MPTCP Linux Development
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* Re: selftests: mptcp: rm subflow with v4/v4mapped addr: Tests Results
  2023-11-28 14:22 [PATCH mptcp-next v13 32/32] selftests: mptcp: rm subflow with v4/v4mapped addr Geliang Tang
@ 2023-11-28 14:33 ` MPTCP CI
  2023-12-04 20:35 ` MPTCP CI
  1 sibling, 0 replies; 15+ messages in thread
From: MPTCP CI @ 2023-11-28 14:33 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Geliang Tang; +Cc: mptcp

Hi Geliang,

Thank you for your modifications, that's great!

Our CI did some validations and here is its report:

- {"code":404,"message":
  - "Can't find artifacts containing file conclusion.txt"}:
  - Task: https://cirrus-ci.com/task/6138520423628800
  - Summary: https://api.cirrus-ci.com/v1/artifact/task/6138520423628800/summary/summary.txt

- {"code":404,"message":
  - "Can't find artifacts containing file conclusion.txt"}:
  - Task: https://cirrus-ci.com/task/4555223679631360
  - Summary: https://api.cirrus-ci.com/v1/artifact/task/4555223679631360/summary/summary.txt

- {"code":404,"message":
  - "Can't find artifacts containing file conclusion.txt"}:
  - Task: https://cirrus-ci.com/task/6701470377050112
  - Summary: https://api.cirrus-ci.com/v1/artifact/task/6701470377050112/summary/summary.txt

- {"code":404,"message":
  - "Can't find artifacts containing file conclusion.txt"}:
  - Task: https://cirrus-ci.com/task/5575570470207488
  - Summary: https://api.cirrus-ci.com/v1/artifact/task/5575570470207488/summary/summary.txt

Initiator: Patchew Applier
Commits: https://github.com/multipath-tcp/mptcp_net-next/commits/6010fa5e2dc9


If there are some issues, you can reproduce them using the same environment as
the one used by the CI thanks to a docker image, e.g.:

    $ cd [kernel source code]
    $ docker run -v "${PWD}:${PWD}:rw" -w "${PWD}" --privileged --rm -it \
        --pull always mptcp/mptcp-upstream-virtme-docker:latest \
        auto-debug

For more details:

    https://github.com/multipath-tcp/mptcp-upstream-virtme-docker


Please note that despite all the efforts that have been already done to have a
stable tests suite when executed on a public CI like here, it is possible some
reported issues are not due to your modifications. Still, do not hesitate to
help us improve that ;-)

Cheers,
MPTCP GH Action bot
Bot operated by Matthieu Baerts (NGI0 Core)

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 15+ messages in thread

* Re: selftests: mptcp: rm subflow with v4/v4mapped addr: Tests Results
  2023-11-28 14:22 [PATCH mptcp-next v13 32/32] selftests: mptcp: rm subflow with v4/v4mapped addr Geliang Tang
  2023-11-28 14:33 ` selftests: mptcp: rm subflow with v4/v4mapped addr: Tests Results MPTCP CI
@ 2023-12-04 20:35 ` MPTCP CI
  1 sibling, 0 replies; 15+ messages in thread
From: MPTCP CI @ 2023-12-04 20:35 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Geliang Tang; +Cc: mptcp

Hi Geliang,

Thank you for your modifications, that's great!

Our CI did some validations and here is its report:

- KVM Validation: normal (except selftest_mptcp_join):
  - Success! ✅:
  - Task: https://cirrus-ci.com/task/4613003270684672
  - Summary: https://api.cirrus-ci.com/v1/artifact/task/4613003270684672/summary/summary.txt

- KVM Validation: debug (only selftest_mptcp_join):
  - Success! ✅:
  - Task: https://cirrus-ci.com/task/6301853130948608
  - Summary: https://api.cirrus-ci.com/v1/artifact/task/6301853130948608/summary/summary.txt

- KVM Validation: normal (only selftest_mptcp_join):
  - Success! ✅:
  - Task: https://cirrus-ci.com/task/5738903177527296
  - Summary: https://api.cirrus-ci.com/v1/artifact/task/5738903177527296/summary/summary.txt

- KVM Validation: debug (except selftest_mptcp_join):
  - Success! ✅:
  - Task: https://cirrus-ci.com/task/6487375115714560
  - Summary: https://api.cirrus-ci.com/v1/artifact/task/6487375115714560/summary/summary.txt

Initiator: Patchew Applier
Commits: https://github.com/multipath-tcp/mptcp_net-next/commits/9a3366ece031


If there are some issues, you can reproduce them using the same environment as
the one used by the CI thanks to a docker image, e.g.:

    $ cd [kernel source code]
    $ docker run -v "${PWD}:${PWD}:rw" -w "${PWD}" --privileged --rm -it \
        --pull always mptcp/mptcp-upstream-virtme-docker:latest \
        auto-debug

For more details:

    https://github.com/multipath-tcp/mptcp-upstream-virtme-docker


Please note that despite all the efforts that have been already done to have a
stable tests suite when executed on a public CI like here, it is possible some
reported issues are not due to your modifications. Still, do not hesitate to
help us improve that ;-)

Cheers,
MPTCP GH Action bot
Bot operated by Matthieu Baerts (NGI0 Core)

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 15+ messages in thread

* Re: selftests: mptcp: rm subflow with v4/v4mapped addr: Tests Results
  2024-02-01  3:51 [PATCH mptcp-net 4/4] selftests: mptcp: rm subflow with v4/v4mapped addr Geliang Tang
@ 2024-02-01  4:40 ` MPTCP CI
  2024-02-01  5:01 ` MPTCP CI
                   ` (2 subsequent siblings)
  3 siblings, 0 replies; 15+ messages in thread
From: MPTCP CI @ 2024-02-01  4:40 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Geliang Tang; +Cc: mptcp

Hi Geliang,

Thank you for your modifications, that's great!

Our CI (GitHub Action) did some validations and here is its report:

- KVM Validation: normal:
  - Success! ✅:
  - Task: https://github.com/multipath-tcp/mptcp_net-next/actions/runs/7736093723

Initiator: Patchew Applier
Commits: https://github.com/multipath-tcp/mptcp_net-next/commits/4625d77bcf04


If there are some issues, you can reproduce them using the same environment as
the one used by the CI thanks to a docker image, e.g.:

    $ cd [kernel source code]
    $ docker run -v "${PWD}:${PWD}:rw" -w "${PWD}" --privileged --rm -it \
        --pull always mptcp/mptcp-upstream-virtme-docker:latest \
        auto-normal

For more details:

    https://github.com/multipath-tcp/mptcp-upstream-virtme-docker


Please note that despite all the efforts that have been already done to have a
stable tests suite when executed on a public CI like here, it is possible some
reported issues are not due to your modifications. Still, do not hesitate to
help us improve that ;-)

Cheers,
MPTCP GH Action bot
Bot operated by Matthieu Baerts (NGI0 Core)

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 15+ messages in thread

* Re: selftests: mptcp: rm subflow with v4/v4mapped addr: Tests Results
  2024-02-01  3:51 [PATCH mptcp-net 4/4] selftests: mptcp: rm subflow with v4/v4mapped addr Geliang Tang
  2024-02-01  4:40 ` selftests: mptcp: rm subflow with v4/v4mapped addr: Tests Results MPTCP CI
@ 2024-02-01  5:01 ` MPTCP CI
  2024-02-06  2:21 ` MPTCP CI
  2024-02-06  2:38 ` MPTCP CI
  3 siblings, 0 replies; 15+ messages in thread
From: MPTCP CI @ 2024-02-01  5:01 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Geliang Tang; +Cc: mptcp

Hi Geliang,

Thank you for your modifications, that's great!

Our CI (Cirrus) did some validations with a debug kernel and here is its report:

- KVM Validation: debug (except selftest_mptcp_join):
  - Success! ✅:
  - Task: https://cirrus-ci.com/task/6118213113610240
  - Summary: https://api.cirrus-ci.com/v1/artifact/task/6118213113610240/summary/summary.txt

- KVM Validation: debug (only selftest_mptcp_join):
  - Success! ✅:
  - Task: https://cirrus-ci.com/task/5555263160188928
  - Summary: https://api.cirrus-ci.com/v1/artifact/task/5555263160188928/summary/summary.txt

Initiator: Patchew Applier
Commits: https://github.com/multipath-tcp/mptcp_net-next/commits/4625d77bcf04


If there are some issues, you can reproduce them using the same environment as
the one used by the CI thanks to a docker image, e.g.:

    $ cd [kernel source code]
    $ docker run -v "${PWD}:${PWD}:rw" -w "${PWD}" --privileged --rm -it \
        --pull always mptcp/mptcp-upstream-virtme-docker:latest \
        auto-debug

For more details:

    https://github.com/multipath-tcp/mptcp-upstream-virtme-docker


Please note that despite all the efforts that have been already done to have a
stable tests suite when executed on a public CI like here, it is possible some
reported issues are not due to your modifications. Still, do not hesitate to
help us improve that ;-)

Cheers,
MPTCP GH Action bot
Bot operated by Matthieu Baerts (NGI0 Core)

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 15+ messages in thread

* Re: selftests: mptcp: rm subflow with v4/v4mapped addr: Tests Results
  2024-02-01  3:51 [PATCH mptcp-net 4/4] selftests: mptcp: rm subflow with v4/v4mapped addr Geliang Tang
  2024-02-01  4:40 ` selftests: mptcp: rm subflow with v4/v4mapped addr: Tests Results MPTCP CI
  2024-02-01  5:01 ` MPTCP CI
@ 2024-02-06  2:21 ` MPTCP CI
  2024-02-06  2:38 ` MPTCP CI
  3 siblings, 0 replies; 15+ messages in thread
From: MPTCP CI @ 2024-02-06  2:21 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Geliang Tang; +Cc: mptcp

Hi Geliang,

Thank you for your modifications, that's great!

Our CI (GitHub Action) did some validations and here is its report:

- KVM Validation: normal:
  - Success! ✅:
  - Task: https://github.com/multipath-tcp/mptcp_net-next/actions/runs/7793464637

Initiator: Patchew Applier
Commits: https://github.com/multipath-tcp/mptcp_net-next/commits/483bc6889d53


If there are some issues, you can reproduce them using the same environment as
the one used by the CI thanks to a docker image, e.g.:

    $ cd [kernel source code]
    $ docker run -v "${PWD}:${PWD}:rw" -w "${PWD}" --privileged --rm -it \
        --pull always mptcp/mptcp-upstream-virtme-docker:latest \
        auto-normal

For more details:

    https://github.com/multipath-tcp/mptcp-upstream-virtme-docker


Please note that despite all the efforts that have been already done to have a
stable tests suite when executed on a public CI like here, it is possible some
reported issues are not due to your modifications. Still, do not hesitate to
help us improve that ;-)

Cheers,
MPTCP GH Action bot
Bot operated by Matthieu Baerts (NGI0 Core)

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 15+ messages in thread

* Re: selftests: mptcp: rm subflow with v4/v4mapped addr: Tests Results
  2024-02-01  3:51 [PATCH mptcp-net 4/4] selftests: mptcp: rm subflow with v4/v4mapped addr Geliang Tang
                   ` (2 preceding siblings ...)
  2024-02-06  2:21 ` MPTCP CI
@ 2024-02-06  2:38 ` MPTCP CI
  3 siblings, 0 replies; 15+ messages in thread
From: MPTCP CI @ 2024-02-06  2:38 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Geliang Tang; +Cc: mptcp

Hi Geliang,

Thank you for your modifications, that's great!

Our CI (Cirrus) did some validations with a debug kernel and here is its report:

- KVM Validation: debug (except selftest_mptcp_join):
  - Success! ✅:
  - Task: https://cirrus-ci.com/task/5780927813517312
  - Summary: https://api.cirrus-ci.com/v1/artifact/task/5780927813517312/summary/summary.txt

- KVM Validation: debug (only selftest_mptcp_join):
  - Success! ✅:
  - Task: https://cirrus-ci.com/task/5217977860096000
  - Summary: https://api.cirrus-ci.com/v1/artifact/task/5217977860096000/summary/summary.txt

Initiator: Patchew Applier
Commits: https://github.com/multipath-tcp/mptcp_net-next/commits/483bc6889d53


If there are some issues, you can reproduce them using the same environment as
the one used by the CI thanks to a docker image, e.g.:

    $ cd [kernel source code]
    $ docker run -v "${PWD}:${PWD}:rw" -w "${PWD}" --privileged --rm -it \
        --pull always mptcp/mptcp-upstream-virtme-docker:latest \
        auto-debug

For more details:

    https://github.com/multipath-tcp/mptcp-upstream-virtme-docker


Please note that despite all the efforts that have been already done to have a
stable tests suite when executed on a public CI like here, it is possible some
reported issues are not due to your modifications. Still, do not hesitate to
help us improve that ;-)

Cheers,
MPTCP GH Action bot
Bot operated by Matthieu Baerts (NGI0 Core)

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 15+ messages in thread

* [PATCH mptcp-next v2 0/2] fixes for "map v4 address to v6"
@ 2024-02-06  5:43 Geliang Tang
  2024-02-06  5:43 ` [PATCH mptcp-next v2 1/2] mptcp: map v4 address to v6 when destroying subflow Geliang Tang
  2024-02-06  5:43 ` [PATCH mptcp-next v2 2/2] selftests: mptcp: rm subflow with v4/v4mapped addr Geliang Tang
  0 siblings, 2 replies; 15+ messages in thread
From: Geliang Tang @ 2024-02-06  5:43 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: mptcp; +Cc: Geliang Tang

From: Geliang Tang <tanggeliang@kylinos.cn>

v2:
 - update selftests as Mat suggested.

Geliang Tang (2):
  mptcp: map v4 address to v6 when destroying subflow
  selftests: mptcp: rm subflow with v4/v4mapped addr

 net/mptcp/pm_userspace.c                      | 10 +++++++
 .../testing/selftests/net/mptcp/mptcp_join.sh | 28 +++++++++++--------
 .../testing/selftests/net/mptcp/mptcp_lib.sh  |  6 ++++
 3 files changed, 32 insertions(+), 12 deletions(-)

-- 
2.40.1


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 15+ messages in thread

* [PATCH mptcp-next v2 1/2] mptcp: map v4 address to v6 when destroying subflow
  2024-02-06  5:43 [PATCH mptcp-next v2 0/2] fixes for "map v4 address to v6" Geliang Tang
@ 2024-02-06  5:43 ` Geliang Tang
  2024-02-06  5:43 ` [PATCH mptcp-next v2 2/2] selftests: mptcp: rm subflow with v4/v4mapped addr Geliang Tang
  1 sibling, 0 replies; 15+ messages in thread
From: Geliang Tang @ 2024-02-06  5:43 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: mptcp; +Cc: Geliang Tang

From: Geliang Tang <tanggeliang@kylinos.cn>

Address family of server side mismatches with that of client side, like
in "userspace pm add & remove address" test:

    userspace_pm_add_addr $ns1 10.0.2.1 10
    userspace_pm_rm_sf $ns1 "::ffff:10.0.2.1" $SUB_ESTABLISHED

That's because on the server side, the family is set to AF_INET6 and the
v4 address is mapped in a v6 one.

This patch fixes this issue. In mptcp_pm_nl_subflow_destroy_doit(), before
checking local address family with remote address family, map an IPv4
address to an IPv6 address if the pair is a v4-mapped address.

Closes: https://github.com/multipath-tcp/mptcp_net-next/issues/387
Fixes: 702c2f646d42 ("mptcp: netlink: allow userspace-driven subflow establishment")
Signed-off-by: Geliang Tang <tanggeliang@kylinos.cn>
---
 net/mptcp/pm_userspace.c | 10 ++++++++++
 1 file changed, 10 insertions(+)

diff --git a/net/mptcp/pm_userspace.c b/net/mptcp/pm_userspace.c
index e582b3b2d174..b40a69649fe1 100644
--- a/net/mptcp/pm_userspace.c
+++ b/net/mptcp/pm_userspace.c
@@ -495,6 +495,16 @@ int mptcp_pm_nl_subflow_destroy_doit(struct sk_buff *skb, struct genl_info *info
 		goto destroy_err;
 	}
 
+#if IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_MPTCP_IPV6)
+	if (addr_l.family == AF_INET && ipv6_addr_v4mapped(&addr_r.addr6)) {
+		ipv6_addr_set_v4mapped(addr_l.addr.s_addr, &addr_l.addr6);
+		addr_l.family = AF_INET6;
+	}
+	if (addr_r.family == AF_INET && ipv6_addr_v4mapped(&addr_l.addr6)) {
+		ipv6_addr_set_v4mapped(addr_r.addr.s_addr, &addr_r.addr6);
+		addr_r.family = AF_INET6;
+	}
+#endif
 	if (addr_l.family != addr_r.family) {
 		GENL_SET_ERR_MSG(info, "address families do not match");
 		err = -EINVAL;
-- 
2.40.1


^ permalink raw reply related	[flat|nested] 15+ messages in thread

* [PATCH mptcp-next v2 2/2] selftests: mptcp: rm subflow with v4/v4mapped addr
  2024-02-06  5:43 [PATCH mptcp-next v2 0/2] fixes for "map v4 address to v6" Geliang Tang
  2024-02-06  5:43 ` [PATCH mptcp-next v2 1/2] mptcp: map v4 address to v6 when destroying subflow Geliang Tang
@ 2024-02-06  5:43 ` Geliang Tang
  2024-02-06  6:43   ` selftests: mptcp: rm subflow with v4/v4mapped addr: Tests Results MPTCP CI
  2024-02-06  7:30   ` MPTCP CI
  1 sibling, 2 replies; 15+ messages in thread
From: Geliang Tang @ 2024-02-06  5:43 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: mptcp; +Cc: Geliang Tang

From: Geliang Tang <tanggeliang@kylinos.cn>

Now both a v4 address and a v4-mapped address are supported when
destroying a userspace pm subflow, this patch adds a second subflow
to "userspace pm add & remove address" test, and two subflows could
be removed two different ways, one with the v4mapped and one with v4.

Closes: https://github.com/multipath-tcp/mptcp_net-next/issues/387
Fixes: 48d73f609dcc ("selftests: mptcp: update userspace pm addr tests")
Signed-off-by: Geliang Tang <tanggeliang@kylinos.cn>
---
 .../testing/selftests/net/mptcp/mptcp_join.sh | 28 +++++++++++--------
 .../testing/selftests/net/mptcp/mptcp_lib.sh  |  6 ++++
 2 files changed, 22 insertions(+), 12 deletions(-)

diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/net/mptcp/mptcp_join.sh b/tools/testing/selftests/net/mptcp/mptcp_join.sh
index c07386e21e0a..0aa6c5b3aec0 100755
--- a/tools/testing/selftests/net/mptcp/mptcp_join.sh
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/net/mptcp/mptcp_join.sh
@@ -3333,16 +3333,17 @@ userspace_pm_rm_sf()
 {
 	local evts=$evts_ns1
 	local t=${3:-1}
-	local ip=4
+	local ip
 	local tk da dp sp
 	local cnt
 
 	[ "$1" == "$ns2" ] && evts=$evts_ns2
-	if mptcp_lib_is_v6 $2; then ip=6; fi
+	[ -n "$(mptcp_lib_evts_get_info "saddr4" "$evts" $t)" ] && ip=4
+	[ -n "$(mptcp_lib_evts_get_info "saddr6" "$evts" $t)" ] && ip=6
 	tk=$(mptcp_lib_evts_get_info token "$evts")
-	da=$(mptcp_lib_evts_get_info "daddr$ip" "$evts" $t)
-	dp=$(mptcp_lib_evts_get_info dport "$evts" $t)
-	sp=$(mptcp_lib_evts_get_info sport "$evts" $t)
+	da=$(mptcp_lib_evts_get_info_with_addr "daddr$ip" "$evts" $t $2)
+	dp=$(mptcp_lib_evts_get_info_with_addr dport "$evts" $t $2)
+	sp=$(mptcp_lib_evts_get_info_with_addr sport "$evts" $t $2)
 
 	cnt=$(rm_sf_count ${1})
 	ip netns exec $1 ./pm_nl_ctl dsf lip $2 lport $sp \
@@ -3429,20 +3430,23 @@ userspace_tests()
 	if reset_with_events "userspace pm add & remove address" &&
 	   continue_if mptcp_lib_has_file '/proc/sys/net/mptcp/pm_type'; then
 		set_userspace_pm $ns1
-		pm_nl_set_limits $ns2 1 1
+		pm_nl_set_limits $ns2 2 2
 		speed=5 \
 			run_tests $ns1 $ns2 10.0.1.1 &
 		local tests_pid=$!
 		wait_mpj $ns1
 		userspace_pm_add_addr $ns1 10.0.2.1 10
-		chk_join_nr 1 1 1
-		chk_add_nr 1 1
-		chk_mptcp_info subflows 1 subflows 1
-		chk_subflows_total 2 2
-		chk_mptcp_info add_addr_signal 1 add_addr_accepted 1
+		userspace_pm_add_addr $ns1 10.0.3.1 20
+		chk_join_nr 2 2 2
+		chk_add_nr 2 2
+		chk_mptcp_info subflows 2 subflows 2
+		chk_subflows_total 3 3
+		chk_mptcp_info add_addr_signal 2 add_addr_accepted 2
 		userspace_pm_rm_addr $ns1 10
 		userspace_pm_rm_sf $ns1 "::ffff:10.0.2.1" $SUB_ESTABLISHED
-		chk_rm_nr 1 1 invert
+		userspace_pm_rm_addr $ns1 20
+		userspace_pm_rm_sf $ns1 10.0.3.1 $SUB_ESTABLISHED
+		chk_rm_nr 2 2 invert
 		chk_mptcp_info subflows 0 subflows 0
 		chk_subflows_total 1 1
 		kill_events_pids
diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/net/mptcp/mptcp_lib.sh b/tools/testing/selftests/net/mptcp/mptcp_lib.sh
index 3a2abae5993e..29c92e127905 100644
--- a/tools/testing/selftests/net/mptcp/mptcp_lib.sh
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/net/mptcp/mptcp_lib.sh
@@ -218,6 +218,12 @@ mptcp_lib_evts_get_info() {
 	mptcp_lib_get_info_value "${1}" "^type:${3:-1}," < "${2}"
 }
 
+# $1: info name ; $2: evts_ns ; $3: event type; $4: addr
+mptcp_lib_evts_get_info_with_addr() {
+	cat "${2}" | grep "${4}" |
+	mptcp_lib_get_info_value "${1}" "^type:${3:-1},"
+}
+
 # $1: PID
 mptcp_lib_kill_wait() {
 	[ "${1}" -eq 0 ] && return 0
-- 
2.40.1


^ permalink raw reply related	[flat|nested] 15+ messages in thread

* Re: selftests: mptcp: rm subflow with v4/v4mapped addr: Tests Results
  2024-02-06  5:43 ` [PATCH mptcp-next v2 2/2] selftests: mptcp: rm subflow with v4/v4mapped addr Geliang Tang
@ 2024-02-06  6:43   ` MPTCP CI
  2024-02-06  7:30   ` MPTCP CI
  1 sibling, 0 replies; 15+ messages in thread
From: MPTCP CI @ 2024-02-06  6:43 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Geliang Tang; +Cc: mptcp

Hi Geliang,

Thank you for your modifications, that's great!

Our CI (GitHub Action) did some validations and here is its report:

- KVM Validation: normal:
  - Success! ✅:
  - Task: https://github.com/multipath-tcp/mptcp_net-next/actions/runs/7795362577

Initiator: Patchew Applier
Commits: https://github.com/multipath-tcp/mptcp_net-next/commits/c83ded2d90fc


If there are some issues, you can reproduce them using the same environment as
the one used by the CI thanks to a docker image, e.g.:

    $ cd [kernel source code]
    $ docker run -v "${PWD}:${PWD}:rw" -w "${PWD}" --privileged --rm -it \
        --pull always mptcp/mptcp-upstream-virtme-docker:latest \
        auto-normal

For more details:

    https://github.com/multipath-tcp/mptcp-upstream-virtme-docker


Please note that despite all the efforts that have been already done to have a
stable tests suite when executed on a public CI like here, it is possible some
reported issues are not due to your modifications. Still, do not hesitate to
help us improve that ;-)

Cheers,
MPTCP GH Action bot
Bot operated by Matthieu Baerts (NGI0 Core)

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 15+ messages in thread

* Re: selftests: mptcp: rm subflow with v4/v4mapped addr: Tests Results
  2024-02-06  5:43 ` [PATCH mptcp-next v2 2/2] selftests: mptcp: rm subflow with v4/v4mapped addr Geliang Tang
  2024-02-06  6:43   ` selftests: mptcp: rm subflow with v4/v4mapped addr: Tests Results MPTCP CI
@ 2024-02-06  7:30   ` MPTCP CI
  1 sibling, 0 replies; 15+ messages in thread
From: MPTCP CI @ 2024-02-06  7:30 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Geliang Tang; +Cc: mptcp

Hi Geliang,

Thank you for your modifications, that's great!

Our CI (Cirrus) did some validations with a debug kernel and here is its report:

- KVM Validation: debug (except selftest_mptcp_join):
  - Success! ✅:
  - Task: https://cirrus-ci.com/task/6515054728708096
  - Summary: https://api.cirrus-ci.com/v1/artifact/task/6515054728708096/summary/summary.txt

- KVM Validation: debug (only selftest_mptcp_join):
  - Success! ✅:
  - Task: https://cirrus-ci.com/task/5054167002120192
  - Summary: https://api.cirrus-ci.com/v1/artifact/task/5054167002120192/summary/summary.txt

Initiator: Patchew Applier
Commits: https://github.com/multipath-tcp/mptcp_net-next/commits/c83ded2d90fc


If there are some issues, you can reproduce them using the same environment as
the one used by the CI thanks to a docker image, e.g.:

    $ cd [kernel source code]
    $ docker run -v "${PWD}:${PWD}:rw" -w "${PWD}" --privileged --rm -it \
        --pull always mptcp/mptcp-upstream-virtme-docker:latest \
        auto-debug

For more details:

    https://github.com/multipath-tcp/mptcp-upstream-virtme-docker


Please note that despite all the efforts that have been already done to have a
stable tests suite when executed on a public CI like here, it is possible some
reported issues are not due to your modifications. Still, do not hesitate to
help us improve that ;-)

Cheers,
MPTCP GH Action bot
Bot operated by Matthieu Baerts (NGI0 Core)

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 15+ messages in thread

* Re: selftests: mptcp: rm subflow with v4/v4mapped addr: Tests Results
  2024-02-07  1:55 [PATCH mptcp-next v3 2/2] selftests: mptcp: rm subflow with v4/v4mapped addr Geliang Tang
@ 2024-02-07  2:49 ` MPTCP CI
  2024-02-07  3:11 ` MPTCP CI
                   ` (2 subsequent siblings)
  3 siblings, 0 replies; 15+ messages in thread
From: MPTCP CI @ 2024-02-07  2:49 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Geliang Tang; +Cc: mptcp

Hi Geliang,

Thank you for your modifications, that's great!

Our CI (GitHub Action) did some validations and here is its report:

- KVM Validation: normal:
  - Success! ✅:
  - Task: https://github.com/multipath-tcp/mptcp_net-next/actions/runs/7808971609

Initiator: Patchew Applier
Commits: https://github.com/multipath-tcp/mptcp_net-next/commits/d954c612ab76


If there are some issues, you can reproduce them using the same environment as
the one used by the CI thanks to a docker image, e.g.:

    $ cd [kernel source code]
    $ docker run -v "${PWD}:${PWD}:rw" -w "${PWD}" --privileged --rm -it \
        --pull always mptcp/mptcp-upstream-virtme-docker:latest \
        auto-normal

For more details:

    https://github.com/multipath-tcp/mptcp-upstream-virtme-docker


Please note that despite all the efforts that have been already done to have a
stable tests suite when executed on a public CI like here, it is possible some
reported issues are not due to your modifications. Still, do not hesitate to
help us improve that ;-)

Cheers,
MPTCP GH Action bot
Bot operated by Matthieu Baerts (NGI0 Core)

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 15+ messages in thread

* Re: selftests: mptcp: rm subflow with v4/v4mapped addr: Tests Results
  2024-02-07  1:55 [PATCH mptcp-next v3 2/2] selftests: mptcp: rm subflow with v4/v4mapped addr Geliang Tang
  2024-02-07  2:49 ` selftests: mptcp: rm subflow with v4/v4mapped addr: Tests Results MPTCP CI
@ 2024-02-07  3:11 ` MPTCP CI
  2024-02-14  2:36 ` MPTCP CI
  2024-02-14  2:55 ` MPTCP CI
  3 siblings, 0 replies; 15+ messages in thread
From: MPTCP CI @ 2024-02-07  3:11 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Geliang Tang; +Cc: mptcp

Hi Geliang,

Thank you for your modifications, that's great!

Our CI (Cirrus) did some validations with a debug kernel and here is its report:

- KVM Validation: debug (except selftest_mptcp_join):
  - Success! ✅:
  - Task: https://cirrus-ci.com/task/5682143834144768
  - Summary: https://api.cirrus-ci.com/v1/artifact/task/5682143834144768/summary/summary.txt

- KVM Validation: debug (only selftest_mptcp_join):
  - Unstable: 1 failed test(s): selftest_mptcp_join 🔴:
  - Task: https://cirrus-ci.com/task/5119193880723456
  - Summary: https://api.cirrus-ci.com/v1/artifact/task/5119193880723456/summary/summary.txt

Initiator: Patchew Applier
Commits: https://github.com/multipath-tcp/mptcp_net-next/commits/d954c612ab76


If there are some issues, you can reproduce them using the same environment as
the one used by the CI thanks to a docker image, e.g.:

    $ cd [kernel source code]
    $ docker run -v "${PWD}:${PWD}:rw" -w "${PWD}" --privileged --rm -it \
        --pull always mptcp/mptcp-upstream-virtme-docker:latest \
        auto-debug

For more details:

    https://github.com/multipath-tcp/mptcp-upstream-virtme-docker


Please note that despite all the efforts that have been already done to have a
stable tests suite when executed on a public CI like here, it is possible some
reported issues are not due to your modifications. Still, do not hesitate to
help us improve that ;-)

Cheers,
MPTCP GH Action bot
Bot operated by Matthieu Baerts (NGI0 Core)

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 15+ messages in thread

* Re: selftests: mptcp: rm subflow with v4/v4mapped addr: Tests Results
  2024-02-07  1:55 [PATCH mptcp-next v3 2/2] selftests: mptcp: rm subflow with v4/v4mapped addr Geliang Tang
  2024-02-07  2:49 ` selftests: mptcp: rm subflow with v4/v4mapped addr: Tests Results MPTCP CI
  2024-02-07  3:11 ` MPTCP CI
@ 2024-02-14  2:36 ` MPTCP CI
  2024-02-14  2:55 ` MPTCP CI
  3 siblings, 0 replies; 15+ messages in thread
From: MPTCP CI @ 2024-02-14  2:36 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Geliang Tang; +Cc: mptcp

Hi Geliang,

Thank you for your modifications, that's great!

Our CI (GitHub Action) did some validations and here is its report:

- KVM Validation: normal:
  - Success! ✅:
  - Task: https://github.com/multipath-tcp/mptcp_net-next/actions/runs/7895424329

Initiator: Patchew Applier
Commits: https://github.com/multipath-tcp/mptcp_net-next/commits/9b8ecb217a79


If there are some issues, you can reproduce them using the same environment as
the one used by the CI thanks to a docker image, e.g.:

    $ cd [kernel source code]
    $ docker run -v "${PWD}:${PWD}:rw" -w "${PWD}" --privileged --rm -it \
        --pull always mptcp/mptcp-upstream-virtme-docker:latest \
        auto-normal

For more details:

    https://github.com/multipath-tcp/mptcp-upstream-virtme-docker


Please note that despite all the efforts that have been already done to have a
stable tests suite when executed on a public CI like here, it is possible some
reported issues are not due to your modifications. Still, do not hesitate to
help us improve that ;-)

Cheers,
MPTCP GH Action bot
Bot operated by Matthieu Baerts (NGI0 Core)

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 15+ messages in thread

* Re: selftests: mptcp: rm subflow with v4/v4mapped addr: Tests Results
  2024-02-07  1:55 [PATCH mptcp-next v3 2/2] selftests: mptcp: rm subflow with v4/v4mapped addr Geliang Tang
                   ` (2 preceding siblings ...)
  2024-02-14  2:36 ` MPTCP CI
@ 2024-02-14  2:55 ` MPTCP CI
  3 siblings, 0 replies; 15+ messages in thread
From: MPTCP CI @ 2024-02-14  2:55 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Geliang Tang; +Cc: mptcp

Hi Geliang,

Thank you for your modifications, that's great!

Our CI (Cirrus) did some validations with a debug kernel and here is its report:

- KVM Validation: debug (except selftest_mptcp_join):
  - Success! ✅:
  - Task: https://cirrus-ci.com/task/5714999662870528
  - Summary: https://api.cirrus-ci.com/v1/artifact/task/5714999662870528/summary/summary.txt

- KVM Validation: debug (only selftest_mptcp_join):
  - Unstable: 1 failed test(s): selftest_mptcp_join 🔴:
  - Task: https://cirrus-ci.com/task/5152049709449216
  - Summary: https://api.cirrus-ci.com/v1/artifact/task/5152049709449216/summary/summary.txt

Initiator: Patchew Applier
Commits: https://github.com/multipath-tcp/mptcp_net-next/commits/9b8ecb217a79


If there are some issues, you can reproduce them using the same environment as
the one used by the CI thanks to a docker image, e.g.:

    $ cd [kernel source code]
    $ docker run -v "${PWD}:${PWD}:rw" -w "${PWD}" --privileged --rm -it \
        --pull always mptcp/mptcp-upstream-virtme-docker:latest \
        auto-debug

For more details:

    https://github.com/multipath-tcp/mptcp-upstream-virtme-docker


Please note that despite all the efforts that have been already done to have a
stable tests suite when executed on a public CI like here, it is possible some
reported issues are not due to your modifications. Still, do not hesitate to
help us improve that ;-)

Cheers,
MPTCP GH Action bot
Bot operated by Matthieu Baerts (NGI0 Core)

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 15+ messages in thread

end of thread, other threads:[~2024-02-14  2:55 UTC | newest]

Thread overview: 15+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2024-02-06  5:43 [PATCH mptcp-next v2 0/2] fixes for "map v4 address to v6" Geliang Tang
2024-02-06  5:43 ` [PATCH mptcp-next v2 1/2] mptcp: map v4 address to v6 when destroying subflow Geliang Tang
2024-02-06  5:43 ` [PATCH mptcp-next v2 2/2] selftests: mptcp: rm subflow with v4/v4mapped addr Geliang Tang
2024-02-06  6:43   ` selftests: mptcp: rm subflow with v4/v4mapped addr: Tests Results MPTCP CI
2024-02-06  7:30   ` MPTCP CI
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2024-02-07  1:55 [PATCH mptcp-next v3 2/2] selftests: mptcp: rm subflow with v4/v4mapped addr Geliang Tang
2024-02-07  2:49 ` selftests: mptcp: rm subflow with v4/v4mapped addr: Tests Results MPTCP CI
2024-02-07  3:11 ` MPTCP CI
2024-02-14  2:36 ` MPTCP CI
2024-02-14  2:55 ` MPTCP CI
2024-02-01  3:51 [PATCH mptcp-net 4/4] selftests: mptcp: rm subflow with v4/v4mapped addr Geliang Tang
2024-02-01  4:40 ` selftests: mptcp: rm subflow with v4/v4mapped addr: Tests Results MPTCP CI
2024-02-01  5:01 ` MPTCP CI
2024-02-06  2:21 ` MPTCP CI
2024-02-06  2:38 ` MPTCP CI
2023-11-28 14:22 [PATCH mptcp-next v13 32/32] selftests: mptcp: rm subflow with v4/v4mapped addr Geliang Tang
2023-11-28 14:33 ` selftests: mptcp: rm subflow with v4/v4mapped addr: Tests Results MPTCP CI
2023-12-04 20:35 ` MPTCP CI

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox