public inbox for ltp@lists.linux.it
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Cyril Hrubis <chrubis@suse.cz>
To: Tarun Sahu <tsahu@linux.ibm.com>
Cc: aneesh.kumar@linux.ibm.com, ltp@lists.linux.it,
	geetika@linux.ibm.com, sbhat@linux.ibm.com,
	vaibhav@linux.ibm.com
Subject: Re: [LTP] [PATCH v3 1/4] Hugetlb: Add new tst_test options for hugeltb test support
Date: Wed, 2 Nov 2022 14:38:00 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <Y2JyuL6bh1BlD4lE@yuki> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20221031192519.x2exs2pfumpxe4zj@tarunpc>

Hi!
> > Is there a good reason for this, why can't we call tst_umount() for
> > hugetlbfs?
> > 
> 
> My reason behind this is, 
> tst_umount doesnt break the test, if umount fails. One of the cause
> of failure can be that test left the mounted fs busy, which is not
> expected.

This does not matter, because the do_cleanup() is called only once at
the end of the test. The test exists once the function does finish
anyways.

-- 
Cyril Hrubis
chrubis@suse.cz

-- 
Mailing list info: https://lists.linux.it/listinfo/ltp

  reply	other threads:[~2022-11-02 13:36 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 16+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2022-10-29  7:13 [LTP] [PATCH v3 0/4] Hugetlb:Migrating the libhugetlbfs tests Tarun Sahu
2022-10-29  7:13 ` [LTP] [PATCH v3 1/4] Hugetlb: Add new tst_test options for hugeltb test support Tarun Sahu
2022-10-31  3:39   ` Li Wang
2022-10-31 11:08     ` Tarun Sahu
2022-10-31 14:49     ` Cyril Hrubis
2022-10-31 14:56     ` Cyril Hrubis
2022-10-31 18:02       ` Tarun Sahu
2022-11-01  2:05       ` Li Wang
2022-10-31 14:47   ` Cyril Hrubis
2022-10-31 19:25     ` Tarun Sahu
2022-11-02 13:38       ` Cyril Hrubis [this message]
2022-10-29  7:13 ` [LTP] [PATCH v3 2/4] Hugetlb: Migrating libhugetlbfs brk_near_huge Tarun Sahu
2022-10-29  7:13 ` [LTP] [PATCH v3 3/4] Hugetlb: Migrating libhugetlbfs chunk-overcommit Tarun Sahu
2022-10-31  7:34   ` Li Wang
2022-10-31 11:19     ` Tarun Sahu
2022-10-29  7:13 ` [LTP] [PATCH v3 4/4] Hugetlb: Migrating libhugetlbfs corrupt-by-cow-opt Tarun Sahu

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=Y2JyuL6bh1BlD4lE@yuki \
    --to=chrubis@suse.cz \
    --cc=aneesh.kumar@linux.ibm.com \
    --cc=geetika@linux.ibm.com \
    --cc=ltp@lists.linux.it \
    --cc=sbhat@linux.ibm.com \
    --cc=tsahu@linux.ibm.com \
    --cc=vaibhav@linux.ibm.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox