[PATCH mptcp-next v2 0/4] refactor push pending

[PATCH mptcp-next v2 0/4] refactor push pending

[Geliang Tang]

v2:
- add snd_burst check in dfrags loop as Mat suggested.

Refactor __mptcp_push_pending() and __mptcp_subflow_push_pending() to
remove duplicate code and support redundant scheduler more easily in
__mptcp_subflow_push_pending().

Geliang Tang (4):
  mptcp: update __mptcp_push_pending
  mptcp: add do_push_pending helper
  mptcp: update __mptcp_subflow_push_pending
  mptcp: simplify __mptcp_subflow_push_pending

 net/mptcp/protocol.c | 153 ++++++++++++++++---------------------------
 1 file changed, 58 insertions(+), 95 deletions(-)

-- 
2.35.3

[PATCH mptcp-next v2 1/4] mptcp: update __mptcp_push_pending

[Geliang Tang]

To support redundant package schedulers more easily, this patch moves the
packet scheduler out of the dfrags loop in __mptcp_push_pending(), invoke
mptcp_sched_get_send() only once. And update the socket locks
correspondingly.

Signed-off-by: Geliang Tang <geliang.tang@suse.com>
---
 net/mptcp/protocol.c | 50 ++++++++++++++++++--------------------------
 1 file changed, 20 insertions(+), 30 deletions(-)

diff --git a/net/mptcp/protocol.c b/net/mptcp/protocol.c
index 7ca21915b3d1..37a252a3f05b 100644
--- a/net/mptcp/protocol.c
+++ b/net/mptcp/protocol.c
@@ -1417,14 +1417,6 @@ struct sock *mptcp_subflow_get_send(struct mptcp_sock *msk)
 	u64 linger_time;
 	long tout = 0;
 
-	/* re-use last subflow, if the burst allow that */
-	if (msk->last_snd && msk->snd_burst > 0 &&
-	    sk_stream_memory_free(msk->last_snd) &&
-	    mptcp_subflow_active(mptcp_subflow_ctx(msk->last_snd))) {
-		mptcp_set_timeout(sk);
-		return msk->last_snd;
-	}
-
 	/* pick the subflow with the lower wmem/wspace ratio */
 	for (i = 0; i < SSK_MODE_MAX; ++i) {
 		send_info[i].ssk = NULL;
@@ -1530,15 +1522,21 @@ void mptcp_check_and_set_pending(struct sock *sk)
 
 void __mptcp_push_pending(struct sock *sk, unsigned int flags)
 {
-	struct sock *prev_ssk = NULL, *ssk = NULL;
 	struct mptcp_sock *msk = mptcp_sk(sk);
 	struct mptcp_sendmsg_info info = {
 				.flags = flags,
 	};
 	bool do_check_data_fin = false;
 	struct mptcp_data_frag *dfrag;
+	struct sock *ssk;
 	int len;
 
+	ssk = mptcp_sched_get_send(msk);
+	if (!ssk)
+		goto out;
+
+	lock_sock(ssk);
+
 	while ((dfrag = mptcp_send_head(sk))) {
 		info.sent = dfrag->already_sent;
 		info.limit = dfrag->data_len;
@@ -1546,24 +1544,6 @@ void __mptcp_push_pending(struct sock *sk, unsigned int flags)
 		while (len > 0) {
 			int ret = 0;
 
-			prev_ssk = ssk;
-			ssk = mptcp_sched_get_send(msk);
-
-			/* First check. If the ssk has changed since
-			 * the last round, release prev_ssk
-			 */
-			if (ssk != prev_ssk && prev_ssk)
-				mptcp_push_release(prev_ssk, &info);
-			if (!ssk)
-				goto out;
-
-			/* Need to lock the new subflow only if different
-			 * from the previous one, otherwise we are still
-			 * helding the relevant lock
-			 */
-			if (ssk != prev_ssk)
-				lock_sock(ssk);
-
 			ret = mptcp_sendmsg_frag(sk, ssk, dfrag, &info);
 			if (ret <= 0) {
 				if (ret == -EAGAIN)
@@ -1579,11 +1559,21 @@ void __mptcp_push_pending(struct sock *sk, unsigned int flags)
 			mptcp_update_post_push(msk, dfrag, ret);
 		}
 		WRITE_ONCE(msk->first_pending, mptcp_send_next(sk));
+
+		if (msk->snd_burst > 0 &&
+		    sk_stream_memory_free(ssk) &&
+		    mptcp_subflow_active(mptcp_subflow_ctx(ssk))) {
+			mptcp_set_timeout(sk);
+		} else {
+			break;
+		}
 	}
 
-	/* at this point we held the socket lock for the last subflow we used */
-	if (ssk)
-		mptcp_push_release(ssk, &info);
+	if (do_check_data_fin) {
+		tcp_push(ssk, 0, info.mss_now, tcp_sk(ssk)->nonagle,
+			 info.size_goal);
+	}
+	release_sock(ssk);
 
 out:
 	/* ensure the rtx timer is running */
-- 
2.35.3

Re: [PATCH mptcp-next v2 1/4] mptcp: update __mptcp_push_pending

[Mat Martineau]

On Thu, 29 Sep 2022, Geliang Tang wrote:

> To support redundant package schedulers more easily, this patch moves the
> packet scheduler out of the dfrags loop in __mptcp_push_pending(), invoke
> mptcp_sched_get_send() only once. And update the socket locks
> correspondingly.
>
> Signed-off-by: Geliang Tang <geliang.tang@suse.com>
> ---
> net/mptcp/protocol.c | 50 ++++++++++++++++++--------------------------
> 1 file changed, 20 insertions(+), 30 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/net/mptcp/protocol.c b/net/mptcp/protocol.c
> index 7ca21915b3d1..37a252a3f05b 100644
> --- a/net/mptcp/protocol.c
> +++ b/net/mptcp/protocol.c
> @@ -1417,14 +1417,6 @@ struct sock *mptcp_subflow_get_send(struct mptcp_sock *msk)
> 	u64 linger_time;
> 	long tout = 0;
>
> -	/* re-use last subflow, if the burst allow that */
> -	if (msk->last_snd && msk->snd_burst > 0 &&
> -	    sk_stream_memory_free(msk->last_snd) &&
> -	    mptcp_subflow_active(mptcp_subflow_ctx(msk->last_snd))) {
> -		mptcp_set_timeout(sk);
> -		return msk->last_snd;
> -	}
> -

With msk->last_snd not used here any more, it seems like it can be 
removed.

> 	/* pick the subflow with the lower wmem/wspace ratio */
> 	for (i = 0; i < SSK_MODE_MAX; ++i) {
> 		send_info[i].ssk = NULL;
> @@ -1530,15 +1522,21 @@ void mptcp_check_and_set_pending(struct sock *sk)
>
> void __mptcp_push_pending(struct sock *sk, unsigned int flags)
> {
> -	struct sock *prev_ssk = NULL, *ssk = NULL;
> 	struct mptcp_sock *msk = mptcp_sk(sk);
> 	struct mptcp_sendmsg_info info = {
> 				.flags = flags,
> 	};
> 	bool do_check_data_fin = false;
> 	struct mptcp_data_frag *dfrag;
> +	struct sock *ssk;
> 	int len;
>
> +	ssk = mptcp_sched_get_send(msk);
> +	if (!ssk)
> +		goto out;
> +
> +	lock_sock(ssk);
> +
> 	while ((dfrag = mptcp_send_head(sk))) {
> 		info.sent = dfrag->already_sent;
> 		info.limit = dfrag->data_len;
> @@ -1546,24 +1544,6 @@ void __mptcp_push_pending(struct sock *sk, unsigned int flags)
> 		while (len > 0) {
> 			int ret = 0;
>
> -			prev_ssk = ssk;
> -			ssk = mptcp_sched_get_send(msk);
> -
> -			/* First check. If the ssk has changed since
> -			 * the last round, release prev_ssk
> -			 */
> -			if (ssk != prev_ssk && prev_ssk)
> -				mptcp_push_release(prev_ssk, &info);
> -			if (!ssk)
> -				goto out;
> -
> -			/* Need to lock the new subflow only if different
> -			 * from the previous one, otherwise we are still
> -			 * helding the relevant lock
> -			 */
> -			if (ssk != prev_ssk)
> -				lock_sock(ssk);
> -
> 			ret = mptcp_sendmsg_frag(sk, ssk, dfrag, &info);
> 			if (ret <= 0) {
> 				if (ret == -EAGAIN)
> @@ -1579,11 +1559,21 @@ void __mptcp_push_pending(struct sock *sk, unsigned int flags)
> 			mptcp_update_post_push(msk, dfrag, ret);
> 		}
> 		WRITE_ONCE(msk->first_pending, mptcp_send_next(sk));
> +
> +		if (msk->snd_burst > 0 &&
> +		    sk_stream_memory_free(ssk) &&
> +		    mptcp_subflow_active(mptcp_subflow_ctx(ssk))) {
> +			mptcp_set_timeout(sk);
> +		} else {
> +			break;
> +		}
> 	}
>
> -	/* at this point we held the socket lock for the last subflow we used */
> -	if (ssk)
> -		mptcp_push_release(ssk, &info);
> +	if (do_check_data_fin) {
> +		tcp_push(ssk, 0, info.mss_now, tcp_sk(ssk)->nonagle,
> +			 info.size_goal);
> +	}
> +	release_sock(ssk);
>
> out:
> 	/* ensure the rtx timer is running */
> -- 
> 2.35.3
>
>
>

--
Mat Martineau
Intel

[PATCH mptcp-next v2 2/4] mptcp: add do_push_pending helper

[Geliang Tang]

This patch moves the duplicate code from __mptcp_push_pending() and
__mptcp_subflow_push_pending() into a new helper function, named
__do_push_pending(). And simplify __mptcp_push_pending() by invoking
this helper.

Signed-off-by: Geliang Tang <geliang.tang@suse.com>
---
 net/mptcp/protocol.c | 62 ++++++++++++++++++++++++--------------------
 1 file changed, 34 insertions(+), 28 deletions(-)

diff --git a/net/mptcp/protocol.c b/net/mptcp/protocol.c
index 37a252a3f05b..fe92a301b8f7 100644
--- a/net/mptcp/protocol.c
+++ b/net/mptcp/protocol.c
@@ -1483,12 +1483,6 @@ struct sock *mptcp_subflow_get_send(struct mptcp_sock *msk)
 	return ssk;
 }
 
-static void mptcp_push_release(struct sock *ssk, struct mptcp_sendmsg_info *info)
-{
-	tcp_push(ssk, 0, info->mss_now, tcp_sk(ssk)->nonagle, info->size_goal);
-	release_sock(ssk);
-}
-
 static void mptcp_update_post_push(struct mptcp_sock *msk,
 				   struct mptcp_data_frag *dfrag,
 				   u32 sent)
@@ -1520,40 +1514,29 @@ void mptcp_check_and_set_pending(struct sock *sk)
 		mptcp_sk(sk)->push_pending |= BIT(MPTCP_PUSH_PENDING);
 }
 
-void __mptcp_push_pending(struct sock *sk, unsigned int flags)
+static int __do_push_pending(struct sock *sk, struct sock *ssk,
+			     struct mptcp_sendmsg_info *info)
 {
 	struct mptcp_sock *msk = mptcp_sk(sk);
-	struct mptcp_sendmsg_info info = {
-				.flags = flags,
-	};
-	bool do_check_data_fin = false;
 	struct mptcp_data_frag *dfrag;
-	struct sock *ssk;
-	int len;
-
-	ssk = mptcp_sched_get_send(msk);
-	if (!ssk)
-		goto out;
-
-	lock_sock(ssk);
+	int len, copied = 0;
 
 	while ((dfrag = mptcp_send_head(sk))) {
-		info.sent = dfrag->already_sent;
-		info.limit = dfrag->data_len;
+		info->sent = dfrag->already_sent;
+		info->limit = dfrag->data_len;
 		len = dfrag->data_len - dfrag->already_sent;
 		while (len > 0) {
 			int ret = 0;
 
-			ret = mptcp_sendmsg_frag(sk, ssk, dfrag, &info);
+			ret = mptcp_sendmsg_frag(sk, ssk, dfrag, info);
 			if (ret <= 0) {
 				if (ret == -EAGAIN)
 					continue;
-				mptcp_push_release(ssk, &info);
 				goto out;
 			}
 
-			do_check_data_fin = true;
-			info.sent += ret;
+			info->sent += ret;
+			copied += ret;
 			len -= ret;
 
 			mptcp_update_post_push(msk, dfrag, ret);
@@ -1569,10 +1552,33 @@ void __mptcp_push_pending(struct sock *sk, unsigned int flags)
 		}
 	}
 
-	if (do_check_data_fin) {
-		tcp_push(ssk, 0, info.mss_now, tcp_sk(ssk)->nonagle,
-			 info.size_goal);
+out:
+	if (copied) {
+		tcp_push(ssk, 0, info->mss_now, tcp_sk(ssk)->nonagle,
+			 info->size_goal);
 	}
+
+	return copied;
+}
+
+void __mptcp_push_pending(struct sock *sk, unsigned int flags)
+{
+	struct mptcp_sock *msk = mptcp_sk(sk);
+	struct mptcp_sendmsg_info info = {
+				.flags = flags,
+	};
+	bool do_check_data_fin = false;
+	struct sock *ssk;
+
+	ssk = mptcp_sched_get_send(msk);
+	if (!ssk)
+		goto out;
+
+	if (!mptcp_send_head(sk))
+		goto out;
+
+	lock_sock(ssk);
+	do_check_data_fin = __do_push_pending(sk, ssk, &info);
 	release_sock(ssk);
 
 out:
-- 
2.35.3

Re: [PATCH mptcp-next v2 2/4] mptcp: add do_push_pending helper

[Mat Martineau]

On Thu, 29 Sep 2022, Geliang Tang wrote:

> This patch moves the duplicate code from __mptcp_push_pending() and
> __mptcp_subflow_push_pending() into a new helper function, named
> __do_push_pending(). And simplify __mptcp_push_pending() by invoking
> this helper.
>
> Signed-off-by: Geliang Tang <geliang.tang@suse.com>
> ---
> net/mptcp/protocol.c | 62 ++++++++++++++++++++++++--------------------
> 1 file changed, 34 insertions(+), 28 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/net/mptcp/protocol.c b/net/mptcp/protocol.c
> index 37a252a3f05b..fe92a301b8f7 100644
> --- a/net/mptcp/protocol.c
> +++ b/net/mptcp/protocol.c
> @@ -1483,12 +1483,6 @@ struct sock *mptcp_subflow_get_send(struct mptcp_sock *msk)
> 	return ssk;
> }
>
> -static void mptcp_push_release(struct sock *ssk, struct mptcp_sendmsg_info *info)
> -{
> -	tcp_push(ssk, 0, info->mss_now, tcp_sk(ssk)->nonagle, info->size_goal);
> -	release_sock(ssk);
> -}
> -
> static void mptcp_update_post_push(struct mptcp_sock *msk,
> 				   struct mptcp_data_frag *dfrag,
> 				   u32 sent)
> @@ -1520,40 +1514,29 @@ void mptcp_check_and_set_pending(struct sock *sk)
> 		mptcp_sk(sk)->push_pending |= BIT(MPTCP_PUSH_PENDING);
> }
>
> -void __mptcp_push_pending(struct sock *sk, unsigned int flags)
> +static int __do_push_pending(struct sock *sk, struct sock *ssk,
> +			     struct mptcp_sendmsg_info *info)
> {
> 	struct mptcp_sock *msk = mptcp_sk(sk);
> -	struct mptcp_sendmsg_info info = {
> -				.flags = flags,
> -	};
> -	bool do_check_data_fin = false;
> 	struct mptcp_data_frag *dfrag;
> -	struct sock *ssk;
> -	int len;
> -
> -	ssk = mptcp_sched_get_send(msk);
> -	if (!ssk)
> -		goto out;
> -
> -	lock_sock(ssk);
> +	int len, copied = 0;
>
> 	while ((dfrag = mptcp_send_head(sk))) {
> -		info.sent = dfrag->already_sent;
> -		info.limit = dfrag->data_len;
> +		info->sent = dfrag->already_sent;
> +		info->limit = dfrag->data_len;
> 		len = dfrag->data_len - dfrag->already_sent;
> 		while (len > 0) {
> 			int ret = 0;
>
> -			ret = mptcp_sendmsg_frag(sk, ssk, dfrag, &info);
> +			ret = mptcp_sendmsg_frag(sk, ssk, dfrag, info);
> 			if (ret <= 0) {
> 				if (ret == -EAGAIN)
> 					continue;
> -				mptcp_push_release(ssk, &info);
> 				goto out;
> 			}
>
> -			do_check_data_fin = true;
> -			info.sent += ret;
> +			info->sent += ret;
> +			copied += ret;
> 			len -= ret;
>
> 			mptcp_update_post_push(msk, dfrag, ret);
> @@ -1569,10 +1552,33 @@ void __mptcp_push_pending(struct sock *sk, unsigned int flags)
> 		}
> 	}
>
> -	if (do_check_data_fin) {
> -		tcp_push(ssk, 0, info.mss_now, tcp_sk(ssk)->nonagle,
> -			 info.size_goal);
> +out:
> +	if (copied) {
> +		tcp_push(ssk, 0, info->mss_now, tcp_sk(ssk)->nonagle,
> +			 info->size_goal);
> 	}
> +
> +	return copied;
> +}
> +
> +void __mptcp_push_pending(struct sock *sk, unsigned int flags)
> +{
> +	struct mptcp_sock *msk = mptcp_sk(sk);
> +	struct mptcp_sendmsg_info info = {
> +				.flags = flags,
> +	};
> +	bool do_check_data_fin = false;
> +	struct sock *ssk;
> +
> +	ssk = mptcp_sched_get_send(msk);
> +	if (!ssk)
> +		goto out;
> +
> +	if (!mptcp_send_head(sk))
> +		goto out;
> +
> +	lock_sock(ssk);
> +	do_check_data_fin = __do_push_pending(sk, ssk, &info);
> 	release_sock(ssk);
>
> out:

I think this is getting close to what I was talking about, but does not 
have the loop that will call the scheduler again. I tried this code and 
got slightly better performance in simult_flows.sh:

void __mptcp_push_pending(struct sock *sk, unsigned int flags)
{
 	struct mptcp_sock *msk = mptcp_sk(sk);
 	struct mptcp_sendmsg_info info = {
 				.flags = flags,
 	};
 	bool do_check_data_fin = false;
 	struct sock *ssk;

 	while (mptcp_send_head(sk) && (ssk = mptcp_sched_get_send(msk))) {
 		lock_sock(ssk);
 		do_check_data_fin = __do_push_pending(sk, ssk, &info);
 		release_sock(ssk);
 	}

 	/* ensure the rtx timer is running */
 	if (!mptcp_timer_pending(sk))
 		mptcp_reset_timer(sk);
 	if (do_check_data_fin)
 		__mptcp_check_send_data_fin(sk);
}



--
Mat Martineau
Intel

[PATCH mptcp-next v2 3/4] mptcp: update __mptcp_subflow_push_pending

[Geliang Tang]

Move the packet scheduler out of the dfrags loop, invoke it only once in
__mptcp_subflow_push_pending().

Signed-off-by: Geliang Tang <geliang.tang@suse.com>
---
 net/mptcp/protocol.c | 44 ++++++++++++++++++++------------------------
 1 file changed, 20 insertions(+), 24 deletions(-)

diff --git a/net/mptcp/protocol.c b/net/mptcp/protocol.c
index fe92a301b8f7..af37b18aa5a5 100644
--- a/net/mptcp/protocol.c
+++ b/net/mptcp/protocol.c
@@ -1598,7 +1598,15 @@ static void __mptcp_subflow_push_pending(struct sock *sk, struct sock *ssk)
 	struct mptcp_data_frag *dfrag;
 	struct sock *xmit_ssk;
 	int len, copied = 0;
-	bool first = true;
+
+	xmit_ssk = mptcp_sched_get_send(mptcp_sk(sk));
+	if (!xmit_ssk)
+		goto out;
+	if (xmit_ssk != ssk) {
+		mptcp_subflow_delegate(mptcp_subflow_ctx(xmit_ssk),
+				       MPTCP_DELEGATE_SEND);
+		goto out;
+	}
 
 	info.flags = 0;
 	while ((dfrag = mptcp_send_head(sk))) {
@@ -1608,19 +1616,6 @@ static void __mptcp_subflow_push_pending(struct sock *sk, struct sock *ssk)
 		while (len > 0) {
 			int ret = 0;
 
-			/* the caller already invoked the packet scheduler,
-			 * check for a different subflow usage only after
-			 * spooling the first chunk of data
-			 */
-			xmit_ssk = first ? ssk : mptcp_sched_get_send(mptcp_sk(sk));
-			if (!xmit_ssk)
-				goto out;
-			if (xmit_ssk != ssk) {
-				mptcp_subflow_delegate(mptcp_subflow_ctx(xmit_ssk),
-						       MPTCP_DELEGATE_SEND);
-				goto out;
-			}
-
 			ret = mptcp_sendmsg_frag(sk, ssk, dfrag, &info);
 			if (ret <= 0)
 				goto out;
@@ -1628,11 +1623,18 @@ static void __mptcp_subflow_push_pending(struct sock *sk, struct sock *ssk)
 			info.sent += ret;
 			copied += ret;
 			len -= ret;
-			first = false;
 
 			mptcp_update_post_push(msk, dfrag, ret);
 		}
 		WRITE_ONCE(msk->first_pending, mptcp_send_next(sk));
+
+		if (msk->snd_burst > 0 &&
+		    sk_stream_memory_free(ssk) &&
+		    mptcp_subflow_active(mptcp_subflow_ctx(ssk))) {
+			mptcp_set_timeout(sk);
+		} else {
+			break;
+		}
 	}
 
 out:
@@ -3191,16 +3193,10 @@ void __mptcp_check_push(struct sock *sk, struct sock *ssk)
 	if (!mptcp_send_head(sk))
 		return;
 
-	if (!sock_owned_by_user(sk)) {
-		struct sock *xmit_ssk = mptcp_sched_get_send(mptcp_sk(sk));
-
-		if (xmit_ssk == ssk)
-			__mptcp_subflow_push_pending(sk, ssk);
-		else if (xmit_ssk)
-			mptcp_subflow_delegate(mptcp_subflow_ctx(xmit_ssk), MPTCP_DELEGATE_SEND);
-	} else {
+	if (!sock_owned_by_user(sk))
+		__mptcp_subflow_push_pending(sk, ssk);
+	else
 		__set_bit(MPTCP_PUSH_PENDING, &mptcp_sk(sk)->cb_flags);
-	}
 }
 
 #define MPTCP_FLAGS_PROCESS_CTX_NEED (BIT(MPTCP_PUSH_PENDING) | \
-- 
2.35.3

[PATCH mptcp-next v2 4/4] mptcp: simplify __mptcp_subflow_push_pending

[Geliang Tang]

This patch simplifies __mptcp_subflow_push_pending() by invoking
__do_push_pending() helper.

Signed-off-by: Geliang Tang <geliang.tang@suse.com>
---
 net/mptcp/protocol.c | 33 ++-------------------------------
 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 31 deletions(-)

diff --git a/net/mptcp/protocol.c b/net/mptcp/protocol.c
index af37b18aa5a5..8ab98cd89e87 100644
--- a/net/mptcp/protocol.c
+++ b/net/mptcp/protocol.c
@@ -1595,9 +1595,8 @@ static void __mptcp_subflow_push_pending(struct sock *sk, struct sock *ssk)
 	struct mptcp_sendmsg_info info = {
 		.data_lock_held = true,
 	};
-	struct mptcp_data_frag *dfrag;
 	struct sock *xmit_ssk;
-	int len, copied = 0;
+	int copied = 0;
 
 	xmit_ssk = mptcp_sched_get_send(mptcp_sk(sk));
 	if (!xmit_ssk)
@@ -1609,41 +1608,13 @@ static void __mptcp_subflow_push_pending(struct sock *sk, struct sock *ssk)
 	}
 
 	info.flags = 0;
-	while ((dfrag = mptcp_send_head(sk))) {
-		info.sent = dfrag->already_sent;
-		info.limit = dfrag->data_len;
-		len = dfrag->data_len - dfrag->already_sent;
-		while (len > 0) {
-			int ret = 0;
-
-			ret = mptcp_sendmsg_frag(sk, ssk, dfrag, &info);
-			if (ret <= 0)
-				goto out;
-
-			info.sent += ret;
-			copied += ret;
-			len -= ret;
-
-			mptcp_update_post_push(msk, dfrag, ret);
-		}
-		WRITE_ONCE(msk->first_pending, mptcp_send_next(sk));
-
-		if (msk->snd_burst > 0 &&
-		    sk_stream_memory_free(ssk) &&
-		    mptcp_subflow_active(mptcp_subflow_ctx(ssk))) {
-			mptcp_set_timeout(sk);
-		} else {
-			break;
-		}
-	}
+	copied = __do_push_pending(sk, ssk, &info);
 
 out:
 	/* __mptcp_alloc_tx_skb could have released some wmem and we are
 	 * not going to flush it via release_sock()
 	 */
 	if (copied) {
-		tcp_push(ssk, 0, info.mss_now, tcp_sk(ssk)->nonagle,
-			 info.size_goal);
 		if (!mptcp_timer_pending(sk))
 			mptcp_reset_timer(sk);
 
-- 
2.35.3

Re: mptcp: simplify __mptcp_subflow_push_pending: Tests Results

[MPTCP CI]

Hi Geliang,

Thank you for your modifications, that's great!

Our CI did some validations and here is its report:

- KVM Validation: normal:
  - Success! ✅:
  - Task: https://cirrus-ci.com/task/5897416976105472
  - Summary: https://api.cirrus-ci.com/v1/artifact/task/5897416976105472/summary/summary.txt

- KVM Validation: debug:
  - Success! ✅:
  - Task: https://cirrus-ci.com/task/5334467022684160
  - Summary: https://api.cirrus-ci.com/v1/artifact/task/5334467022684160/summary/summary.txt

Initiator: Patchew Applier
Commits: https://github.com/multipath-tcp/mptcp_net-next/commits/95535e05c593


If there are some issues, you can reproduce them using the same environment as
the one used by the CI thanks to a docker image, e.g.:

    $ cd [kernel source code]
    $ docker run -v "${PWD}:${PWD}:rw" -w "${PWD}" --privileged --rm -it \
        --pull always mptcp/mptcp-upstream-virtme-docker:latest \
        auto-debug

For more details:

    https://github.com/multipath-tcp/mptcp-upstream-virtme-docker


Please note that despite all the efforts that have been already done to have a
stable tests suite when executed on a public CI like here, it is possible some
reported issues are not due to your modifications. Still, do not hesitate to
help us improve that ;-)

Cheers,
MPTCP GH Action bot
Bot operated by Matthieu Baerts (Tessares)