[PATCH mptcp-next v6 0/9] refactor mptcp bpf tests

[PATCH mptcp-next v6 0/9] refactor mptcp bpf tests

[Geliang Tang]

From: Geliang Tang <tanggeliang@kylinos.cn>

v6:
- drop patch 1 in v5 and rebased.

v5:
 - drop patch 5 in v4:
  Squash to "selftests/bpf: Add bpf scheduler test" 4 cleanup

v4:
 - add set_nonblock to make BPF tests stable.
 - split 'Squash to "selftests/bpf: Add bpf scheduler test"' into 4 patches.

v3:
 - part 1, bpf schedulers.

v2:
 - add two more helpers, send_single_byte and send_recv_data.

Refactor mptcp bpf tests using newly added macros MPTCP_BASE_TEST,
RUN_MPTCP_TEST and MPTCP_SCHED_TEST macro.

Geliang Tang (9):
  selftests/bpf: Add RUN_MPTCP_TEST macro
  Squash to "selftests/bpf: Add bpf scheduler test" 1 verify
  Squash to "selftests/bpf: Add bpf scheduler test" 2 time
  selftests/bpf: Add MPTCP_SCHED_TEST macro
  Squash to "selftests/bpf: Add bpf_first scheduler & test"
  Squash to "selftests/bpf: Add bpf_bkup scheduler & test"
  Squash to "selftests/bpf: Add bpf_rr scheduler & test"
  Squash to "selftests/bpf: Add bpf_red scheduler & test"
  Squash to "selftests/bpf: Add bpf_burst scheduler & test"

 .../testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/mptcp.c  | 265 +++++-------------
 .../selftests/bpf/progs/mptcp_bpf_bkup.c      |   1 +
 .../selftests/bpf/progs/mptcp_bpf_burst.c     |   1 +
 .../selftests/bpf/progs/mptcp_bpf_first.c     |   1 +
 .../selftests/bpf/progs/mptcp_bpf_red.c       |   1 +
 .../selftests/bpf/progs/mptcp_bpf_rr.c        |   1 +
 6 files changed, 77 insertions(+), 193 deletions(-)

-- 
2.40.1

[PATCH mptcp-next v6 1/9] selftests/bpf: Add RUN_MPTCP_TEST macro

[Geliang Tang]

From: Geliang Tang <tanggeliang@kylinos.cn>

Each MPTCP subtest tests test__start_subtest(suffix), then invokes
test_suffix(). It makes sense to add a new macro RUN_MPTCP_TEST to
simpolify the code.

Signed-off-by: Geliang Tang <tanggeliang@kylinos.cn>
---
 tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/mptcp.c | 12 ++++++++----
 1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)

diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/mptcp.c b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/mptcp.c
index cbdb15922949..c29c81239603 100644
--- a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/mptcp.c
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/mptcp.c
@@ -653,12 +653,16 @@ static void test_burst(void)
 	mptcp_bpf_burst__destroy(burst_skel);
 }
 
+#define RUN_MPTCP_TEST(suffix)					\
+do {								\
+	if (test__start_subtest(#suffix))			\
+		test_##suffix();				\
+} while (0)
+
 void test_mptcp(void)
 {
-	if (test__start_subtest("base"))
-		test_base();
-	if (test__start_subtest("mptcpify"))
-		test_mptcpify();
+	RUN_MPTCP_TEST(base);
+	RUN_MPTCP_TEST(mptcpify);
 	if (test__start_subtest("default"))
 		test_default();
 	if (test__start_subtest("first"))
-- 
2.40.1

[PATCH mptcp-next v6 2/9] Squash to "selftests/bpf: Add bpf scheduler test" 1 verify

[Geliang Tang]

From: Geliang Tang <tanggeliang@kylinos.cn>

Add send_data_and_verify helper.

Signed-off-by: Geliang Tang <tanggeliang@kylinos.cn>
---
 .../testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/mptcp.c  | 40 ++++++++++++++-----
 1 file changed, 30 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-)

diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/mptcp.c b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/mptcp.c
index c29c81239603..e1114745da63 100644
--- a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/mptcp.c
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/mptcp.c
@@ -457,23 +457,44 @@ static int has_bytes_sent(char *addr)
 	return system(cmd);
 }
 
-static void test_default(void)
+static void send_data_and_verify(char *msg, int addr1, int addr2)
 {
 	int server_fd, client_fd;
-	struct nstoken *nstoken;
 
-	nstoken = sched_init("subflow", "default");
-	if (!ASSERT_OK_PTR(nstoken, "sched_init:default"))
-		goto fail;
 	server_fd = start_mptcp_server(AF_INET, ADDR_1, PORT_1, 0);
+	if (!ASSERT_NEQ(server_fd, -1, "start_mptcp_server"))
+		return;
+
 	client_fd = connect_to_fd(server_fd, 0);
+	if (!ASSERT_NEQ(client_fd, -1, "connect_to_fd"))
+		goto close_server;
 
-	send_data(server_fd, client_fd, "default");
-	ASSERT_OK(has_bytes_sent(ADDR_1), "has_bytes_sent addr_1");
-	ASSERT_OK(has_bytes_sent(ADDR_2), "has_bytes_sent addr_2");
+	send_data(server_fd, client_fd, msg);
+
+	if (addr1)
+		ASSERT_OK(has_bytes_sent(ADDR_1), "Should have bytes_sent on addr1");
+	else
+		ASSERT_GT(has_bytes_sent(ADDR_1), 0, "Shouldn't have bytes_sent on addr1");
+	if (addr2)
+		ASSERT_OK(has_bytes_sent(ADDR_2), "Should have bytes_sent on addr2");
+	else
+		ASSERT_GT(has_bytes_sent(ADDR_2), 0, "Shouldn't have bytes_sent on addr2");
 
 	close(client_fd);
+close_server:
 	close(server_fd);
+}
+
+static void test_default(void)
+{
+	struct nstoken *nstoken;
+
+	nstoken = sched_init("subflow", "default");
+	if (!ASSERT_OK_PTR(nstoken, "sched_init:default"))
+		goto fail;
+
+	send_data_and_verify("default", 1, 1);
+
 fail:
 	cleanup_netns(nstoken);
 }
@@ -663,8 +684,7 @@ void test_mptcp(void)
 {
 	RUN_MPTCP_TEST(base);
 	RUN_MPTCP_TEST(mptcpify);
-	if (test__start_subtest("default"))
-		test_default();
+	RUN_MPTCP_TEST(default);
 	if (test__start_subtest("first"))
 		test_first();
 	if (test__start_subtest("bkup"))
-- 
2.40.1

Re: [PATCH mptcp-next v6 2/9] Squash to "selftests/bpf: Add bpf scheduler test" 1 verify

[Matthieu Baerts]

Hi Geliang,

On 04/04/2024 15:03, Geliang Tang wrote:
> From: Geliang Tang <tanggeliang@kylinos.cn>
> 
> Add send_data_and_verify helper.

Please always add the reason, even if it is just a "to avoid duplicated
code".
> 
> Signed-off-by: Geliang Tang <tanggeliang@kylinos.cn>
> ---
>  .../testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/mptcp.c  | 40 ++++++++++++++-----
>  1 file changed, 30 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/mptcp.c b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/mptcp.c
> index c29c81239603..e1114745da63 100644
> --- a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/mptcp.c
> +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/mptcp.c
> @@ -457,23 +457,44 @@ static int has_bytes_sent(char *addr)
>  	return system(cmd);
>  }
>  
> -static void test_default(void)
> +static void send_data_and_verify(char *msg, int addr1, int addr2)
>  {
>  	int server_fd, client_fd;
> -	struct nstoken *nstoken;
>  
> -	nstoken = sched_init("subflow", "default");
> -	if (!ASSERT_OK_PTR(nstoken, "sched_init:default"))
> -		goto fail;
>  	server_fd = start_mptcp_server(AF_INET, ADDR_1, PORT_1, 0);
> +	if (!ASSERT_NEQ(server_fd, -1, "start_mptcp_server"))
> +		return;
> +
>  	client_fd = connect_to_fd(server_fd, 0);
> +	if (!ASSERT_NEQ(client_fd, -1, "connect_to_fd"))
> +		goto close_server;
>  
> -	send_data(server_fd, client_fd, "default");
> -	ASSERT_OK(has_bytes_sent(ADDR_1), "has_bytes_sent addr_1");
> -	ASSERT_OK(has_bytes_sent(ADDR_2), "has_bytes_sent addr_2");
> +	send_data(server_fd, client_fd, msg);
> +
> +	if (addr1)

Maybe clearer to use booleans if you use addr1 and addr2 as such, no?

> +		ASSERT_OK(has_bytes_sent(ADDR_1), "Should have bytes_sent on addr1");
> +	else
> +		ASSERT_GT(has_bytes_sent(ADDR_1), 0, "Shouldn't have bytes_sent on addr1");
> +	if (addr2)
> +		ASSERT_OK(has_bytes_sent(ADDR_2), "Should have bytes_sent on addr2");
> +	else
> +		ASSERT_GT(has_bytes_sent(ADDR_2), 0, "Shouldn't have bytes_sent on addr2");

In case of error, will we directly understand from which scheduler the
error is linked to? I understood that some BPF tests can be run in
parallel, maybe we need a prefix to know which tests had an issue? Or
maybe the prefix is not needed because these schedulers tests are
executed in sequence and we print which one is being executed?

In other words, what do you see if on purpose you create an error by
inverting 'addr2' value for example in only one sched test, and you
launch the tests with 'test_progs -j'?

>  
>  	close(client_fd);
> +close_server:
>  	close(server_fd);
> +}
> +
> +static void test_default(void)
> +{
> +	struct nstoken *nstoken;
> +
> +	nstoken = sched_init("subflow", "default");
> +	if (!ASSERT_OK_PTR(nstoken, "sched_init:default"))
> +		goto fail;
> +
> +	send_data_and_verify("default", 1, 1);


It is good to have such helper to reduce duplicated code, but having:

  1, 1

is really not clear, no?

Maybe clearer (especially later if you use this a lot), to use macros?
e.g. to have:

  send_data_and_verify("default", USE_ADDR1, NO_ADDR2);

or

  send_data_and_verify("default", WITH_DATA, WITHOUT_DATA);

(we might understand one is for addr1 and the other for addr2)

WDYT? I don't know if it is clearer.

> +
>  fail:
>  	cleanup_netns(nstoken);
>  }
> @@ -663,8 +684,7 @@ void test_mptcp(void)
>  {
>  	RUN_MPTCP_TEST(base);
>  	RUN_MPTCP_TEST(mptcpify);
> -	if (test__start_subtest("default"))
> -		test_default();
> +	RUN_MPTCP_TEST(default);
>  	if (test__start_subtest("first"))
>  		test_first();
>  	if (test__start_subtest("bkup"))

Cheers,
Matt
-- 
Sponsored by the NGI0 Core fund.

[PATCH mptcp-next v6 3/9] Squash to "selftests/bpf: Add bpf scheduler test" 2 time

[Geliang Tang]

From: Geliang Tang <tanggeliang@kylinos.cn>

Move time related code into send_data_and_verify.

Signed-off-by: Geliang Tang <tanggeliang@kylinos.cn>
---
 .../testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/mptcp.c  | 23 +++++++++----------
 1 file changed, 11 insertions(+), 12 deletions(-)

diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/mptcp.c b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/mptcp.c
index e1114745da63..ffcd5ebe38b9 100644
--- a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/mptcp.c
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/mptcp.c
@@ -5,7 +5,6 @@
 #include <linux/const.h>
 #include <netinet/in.h>
 #include <test_progs.h>
-#include <time.h>
 #include "cgroup_helpers.h"
 #include "network_helpers.h"
 #include "mptcp_sock.skel.h"
@@ -380,16 +379,12 @@ static void *server(void *arg)
 static void send_data(int lfd, int fd, char *msg)
 {
 	ssize_t nr_recv = 0, bytes = 0;
-	struct timespec start, end;
-	unsigned int delta_ms;
 	pthread_t srv_thread;
 	void *thread_ret;
 	char batch[1500];
 	int err;
 
 	WRITE_ONCE(stop, 0);
-	if (clock_gettime(CLOCK_MONOTONIC, &start) < 0)
-		return;
 
 	err = pthread_create(&srv_thread, NULL, server, (void *)(long)lfd);
 	if (CHECK(err != 0, "pthread_create", "err:%d errno:%d\n", err, errno))
@@ -406,16 +401,9 @@ static void send_data(int lfd, int fd, char *msg)
 		bytes += nr_recv;
 	}
 
-	if (clock_gettime(CLOCK_MONOTONIC, &end) < 0)
-		return;
-
-	delta_ms = (end.tv_sec - start.tv_sec) * 1000 + (end.tv_nsec - start.tv_nsec) / 1000000;
-
 	CHECK(bytes != total_bytes, "recv", "%zd != %u nr_recv:%zd errno:%d\n",
 	      bytes, total_bytes, nr_recv, errno);
 
-	printf("%s: %u ms\n", msg, delta_ms);
-
 	WRITE_ONCE(stop, 1);
 
 	pthread_join(srv_thread, &thread_ret);
@@ -459,7 +447,9 @@ static int has_bytes_sent(char *addr)
 
 static void send_data_and_verify(char *msg, int addr1, int addr2)
 {
+	struct timespec start, end;
 	int server_fd, client_fd;
+	unsigned int delta_ms;
 
 	server_fd = start_mptcp_server(AF_INET, ADDR_1, PORT_1, 0);
 	if (!ASSERT_NEQ(server_fd, -1, "start_mptcp_server"))
@@ -469,8 +459,17 @@ static void send_data_and_verify(char *msg, int addr1, int addr2)
 	if (!ASSERT_NEQ(client_fd, -1, "connect_to_fd"))
 		goto close_server;
 
+	if (clock_gettime(CLOCK_MONOTONIC, &start) < 0)
+		goto close_server;
+
 	send_data(server_fd, client_fd, msg);
 
+	if (clock_gettime(CLOCK_MONOTONIC, &end) < 0)
+		goto close_server;
+
+	delta_ms = (end.tv_sec - start.tv_sec) * 1000 + (end.tv_nsec - start.tv_nsec) / 1000000;
+	printf("%s: %u ms\n", msg, delta_ms);
+
 	if (addr1)
 		ASSERT_OK(has_bytes_sent(ADDR_1), "Should have bytes_sent on addr1");
 	else
-- 
2.40.1

Re: [PATCH mptcp-next v6 3/9] Squash to "selftests/bpf: Add bpf scheduler test" 2 time

[Matthieu Baerts]

Hi Geliang,

On 04/04/2024 15:03, Geliang Tang wrote:
> From: Geliang Tang <tanggeliang@kylinos.cn>
> 
> Move time related code into send_data_and_verify.

Please explain the reason. Now the time will be taken after having
waited for the server to stop, the info is then different. It might be
OK to do that, but then please explain.

(always add the reason why we need a patch, not just what you did)

Cheers,
Matt
-- 
Sponsored by the NGI0 Core fund.

[PATCH mptcp-next v6 4/9] selftests/bpf: Add MPTCP_SCHED_TEST macro

[Geliang Tang]

From: Geliang Tang <tanggeliang@kylinos.cn>

This patch defines MPTCP_SCHED_TEST macro, a template for all scheduler
tests. Every scheduler is identified by argument name, and use sysctl
to set net.mptcp.scheduler as "bpf_name" to use this sched. Add two
veth net devices to simulate the multiple addresses case. Use 'ip mptcp
endpoint' command to add the new endpoint ADDR2 to PM netlink. Arguments
addr1/add2 means whether the data has been sent on the first/second subflow
or not. Send data and check bytes_sent of 'ss' output after it using
send_data_and_verify().

Signed-off-by: Geliang Tang <tanggeliang@kylinos.cn>
---
 .../testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/mptcp.c  | 30 +++++++++++++++++++
 1 file changed, 30 insertions(+)

diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/mptcp.c b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/mptcp.c
index ffcd5ebe38b9..8a6b09a97698 100644
--- a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/mptcp.c
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/mptcp.c
@@ -498,6 +498,36 @@ static void test_default(void)
 	cleanup_netns(nstoken);
 }
 
+#define MPTCP_SCHED_TEST(name, addr1, addr2)			\
+static void test_##name(void)					\
+{								\
+	struct mptcp_bpf_##name *skel;				\
+	struct nstoken *nstoken;				\
+	struct bpf_link *link;					\
+	struct bpf_map *map;					\
+								\
+	skel = mptcp_bpf_##name##__open_and_load();		\
+	if (!ASSERT_OK_PTR(skel, "open_and_load " #name))	\
+		return;						\
+								\
+	map = bpf_object__find_map_by_name(skel->obj, #name);	\
+	link = bpf_map__attach_struct_ops(map);			\
+	if (!ASSERT_OK_PTR(link, "attach_struct_ops " #name))	\
+		goto skel_destroy;				\
+								\
+	nstoken = sched_init("subflow", "bpf_" #name);		\
+	if (!ASSERT_OK_PTR(nstoken, "sched_init " #name))	\
+		goto link_destroy;				\
+								\
+	send_data_and_verify(#name, atoi(#addr1), atoi(#addr2));\
+								\
+	cleanup_netns(nstoken);					\
+link_destroy:							\
+	bpf_link__destroy(link);				\
+skel_destroy:							\
+	mptcp_bpf_##name##__destroy(skel);			\
+}
+
 static void test_first(void)
 {
 	struct mptcp_bpf_first *first_skel;
-- 
2.40.1

Re: [PATCH mptcp-next v6 4/9] selftests/bpf: Add MPTCP_SCHED_TEST macro

[Matthieu Baerts]

Hi Geliang,

On 04/04/2024 15:03, Geliang Tang wrote:
> From: Geliang Tang <tanggeliang@kylinos.cn>
> 
> This patch defines MPTCP_SCHED_TEST macro, a template for all scheduler
> tests. Every scheduler is identified by argument name, and use sysctl
> to set net.mptcp.scheduler as "bpf_name" to use this sched. Add two
> veth net devices to simulate the multiple addresses case. Use 'ip mptcp
> endpoint' command to add the new endpoint ADDR2 to PM netlink. Arguments
> addr1/add2 means whether the data has been sent on the first/second subflow
> or not. Send data and check bytes_sent of 'ss' output after it using
> send_data_and_verify().

Should we not squash this in "selftests/bpf: Add bpf scheduler test" as
well? We already have a lot of different commits.

> 
> Signed-off-by: Geliang Tang <tanggeliang@kylinos.cn>
> ---
>  .../testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/mptcp.c  | 30 +++++++++++++++++++
>  1 file changed, 30 insertions(+)
> 
> diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/mptcp.c b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/mptcp.c
> index ffcd5ebe38b9..8a6b09a97698 100644
> --- a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/mptcp.c
> +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/mptcp.c
> @@ -498,6 +498,36 @@ static void test_default(void)
>  	cleanup_netns(nstoken);
>  }
>  
> +#define MPTCP_SCHED_TEST(name, addr1, addr2)			\
> +static void test_##name(void)					\
> +{								\
> +	struct mptcp_bpf_##name *skel;				\
> +	struct nstoken *nstoken;				\
> +	struct bpf_link *link;					\
> +	struct bpf_map *map;					\
> +								\
> +	skel = mptcp_bpf_##name##__open_and_load();		\
> +	if (!ASSERT_OK_PTR(skel, "open_and_load " #name))	\
> +		return;						\
> +								\
> +	map = bpf_object__find_map_by_name(skel->obj, #name);	\
> +	link = bpf_map__attach_struct_ops(map);			\
> +	if (!ASSERT_OK_PTR(link, "attach_struct_ops " #name))	\
> +		goto skel_destroy;				\
> +								\
> +	nstoken = sched_init("subflow", "bpf_" #name);		\
> +	if (!ASSERT_OK_PTR(nstoken, "sched_init " #name))	\
> +		goto link_destroy;				\
> +								\
> +	send_data_and_verify(#name, atoi(#addr1), atoi(#addr2));\

Can you not use the values of addr1 and addr2 directly as number instead
of string + atoi()?

> +								\
> +	cleanup_netns(nstoken);					\
> +link_destroy:							\
> +	bpf_link__destroy(link);				\
> +skel_destroy:							\
> +	mptcp_bpf_##name##__destroy(skel);			\
> +}

I don't mind having functions defined in macros, but I think we should
try to reduce their size to the minimum (if possible) because they are
hard to read and debug in case of error.

Here, do you think we could have a smaller macro passing the name as a
string (for the error messages) and the different functions pointers you
need to a new helper? (+ using generic skel structure?)

Maybe it will not work or will not be easier to read, but worth a try I
think. If it is not possible, please explain why.


> +
>  static void test_first(void)
>  {
>  	struct mptcp_bpf_first *first_skel;

Cheers,
Matt
-- 
Sponsored by the NGI0 Core fund.

Re: [PATCH mptcp-next v6 4/9] selftests/bpf: Add MPTCP_SCHED_TEST macro

[Geliang Tang]

Hi Matt,

On Thu, 2024-04-04 at 19:52 +0200, Matthieu Baerts wrote:
> Hi Geliang,
> 
> On 04/04/2024 15:03, Geliang Tang wrote:
> > From: Geliang Tang <tanggeliang@kylinos.cn>
> > 
> > This patch defines MPTCP_SCHED_TEST macro, a template for all
> > scheduler
> > tests. Every scheduler is identified by argument name, and use
> > sysctl
> > to set net.mptcp.scheduler as "bpf_name" to use this sched. Add two
> > veth net devices to simulate the multiple addresses case. Use 'ip
> > mptcp
> > endpoint' command to add the new endpoint ADDR2 to PM netlink.
> > Arguments
> > addr1/add2 means whether the data has been sent on the first/second
> > subflow
> > or not. Send data and check bytes_sent of 'ss' output after it
> > using
> > send_data_and_verify().
> 
> Should we not squash this in "selftests/bpf: Add bpf scheduler test"
> as
> well? We already have a lot of different commits.
> 
> > 
> > Signed-off-by: Geliang Tang <tanggeliang@kylinos.cn>
> > ---
> >  .../testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/mptcp.c  | 30
> > +++++++++++++++++++
> >  1 file changed, 30 insertions(+)
> > 
> > diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/mptcp.c
> > b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/mptcp.c
> > index ffcd5ebe38b9..8a6b09a97698 100644
> > --- a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/mptcp.c
> > +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/mptcp.c
> > @@ -498,6 +498,36 @@ static void test_default(void)
> >  	cleanup_netns(nstoken);
> >  }
> >  
> > +#define MPTCP_SCHED_TEST(name, addr1, addr2)			\
> > +static void test_##name(void)					\
> > +{								\
> > +	struct mptcp_bpf_##name *skel;				\
> > +	struct nstoken *nstoken;				\
> > +	struct bpf_link *link;					\
> > +	struct bpf_map *map;					\
> > +								\
> > +	skel = mptcp_bpf_##name##__open_and_load();		\
> > +	if (!ASSERT_OK_PTR(skel, "open_and_load " #name))	\
> > +		return;					
> > 	\
> > +								\
> > +	map = bpf_object__find_map_by_name(skel->obj, #name);	\
> > +	link =
> > bpf_map__attach_struct_ops(map);			\
> > +	if (!ASSERT_OK_PTR(link, "attach_struct_ops " #name))	\
> > +		goto skel_destroy;				\
> > +								\
> > +	nstoken = sched_init("subflow", "bpf_" #name);		\
> > +	if (!ASSERT_OK_PTR(nstoken, "sched_init " #name))	\
> > +		goto link_destroy;				\
> > +								\
> > +	send_data_and_verify(#name, atoi(#addr1), atoi(#addr2));\
> 
> Can you not use the values of addr1 and addr2 directly as number
> instead
> of string + atoi()?
> 
> > +								\
> > +	cleanup_netns(nstoken);				
> > 	\
> > +link_destroy:							\
> > +	bpf_link__destroy(link);				\
> > +skel_destroy:							\
> > +	mptcp_bpf_##name##__destroy(skel);			\
> > +}
> 
> I don't mind having functions defined in macros, but I think we
> should
> try to reduce their size to the minimum (if possible) because they
> are
> hard to read and debug in case of error.
> 
> Here, do you think we could have a smaller macro passing the name as
> a
> string (for the error messages) and the different functions pointers
> you
> need to a new helper? (+ using generic skel structure?)

Thanks for your review, it's very useful. v7 is sent, address all your
comments except this one. I didn't got it, please give me more details
about this.

-Geliang

> 
> Maybe it will not work or will not be easier to read, but worth a try
> I
> think. If it is not possible, please explain why.
> 
> 
> > +
> >  static void test_first(void)
> >  {
> >  	struct mptcp_bpf_first *first_skel;
> 
> Cheers,
> Matt

Re: [PATCH mptcp-next v6 4/9] selftests/bpf: Add MPTCP_SCHED_TEST macro

[Matthieu Baerts]

Hi Geliang, Mat,

On 08/04/2024 05:10, Geliang Tang wrote:
> Hi Matt,
> 
> On Thu, 2024-04-04 at 19:52 +0200, Matthieu Baerts wrote:
>> Hi Geliang,
>>
>> On 04/04/2024 15:03, Geliang Tang wrote:
>>> From: Geliang Tang <tanggeliang@kylinos.cn>
>>>
>>> This patch defines MPTCP_SCHED_TEST macro, a template for all
>>> scheduler
>>> tests. Every scheduler is identified by argument name, and use
>>> sysctl
>>> to set net.mptcp.scheduler as "bpf_name" to use this sched. Add two
>>> veth net devices to simulate the multiple addresses case. Use 'ip
>>> mptcp
>>> endpoint' command to add the new endpoint ADDR2 to PM netlink.
>>> Arguments
>>> addr1/add2 means whether the data has been sent on the first/second
>>> subflow
>>> or not. Send data and check bytes_sent of 'ss' output after it
>>> using
>>> send_data_and_verify().
>>
>> Should we not squash this in "selftests/bpf: Add bpf scheduler test"
>> as
>> well? We already have a lot of different commits.
>>
>>>
>>> Signed-off-by: Geliang Tang <tanggeliang@kylinos.cn>
>>> ---
>>>  .../testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/mptcp.c  | 30
>>> +++++++++++++++++++
>>>  1 file changed, 30 insertions(+)
>>>
>>> diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/mptcp.c
>>> b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/mptcp.c
>>> index ffcd5ebe38b9..8a6b09a97698 100644
>>> --- a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/mptcp.c
>>> +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/mptcp.c
>>> @@ -498,6 +498,36 @@ static void test_default(void)
>>>  	cleanup_netns(nstoken);
>>>  }
>>>  
>>> +#define MPTCP_SCHED_TEST(name, addr1, addr2)			\
>>> +static void test_##name(void)					\
>>> +{								\
>>> +	struct mptcp_bpf_##name *skel;				\
>>> +	struct nstoken *nstoken;				\
>>> +	struct bpf_link *link;					\
>>> +	struct bpf_map *map;					\
>>> +								\
>>> +	skel = mptcp_bpf_##name##__open_and_load();		\
>>> +	if (!ASSERT_OK_PTR(skel, "open_and_load " #name))	\
>>> +		return;					
>>> 	\
>>> +								\
>>> +	map = bpf_object__find_map_by_name(skel->obj, #name);	\
>>> +	link =
>>> bpf_map__attach_struct_ops(map);			\
>>> +	if (!ASSERT_OK_PTR(link, "attach_struct_ops " #name))	\
>>> +		goto skel_destroy;				\
>>> +								\
>>> +	nstoken = sched_init("subflow", "bpf_" #name);		\
>>> +	if (!ASSERT_OK_PTR(nstoken, "sched_init " #name))	\
>>> +		goto link_destroy;				\
>>> +								\
>>> +	send_data_and_verify(#name, atoi(#addr1), atoi(#addr2));\
>>
>> Can you not use the values of addr1 and addr2 directly as number
>> instead
>> of string + atoi()?
>>
>>> +								\
>>> +	cleanup_netns(nstoken);				
>>> 	\
>>> +link_destroy:							\
>>> +	bpf_link__destroy(link);				\
>>> +skel_destroy:							\
>>> +	mptcp_bpf_##name##__destroy(skel);			\
>>> +}
>>
>> I don't mind having functions defined in macros, but I think we
>> should
>> try to reduce their size to the minimum (if possible) because they
>> are
>> hard to read and debug in case of error.
>>
>> Here, do you think we could have a smaller macro passing the name as
>> a
>> string (for the error messages) and the different functions pointers
>> you
>> need to a new helper? (+ using generic skel structure?)
> 
> Thanks for your review, it's very useful. v7 is sent, address all your
> comments except this one. I didn't got it, please give me more details
> about this.
My comment was similar to the one from Mat:

https://lore.kernel.org/mptcp/f9daffc3-c1a6-0ec3-f821-107ab97f551c@kernel.org/

In short: macros can be hard to debug.


I also see why you are using a macro here, all these functions are very
similar. Here, there are more functions that can "reduced", so maybe
that's OK?

@Mat: what do you think? Or maybe another idea?

(Or maybe it is possible to have a "small" macro, passing function
pointers to a (proper) helper? But not sure if it is less complex. And
maybe not worth it for the tests.)

Cheers,
Matt
-- 
Sponsored by the NGI0 Core fund.

[PATCH mptcp-next v6 5/9] Squash to "selftests/bpf: Add bpf_first scheduler & test"

[Geliang Tang]

From: Geliang Tang <tanggeliang@kylinos.cn>

After squashing into this change, the patch "selftests/bpf: Add bpf_first
test" can be merged into the patch "selftests/bpf: Add bpf_first scheduler"
appending the following lines into commit log:

'''
Using MPTCP_SCHED_TEST macro to add a new test for this bpf_first
scheduler, the arguments "1 0" means data has been only sent on the
first subflow ADDR1. Run this test by RUN_MPTCP_TEST macro.
'''

And update the subject to "selftests/bpf: Add bpf_first scheduler & test".

Signed-off-by: Geliang Tang <tanggeliang@kylinos.cn>
---
 .../testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/mptcp.c  | 38 +------------------
 .../selftests/bpf/progs/mptcp_bpf_first.c     |  1 +
 2 files changed, 3 insertions(+), 36 deletions(-)

diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/mptcp.c b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/mptcp.c
index 8a6b09a97698..9231ddfc6c90 100644
--- a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/mptcp.c
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/mptcp.c
@@ -528,40 +528,7 @@ skel_destroy:							\
 	mptcp_bpf_##name##__destroy(skel);			\
 }
 
-static void test_first(void)
-{
-	struct mptcp_bpf_first *first_skel;
-	int server_fd, client_fd;
-	struct nstoken *nstoken;
-	struct bpf_link *link;
-
-	first_skel = mptcp_bpf_first__open_and_load();
-	if (!ASSERT_OK_PTR(first_skel, "bpf_first__open_and_load"))
-		return;
-
-	link = bpf_map__attach_struct_ops(first_skel->maps.first);
-	if (!ASSERT_OK_PTR(link, "bpf_map__attach_struct_ops")) {
-		mptcp_bpf_first__destroy(first_skel);
-		return;
-	}
-
-	nstoken = sched_init("subflow", "bpf_first");
-	if (!ASSERT_OK_PTR(nstoken, "sched_init:bpf_first"))
-		goto fail;
-	server_fd = start_mptcp_server(AF_INET, ADDR_1, PORT_1, 0);
-	client_fd = connect_to_fd(server_fd, 0);
-
-	send_data(server_fd, client_fd, "bpf_first");
-	ASSERT_OK(has_bytes_sent(ADDR_1), "has_bytes_sent addr_1");
-	ASSERT_GT(has_bytes_sent(ADDR_2), 0, "has_bytes_sent addr_2");
-
-	close(client_fd);
-	close(server_fd);
-fail:
-	cleanup_netns(nstoken);
-	bpf_link__destroy(link);
-	mptcp_bpf_first__destroy(first_skel);
-}
+MPTCP_SCHED_TEST(first, 1, 0);
 
 static void test_bkup(void)
 {
@@ -714,8 +681,7 @@ void test_mptcp(void)
 	RUN_MPTCP_TEST(base);
 	RUN_MPTCP_TEST(mptcpify);
 	RUN_MPTCP_TEST(default);
-	if (test__start_subtest("first"))
-		test_first();
+	RUN_MPTCP_TEST(first);
 	if (test__start_subtest("bkup"))
 		test_bkup();
 	if (test__start_subtest("rr"))
diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/mptcp_bpf_first.c b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/mptcp_bpf_first.c
index 23a3e8e69e8f..2d067b25d60b 100644
--- a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/mptcp_bpf_first.c
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/mptcp_bpf_first.c
@@ -1,5 +1,6 @@
 // SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0
 /* Copyright (c) 2022, SUSE. */
+/* Copyright (c) 2024, Kylin Software */
 
 #include <linux/bpf.h>
 #include "bpf_tcp_helpers.h"
-- 
2.40.1

[PATCH mptcp-next v6 6/9] Squash to "selftests/bpf: Add bpf_bkup scheduler & test"

[Geliang Tang]

From: Geliang Tang <tanggeliang@kylinos.cn>

After squashing into this change, the patch "selftests/bpf: Add bpf_bkup
test" can be merged into the patch "selftests/bpf: Add bpf_bkup scheduler"
appending the following lines into commit log:

'''
Using MPTCP_SCHED_TEST macro to add a new test for this bpf_bkup
scheduler, the arguments "1 0" means data has been only sent on the
first subflow ADDR1. Run this test by RUN_MPTCP_TEST macro.
'''

And update the subject to "selftests/bpf: Add bpf_bkup scheduler & test".

Signed-off-by: Geliang Tang <tanggeliang@kylinos.cn>
---
 .../testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/mptcp.c  | 39 +------------------
 .../selftests/bpf/progs/mptcp_bpf_bkup.c      |  1 +
 2 files changed, 3 insertions(+), 37 deletions(-)

diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/mptcp.c b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/mptcp.c
index 9231ddfc6c90..cf6ee27b8b18 100644
--- a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/mptcp.c
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/mptcp.c
@@ -529,41 +529,7 @@ skel_destroy:							\
 }
 
 MPTCP_SCHED_TEST(first, 1, 0);
-
-static void test_bkup(void)
-{
-	struct mptcp_bpf_bkup *bkup_skel;
-	int server_fd, client_fd;
-	struct nstoken *nstoken;
-	struct bpf_link *link;
-
-	bkup_skel = mptcp_bpf_bkup__open_and_load();
-	if (!ASSERT_OK_PTR(bkup_skel, "bpf_bkup__open_and_load"))
-		return;
-
-	link = bpf_map__attach_struct_ops(bkup_skel->maps.bkup);
-	if (!ASSERT_OK_PTR(link, "bpf_map__attach_struct_ops")) {
-		mptcp_bpf_bkup__destroy(bkup_skel);
-		return;
-	}
-
-	nstoken = sched_init("subflow backup", "bpf_bkup");
-	if (!ASSERT_OK_PTR(nstoken, "sched_init:bpf_bkup"))
-		goto fail;
-	server_fd = start_mptcp_server(AF_INET, ADDR_1, PORT_1, 0);
-	client_fd = connect_to_fd(server_fd, 0);
-
-	send_data(server_fd, client_fd, "bpf_bkup");
-	ASSERT_OK(has_bytes_sent(ADDR_1), "has_bytes_sent addr_1");
-	ASSERT_GT(has_bytes_sent(ADDR_2), 0, "has_bytes_sent addr_2");
-
-	close(client_fd);
-	close(server_fd);
-fail:
-	cleanup_netns(nstoken);
-	bpf_link__destroy(link);
-	mptcp_bpf_bkup__destroy(bkup_skel);
-}
+MPTCP_SCHED_TEST(bkup, 1, 0);
 
 static void test_rr(void)
 {
@@ -682,8 +648,7 @@ void test_mptcp(void)
 	RUN_MPTCP_TEST(mptcpify);
 	RUN_MPTCP_TEST(default);
 	RUN_MPTCP_TEST(first);
-	if (test__start_subtest("bkup"))
-		test_bkup();
+	RUN_MPTCP_TEST(bkup);
 	if (test__start_subtest("rr"))
 		test_rr();
 	if (test__start_subtest("red"))
diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/mptcp_bpf_bkup.c b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/mptcp_bpf_bkup.c
index bfd4644dd592..486407a135c9 100644
--- a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/mptcp_bpf_bkup.c
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/mptcp_bpf_bkup.c
@@ -1,5 +1,6 @@
 // SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0
 /* Copyright (c) 2022, SUSE. */
+/* Copyright (c) 2024, Kylin Software */
 
 #include <linux/bpf.h>
 #include "bpf_tcp_helpers.h"
-- 
2.40.1

[PATCH mptcp-next v6 7/9] Squash to "selftests/bpf: Add bpf_rr scheduler & test"

[Geliang Tang]

From: Geliang Tang <tanggeliang@kylinos.cn>

After squashing into this change, the patch "selftests/bpf: Add bpf_rr
test" can be merged into the patch "selftests/bpf: Add bpf_rr scheduler"
appending the following lines into commit log:

'''
Using MPTCP_SCHED_TEST macro to add a new test for this bpf_rr
scheduler, the arguments "1 1" means data has been sent on both
net devices. Run this test by RUN_MPTCP_TEST macro.
'''

And update the subject to "selftests/bpf: Add bpf_rr scheduler & test".

Signed-off-by: Geliang Tang <tanggeliang@kylinos.cn>
---
 .../testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/mptcp.c  | 39 +------------------
 .../selftests/bpf/progs/mptcp_bpf_rr.c        |  1 +
 2 files changed, 3 insertions(+), 37 deletions(-)

diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/mptcp.c b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/mptcp.c
index cf6ee27b8b18..6736502a93fd 100644
--- a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/mptcp.c
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/mptcp.c
@@ -530,41 +530,7 @@ skel_destroy:							\
 
 MPTCP_SCHED_TEST(first, 1, 0);
 MPTCP_SCHED_TEST(bkup, 1, 0);
-
-static void test_rr(void)
-{
-	struct mptcp_bpf_rr *rr_skel;
-	int server_fd, client_fd;
-	struct nstoken *nstoken;
-	struct bpf_link *link;
-
-	rr_skel = mptcp_bpf_rr__open_and_load();
-	if (!ASSERT_OK_PTR(rr_skel, "bpf_rr__open_and_load"))
-		return;
-
-	link = bpf_map__attach_struct_ops(rr_skel->maps.rr);
-	if (!ASSERT_OK_PTR(link, "bpf_map__attach_struct_ops")) {
-		mptcp_bpf_rr__destroy(rr_skel);
-		return;
-	}
-
-	nstoken = sched_init("subflow", "bpf_rr");
-	if (!ASSERT_OK_PTR(nstoken, "sched_init:bpf_rr"))
-		goto fail;
-	server_fd = start_mptcp_server(AF_INET, ADDR_1, PORT_1, 0);
-	client_fd = connect_to_fd(server_fd, 0);
-
-	send_data(server_fd, client_fd, "bpf_rr");
-	ASSERT_OK(has_bytes_sent(ADDR_1), "has_bytes_sent addr 1");
-	ASSERT_OK(has_bytes_sent(ADDR_2), "has_bytes_sent addr 2");
-
-	close(client_fd);
-	close(server_fd);
-fail:
-	cleanup_netns(nstoken);
-	bpf_link__destroy(link);
-	mptcp_bpf_rr__destroy(rr_skel);
-}
+MPTCP_SCHED_TEST(rr, 1, 1);
 
 static void test_red(void)
 {
@@ -649,8 +615,7 @@ void test_mptcp(void)
 	RUN_MPTCP_TEST(default);
 	RUN_MPTCP_TEST(first);
 	RUN_MPTCP_TEST(bkup);
-	if (test__start_subtest("rr"))
-		test_rr();
+	RUN_MPTCP_TEST(rr);
 	if (test__start_subtest("red"))
 		test_red();
 	if (test__start_subtest("burst"))
diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/mptcp_bpf_rr.c b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/mptcp_bpf_rr.c
index 39b7e1cfbbd5..05621467fe48 100644
--- a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/mptcp_bpf_rr.c
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/mptcp_bpf_rr.c
@@ -1,5 +1,6 @@
 // SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0
 /* Copyright (c) 2022, SUSE. */
+/* Copyright (c) 2024, Kylin Software */
 
 #include <linux/bpf.h>
 #include "bpf_tcp_helpers.h"
-- 
2.40.1

[PATCH mptcp-next v6 8/9] Squash to "selftests/bpf: Add bpf_red scheduler & test"

[Geliang Tang]

From: Geliang Tang <tanggeliang@kylinos.cn>

After squashing into this change, the patch "selftests/bpf: Add bpf_red
test" can be merged into the patch "selftests/bpf: Add bpf_red scheduler"
appending the following lines into commit log:

'''
Using MPTCP_SCHED_TEST macro to add a new test for this bpf_red
scheduler, the arguments "1 1" means data has been sent on both
net devices. Run this test by RUN_MPTCP_TEST macro.
'''

And update the subject to "selftests/bpf: Add bpf_red scheduler & test".

Signed-off-by: Geliang Tang <tanggeliang@kylinos.cn>
---
 .../testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/mptcp.c  | 39 +------------------
 .../selftests/bpf/progs/mptcp_bpf_red.c       |  1 +
 2 files changed, 3 insertions(+), 37 deletions(-)

diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/mptcp.c b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/mptcp.c
index 6736502a93fd..57094bc5e67f 100644
--- a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/mptcp.c
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/mptcp.c
@@ -531,41 +531,7 @@ skel_destroy:							\
 MPTCP_SCHED_TEST(first, 1, 0);
 MPTCP_SCHED_TEST(bkup, 1, 0);
 MPTCP_SCHED_TEST(rr, 1, 1);
-
-static void test_red(void)
-{
-	struct mptcp_bpf_red *red_skel;
-	int server_fd, client_fd;
-	struct nstoken *nstoken;
-	struct bpf_link *link;
-
-	red_skel = mptcp_bpf_red__open_and_load();
-	if (!ASSERT_OK_PTR(red_skel, "bpf_red__open_and_load"))
-		return;
-
-	link = bpf_map__attach_struct_ops(red_skel->maps.red);
-	if (!ASSERT_OK_PTR(link, "bpf_map__attach_struct_ops")) {
-		mptcp_bpf_red__destroy(red_skel);
-		return;
-	}
-
-	nstoken = sched_init("subflow", "bpf_red");
-	if (!ASSERT_OK_PTR(nstoken, "sched_init:bpf_red"))
-		goto fail;
-	server_fd = start_mptcp_server(AF_INET, ADDR_1, PORT_1, 0);
-	client_fd = connect_to_fd(server_fd, 0);
-
-	send_data(server_fd, client_fd, "bpf_red");
-	ASSERT_OK(has_bytes_sent(ADDR_1), "has_bytes_sent addr 1");
-	ASSERT_OK(has_bytes_sent(ADDR_2), "has_bytes_sent addr 2");
-
-	close(client_fd);
-	close(server_fd);
-fail:
-	cleanup_netns(nstoken);
-	bpf_link__destroy(link);
-	mptcp_bpf_red__destroy(red_skel);
-}
+MPTCP_SCHED_TEST(red, 1, 1);
 
 static void test_burst(void)
 {
@@ -616,8 +582,7 @@ void test_mptcp(void)
 	RUN_MPTCP_TEST(first);
 	RUN_MPTCP_TEST(bkup);
 	RUN_MPTCP_TEST(rr);
-	if (test__start_subtest("red"))
-		test_red();
+	RUN_MPTCP_TEST(red);
 	if (test__start_subtest("burst"))
 		test_burst();
 }
diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/mptcp_bpf_red.c b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/mptcp_bpf_red.c
index a3f3e5ca5278..62cba8f2d936 100644
--- a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/mptcp_bpf_red.c
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/mptcp_bpf_red.c
@@ -1,5 +1,6 @@
 // SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0
 /* Copyright (c) 2022, SUSE. */
+/* Copyright (c) 2024, Kylin Software */
 
 #include <linux/bpf.h>
 #include "bpf_tcp_helpers.h"
-- 
2.40.1

[PATCH mptcp-next v6 9/9] Squash to "selftests/bpf: Add bpf_burst scheduler & test"

[Geliang Tang]

From: Geliang Tang <tanggeliang@kylinos.cn>

After squashing into this change, the patch "selftests/bpf: Add bpf_burst
test" can be merged into the patch "selftests/bpf: Add bpf_burst scheduler"
appending the following lines into commit log:

'''
Using MPTCP_SCHED_TEST macro to add a new test for this bpf_burst
scheduler, the arguments "1 1" means data has been sent on both net
devices. Run this test by RUN_MPTCP_TEST macro.
'''

And update the subject to "selftests/bpf: Add bpf_burst scheduler & test".

Signed-off-by: Geliang Tang <tanggeliang@kylinos.cn>
---
 .../testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/mptcp.c  | 39 +------------------
 .../selftests/bpf/progs/mptcp_bpf_burst.c     |  1 +
 2 files changed, 3 insertions(+), 37 deletions(-)

diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/mptcp.c b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/mptcp.c
index 57094bc5e67f..c68d5342fb3e 100644
--- a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/mptcp.c
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/mptcp.c
@@ -532,41 +532,7 @@ MPTCP_SCHED_TEST(first, 1, 0);
 MPTCP_SCHED_TEST(bkup, 1, 0);
 MPTCP_SCHED_TEST(rr, 1, 1);
 MPTCP_SCHED_TEST(red, 1, 1);
-
-static void test_burst(void)
-{
-	struct mptcp_bpf_burst *burst_skel;
-	int server_fd, client_fd;
-	struct nstoken *nstoken;
-	struct bpf_link *link;
-
-	burst_skel = mptcp_bpf_burst__open_and_load();
-	if (!ASSERT_OK_PTR(burst_skel, "bpf_burst__open_and_load"))
-		return;
-
-	link = bpf_map__attach_struct_ops(burst_skel->maps.burst);
-	if (!ASSERT_OK_PTR(link, "bpf_map__attach_struct_ops")) {
-		mptcp_bpf_burst__destroy(burst_skel);
-		return;
-	}
-
-	nstoken = sched_init("subflow", "bpf_burst");
-	if (!ASSERT_OK_PTR(nstoken, "sched_init:bpf_burst"))
-		goto fail;
-	server_fd = start_mptcp_server(AF_INET, ADDR_1, PORT_1, 0);
-	client_fd = connect_to_fd(server_fd, 0);
-
-	send_data(server_fd, client_fd, "bpf_burst");
-	ASSERT_OK(has_bytes_sent(ADDR_1), "has_bytes_sent addr 1");
-	ASSERT_OK(has_bytes_sent(ADDR_2), "has_bytes_sent addr 2");
-
-	close(client_fd);
-	close(server_fd);
-fail:
-	cleanup_netns(nstoken);
-	bpf_link__destroy(link);
-	mptcp_bpf_burst__destroy(burst_skel);
-}
+MPTCP_SCHED_TEST(burst, 1, 1);
 
 #define RUN_MPTCP_TEST(suffix)					\
 do {								\
@@ -583,6 +549,5 @@ void test_mptcp(void)
 	RUN_MPTCP_TEST(bkup);
 	RUN_MPTCP_TEST(rr);
 	RUN_MPTCP_TEST(red);
-	if (test__start_subtest("burst"))
-		test_burst();
+	RUN_MPTCP_TEST(burst);
 }
diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/mptcp_bpf_burst.c b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/mptcp_bpf_burst.c
index b3c811564866..6b79267562f1 100644
--- a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/mptcp_bpf_burst.c
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/mptcp_bpf_burst.c
@@ -1,5 +1,6 @@
 // SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0
 /* Copyright (c) 2023, SUSE. */
+/* Copyright (c) 2024, Kylin Software */
 
 #include <linux/bpf.h>
 #include <limits.h>
-- 
2.40.1

Re: [PATCH mptcp-next v6 0/9] refactor mptcp bpf tests

[MPTCP CI]

Hi Geliang,

Thank you for your modifications, that's great!

Our CI did some validations and here is its report:

- KVM Validation: normal: Success! ✅
- KVM Validation: debug: Success! ✅
- KVM Validation: btf (only bpftest_all): Success! ✅
- Task: https://github.com/multipath-tcp/mptcp_net-next/actions/runs/8555399820

Initiator: Patchew Applier
Commits: https://github.com/multipath-tcp/mptcp_net-next/commits/c7b5767b70ce
Patchwork: https://patchwork.kernel.org/project/mptcp/list/?series=841431


If there are some issues, you can reproduce them using the same environment as
the one used by the CI thanks to a docker image, e.g.:

    $ cd [kernel source code]
    $ docker run -v "${PWD}:${PWD}:rw" -w "${PWD}" --privileged --rm -it \
        --pull always mptcp/mptcp-upstream-virtme-docker:latest \
        auto-normal

For more details:

    https://github.com/multipath-tcp/mptcp-upstream-virtme-docker


Please note that despite all the efforts that have been already done to have a
stable tests suite when executed on a public CI like here, it is possible some
reported issues are not due to your modifications. Still, do not hesitate to
help us improve that ;-)

Cheers,
MPTCP GH Action bot
Bot operated by Matthieu Baerts (NGI0 Core)

Re: [PATCH mptcp-next v6 0/9] refactor mptcp bpf tests

[Matthieu Baerts]

Hi Geliang,

On 04/04/2024 15:03, Geliang Tang wrote:
> From: Geliang Tang <tanggeliang@kylinos.cn>
> 
> v6:
> - drop patch 1 in v5 and rebased.
> 
> v5:
>  - drop patch 5 in v4:
>   Squash to "selftests/bpf: Add bpf scheduler test" 4 cleanup
> 
> v4:
>  - add set_nonblock to make BPF tests stable.
>  - split 'Squash to "selftests/bpf: Add bpf scheduler test"' into 4 patches.
> 
> v3:
>  - part 1, bpf schedulers.
> 
> v2:
>  - add two more helpers, send_single_byte and send_recv_data.
> 
> Refactor mptcp bpf tests using newly added macros MPTCP_BASE_TEST,
> RUN_MPTCP_TEST and MPTCP_SCHED_TEST macro.

Thank you for the cleanup.

Please see my comments on the different patches.

Cheers,
Matt
-- 
Sponsored by the NGI0 Core fund.