Re: [LTP] [PATCH STAGING v2 10/16] fchroot07: test execve blocked by failfs root

[Cyril Hrubis <chrubis@suse.cz>]

Hi!
> Verify that after fchroot() moved the root into failfs, loading a
> binary by absolute path fails with EOPNOTSUPP. The exec runs in a
> grandchild so a wrongly successful exec is still detected through
> the exit code.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Andrea Cervesato <andrea.cervesato@suse.com>
> ---
>  runtest/staging                               |  1 +
>  testcases/kernel/syscalls/fchroot/.gitignore  |  1 +
>  testcases/kernel/syscalls/fchroot/fchroot07.c | 72 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>  3 files changed, 74 insertions(+)
> 
> diff --git a/runtest/staging b/runtest/staging
> index 8b6b1ecd9..b8954bb5a 100644
> --- a/runtest/staging
> +++ b/runtest/staging
> @@ -6,3 +6,4 @@ fchroot03 fchroot03
>  fchroot04 fchroot04
>  fchroot05 fchroot05
>  fchroot06 fchroot06
> +fchroot07 fchroot07
> diff --git a/testcases/kernel/syscalls/fchroot/.gitignore b/testcases/kernel/syscalls/fchroot/.gitignore
> index 12151270a..b68069d9a 100644
> --- a/testcases/kernel/syscalls/fchroot/.gitignore
> +++ b/testcases/kernel/syscalls/fchroot/.gitignore
> @@ -4,3 +4,4 @@ fchroot03
>  fchroot04
>  fchroot05
>  fchroot06
> +fchroot07
> diff --git a/testcases/kernel/syscalls/fchroot/fchroot07.c b/testcases/kernel/syscalls/fchroot/fchroot07.c
> new file mode 100644
> index 000000000..d5ebfc576
> --- /dev/null
> +++ b/testcases/kernel/syscalls/fchroot/fchroot07.c
> @@ -0,0 +1,72 @@
> +// SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0-or-later
> +/*
> + * Copyright (C) 2026 SUSE LLC Andrea Cervesato <andrea.cervesato@suse.com>
> + */
> +
> +/*\
> + * Test that :manpage:`execve(2)` is blocked under the failfs root.
> + *
> + * After :manpage:`fchroot(2)` moved the process root into failfs, loading
> + * a binary by absolute path fails with ``EOPNOTSUPP``.
> + *
> + * Root is required because entering failfs with the ``FD_FAILFS_ROOT``
> + * sentinel requires ``CAP_SYS_CHROOT``.
> + *
> + * The exec runs in a grandchild: a wrongly successful exec would replace
> + * the test image, so the outcome can only be reported when the exec call
> + * returns, and the grandchild exit code tells the parent whether the
> + * image was replaced.
> + */
> +
> +#define _GNU_SOURCE
> +#include <sys/wait.h>
> +#include <unistd.h>
> +#include "tst_test.h"
> +#include "lapi/fcntl.h"
> +#include "lapi/syscalls.h"
> +
> +/* Marker exit code proving the grandchild image was not replaced. */
> +#define EXEC_NOT_REPLACED 42
> +
> +static void check_exec_blocked(void)
> +{
> +	pid_t pid = SAFE_FORK();
> +	int status;
> +
> +	if (!pid) {
> +		TST_EXP_FAIL(execl("/bin/true", "true", NULL), EOPNOTSUPP,
> +			"absolute exec blocked by the failfs root");
> +		exit(EXEC_NOT_REPLACED);
> +	}
> +
> +	SAFE_WAITPID(pid, &status, 0);
> +	if (!WIFEXITED(status) || WEXITSTATUS(status) != EXEC_NOT_REPLACED)
> +		tst_res(TFAIL, "exec replaced the test image");
> +}
> +
> +static void run(void)
> +{
> +	if (SAFE_FORK())
> +		return;
> +
> +	TST_EXP_PASS(tst_syscall(__NR_fchroot, FD_FAILFS_ROOT, 0),
> +		"fchroot() with the FD_FAILFS_ROOT sentinel");
> +
> +	check_exec_blocked();
> +
> +	exit(0);
> +}
> +
> +static void setup(void)
> +{
> +	if (access("/bin/true", X_OK))
> +		tst_brk(TCONF | TERRNO, "/bin/true is not available");

I wonder if it would be better to add a fchroot07_child.c, it could do
just tst_reinit() and tst_res(TFAIL, "child executed") and we can then
drop the WAITPID and WIFEXITED() checks from here...

> +}
> +
> +static struct tst_test test = {
> +	.setup = setup,
> +	.test_all = run,
> +	.needs_root = 1,
> +	.forks_child = 1,
> +};
> 
> -- 
> 2.51.0
> 
> 
> -- 
> Mailing list info: https://lists.linux.it/listinfo/ltp

-- 
Cyril Hrubis
chrubis@suse.cz

-- 
Mailing list info: https://lists.linux.it/listinfo/ltp