* [merged] memcontrol-use-n_memory-instead-n_high_memory.patch removed from -mm tree
@ 2012-12-14 23:28 akpm
0 siblings, 0 replies; only message in thread
From: akpm @ 2012-12-14 23:28 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: laijs, cl, dhillf, linfeng, rientjes, wency, mm-commits
The patch titled
Subject: memcontrol: use N_MEMORY instead N_HIGH_MEMORY
has been removed from the -mm tree. Its filename was
memcontrol-use-n_memory-instead-n_high_memory.patch
This patch was dropped because it was merged into mainline or a subsystem tree
------------------------------------------------------
From: Lai Jiangshan <laijs@cn.fujitsu.com>
Subject: memcontrol: use N_MEMORY instead N_HIGH_MEMORY
N_HIGH_MEMORY stands for the nodes that has normal or high memory.
N_MEMORY stands for the nodes that has any memory.
The code here need to handle with the nodes which have memory, we should
use N_MEMORY instead.
Signed-off-by: Lai Jiangshan <laijs@cn.fujitsu.com>
Signed-off-by: Wen Congyang <wency@cn.fujitsu.com>
Cc: Christoph Lameter <cl@linux.com>
Cc: Hillf Danton <dhillf@gmail.com>
Cc: Lin Feng <linfeng@cn.fujitsu.com>
Cc: David Rientjes <rientjes@google.com>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
---
mm/memcontrol.c | 18 +++++++++---------
mm/page_cgroup.c | 2 +-
2 files changed, 10 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-)
diff -puN mm/memcontrol.c~memcontrol-use-n_memory-instead-n_high_memory mm/memcontrol.c
--- a/mm/memcontrol.c~memcontrol-use-n_memory-instead-n_high_memory
+++ a/mm/memcontrol.c
@@ -800,7 +800,7 @@ static unsigned long mem_cgroup_nr_lru_p
int nid;
u64 total = 0;
- for_each_node_state(nid, N_HIGH_MEMORY)
+ for_each_node_state(nid, N_MEMORY)
total += mem_cgroup_node_nr_lru_pages(memcg, nid, lru_mask);
return total;
}
@@ -1644,9 +1644,9 @@ static void mem_cgroup_may_update_nodema
return;
/* make a nodemask where this memcg uses memory from */
- memcg->scan_nodes = node_states[N_HIGH_MEMORY];
+ memcg->scan_nodes = node_states[N_MEMORY];
- for_each_node_mask(nid, node_states[N_HIGH_MEMORY]) {
+ for_each_node_mask(nid, node_states[N_MEMORY]) {
if (!test_mem_cgroup_node_reclaimable(memcg, nid, false))
node_clear(nid, memcg->scan_nodes);
@@ -1717,7 +1717,7 @@ static bool mem_cgroup_reclaimable(struc
/*
* Check rest of nodes.
*/
- for_each_node_state(nid, N_HIGH_MEMORY) {
+ for_each_node_state(nid, N_MEMORY) {
if (node_isset(nid, memcg->scan_nodes))
continue;
if (test_mem_cgroup_node_reclaimable(memcg, nid, noswap))
@@ -3776,7 +3776,7 @@ static void mem_cgroup_reparent_charges(
lru_add_drain_all();
drain_all_stock_sync(memcg);
mem_cgroup_start_move(memcg);
- for_each_node_state(node, N_HIGH_MEMORY) {
+ for_each_node_state(node, N_MEMORY) {
for (zid = 0; zid < MAX_NR_ZONES; zid++) {
enum lru_list lru;
for_each_lru(lru) {
@@ -4122,7 +4122,7 @@ static int memcg_numa_stat_show(struct c
total_nr = mem_cgroup_nr_lru_pages(memcg, LRU_ALL);
seq_printf(m, "total=%lu", total_nr);
- for_each_node_state(nid, N_HIGH_MEMORY) {
+ for_each_node_state(nid, N_MEMORY) {
node_nr = mem_cgroup_node_nr_lru_pages(memcg, nid, LRU_ALL);
seq_printf(m, " N%d=%lu", nid, node_nr);
}
@@ -4130,7 +4130,7 @@ static int memcg_numa_stat_show(struct c
file_nr = mem_cgroup_nr_lru_pages(memcg, LRU_ALL_FILE);
seq_printf(m, "file=%lu", file_nr);
- for_each_node_state(nid, N_HIGH_MEMORY) {
+ for_each_node_state(nid, N_MEMORY) {
node_nr = mem_cgroup_node_nr_lru_pages(memcg, nid,
LRU_ALL_FILE);
seq_printf(m, " N%d=%lu", nid, node_nr);
@@ -4139,7 +4139,7 @@ static int memcg_numa_stat_show(struct c
anon_nr = mem_cgroup_nr_lru_pages(memcg, LRU_ALL_ANON);
seq_printf(m, "anon=%lu", anon_nr);
- for_each_node_state(nid, N_HIGH_MEMORY) {
+ for_each_node_state(nid, N_MEMORY) {
node_nr = mem_cgroup_node_nr_lru_pages(memcg, nid,
LRU_ALL_ANON);
seq_printf(m, " N%d=%lu", nid, node_nr);
@@ -4148,7 +4148,7 @@ static int memcg_numa_stat_show(struct c
unevictable_nr = mem_cgroup_nr_lru_pages(memcg, BIT(LRU_UNEVICTABLE));
seq_printf(m, "unevictable=%lu", unevictable_nr);
- for_each_node_state(nid, N_HIGH_MEMORY) {
+ for_each_node_state(nid, N_MEMORY) {
node_nr = mem_cgroup_node_nr_lru_pages(memcg, nid,
BIT(LRU_UNEVICTABLE));
seq_printf(m, " N%d=%lu", nid, node_nr);
diff -puN mm/page_cgroup.c~memcontrol-use-n_memory-instead-n_high_memory mm/page_cgroup.c
--- a/mm/page_cgroup.c~memcontrol-use-n_memory-instead-n_high_memory
+++ a/mm/page_cgroup.c
@@ -274,7 +274,7 @@ void __init page_cgroup_init(void)
if (mem_cgroup_disabled())
return;
- for_each_node_state(nid, N_HIGH_MEMORY) {
+ for_each_node_state(nid, N_MEMORY) {
unsigned long start_pfn, end_pfn;
start_pfn = node_start_pfn(nid);
_
Patches currently in -mm which might be from laijs@cn.fujitsu.com are
origin.patch
linux-next.patch
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] only message in thread
only message in thread, other threads:[~2012-12-14 23:28 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: (only message) (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2012-12-14 23:28 [merged] memcontrol-use-n_memory-instead-n_high_memory.patch removed from -mm tree akpm
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox