From: Petr Vorel <pvorel@suse.cz>
To: ltp@lists.linux.it
Subject: [LTP] [PATCH v3 1/2] lib: Fix kernel module detection on BusyBox
Date: Wed, 20 Jan 2021 20:27:48 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <YAiENOUzMVpDThsk@pevik> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <YAhMCz4j9Q2ltGcJ@yuki.lan>
Hi,
> > modules.dep has format:
> > module:[dependency [another-dependency ...]]
> > e.g.:
> > kernel/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/mce/mce-inject.ko.xz:
> > kernel/arch/x86/crypto/twofish-x86_64.ko.xz: kernel/crypto/twofish_common.ko.xz
> > kernel/arch/x86/crypto/aesni-intel.ko.xz: kernel/crypto/crypto_simd.ko.xz kernel/crypto/cryptd.ko.xz kernel/arch/x86/crypto/glue_helper.ko.xz
> > First reading "%s" reads only first module with ':' separator.
> > Searching without it could find first module which is as dependency (e.g.
> > "/twofish_common.ko.xz" instead of "/twofish-x86_64.ko.xz"). Although that
> > shouldn't be a problem, because it's very unlikely that module dependency is
> > missing. Do you want me to drop sscanf() or put some comment?
> Well it would be probably cleaner to do something as:
> /* Cut dependencies after : */
> if ((sep = strchr(buf, ':')))
> *sep = 0;
> No need to copy the string just because we neet to cut part of it.
+1, thanks!
> > Also man modules.dep(5) warns about using text format as "their format is
> > subject to change in the future". Hopefully we can depend on it. Or should we
> > use binary format?
> That depends on how complicated is to parse the binary format...
I'll have a look.
I was also thinking whether whole thing really works on toolchains which use
BusyBox. BusyBox's depmod implementation does not generate modules.builtin
(it generates only modules.{alias,dep,symbols}, i.e. only few text files, no
binary). But the only distro I know which installs BusyBox depmod/modinfo/modprobe
instead of kmod is Alpine Linux and even this distro clearly generates all
modules.* files for its kernel package with kmod.
It looks to me that kernel supports generating modules.builtin.modinfo
since v5.2-rc1 (898490c010b5 "moduleparam: Save information about built-in
modules in separate file") and kmod used this change in v27 (in 60084cf
"libkmod: Add parser for modules.builtin.modinfo" released a year ago).
Thus built-in modules are impossible to detect on old kernels no matter we use
kmod or our own implementation.
But built-in modules are mostly problem for embedded: we require modules like
btrfs, loop, tun, uinput, ... which are loadable modules on typical linux
distros.
Thus generally using modules.{dep,builtin} seems to me as a good approach for
linux distros including embedded ones and we could also use binary variants.
Other possible improvements:
* last resort effort search in /lib/modules/$(uname -r) or a directory defined
in environment variable (with or without version) - fallback for old android or
some embedded (again - not working for built-in modules)
* environment variable to skip the detection.
Kind regards,
Petr
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2021-01-20 19:27 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2021-01-19 16:03 [LTP] [PATCH v3 0/2] kernel module detection (own implementation) Petr Vorel
2021-01-19 16:03 ` [LTP] [PATCH v3 1/2] lib: Fix kernel module detection on BusyBox Petr Vorel
2021-01-19 19:56 ` Sandeep Patil
2021-01-19 21:48 ` Petr Vorel
2021-01-20 12:16 ` Petr Vorel
2021-01-20 14:14 ` Cyril Hrubis
2021-01-20 15:21 ` Petr Vorel
2021-01-20 15:28 ` Cyril Hrubis
2021-01-20 19:27 ` Petr Vorel [this message]
2021-01-19 16:03 ` [LTP] [PATCH v3 2/2] zram: Fix " Petr Vorel
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=YAiENOUzMVpDThsk@pevik \
--to=pvorel@suse.cz \
--cc=ltp@lists.linux.it \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox