MPTCP Linux Development
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Matthieu Baerts <matttbe@kernel.org>
To: Geliang Tang <geliang@kernel.org>, mptcp@lists.linux.dev
Subject: Re: [PATCH mptcp-next] Squash to "DO-NOT-MERGE: mptcp: improve code coverage for CI"
Date: Mon, 4 Nov 2024 13:07:56 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <21137b33-9b79-403a-8032-6aec174e91f2@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <26b229f0-9b4d-43ca-b06d-0d2ff1271c6c@kernel.org>

On 04/11/2024 12:58, Matthieu Baerts wrote:
> Hi Geliang,
> 
> On 04/11/2024 09:28, Geliang Tang wrote:
>> When our bpf_selftests are re-built, this error occurs:
>>
>>  make[1]: *** No rule to make target 'atomics.lskel.h',
>> 			needed by '.../atomics.test.o'.  Stop.
>>  make[1]: *** Waiting for unfinished jobs....
>>  make[1]: Leaving directory 'tools/testing/selftests/bpf'
>>  make: *** [Makefile:259: install] Error 2
>>  make: Leaving directory 'tools/testing/selftests'
> 
> Ah yes, I already noticed that when checking some stuffs, but I didn't
> investigate. Thank you for having looked at this!
> 
>> In this case, I had to remove the cache directory .virtme and recompile it
>> again. This was very time-consuming.
> 
> You don't need to remove the whole ".virtme" directory, you can remove
> ".virtme/build*" instead, so you still have CCache (from ".virtme/ccache*").
> 
>> A workaround patch for this is found in [1]. I don't know why this patch
>> has not been upstreamed, but it's in BPF CI environment. I think it's
>> necessary to synchronize this modification to MPTCP CI environment as well.
> 
> It looks like another version has been applied in bpf-next, even if it
> is a fix:
> 
>   https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20240916195919.1872371-2-ihor.solodrai@pm.me/
> 
> Do you mind checking it please?

Just in case, their bpf-next/master branch has been rewritten in
between. The last ref I have is:

  fd4a0e67838c ("selftests/bpf: Set vpath in Makefile to search for skels")

> If it works, I can backport it to our tree, and ask BPF maintainers if
> they can add these two patches in 'bpf' (fix) instead, because this
> issue is present in v6.12, but only fixed in next (v6.13).
> 
> Cheers,
> Matt

Cheers,
Matt
-- 
Sponsored by the NGI0 Core fund.


  reply	other threads:[~2024-11-04 12:07 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2024-11-04  8:28 [PATCH mptcp-next] Squash to "DO-NOT-MERGE: mptcp: improve code coverage for CI" Geliang Tang
2024-11-04  9:35 ` MPTCP CI
2024-11-04 11:58 ` Matthieu Baerts
2024-11-04 12:07   ` Matthieu Baerts [this message]
2024-11-05 10:04     ` Geliang Tang
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2024-09-24 16:39 Matthieu Baerts (NGI0)
2024-09-24 16:48 ` Matthieu Baerts
2024-09-24 17:36 ` MPTCP CI
2024-02-16 12:04 Matthieu Baerts (NGI0)
2024-02-16 20:21 ` Mat Martineau
2024-02-19 10:06   ` Matthieu Baerts
2024-02-19 10:35 ` Matthieu Baerts

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=21137b33-9b79-403a-8032-6aec174e91f2@kernel.org \
    --to=matttbe@kernel.org \
    --cc=geliang@kernel.org \
    --cc=mptcp@lists.linux.dev \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox