public inbox for ltp@lists.linux.it
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Petr Vorel <pvorel@suse.cz>
To: Akihiko Odaki <akihiko.odaki@daynix.com>
Cc: Yan Vugenfirer <yan@daynix.com>,
	Yuri Benditovich <yuri.benditovich@daynix.com>,
	ltp@lists.linux.it
Subject: Re: [LTP] [PATCH 1/6] ftp/ftp01: Use tst_net.sh
Date: Wed, 26 Oct 2022 22:47:39 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <Y1mc6xRJPJwSv/Oe@pevik> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <5be433f9-a459-883d-53cf-c702f2b8ae5d@daynix.com>

Hi Akihiko,

> Hi,

> Thanks for suggestions, improvements, and merging.

> This test assumes FTP is set up and running and that defeats the purpose of
> netns. It is certainly possible to say the FTP test functionality is covered
> with testcases/network/stress/ftp and this test can be removed, but for now,
> the fixes allows me to execute net.tcp_cmds tests without explicitly
> excluding this.

Thanks a lot for confirming that it works with my additional changes.

IMHO ftp can be tested via, that's actually done in ftp-upload-stress.sh.

Kind regards,
Petr

> Regards,
> Akihiko Odaki

> On 2022/10/24 19:18, Petr Vorel wrote:
> > Hi Akihiko,

> > ...
> > > > I just modified this test because it is annoying to set up rsh just to fix
> > > > this test so I would rather not put more effort for further improvement.
> > > Understand, ack. Thanks for your work!

> > > > Personally I don't object to remove this test either.
> > > The fastest solution is to merge your fixed version.
> > > But there should be even more modifications:
> > > RHOST is obsolete, instead $(tst_ipaddr rhost) should be used.

> > > Therefore we should decide if this smoke test (and other FTP tests in LTP) is
> > > worth effort. If yes, I should force myself to create ftp_lib.sh and migrate
> > > everything to work similar way as ftp-upload-stress.sh.

> > Merged as it's some improvement. I'm not sure if I invest time to FTP in the
> > future, maybe we should really delete it.

> > The only significant change I did was to force running over SSH:
> > with RHOST="${RHOST:-localhost}"

> > In my case only first half of the tests is working (suppose just wrong setup),
> > but on netns everything si broken and you also tested it on SSH I dared to do
> > this change. I documented the proper fix above in case anybody cares.

> > Kind regards,
> > Petr

-- 
Mailing list info: https://lists.linux.it/listinfo/ltp

      reply	other threads:[~2022-10-26 20:48 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2022-10-20 12:07 [LTP] [PATCH 1/6] ftp/ftp01: Use tst_net.sh Akihiko Odaki
2022-10-20 12:07 ` [LTP] [PATCH 2/6] ftp/ftp01: Remove verbose comments Akihiko Odaki
2022-10-20 12:07 ` [LTP] [PATCH 3/6] ftp/ftp01: Remove old-style command substitution Akihiko Odaki
2022-10-20 12:07 ` [LTP] [PATCH 4/6] ftp/ftp01: Remove sleep option Akihiko Odaki
2022-10-20 12:07 ` [LTP] [PATCH 5/6] ftp/ftp01: Make variables local Akihiko Odaki
2022-10-20 12:07 ` [LTP] [PATCH 6/6] ftp/ftp01: Split the test function Akihiko Odaki
2022-10-20 18:40 ` [LTP] [PATCH 1/6] ftp/ftp01: Use tst_net.sh Petr Vorel
2022-10-21  6:22   ` Petr Vorel
2022-10-22  2:49     ` Akihiko Odaki
2022-10-24  9:46       ` Petr Vorel
2022-10-24 10:18         ` Petr Vorel
2022-10-26 19:22           ` Akihiko Odaki
2022-10-26 20:47             ` Petr Vorel [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=Y1mc6xRJPJwSv/Oe@pevik \
    --to=pvorel@suse.cz \
    --cc=akihiko.odaki@daynix.com \
    --cc=ltp@lists.linux.it \
    --cc=yan@daynix.com \
    --cc=yuri.benditovich@daynix.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox