Linux Test Project
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* [LTP] [PATCH v1] kernel/pty06: Skip test when TTY not available
@ 2022-03-11 12:39 Bogdan Lezhepekov
  2022-03-11 15:33 ` Cyril Hrubis
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 4+ messages in thread
From: Bogdan Lezhepekov @ 2022-03-11 12:39 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: ltp

Since TTYs under test are hardcoded, they
might not be available in some systems.

Signed-off-by: Bogdan Lezhepekov <blezhepekov@suse.de>
---
 testcases/kernel/pty/pty06.c | 9 ++++++---
 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)

diff --git a/testcases/kernel/pty/pty06.c b/testcases/kernel/pty/pty06.c
index b621f584f..250c38f6b 100644
--- a/testcases/kernel/pty/pty06.c
+++ b/testcases/kernel/pty/pty06.c
@@ -45,8 +45,6 @@ static struct tst_fzsync_pair fzp;
 
 static void *open_close(void *unused)
 {
-	sprintf(tty_path_b, "/dev/tty%d", test_tty_port);
-
 	while (tst_fzsync_run_b(&fzp)) {
 		tst_fzsync_start_race_b(&fzp);
 		int fd = SAFE_OPEN(tty_path_b, O_RDWR);
@@ -60,7 +58,6 @@ static void *open_close(void *unused)
 
 static void do_test(void)
 {
-	sprintf(tty_path_a, "/dev/tty%d", test_tty_port + 1);
 	int fd = SAFE_OPEN(tty_path_a, O_RDWR);
 
 	tst_fzsync_pair_reset(&fzp, open_close);
@@ -80,6 +77,12 @@ static void do_test(void)
 
 static void setup(void)
 {
+	sprintf(tty_path_a, "/dev/tty%d", test_tty_port + 1);
+	sprintf(tty_path_b, "/dev/tty%d", test_tty_port);
+
+	if (access(tty_path_a, F_OK) != 0 || access(tty_path_b, F_OK) != 0)
+		tst_brk(TCONF, "TTY(s) under test not available in system");
+
 	tst_fzsync_pair_init(&fzp);
 }
 
-- 
2.35.1


-- 
Mailing list info: https://lists.linux.it/listinfo/ltp

^ permalink raw reply related	[flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread

* Re: [LTP] [PATCH v1] kernel/pty06: Skip test when TTY not available
  2022-03-11 12:39 [LTP] [PATCH v1] kernel/pty06: Skip test when TTY not available Bogdan Lezhepekov
@ 2022-03-11 15:33 ` Cyril Hrubis
  2022-04-05  6:49   ` blezhepekov
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 4+ messages in thread
From: Cyril Hrubis @ 2022-03-11 15:33 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Bogdan Lezhepekov; +Cc: ltp

Hi!
> Since TTYs under test are hardcoded, they
> might not be available in some systems.

Is the system you are running the tests on completely without ttys?

> Signed-off-by: Bogdan Lezhepekov <blezhepekov@suse.de>
> ---
>  testcases/kernel/pty/pty06.c | 9 ++++++---
>  1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/testcases/kernel/pty/pty06.c b/testcases/kernel/pty/pty06.c
> index b621f584f..250c38f6b 100644
> --- a/testcases/kernel/pty/pty06.c
> +++ b/testcases/kernel/pty/pty06.c
> @@ -45,8 +45,6 @@ static struct tst_fzsync_pair fzp;
>  
>  static void *open_close(void *unused)
>  {
> -	sprintf(tty_path_b, "/dev/tty%d", test_tty_port);
> -
>  	while (tst_fzsync_run_b(&fzp)) {
>  		tst_fzsync_start_race_b(&fzp);
>  		int fd = SAFE_OPEN(tty_path_b, O_RDWR);
> @@ -60,7 +58,6 @@ static void *open_close(void *unused)
>  
>  static void do_test(void)
>  {
> -	sprintf(tty_path_a, "/dev/tty%d", test_tty_port + 1);
>  	int fd = SAFE_OPEN(tty_path_a, O_RDWR);
>  
>  	tst_fzsync_pair_reset(&fzp, open_close);
> @@ -80,6 +77,12 @@ static void do_test(void)
>  
>  static void setup(void)
>  {
> +	sprintf(tty_path_a, "/dev/tty%d", test_tty_port + 1);
> +	sprintf(tty_path_b, "/dev/tty%d", test_tty_port);
> +
> +	if (access(tty_path_a, F_OK) != 0 || access(tty_path_b, F_OK) != 0)
> +		tst_brk(TCONF, "TTY(s) under test not available in system");

There is no need for the != 0 could be simplified just to:

	if (access(...) || access(...))
		tst_brk(TCONF, ...);

>  	tst_fzsync_pair_init(&fzp);
>  }
>  
> -- 
> 2.35.1
> 
> 
> -- 
> Mailing list info: https://lists.linux.it/listinfo/ltp

-- 
Cyril Hrubis
chrubis@suse.cz

-- 
Mailing list info: https://lists.linux.it/listinfo/ltp

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread

* Re: [LTP] [PATCH v1] kernel/pty06: Skip test when TTY not available
  2022-03-11 15:33 ` Cyril Hrubis
@ 2022-04-05  6:49   ` blezhepekov
  2022-04-11 11:25     ` Richard Palethorpe
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 4+ messages in thread
From: blezhepekov @ 2022-04-05  6:49 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Cyril Hrubis; +Cc: ltp

On 2022-03-11 17:33, Cyril Hrubis wrote:
> Hi!
>> Since TTYs under test are hardcoded, they
>> might not be available in some systems.
> 
> Is the system you are running the tests on completely without ttys?
> 
>> Signed-off-by: Bogdan Lezhepekov <blezhepekov@suse.de>
>> ---
>>  testcases/kernel/pty/pty06.c | 9 ++++++---
>>  1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
>> 
>> diff --git a/testcases/kernel/pty/pty06.c 
>> b/testcases/kernel/pty/pty06.c
>> index b621f584f..250c38f6b 100644
>> --- a/testcases/kernel/pty/pty06.c
>> +++ b/testcases/kernel/pty/pty06.c
>> @@ -45,8 +45,6 @@ static struct tst_fzsync_pair fzp;
>> 
>>  static void *open_close(void *unused)
>>  {
>> -	sprintf(tty_path_b, "/dev/tty%d", test_tty_port);
>> -
>>  	while (tst_fzsync_run_b(&fzp)) {
>>  		tst_fzsync_start_race_b(&fzp);
>>  		int fd = SAFE_OPEN(tty_path_b, O_RDWR);
>> @@ -60,7 +58,6 @@ static void *open_close(void *unused)
>> 
>>  static void do_test(void)
>>  {
>> -	sprintf(tty_path_a, "/dev/tty%d", test_tty_port + 1);
>>  	int fd = SAFE_OPEN(tty_path_a, O_RDWR);
>> 
>>  	tst_fzsync_pair_reset(&fzp, open_close);
>> @@ -80,6 +77,12 @@ static void do_test(void)
>> 
>>  static void setup(void)
>>  {
>> +	sprintf(tty_path_a, "/dev/tty%d", test_tty_port + 1);
>> +	sprintf(tty_path_b, "/dev/tty%d", test_tty_port);
>> +
>> +	if (access(tty_path_a, F_OK) != 0 || access(tty_path_b, F_OK) != 0)
>> +		tst_brk(TCONF, "TTY(s) under test not available in system");
> 
> There is no need for the != 0 could be simplified just to:
> 
> 	if (access(...) || access(...))
> 		tst_brk(TCONF, ...);
> 
>>  	tst_fzsync_pair_init(&fzp);
>>  }
>> 
>> --
>> 2.35.1
>> 
>> 
>> --
>> Mailing list info: https://lists.linux.it/listinfo/ltp

Hi Cyril,

Sorry for the delayed reply. I see the test requires an emulated 
terminal (ttyX), whilst our system supports serial console only (ttySX).

What would be your recommendation, does it make sense to switch to 
ttySX? I wasn't sure about it, so disabling seemed more logical.

Thanks,
Bogdan

-- 
Mailing list info: https://lists.linux.it/listinfo/ltp

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread

* Re: [LTP] [PATCH v1] kernel/pty06: Skip test when TTY not available
  2022-04-05  6:49   ` blezhepekov
@ 2022-04-11 11:25     ` Richard Palethorpe
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 4+ messages in thread
From: Richard Palethorpe @ 2022-04-11 11:25 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: blezhepekov; +Cc: ltp

Hello Bogdan,

blezhepekov <blezhepekov@suse.de> writes:

> On 2022-03-11 17:33, Cyril Hrubis wrote:
>> Hi!
>>> Since TTYs under test are hardcoded, they
>>> might not be available in some systems.
>> Is the system you are running the tests on completely without ttys?
>> 
>>> Signed-off-by: Bogdan Lezhepekov <blezhepekov@suse.de>
>>> ---
>>>  testcases/kernel/pty/pty06.c | 9 ++++++---
>>>  1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
>>> diff --git a/testcases/kernel/pty/pty06.c 
>>> b/testcases/kernel/pty/pty06.c
>>> index b621f584f..250c38f6b 100644
>>> --- a/testcases/kernel/pty/pty06.c
>>> +++ b/testcases/kernel/pty/pty06.c
>>> @@ -45,8 +45,6 @@ static struct tst_fzsync_pair fzp;
>>>  static void *open_close(void *unused)
>>>  {
>>> -	sprintf(tty_path_b, "/dev/tty%d", test_tty_port);
>>> -
>>>  	while (tst_fzsync_run_b(&fzp)) {
>>>  		tst_fzsync_start_race_b(&fzp);
>>>  		int fd = SAFE_OPEN(tty_path_b, O_RDWR);
>>> @@ -60,7 +58,6 @@ static void *open_close(void *unused)
>>>  static void do_test(void)
>>>  {
>>> -	sprintf(tty_path_a, "/dev/tty%d", test_tty_port + 1);
>>>  	int fd = SAFE_OPEN(tty_path_a, O_RDWR);
>>>  	tst_fzsync_pair_reset(&fzp, open_close);
>>> @@ -80,6 +77,12 @@ static void do_test(void)
>>>  static void setup(void)
>>>  {
>>> +	sprintf(tty_path_a, "/dev/tty%d", test_tty_port + 1);
>>> +	sprintf(tty_path_b, "/dev/tty%d", test_tty_port);
>>> +
>>> +	if (access(tty_path_a, F_OK) != 0 || access(tty_path_b, F_OK) != 0)
>>> +		tst_brk(TCONF, "TTY(s) under test not available in system");
>> There is no need for the != 0 could be simplified just to:
>> 	if (access(...) || access(...))
>> 		tst_brk(TCONF, ...);
>> 
>>>  	tst_fzsync_pair_init(&fzp);
>>>  }
>>> --
>>> 2.35.1
>>> 
>>> --
>>> Mailing list info: https://lists.linux.it/listinfo/ltp
>
> Hi Cyril,
>
> Sorry for the delayed reply. I see the test requires an emulated
> terminal (ttyX), whilst our system supports serial console only
> (ttySX).
>
> What would be your recommendation, does it make sense to switch to
> ttySX? I wasn't sure about it, so disabling seemed more logical.

No, I think this only applies to graphical VTs. I'm not sure if it is
possible to create one on a system without real graphics.

Unless someone has an answer to the above, I think it is enough for now
to address Cyril's access comments and post a V2.

>
> Thanks,
> Bogdan


-- 
Thank you,
Richard.

-- 
Mailing list info: https://lists.linux.it/listinfo/ltp

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread

end of thread, other threads:[~2022-04-11 11:53 UTC | newest]

Thread overview: 4+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2022-03-11 12:39 [LTP] [PATCH v1] kernel/pty06: Skip test when TTY not available Bogdan Lezhepekov
2022-03-11 15:33 ` Cyril Hrubis
2022-04-05  6:49   ` blezhepekov
2022-04-11 11:25     ` Richard Palethorpe

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox