Netdev List
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Markus Stockhausen" <markus.stockhausen@gmx.de>
To: "'Andrew Lunn'" <andrew@lunn.ch>
Cc: <hkallweit1@gmail.com>, <linux@armlinux.org.uk>,
	<davem@davemloft.net>, <edumazet@google.com>, <kuba@kernel.org>,
	<pabeni@redhat.com>, <netdev@vger.kernel.org>,
	<chris.packham@alliedtelesis.co.nz>, <daniel@makrotopia.org>,
	<mensi@mensi.ch>
Subject: AW: [PATCH net-next 6/8] net: mdio: realtek-rtl9300: relocate topology setup
Date: Tue, 2 Jun 2026 20:48:37 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <00b401dcf2c0$6e2826c0$4a787440$@gmx.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <6ebe2342-fd11-4588-a17a-fdb057335915@lunn.ch>

> Von: Andrew Lunn <andrew@lunn.ch> 
> Gesendet: Dienstag, 2. Juni 2026 17:18
> An: Markus Stockhausen <markus.stockhausen@gmx.de>
> Betreff: Re: [PATCH net-next 6/8] net: mdio: realtek-rtl9300: relocate
topology setup
> 
> > With the next series I want to deactivate/activate hardware polling 
> > during the whole probing process (besides other things). This avoids
> > that hardware polling fills wrong MAC register states during
> > bus/PHY setup.
> > 
> > Are you thinking about this? If yes I can add that to this series.
>
> No, i mean during normal operation. When the core takes the mdio bus
> lock, you need to disable polling until the lock is released. That is
> going to need some additional API calls in struct mii_bus.

I have always tried to avoid kernel hacks downstream and never
thought about enhancing the mii_bus. But as this seems to be 
some kind of invitation I will shortly explain the situation here.

The hardware polling in these devices is very important for the DSA
driver. Especially as a port can be either PHY or SerDes driven. Some
MAC operations simply do not work if a wrong state is reported.

Hardware polling and PHY access coexist without any issues. The
MDIO controller coordinates the different requests and the kernel 
does not need to take care about that. 

However we have rare cases where polling should be disabled.
There is no evidence about any issues in the OpenWrt ecosystem 
but vendor SDK disables polling for certain sequence of operations. 
These include

- PHY Firmware patching
- Switching the port on a dual Fibre/Copper PHY
- Enabling/disabling EEE on a port

So we can benefit from some kind of bus enhancement that 
allows to "isolate" a PHY on a bus from any hardware interfering. 
Best case would be to allow the PHY to access these functions.

As said no idea at the moment because never thought about it.
So any guidance is appreciated.

Markus



  reply	other threads:[~2026-06-02 18:49 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 34+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2026-06-02  5:26 [PATCH net-next 0/8] net: mdio: realtek-rtl9300: Refactor initialization and port lookup Markus Stockhausen
2026-06-02  5:26 ` [PATCH net-next 1/8] net: mdio: realtek-rtl9300: Convert to fwnode API Markus Stockhausen
2026-06-02 12:06   ` Andrew Lunn
2026-06-02 12:29     ` AW: " Markus Stockhausen
2026-06-02 12:50       ` Andrew Lunn
2026-06-02 18:05   ` Jakub Kicinski
2026-06-02 18:58     ` AW: " Markus Stockhausen
2026-06-02  5:26 ` [PATCH net-next 2/8] net: mdio: realtek-rtl9300: Correctly handle ethernet-phy-package Markus Stockhausen
2026-06-02  9:32   ` Jagielski, Jedrzej
2026-06-02 10:23     ` AW: " Markus Stockhausen
2026-06-02 11:22       ` Jagielski, Jedrzej
2026-06-02  5:26 ` [PATCH net-next 3/8] net: mdio: realtek-rtl9300: harden otto_emdio_map_ports() Markus Stockhausen
2026-06-02  9:38   ` Jagielski, Jedrzej
2026-06-02 10:42     ` AW: " Markus Stockhausen
2026-06-02 11:29       ` Jagielski, Jedrzej
2026-06-02 12:14   ` Andrew Lunn
2026-06-02  5:26 ` [PATCH net-next 4/8] net: mdio: realtek-rtl9300: harden otto_emdio_probe_one() Markus Stockhausen
2026-06-02  5:26 ` [PATCH net-next 5/8] net: mdio: realtek-rtl9300: adapt spaces for defines Markus Stockhausen
2026-06-02  9:42   ` Jagielski, Jedrzej
2026-06-02 10:18     ` AW: " Markus Stockhausen
2026-06-02 11:16       ` Jagielski, Jedrzej
2026-06-02 12:20   ` Andrew Lunn
2026-06-02  5:26 ` [PATCH net-next 6/8] net: mdio: realtek-rtl9300: relocate topology setup Markus Stockhausen
2026-06-02  9:50   ` Jagielski, Jedrzej
2026-06-02 10:50     ` AW: " Markus Stockhausen
2026-06-02 12:24   ` Andrew Lunn
2026-06-02 13:01     ` AW: " Markus Stockhausen
2026-06-02 15:17       ` Andrew Lunn
2026-06-02 18:48         ` Markus Stockhausen [this message]
2026-06-02 20:29           ` Andrew Lunn
2026-06-02  5:26 ` [PATCH net-next 7/8] net: mdio: realtek-rtl9300: reorder controller setup Markus Stockhausen
2026-06-02  5:26 ` [PATCH net-next 8/8] net: mdio: realtek-rtl9300: Convert port lookup from O(n) to O(1) Markus Stockhausen
2026-06-02 12:30   ` Andrew Lunn
2026-06-02 20:02     ` AW: " Markus Stockhausen

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to='00b401dcf2c0$6e2826c0$4a787440$@gmx.de' \
    --to=markus.stockhausen@gmx.de \
    --cc=andrew@lunn.ch \
    --cc=chris.packham@alliedtelesis.co.nz \
    --cc=daniel@makrotopia.org \
    --cc=davem@davemloft.net \
    --cc=edumazet@google.com \
    --cc=hkallweit1@gmail.com \
    --cc=kuba@kernel.org \
    --cc=linux@armlinux.org.uk \
    --cc=mensi@mensi.ch \
    --cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=pabeni@redhat.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox