* [PATCH mptcp-next v3 0/3] fixes for "new MPTCP subflow subtest v6"
@ 2024-09-22 1:00 Geliang Tang
2024-09-22 1:00 ` [PATCH mptcp-next v3 1/3] Squash to "selftests/bpf: Add getsockopt to inspect mptcp subflow" Geliang Tang
` (3 more replies)
0 siblings, 4 replies; 6+ messages in thread
From: Geliang Tang @ 2024-09-22 1:00 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: mptcp; +Cc: Geliang Tang
From: Geliang Tang <tanggeliang@kylinos.cn>
v3:
- update endpoint_init
- squash 2-3 into one
- drop 5-6, they will be sent in the next series.
v2:
- two more cleanups, 5-6, use __bpf_kfunc_start_defs/__bpf_kfunc_end_defs
and drop the declarations of __bpf_kfunc.
1-2 address Martin's comments
3-4 cleanups for endpoint_init
Geliang Tang (3):
Squash to "selftests/bpf: Add getsockopt to inspect mptcp subflow"
Squash to "selftests/bpf: Add mptcp subflow subtest"
Squash to "selftests/bpf: Add bpf scheduler test"
.../testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/mptcp.c | 58 +++++++++++++------
tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/mptcp_bpf.h | 4 +-
2 files changed, 41 insertions(+), 21 deletions(-)
--
2.43.0
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread* [PATCH mptcp-next v3 1/3] Squash to "selftests/bpf: Add getsockopt to inspect mptcp subflow" 2024-09-22 1:00 [PATCH mptcp-next v3 0/3] fixes for "new MPTCP subflow subtest v6" Geliang Tang @ 2024-09-22 1:00 ` Geliang Tang 2024-09-22 1:00 ` [PATCH mptcp-next v3 2/3] Squash to "selftests/bpf: Add mptcp subflow subtest" Geliang Tang ` (2 subsequent siblings) 3 siblings, 0 replies; 6+ messages in thread From: Geliang Tang @ 2024-09-22 1:00 UTC (permalink / raw) To: mptcp; +Cc: Geliang Tang From: Geliang Tang <tanggeliang@kylinos.cn> Use can_loop instead of cond_break as Martin suggested. Signed-off-by: Geliang Tang <tanggeliang@kylinos.cn> --- tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/mptcp_bpf.h | 4 ++-- 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/mptcp_bpf.h b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/mptcp_bpf.h index 928a1e5ad8db..c3800f986ae1 100644 --- a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/mptcp_bpf.h +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/mptcp_bpf.h @@ -26,10 +26,10 @@ static inline int list_is_head(const struct list_head *list, #define list_entry_is_head(pos, head, member) \ list_is_head(&pos->member, (head)) -/* small difference: 'cond_break' has been added in the conditions */ +/* small difference: 'can_loop' has been added in the conditions */ #define list_for_each_entry(pos, head, member) \ for (pos = list_first_entry(head, typeof(*pos), member); \ - cond_break, !list_entry_is_head(pos, head, member); \ + !list_entry_is_head(pos, head, member) && can_loop; \ pos = list_next_entry(pos, member)) /* mptcp helpers from protocol.h */ -- 2.43.0 ^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
* [PATCH mptcp-next v3 2/3] Squash to "selftests/bpf: Add mptcp subflow subtest" 2024-09-22 1:00 [PATCH mptcp-next v3 0/3] fixes for "new MPTCP subflow subtest v6" Geliang Tang 2024-09-22 1:00 ` [PATCH mptcp-next v3 1/3] Squash to "selftests/bpf: Add getsockopt to inspect mptcp subflow" Geliang Tang @ 2024-09-22 1:00 ` Geliang Tang 2024-09-23 15:54 ` Matthieu Baerts 2024-09-22 1:00 ` [PATCH mptcp-next v3 3/3] Squash to "selftests/bpf: Add bpf scheduler test" Geliang Tang 2024-09-22 1:54 ` [PATCH mptcp-next v3 0/3] fixes for "new MPTCP subflow subtest v6" MPTCP CI 3 siblings, 1 reply; 6+ messages in thread From: Geliang Tang @ 2024-09-22 1:00 UTC (permalink / raw) To: mptcp; +Cc: Geliang Tang From: Geliang Tang <tanggeliang@kylinos.cn> Address Martin's comments: Drop mptcp_subflow__attach. Use bpf_program__attach_cgroup instead of bpf_prog_attach. Use the skel->links.{mptcp_subflow, _getsockopt_subflow}, instead of declaring a local "link". More subflows for endpoint_init: Add two more test addresses ADDR_3 and ADDR_4, and adds a new parameter "subflows" for endpoint_init() to control how many subflows are used for the tests. This makes it more flexible. Update the parameters of endpoint_init() in test_subflow(). Signed-off-by: Geliang Tang <tanggeliang@kylinos.cn> --- .../testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/mptcp.c | 56 +++++++++++++------ 1 file changed, 38 insertions(+), 18 deletions(-) diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/mptcp.c b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/mptcp.c index a3e68bc6afa3..167fd9b190ee 100644 --- a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/mptcp.c +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/mptcp.c @@ -20,6 +20,8 @@ #define NS_TEST "mptcp_ns" #define ADDR_1 "10.0.1.1" #define ADDR_2 "10.0.1.2" +#define ADDR_3 "10.0.1.3" +#define ADDR_4 "10.0.1.4" #define PORT_1 10001 #define WITH_DATA true #define WITHOUT_DATA false @@ -351,22 +353,46 @@ static void test_mptcpify(void) close(cgroup_fd); } -static int endpoint_init(char *flags) +static int endpoint_add(char *addr, char *flags) { + return SYS_NOFAIL("ip -net %s mptcp endpoint add %s %s", + NS_TEST, addr, flags); +} + +static int endpoint_init(char *flags, u8 subflows) +{ + int ret = -1; + + if (!subflows || subflows > 4) + goto fail; + SYS(fail, "ip -net %s link add veth1 type veth peer name veth2", NS_TEST); SYS(fail, "ip -net %s addr add %s/24 dev veth1", NS_TEST, ADDR_1); SYS(fail, "ip -net %s link set dev veth1 up", NS_TEST); SYS(fail, "ip -net %s addr add %s/24 dev veth2", NS_TEST, ADDR_2); SYS(fail, "ip -net %s link set dev veth2 up", NS_TEST); - if (SYS_NOFAIL("ip -net %s mptcp endpoint add %s %s", NS_TEST, ADDR_2, flags)) { + + SYS(fail, "ip -net %s link add veth3 type veth peer name veth4", NS_TEST); + SYS(fail, "ip -net %s addr add %s/24 dev veth3", NS_TEST, ADDR_3); + SYS(fail, "ip -net %s link set dev veth3 up", NS_TEST); + SYS(fail, "ip -net %s addr add %s/24 dev veth4", NS_TEST, ADDR_4); + SYS(fail, "ip -net %s link set dev veth4 up", NS_TEST); + + if (SYS_NOFAIL("ip -net %s mptcp limits set subflows 4", NS_TEST)) { printf("'ip mptcp' not supported, skip this test.\n"); test__skip(); goto fail; } - return 0; + if (subflows > 1) + ret = endpoint_add(ADDR_2, flags); + if (subflows > 2) + ret = ret ?: endpoint_add(ADDR_3, flags); + if (subflows > 3) + ret = ret ?: endpoint_add(ADDR_4, flags); + fail: - return -1; + return ret; } static void wait_for_new_subflows(int fd) @@ -424,10 +450,9 @@ static void run_subflow(void) static void test_subflow(void) { - int cgroup_fd, prog_fd, err; struct mptcp_subflow *skel; struct nstoken *nstoken; - struct bpf_link *link; + int cgroup_fd; cgroup_fd = test__join_cgroup("/mptcp_subflow"); if (!ASSERT_OK_FD(cgroup_fd, "join_cgroup: mptcp_subflow")) @@ -439,30 +464,25 @@ static void test_subflow(void) skel->bss->pid = getpid(); - err = mptcp_subflow__attach(skel); - if (!ASSERT_OK(err, "skel_attach: mptcp_subflow")) + skel->links.mptcp_subflow = + bpf_program__attach_cgroup(skel->progs.mptcp_subflow, cgroup_fd); + if (!ASSERT_OK_PTR(skel->links.mptcp_subflow, "attach mptcp_subflow")) goto skel_destroy; - prog_fd = bpf_program__fd(skel->progs.mptcp_subflow); - err = bpf_prog_attach(prog_fd, cgroup_fd, BPF_CGROUP_SOCK_OPS, 0); - if (!ASSERT_OK(err, "prog_attach")) + skel->links._getsockopt_subflow = + bpf_program__attach_cgroup(skel->progs._getsockopt_subflow, cgroup_fd); + if (!ASSERT_OK_PTR(skel->links._getsockopt_subflow, "attach _getsockopt_subflow")) goto skel_destroy; nstoken = create_netns(); if (!ASSERT_OK_PTR(nstoken, "create_netns: mptcp_subflow")) goto skel_destroy; - if (endpoint_init("subflow") < 0) - goto close_netns; - - link = bpf_program__attach_cgroup(skel->progs._getsockopt_subflow, - cgroup_fd); - if (!ASSERT_OK_PTR(link, "getsockopt prog")) + if (endpoint_init("subflow", 2) < 0) goto close_netns; run_subflow(); - bpf_link__destroy(link); close_netns: cleanup_netns(nstoken); skel_destroy: -- 2.43.0 ^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH mptcp-next v3 2/3] Squash to "selftests/bpf: Add mptcp subflow subtest" 2024-09-22 1:00 ` [PATCH mptcp-next v3 2/3] Squash to "selftests/bpf: Add mptcp subflow subtest" Geliang Tang @ 2024-09-23 15:54 ` Matthieu Baerts 0 siblings, 0 replies; 6+ messages in thread From: Matthieu Baerts @ 2024-09-23 15:54 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Geliang Tang, mptcp; +Cc: Geliang Tang Hi Geliang, On 22/09/2024 03:00, Geliang Tang wrote: > From: Geliang Tang <tanggeliang@kylinos.cn> > > Address Martin's comments: Thank you for that! > Drop mptcp_subflow__attach. > Use bpf_program__attach_cgroup instead of bpf_prog_attach. > Use the skel->links.{mptcp_subflow, _getsockopt_subflow}, instead of declaring a > local "link". > > More subflows for endpoint_init: > > Add two more test addresses ADDR_3 and ADDR_4, and adds a new parameter > "subflows" for endpoint_init() to control how many subflows are used for the > tests. This makes it more flexible. Should we not split that and keep it for later? I mean: I think it would be better to only address Martin's comments, and modify endpoint_init() later because this is not needed for the moment if I'm not mistaken. When we will need more than 2 subflows, we can add these patches, no? It's just to minimise the differences between the versions already reviewed by Martin, and the future one. WDYT? I can already apply patches 1 and 2/6 from your v2. Then check later what is preferred before sending a new version upstream. Cheers, Matt -- Sponsored by the NGI0 Core fund. ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
* [PATCH mptcp-next v3 3/3] Squash to "selftests/bpf: Add bpf scheduler test" 2024-09-22 1:00 [PATCH mptcp-next v3 0/3] fixes for "new MPTCP subflow subtest v6" Geliang Tang 2024-09-22 1:00 ` [PATCH mptcp-next v3 1/3] Squash to "selftests/bpf: Add getsockopt to inspect mptcp subflow" Geliang Tang 2024-09-22 1:00 ` [PATCH mptcp-next v3 2/3] Squash to "selftests/bpf: Add mptcp subflow subtest" Geliang Tang @ 2024-09-22 1:00 ` Geliang Tang 2024-09-22 1:54 ` [PATCH mptcp-next v3 0/3] fixes for "new MPTCP subflow subtest v6" MPTCP CI 3 siblings, 0 replies; 6+ messages in thread From: Geliang Tang @ 2024-09-22 1:00 UTC (permalink / raw) To: mptcp; +Cc: Geliang Tang From: Geliang Tang <tanggeliang@kylinos.cn> Update endpoint_init() in sched_init(). Signed-off-by: Geliang Tang <tanggeliang@kylinos.cn> --- tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/mptcp.c | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/mptcp.c b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/mptcp.c index 167fd9b190ee..ce18da1a6330 100644 --- a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/mptcp.c +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/mptcp.c @@ -499,7 +499,7 @@ static struct nstoken *sched_init(char *flags, char *sched) if (!ASSERT_OK_PTR(nstoken, "create_netns")) return NULL; - if (endpoint_init("subflow") < 0) + if (endpoint_init("subflow", 2) < 0) goto fail; SYS(fail, "ip netns exec %s sysctl -qw net.mptcp.scheduler=%s", NS_TEST, sched); -- 2.43.0 ^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH mptcp-next v3 0/3] fixes for "new MPTCP subflow subtest v6" 2024-09-22 1:00 [PATCH mptcp-next v3 0/3] fixes for "new MPTCP subflow subtest v6" Geliang Tang ` (2 preceding siblings ...) 2024-09-22 1:00 ` [PATCH mptcp-next v3 3/3] Squash to "selftests/bpf: Add bpf scheduler test" Geliang Tang @ 2024-09-22 1:54 ` MPTCP CI 3 siblings, 0 replies; 6+ messages in thread From: MPTCP CI @ 2024-09-22 1:54 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Geliang Tang; +Cc: mptcp Hi Geliang, Thank you for your modifications, that's great! Our CI did some validations and here is its report: - KVM Validation: normal: Success! ✅ - KVM Validation: debug: Success! ✅ - KVM Validation: btf (only bpftest_all): Success! ✅ - Task: https://github.com/multipath-tcp/mptcp_net-next/actions/runs/10977099962 Initiator: Patchew Applier Commits: https://github.com/multipath-tcp/mptcp_net-next/commits/c784e8c47dba Patchwork: https://patchwork.kernel.org/project/mptcp/list/?series=891874 If there are some issues, you can reproduce them using the same environment as the one used by the CI thanks to a docker image, e.g.: $ cd [kernel source code] $ docker run -v "${PWD}:${PWD}:rw" -w "${PWD}" --privileged --rm -it \ --pull always mptcp/mptcp-upstream-virtme-docker:latest \ auto-normal For more details: https://github.com/multipath-tcp/mptcp-upstream-virtme-docker Please note that despite all the efforts that have been already done to have a stable tests suite when executed on a public CI like here, it is possible some reported issues are not due to your modifications. Still, do not hesitate to help us improve that ;-) Cheers, MPTCP GH Action bot Bot operated by Matthieu Baerts (NGI0 Core) ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2024-09-23 15:54 UTC | newest] Thread overview: 6+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed -- links below jump to the message on this page -- 2024-09-22 1:00 [PATCH mptcp-next v3 0/3] fixes for "new MPTCP subflow subtest v6" Geliang Tang 2024-09-22 1:00 ` [PATCH mptcp-next v3 1/3] Squash to "selftests/bpf: Add getsockopt to inspect mptcp subflow" Geliang Tang 2024-09-22 1:00 ` [PATCH mptcp-next v3 2/3] Squash to "selftests/bpf: Add mptcp subflow subtest" Geliang Tang 2024-09-23 15:54 ` Matthieu Baerts 2024-09-22 1:00 ` [PATCH mptcp-next v3 3/3] Squash to "selftests/bpf: Add bpf scheduler test" Geliang Tang 2024-09-22 1:54 ` [PATCH mptcp-next v3 0/3] fixes for "new MPTCP subflow subtest v6" MPTCP CI
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox