From: Matthieu Baerts <matttbe@kernel.org>
To: Paolo Abeni <pabeni@redhat.com>,
Kalpan Jani <kalpan.jani@mpiricsoftware.com>,
mptcp <mptcp@lists.linux.dev>
Cc: "shardul.b" <shardul.b@mpiricsoftware.com>,
janak <janak@mpiric.us>, kalpanjani009 <kalpanjani009@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net v3] mptcp: fix stale skb->sk reference on subflow close
Date: Sun, 31 May 2026 16:14:36 +1000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <43d9232a-77f9-4678-85e6-59c93417a334@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <b95faee7-e32b-40ac-8010-eb57948a3fbb@redhat.com>
Hi Paolo,
On 29/05/2026 20:38, Paolo Abeni wrote:
> On 5/27/26 1:31 PM, Matthieu Baerts wrote:
>> Hi Paolo,
>>
>> Thank you for your review!
>>
>> On 27/05/2026 19:40, Paolo Abeni wrote:
>>> On 5/27/26 7:49 AM, Kalpan Jani wrote:
>>>> Gentle ping on this patch sent on 19 May 2026 — I haven't seen any review feedback yet. If anyone has had a chance to look, I'd appreciate comments; otherwise I'm happy to rebase or resend if it slipped through.
>>>
>>> Note that maintainers are under an ever increasing influx of AI
>>> generated contents that make processing incoming patches more
>>> challenging every day.
>>
>> +1
>>
>>> FTR this revision LGTM.
>>
>> Just to be sure, does it mean that Sashiko was wrong?
>>
>> https://sashiko.dev/#/patchset/20260519092243.1242351-1-kalpan.jani%40mpiricsoftware.com
>
> AFAICS, yes: the msk socket is set to TCP_CLOSE status before calling
> mptcp_backlog_purge(): __mptcp_add_backlog() can't add anything to the
> backlog.
Thank you for having checked!
The code then looks good, but it seems the commit message is no longer
correct with the last version (and a Fixes tag is still missing). I sent
a dedicated message for that.
>> If yes, can I convert this "LGTM" as an Acked-by? :)
>
> There is already my Suggested-by: tag, I think the latter would be
> redundant?!?
Personally, I think it is clearer with an extra Acked-by, just to say
that what you had in mind (the suggestion) is what is actually done in
the patch. But if you prefer without, fine by me :)
Cheers,
Matt
--
Sponsored by the NGI0 Core fund.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-05-31 6:14 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-05-19 9:22 [PATCH net v3] mptcp: fix stale skb->sk reference on subflow close Kalpan Jani
2026-05-19 10:34 ` MPTCP CI
2026-05-27 5:49 ` Kalpan Jani
2026-05-27 9:40 ` [PATCH " Paolo Abeni
2026-05-27 11:31 ` Matthieu Baerts
2026-05-29 10:38 ` Paolo Abeni
2026-05-31 6:14 ` Matthieu Baerts [this message]
2026-05-31 6:11 ` Matthieu Baerts
2026-06-10 10:45 ` Kalpan Jani
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=43d9232a-77f9-4678-85e6-59c93417a334@kernel.org \
--to=matttbe@kernel.org \
--cc=janak@mpiric.us \
--cc=kalpan.jani@mpiricsoftware.com \
--cc=kalpanjani009@gmail.com \
--cc=mptcp@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=pabeni@redhat.com \
--cc=shardul.b@mpiricsoftware.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox