From: Chenguang Zhao <chenguang.zhao@linux.dev>
To: Paolo Abeni <pabeni@redhat.com>, mptcp@lists.linux.dev
Cc: Chenguang Zhao <zhaochenguang@kylinos.cn>
Subject: Re: [PATCH export v3 4/4] mptcp: fallback to TCP on MP_FAIL with a single subflow
Date: Thu, 13 Aug 2026 16:50:01 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <17b95ca7-c616-426a-a321-dd6bf62f88dc@linux.dev> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <e9082cf3-6889-44b6-9e81-c2a2a21e8e9f@redhat.com>
在 2026/8/12 18:47, Paolo Abeni 写道:
> On 8/12/26 7:46 AM, Chenguang Zhao wrote:
>> @@ -901,6 +898,12 @@ void mptcp_pm_mp_fail_received(struct sock *sk, u64 fail_seq)
>> subflow->send_mp_fail = 1;
>> subflow->send_infinite_map = 1;
>> tcp_send_ack(sk);
> Slightly unrelated... AFAICS the current code sends the mp_fail reply
> immediatally, and will send the infinite mapping with the later data
> send, if any.
>
> I *think* it will be better to send MP_FAIL and infinite mapping
> together. It should remove a little bit of complexity on the xmit path
> and will be IMHO closer to the RFC specs.
>
> /P
>
To keep both MPTCP options on the same packet, that packet would have
to be sent before FALLBACK_DONE: once fallback is done,
mptcp_established_options() drops MPTCP options unless the skb
already carries an infinite mapping.
tcp_send_ack() builds a plain ACK with no mpext->infinite_map, so it
can include MP_FAIL but not the infinite mapping. The infinite
mapping is filled in later on a data skb in mptcp_sendmsg_frag().
With the current xmit path those two options therefore cannot go out
on the same packet. Sending them together would need a dedicated
transmit helper that builds a skb carrying both, rather than reusing
tcp_send_ack().
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-08-13 8:49 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 17+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-08-12 5:46 [PATCH export v3 0/4] mptcp: fix TCP fallback on single-subflow MP_FAIL Chenguang Zhao
2026-08-12 5:46 ` [PATCH export v3 1/4] mptcp: add MPFailFallback MIB Chenguang Zhao
2026-08-12 5:46 ` [PATCH export v3 2/4] mptcp: reject joins after fallback in mptcp_is_fully_established Chenguang Zhao
2026-08-12 9:45 ` Paolo Abeni
2026-08-12 15:32 ` Matthieu Baerts
2026-08-13 9:32 ` gang.yan
2026-08-13 8:45 ` Chenguang Zhao
2026-08-12 5:46 ` [PATCH export v3 3/4] mptcp: reset subflow on MP_FAIL when OoO queue is non-empty Chenguang Zhao
2026-08-12 6:07 ` sashiko-bot
2026-08-12 10:02 ` Paolo Abeni
2026-08-13 8:45 ` Chenguang Zhao
2026-08-12 5:46 ` [PATCH export v3 4/4] mptcp: fallback to TCP on MP_FAIL with a single subflow Chenguang Zhao
2026-08-12 10:43 ` Paolo Abeni
2026-08-13 8:48 ` Chenguang Zhao
2026-08-12 10:47 ` Paolo Abeni
2026-08-13 8:50 ` Chenguang Zhao [this message]
2026-08-12 6:57 ` [PATCH export v3 0/4] mptcp: fix TCP fallback on single-subflow MP_FAIL MPTCP CI
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=17b95ca7-c616-426a-a321-dd6bf62f88dc@linux.dev \
--to=chenguang.zhao@linux.dev \
--cc=mptcp@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=pabeni@redhat.com \
--cc=zhaochenguang@kylinos.cn \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox