From: Hangbin Liu <hangbin.liu@linux.dev>
To: Matthieu Baerts <matttbe@kernel.org>
Cc: MPTCP Linux <mptcp@lists.linux.dev>
Subject: Re: [PATCH mptcp-next 2/2] selftests: mptcp: convert iptables to nftables for mptcp_join.sh
Date: Mon, 7 Sep 2026 09:02:10 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <ap4NEvXYLC1U8hqO@fedora> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <aa5678f7-7089-4049-9120-6604372667ac@kernel.org>
Hi Matthieu,
On Fri, Sep 04, 2026 at 06:40:02PM +0200, Matthieu Baerts wrote:
> >
> > Yes, if not in purpose, I feel flush the whole table is dangerous.
> > Some rules may still in using in later testing.
>
> Indeed. But in our case, each subtest uses a dedicated netns. Plus only
> some tests add Netfilter rules. At the end, it is clearer to delete a
> specific rule, but I think that makes sense only if the nft_handle var
> is set locally, and used a few lines below.
>
> If a global nft_handle var is used, that doesn't seem clear, and I think
> it would be clearer/easier to:
>
> - either delete a specific rule (but I don't think that's supported)
>
> - get the handle from the test and use it to delete the rule
>
> - or flush the table.
>
> So up to you, but probably best to avoid using nft_handle as global var.
Thanks, endpoint_tests is the only test that could delete iptables rules.
I use the nft_handle mainly because the iptables also delete rules with
specific match (iptables -D OUTPUT -s .. -p tcp -j REJECT) other than flush
the table directly.
endpoint_tests
- reset_with_tcp_filter
- iptables -D
- iptables -I
- iptables -D
- reset_with_events
- iptables -I
- iptables -D
- reset_with_tcp_filter
- iptables -D
While from the logic it should be safe to flush the tables. I can avoid the
nft_handle in v4 (after v3 review). Just one question, why we use
iptables -I here? Is there any intend? If not I will use "add" instead of
"insert" in nft rules.
> > However, I cannot perform a reset on the b4 branch, and git rebase also failed.
> > These steps have blocked me a little. I have to manually recreate the b4 branch,
> > or perhaps avoid using b4 when working on mptcp changes.
>
> You need to use `|git rebase --onto` instead, e.g.
>
> git fetch origin # adapt here and below if needed
For export branch, I think git fetch is not enough? I have to reset
to latest net/net-next merge commit and pull on that.
> git rebase --onto origin/export "$(b4 prep --show-info base-commit)"
Yes, it works! New git usage learned :)
>
> Can you check if it works for you, please? (so I can update the wiki
> page if needed)
>
> The alternative is to use `for-review`, with a continuous history, see:
>
> https://github.com/multipath-tcp/mptcp_net-next/wiki/Git-Branches
I will try this tree next time
Thanks
Hangbin
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-09-07 1:02 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 21+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-09-02 6:52 [PATCH mptcp-next 0/2] selftests: mptcp: convert iptables to nftables Hangbin Liu
2026-09-02 6:52 ` [PATCH mptcp-next 1/2] selftests: mptcp: convert iptables to nftables for mptcp_sockopt.sh Hangbin Liu
2026-09-02 7:02 ` sashiko-bot
2026-09-02 7:47 ` Hangbin Liu
2026-09-02 9:17 ` Matthieu Baerts
2026-09-03 2:15 ` Hangbin Liu
2026-09-02 6:52 ` [PATCH mptcp-next 2/2] selftests: mptcp: convert iptables to nftables for mptcp_join.sh Hangbin Liu
2026-09-02 10:00 ` Matthieu Baerts
2026-09-03 2:02 ` Hangbin Liu
2026-09-03 6:35 ` Hangbin Liu
2026-09-03 6:54 ` Florian Westphal
2026-09-03 7:35 ` Hangbin Liu
2026-09-03 9:28 ` Matthieu Baerts
2026-09-04 8:01 ` Hangbin Liu
2026-09-04 16:40 ` Matthieu Baerts
2026-09-07 1:02 ` Hangbin Liu [this message]
2026-09-07 5:50 ` Matthieu Baerts
2026-09-07 6:59 ` Hangbin Liu
2026-09-07 7:55 ` Matthieu Baerts
2026-09-02 7:23 ` [PATCH mptcp-next 0/2] selftests: mptcp: convert iptables to nftables MPTCP CI
2026-09-02 8:14 ` MPTCP CI
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=ap4NEvXYLC1U8hqO@fedora \
--to=hangbin.liu@linux.dev \
--cc=matttbe@kernel.org \
--cc=mptcp@lists.linux.dev \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox