Re: [PATCH mptcp-next v5 00/16] MPTCP sockmap support

[Geliang Tang <geliang@kernel.org>]

On Mon, 2026-09-14 at 12:58 +0200, Matthieu Baerts wrote:
> 
> 
> On 14/09/2026 11:48, Geliang Tang wrote:
> > Hi Matt,
> > 
> > On Sun, 2026-09-13 at 18:14 +0800, Geliang Tang wrote:
> > > From: Geliang Tang <tanggeliang@kylinos.cn>
> > > 
> > > v5:
> > >  - Patches 1-4 are from "Reduce the differences between TCP and
> > > MPTCP
> > > for TLS usage" set.
> > 
> > I put the four patches from the "Reduce the differences between TCP
> > and
> > MPTCP for TLS usage" series here because this "MPTCP sockmap
> > support"
> > series depends on them. Actually, it doesn't just depend on these
> > four
> > patches - it also appears to depend on "mptcp: remove CB offset
> > field"
> > (see sashiko's comments on patch 9) and "mptcp: implement peek_len
> > for
> > proto_ops" (see sashiko's comments on patch 13).
> > 
> > So this series depends on the entire "Reduce the differences
> > between
> > TCP and MPTCP for TLS usage" series. I could use "Based-on: <...>"
> > to
> > trigger CI based on the dependency, but Sashiko doesn't recognize
> > "Based-on", so it won't be able to apply successfully.
> > 
> > Is there some Sashiko feature that can handle this kind of chained
> > dependency between patchsets?
> 
> Not yet, apparently:
> 
>   https://github.com/sashiko-dev/sashiko/issues/49
> 
> > Or do I need to include all ten patches
> > of the "Reduce the differences between TCP and MPTCP for TLS usage"
> > series in the next version? I'd appreciate your thoughts on this.
> > 
> > Alternatively, let's first do the review of the "Reduce the
> > differences
> > between TCP and MPTCP for TLS usage" series - it's already ready
> > for
> > review - so that both the subsequent "MPTCP KTLS support" series
> > and
> > this "MPTCP sockmap support" series can move forward more easily.
> Probably best to do that. I admit that with all the different series
> and
> revisions, I'm sorry, but I'm a bit lost regarding the priorities.
> What
> should be reviewed first?
> 
> These series?
> 
>  - Reduce the differences between TCP and MPTCP for TLS usage
>  - mptcp: remove CB offset field
>  - mptcp: implement peek_len for proto_ops

Sorry for not being clear. The "Reduce the differences between TCP and
MPTCP for TLS usage" v13 [1] series needs to be reviewed - it includes
patch 3 "mptcp: remove CB offset field" and patch 7 "mptcp: implement
peek_len for proto_ops".

Thanks,
-Geliang

[1]
https://patchwork.kernel.org/project/mptcp/cover/cover.1788245079.git.tanggeliang@kylinos.cn/

> 
> Cheers,
> Matt