MPTCP Linux Development
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Hangbin Liu <hangbin.liu@linux.dev>
To: Matthieu Baerts <matttbe@kernel.org>
Cc: MPTCP Linux <mptcp@lists.linux.dev>
Subject: Re: [PATCH mptcp-next 2/2] selftests: mptcp: convert iptables to nftables for mptcp_join.sh
Date: Mon, 7 Sep 2026 09:02:10 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <ap4NEvXYLC1U8hqO@fedora> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <aa5678f7-7089-4049-9120-6604372667ac@kernel.org>


Hi Matthieu,
On Fri, Sep 04, 2026 at 06:40:02PM +0200, Matthieu Baerts wrote:
> > 
> > Yes, if not in purpose, I feel flush the whole table is dangerous.
> > Some rules may still in using in later testing.
> 
> Indeed. But in our case, each subtest uses a dedicated netns. Plus only
> some tests add Netfilter rules. At the end, it is clearer to delete a
> specific rule, but I think that makes sense only if the nft_handle var
> is set locally, and used a few lines below.
> 
> If a global nft_handle var is used, that doesn't seem clear, and I think
> it would be clearer/easier to:
> 
> - either delete a specific rule (but I don't think that's supported)
> 
> - get the handle from the test and use it to delete the rule
> 
> - or flush the table.
> 
> So up to you, but probably best to avoid using nft_handle as global var.

Thanks, endpoint_tests is the only test that could delete iptables rules.
I use the nft_handle mainly because the iptables also delete rules with
specific match (iptables -D OUTPUT -s .. -p tcp -j REJECT) other than flush
the table directly.

endpoint_tests
  - reset_with_tcp_filter
    - iptables -D
    - iptables -I
    - iptables -D
  - reset_with_events
    - iptables -I
    - iptables -D
  - reset_with_tcp_filter
    - iptables -D

While from the logic it should be safe to flush the tables. I can avoid the
nft_handle in v4 (after v3 review). Just one question, why we use
iptables -I here? Is there any intend? If not I will use "add" instead of
"insert" in nft rules.

> > However, I cannot perform a reset on the b4 branch, and git rebase also failed.
> > These steps have blocked me a little. I have to manually recreate the b4 branch,
> > or perhaps avoid using b4 when working on mptcp changes.
> 
> You need to use `|git rebase --onto` instead, e.g.
> 
>   git fetch origin  # adapt here and below if needed

For export branch, I think git fetch is not enough? I have to reset
to latest net/net-next merge commit and pull on that.

>   git rebase --onto origin/export "$(b4 prep --show-info base-commit)"

Yes, it works! New git usage learned :)

> 
> Can you check if it works for you, please? (so I can update the wiki
> page if needed)
> 
> The alternative is to use `for-review`, with a continuous history, see:
> 
>   https://github.com/multipath-tcp/mptcp_net-next/wiki/Git-Branches

I will try this tree next time

Thanks
Hangbin

  reply	other threads:[~2026-09-07  1:02 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 21+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2026-09-02  6:52 [PATCH mptcp-next 0/2] selftests: mptcp: convert iptables to nftables Hangbin Liu
2026-09-02  6:52 ` [PATCH mptcp-next 1/2] selftests: mptcp: convert iptables to nftables for mptcp_sockopt.sh Hangbin Liu
2026-09-02  7:02   ` sashiko-bot
2026-09-02  7:47     ` Hangbin Liu
2026-09-02  9:17   ` Matthieu Baerts
2026-09-03  2:15     ` Hangbin Liu
2026-09-02  6:52 ` [PATCH mptcp-next 2/2] selftests: mptcp: convert iptables to nftables for mptcp_join.sh Hangbin Liu
2026-09-02 10:00   ` Matthieu Baerts
2026-09-03  2:02     ` Hangbin Liu
2026-09-03  6:35       ` Hangbin Liu
2026-09-03  6:54         ` Florian Westphal
2026-09-03  7:35           ` Hangbin Liu
2026-09-03  9:28       ` Matthieu Baerts
2026-09-04  8:01         ` Hangbin Liu
2026-09-04 16:40           ` Matthieu Baerts
2026-09-07  1:02             ` Hangbin Liu [this message]
2026-09-07  5:50               ` Matthieu Baerts
2026-09-07  6:59                 ` Hangbin Liu
2026-09-07  7:55                   ` Matthieu Baerts
2026-09-02  7:23 ` [PATCH mptcp-next 0/2] selftests: mptcp: convert iptables to nftables MPTCP CI
2026-09-02  8:14 ` MPTCP CI

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=ap4NEvXYLC1U8hqO@fedora \
    --to=hangbin.liu@linux.dev \
    --cc=matttbe@kernel.org \
    --cc=mptcp@lists.linux.dev \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox