_movable"
>> + fi
>> + if [[ $2 == "force" ]]; then
>> + force=1
>> + fi
>
> Again why do we convert the parameters? We should have passed the
> hotremove and offlineremove in the tests instead of converting it here.
>
>> + for node in ${HOTPLUGABLE_NODES[@]}; do
>> + memory=$(ls /sys/devices/system/node/node$node/ | grep memory | sort -n -r)
>> + for mem in ${memory[@]}; do
>> + if [[ $force -eq 1 ]]; then
>> + echo -n $hpop > /sys/devices/system/node/node$node/$mem/state 2> /dev/null
>> + mem_hotpluged[$node]=$(( mem_hotpluged[$node] + 1 ))
>> + hotplugedsections=$(( hotplugedsections + 1 ))
>> + else
>> + memhpdone=0
>> + for ((i = 1; i <= RETRY; i++)); do
>> + echo -n $hpop > /sys/devices/system/node/node$node/$mem/state
>> + if [[ $? -eq 0 ]]; then
>> + memhpdone=1
>> + break
>> + else
>> + removable=$(cat /sys/devices/system/node/node$node/$mem/removable)
>> + if [[ $removable -ne 1 ]]; then
>> + tst_res TINFO "memory: Node: $node section: $mem something wrong..."
>> + return 1
>> + fi
>> + tst_res TINFO "memory: Node: $node section: $mem $1 failed ($i times). Retry..."
>> + fi
>> + sleep $RETRY_TIME
>> + done
>> + if [[ $memhpdone -eq 0 ]]; then
>> + tst_res TINFO "memory: Node: $node section: $mem $1 failed."
>> + return 1
>> + else
>> + tst_res TINFO "memory: Node: $node section: $mem $1 successed."
>> + mem_hotpluged[$node]=$(( mem_hotpluged[$node] + 1 ))
>> + hotplugedsections=$(( hotplugedsections + 1 ))
>> + fi
>> + fi
>> + done
>> + done
>> +
>> + for node in ${HOTPLUGABLE_NODES[@]}; do
>> + if [[ $hpop == "offline" ]]; then
>> + expected=0
>> + else
>> + expected=$(echo "${mem_hotpluged[$node]} * $block_size_bytes/1024/1024" | bc)
>> + fi
>> + if [[ $(memhp_result $node $expected) -ne 1 ]]; then
>> + result=$((result + 1))
>> + fi
>> + tst_res TINFO "Memory: Node: $node $hotplugedsections sections hotpluged."
>> + done
>> +
>> + return $result
>> +}
>
> Does this function have anything to do with an ACPI? It looks to me like
> we use just generic sysfs interface for hotplugging the memory.
The ACPI device ID of memory device is PNP0C80, however the memory hotplug
is operated per memory section, and the node actually. So, above code
uses the sysfs of memory section and node.
It may be better that the relation between PNP0C80 and memory section/node
gets cleared. I will try to modify this.
>
>> +container_hp()
>> +{
>> + local hpop=
>> + local online_ret=0
>> +
>> + if [[ $1 == "hotremove" ]]; then
>> + hpop=0
>> + else
>> + hpop=1
>> + fi
>> +
>> + echo $hpop > /sys/bus/acpi/devices/$HOTPLUGABLE_CONTAINER/physical_node/online
>> + online_ret=$?
>> +
>> + if [[ $online_ret -ne 0 ]]; then
>> + tst_res TINFO "ACPI container: $HOTPLUGABLE_CONTAINER $1 failed."
>> + numactl -H
>> + return 1
>> + else
>> + tst_res TINFO "ACPI container: $HOTPLUGABLE_CONTAINER $1 successed."
>> + fi
>> +
>> + return 0
>> +}
>
> All in all this code looks quite brittle to me, as we do parse procfs
> files and output from numactl which may differ sligtly over different
> distributions/kernel versions.
>
Thank you for your review!
I will fix them up.
Thanks,
Masa
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread
* [LTP] [PATCH 2/5] acpi_hotplug: Add ACPI based cpu and memory hotplug testing
2018-08-20 19:49 [LTP] [PATCH 0/5] acpi_hotplug: Add new test for ACPI based cpu and memory hotplug Masayoshi Mizuma
2018-08-20 19:49 ` [LTP] [PATCH 1/5] acpi_hotplug: Add library file " Masayoshi Mizuma
@ 2018-08-20 19:49 ` Masayoshi Mizuma
2018-08-20 19:49 ` [LTP] [PATCH 3/5] acpi_hotplug: Add ACPIHOTPLUG_01.sh under runtest Masayoshi Mizuma
` (2 subsequent siblings)
4 siblings, 0 replies; 8+ messages in thread
From: Masayoshi Mizuma @ 2018-08-20 19:49 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: ltp
From: Masayoshi Mizuma <m.mizuma@jp.fujitsu.com>
This tests the following ACPI based cpu and memory hotplugs.
1. Memory hot remove
2. CPU hot remove
3. ACPI container device hot remove
4. ACPI container device hot add
5. CPU hot add
6. Memory hot add
Signed-off-by: Masayoshi Mizuma <m.mizuma@jp.fujitsu.com>
---
.../hotplug/acpi_hotplug/ACPIHOTPLUG_01.sh | 92 +++++++++++++++++++
1 file changed, 92 insertions(+)
create mode 100755 testcases/kernel/hotplug/acpi_hotplug/ACPIHOTPLUG_01.sh
diff --git a/testcases/kernel/hotplug/acpi_hotplug/ACPIHOTPLUG_01.sh b/testcases/kernel/hotplug/acpi_hotplug/ACPIHOTPLUG_01.sh
new file mode 100755
index 000000000..e01b9ad79
--- /dev/null
+++ b/testcases/kernel/hotplug/acpi_hotplug/ACPIHOTPLUG_01.sh
@@ -0,0 +1,92 @@
+#!/bin/sh
+
+# SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0-or-later
+# Copyright (c) 2018, FUJITSU LIMITED. All rights reserved.
+
+TST_SETUP=_setup
+TST_CLEANUP=_cleanup
+TST_TESTFUNC=test
+TST_CNT=6
+
+. tst_test.sh
+. ACPIHOTPLUG_lib.sh
+
+test1()
+{
+ if [[ ${#HOTPLUGABLE_NODES[@]} -eq 0 ]]; then
+ tst_brk TCONF "Memory hotplug may be not supported in this system"
+ fi
+ memory_hp "hotremove"
+ if [[ $? -eq 0 ]]; then
+ tst_res TPASS "memory hotremove success"
+ else
+ tst_res TFAIL "memory hotremove failed"
+ fi
+}
+
+test2()
+{
+ if [[ -z $HOTPLUGABLE_CONTAINER ]]; then
+ tst_brk TCONF "CPU hotplug may be not supported in this system"
+ fi
+ cpu_hp "hotremove"
+ if [[ $? -eq 0 ]]; then
+ tst_res TPASS "cpu hotremove success"
+ else
+ tst_res TFAIL "cpu hotremove failed"
+ fi
+}
+
+test3()
+{
+ if [[ -z $HOTPLUGABLE_CONTAINER ]]; then
+ tst_brk TCONF "ACPI container hotplug may be not supported in this system"
+ fi
+ container_hp "hotremove"
+ if [[ $? -eq 0 ]]; then
+ tst_res TPASS "ACPI container hotremove success"
+ else
+ tst_res TFAIL "ACPI container hotremove failed"
+ fi
+}
+
+test4()
+{
+ if [[ -z $HOTPLUGABLE_CONTAINER ]]; then
+ tst_brk TCONF "ACPI container hotplug may be not supported in this system"
+ fi
+ container_hp "hotadd"
+ if [[ $? -eq 0 ]]; then
+ tst_res TPASS "ACPI container hotadd success"
+ else
+ tst_res TFAIL "ACPI container hotadd failed"
+ fi
+}
+
+test5()
+{
+ if [[ -z $HOTPLUGABLE_CONTAINER ]]; then
+ tst_brk TCONF "CPU hotplug may be not supported in this system"
+ fi
+ cpu_hp "hotadd"
+ if [[ $? -eq 0 ]]; then
+ tst_res TPASS "cpu hotadd success"
+ else
+ tst_res TFAIL "cpu hotadd failed"
+ fi
+}
+
+
+test6()
+{
+ if [[ ${#HOTPLUGABLE_NODES[@]} -eq 0 ]]; then
+ tst_brk TCONF "Memory hotplug may be not supported in this system"
+ fi
+ memory_hp "hotadd"
+ if [[ $? -eq 0 ]]; then
+ tst_res TPASS "memory hotadd success"
+ else
+ tst_res TFAIL "memory hotadd failed"
+ fi
+}
+tst_run
--
2.18.0
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread* [LTP] [PATCH 3/5] acpi_hotplug: Add ACPIHOTPLUG_01.sh under runtest
2018-08-20 19:49 [LTP] [PATCH 0/5] acpi_hotplug: Add new test for ACPI based cpu and memory hotplug Masayoshi Mizuma
2018-08-20 19:49 ` [LTP] [PATCH 1/5] acpi_hotplug: Add library file " Masayoshi Mizuma
2018-08-20 19:49 ` [LTP] [PATCH 2/5] acpi_hotplug: Add ACPI based cpu and memory hotplug testing Masayoshi Mizuma
@ 2018-08-20 19:49 ` Masayoshi Mizuma
2018-08-20 19:49 ` [LTP] [PATCH 4/5] acpi_hotplug: Add Makefile Masayoshi Mizuma
2018-08-20 19:49 ` [LTP] [PATCH 5/5] acpi_hotplug: Add README Masayoshi Mizuma
4 siblings, 0 replies; 8+ messages in thread
From: Masayoshi Mizuma @ 2018-08-20 19:49 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: ltp
From: Masayoshi Mizuma <m.mizuma@jp.fujitsu.com>
Add ACPI based hotplug test, ACPIHOTPLUG_01.sh under runtest directory.
Signed-off-by: Masayoshi Mizuma <m.mizuma@jp.fujitsu.com>
---
runtest/acpi_hotplug | 1 +
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)
create mode 100644 runtest/acpi_hotplug
diff --git a/runtest/acpi_hotplug b/runtest/acpi_hotplug
new file mode 100644
index 000000000..9c6ccd3ad
--- /dev/null
+++ b/runtest/acpi_hotplug
@@ -0,0 +1 @@
+ACPIHOTPLUG_01 ACPIHOTPLUG_01.sh
--
2.18.0
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread
* [LTP] [PATCH 4/5] acpi_hotplug: Add Makefile
2018-08-20 19:49 [LTP] [PATCH 0/5] acpi_hotplug: Add new test for ACPI based cpu and memory hotplug Masayoshi Mizuma
` (2 preceding siblings ...)
2018-08-20 19:49 ` [LTP] [PATCH 3/5] acpi_hotplug: Add ACPIHOTPLUG_01.sh under runtest Masayoshi Mizuma
@ 2018-08-20 19:49 ` Masayoshi Mizuma
2018-08-20 19:49 ` [LTP] [PATCH 5/5] acpi_hotplug: Add README Masayoshi Mizuma
4 siblings, 0 replies; 8+ messages in thread
From: Masayoshi Mizuma @ 2018-08-20 19:49 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: ltp
From: Masayoshi Mizuma <m.mizuma@jp.fujitsu.com>
Signed-off-by: Masayoshi Mizuma <m.mizuma@jp.fujitsu.com>
---
.../kernel/hotplug/acpi_hotplug/Makefile | 26 +++++++++++++++++++
1 file changed, 26 insertions(+)
create mode 100644 testcases/kernel/hotplug/acpi_hotplug/Makefile
diff --git a/testcases/kernel/hotplug/acpi_hotplug/Makefile b/testcases/kernel/hotplug/acpi_hotplug/Makefile
new file mode 100644
index 000000000..48c969b22
--- /dev/null
+++ b/testcases/kernel/hotplug/acpi_hotplug/Makefile
@@ -0,0 +1,26 @@
+#
+# ACPI based CPU and Memory hotplug test suite Makefile.
+# Copyright (c) 2018, FUJITSU LIMITED. All rights reserved.
+#
+# This program is free software; you can redistribute it and/or modify
+# it under the terms of the GNU General Public License as published by
+# the Free Software Foundation; either version 2 of the License, or
+# (at your option) any later version.
+#
+# This program is distributed in the hope that it will be useful,
+# but WITHOUT ANY WARRANTY; without even the implied warranty of
+# MERCHANTABILITY or FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. See the
+# GNU General Public License for more details.
+#
+# You should have received a copy of the GNU General Public License along
+# with this program; if not, write to the Free Software Foundation, Inc.,
+# 51 Franklin Street, Fifth Floor, Boston, MA 02110-1301 USA.
+#
+
+top_srcdir ?= ../../../..
+
+include $(top_srcdir)/include/mk/testcases.mk
+
+INSTALL_TARGETS := *.sh
+
+include $(top_srcdir)/include/mk/generic_leaf_target.mk
--
2.18.0
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread* [LTP] [PATCH 5/5] acpi_hotplug: Add README
2018-08-20 19:49 [LTP] [PATCH 0/5] acpi_hotplug: Add new test for ACPI based cpu and memory hotplug Masayoshi Mizuma
` (3 preceding siblings ...)
2018-08-20 19:49 ` [LTP] [PATCH 4/5] acpi_hotplug: Add Makefile Masayoshi Mizuma
@ 2018-08-20 19:49 ` Masayoshi Mizuma
4 siblings, 0 replies; 8+ messages in thread
From: Masayoshi Mizuma @ 2018-08-20 19:49 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: ltp
From: Masayoshi Mizuma <m.mizuma@jp.fujitsu.com>
Signed-off-by: Masayoshi Mizuma <m.mizuma@jp.fujitsu.com>
---
testcases/kernel/hotplug/acpi_hotplug/README | 80 ++++++++++++++++++++
1 file changed, 80 insertions(+)
create mode 100644 testcases/kernel/hotplug/acpi_hotplug/README
diff --git a/testcases/kernel/hotplug/acpi_hotplug/README b/testcases/kernel/hotplug/acpi_hotplug/README
new file mode 100644
index 000000000..cec78e19f
--- /dev/null
+++ b/testcases/kernel/hotplug/acpi_hotplug/README
@@ -0,0 +1,80 @@
+ACPI based CPU and Memory hotplug testing
+=========================================
+
+Assumption
+----------
+* The system has two or more ACPI container devices. The HID is 'ACPI0004'.
+* The CPU (HID: ACPI0007) and memory (HID: PNP0C80) belong to the ACPI
+container device. For example of the structure in sysfs is as follows.
+
+[source]
+--------------
+/sys/devices/LNXSYSTM:00/device:00/ACPI0004:03/
+├── ACPI0007:168
+├── ACPI0007:169
+...
+├── PNP0C80:06
+├── PNP0C80:07
+...
+--------------
+
+* The memory has Hot Pluggable affinity in Memory Affinity Structure, SRAT.
+If the memory has Hot Pluggable affinity, you can see the following 'hotplug'
+keyword in dmesg.
+
+[source]
+--------------
+SRAT: Node 2 PXM 6 [mem 0x180000000000-0x1bffffffffff] hotplug
+SRAT: Node 3 PXM 7 [mem 0x1c0000000000-0x1fffffffffff] hotplug
+--------------
+* The memory is marked as 'Movable' which is available when movable_node
+kernel option is set.
+
+* There are one or more memory node in the container device and the memory
+node has 'Movable zone' only, not mixed the other zones. You can check
+such memory node from /proc/pagetypeinfo or /proc/zoneinfo. The example
+of /proc/pagetypeinfo is as follows.
+
+[source]
+--------------
+Free pages count per migrate type at order 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
+Node 3, zone Movable, type Unmovable 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
+Node 3, zone Movable, type Movable 0 0 1 0 1 1 0 1 1 0 16382
+Node 3, zone Movable, type Reclaimable 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
+Node 3, zone Movable, type HighAtomic 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
+Node 3, zone Movable, type CMA 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
+Node 3, zone Movable, type Isolate 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
+
+Number of blocks type Unmovable Movable Reclaimable HighAtomic CMA Isolate
+Node 3, zone Movable 0 32768 0 0 0 0
+--------------
+
+Test case description
+---------------------
+
+ACPIHOTPLUG_01.sh
+~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
+
+Test1
+^^^^^
+Verifies hot-removing the memory.
+
+Test2
+^^^^^
+Verifies hot-removing the CPU.
+
+Test3
+^^^^^
+Verifies hot-removing the ACPI container device.
+
+Test4
+^^^^^
+Verifies hot-adding the ACPI container device.
+
+Test5
+^^^^^
+Verifies hot-adding the CPU.
+
+Test6
+^^^^^
+Verifies hot-adding the memory.
--
2.18.0
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread