public inbox for netdev@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Vadim Fedorenko <vadim.fedorenko@linux.dev>
To: Jiri Pirko <jiri@resnulli.us>,
	netdev@vger.kernel.org,
	Maciek Machnikowski <maciek@machnikowski.net>
Cc: davem@davemloft.net, edumazet@google.com, kuba@kernel.org,
	pabeni@redhat.com, donald.hunter@gmail.com,
	arkadiusz.kubalewski@intel.com, saeedm@nvidia.com,
	leon@kernel.org, tariqt@nvidia.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next 1/2] dpll: add clock quality level attribute and op
Date: Wed, 9 Oct 2024 14:33:13 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <0655aa46-498d-4e8e-be6c-be5fb630c006@linux.dev> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20241009122547.296829-2-jiri@resnulli.us>

On 09/10/2024 13:25, Jiri Pirko wrote:
> From: Jiri Pirko <jiri@nvidia.com>
> 
> In order to allow driver expose quality level of the clock it is
> running, introduce a new netlink attr with enum to carry it to the
> userspace. Also, introduce an op the dpll netlink code calls into the
> driver to obtain the value.

The idea is good, it matches with the work Maciek is doing now in terms
of improving POSIX clock interface. See a comment below.

> Signed-off-by: Jiri Pirko <jiri@nvidia.com>
> ---
>   Documentation/netlink/specs/dpll.yaml | 28 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>   drivers/dpll/dpll_netlink.c           | 22 +++++++++++++++++++++
>   include/linux/dpll.h                  |  4 ++++
>   include/uapi/linux/dpll.h             | 21 ++++++++++++++++++++
>   4 files changed, 75 insertions(+)
> 
> diff --git a/Documentation/netlink/specs/dpll.yaml b/Documentation/netlink/specs/dpll.yaml
> index f2894ca35de8..77a8e9ddb254 100644
> --- a/Documentation/netlink/specs/dpll.yaml
> +++ b/Documentation/netlink/specs/dpll.yaml
> @@ -85,6 +85,30 @@ definitions:
>             This may happen for example if dpll device was previously
>             locked on an input pin of type PIN_TYPE_SYNCE_ETH_PORT.
>       render-max: true
> +  -
> +    type: enum
> +    name: clock-quality-level
> +    doc: |
> +      level of quality of a clock device.
> +    entries:
> +      -
> +        name: prc
> +        value: 1
> +      -
> +        name: ssu-a
> +      -
> +        name: ssu-b
> +      -
> +        name: eec1
> +      -
> +        name: prtc
> +      -
> +        name: eprtc
> +      -
> +        name: eeec
> +      -
> +        name: eprc
> +    render-max: true
>     -
>       type: const
>       name: temp-divider
> @@ -252,6 +276,10 @@ attribute-sets:
>           name: lock-status-error
>           type: u32
>           enum: lock-status-error
> +      -
> +        name: clock-quality-level
> +        type: u32
> +        enum: clock-quality-level
>     -
>       name: pin
>       enum-name: dpll_a_pin
> diff --git a/drivers/dpll/dpll_netlink.c b/drivers/dpll/dpll_netlink.c
> index fc0280dcddd1..689a6d0ff049 100644
> --- a/drivers/dpll/dpll_netlink.c
> +++ b/drivers/dpll/dpll_netlink.c
> @@ -169,6 +169,25 @@ dpll_msg_add_temp(struct sk_buff *msg, struct dpll_device *dpll,
>   	return 0;
>   }
>   
> +static int
> +dpll_msg_add_clock_quality_level(struct sk_buff *msg, struct dpll_device *dpll,
> +				 struct netlink_ext_ack *extack)
> +{
> +	const struct dpll_device_ops *ops = dpll_device_ops(dpll);
> +	enum dpll_clock_quality_level ql;
> +	int ret;
> +
> +	if (!ops->clock_quality_level_get)
> +		return 0;
> +	ret = ops->clock_quality_level_get(dpll, dpll_priv(dpll), &ql, extack);
> +	if (ret)
> +		return ret;
> +	if (nla_put_u32(msg, DPLL_A_CLOCK_QUALITY_LEVEL, ql))
> +		return -EMSGSIZE;
> +
> +	return 0;
> +}
> +
>   static int
>   dpll_msg_add_pin_prio(struct sk_buff *msg, struct dpll_pin *pin,
>   		      struct dpll_pin_ref *ref,
> @@ -557,6 +576,9 @@ dpll_device_get_one(struct dpll_device *dpll, struct sk_buff *msg,
>   	if (ret)
>   		return ret;
>   	ret = dpll_msg_add_lock_status(msg, dpll, extack);
> +	if (ret)
> +		return ret;
> +	ret = dpll_msg_add_clock_quality_level(msg, dpll, extack);
>   	if (ret)
>   		return ret;
>   	ret = dpll_msg_add_mode(msg, dpll, extack);
> diff --git a/include/linux/dpll.h b/include/linux/dpll.h
> index 81f7b623d0ba..e99cdb8ab02c 100644
> --- a/include/linux/dpll.h
> +++ b/include/linux/dpll.h
> @@ -26,6 +26,10 @@ struct dpll_device_ops {
>   			       struct netlink_ext_ack *extack);
>   	int (*temp_get)(const struct dpll_device *dpll, void *dpll_priv,
>   			s32 *temp, struct netlink_ext_ack *extack);
> +	int (*clock_quality_level_get)(const struct dpll_device *dpll,
> +				       void *dpll_priv,
> +				       enum dpll_clock_quality_level *ql,
> +				       struct netlink_ext_ack *extack);
>   };
>   
>   struct dpll_pin_ops {
> diff --git a/include/uapi/linux/dpll.h b/include/uapi/linux/dpll.h
> index b0654ade7b7e..0572f9376da4 100644
> --- a/include/uapi/linux/dpll.h
> +++ b/include/uapi/linux/dpll.h
> @@ -79,6 +79,26 @@ enum dpll_lock_status_error {
>   	DPLL_LOCK_STATUS_ERROR_MAX = (__DPLL_LOCK_STATUS_ERROR_MAX - 1)
>   };
>   
> +/**
> + * enum dpll_clock_quality_level - if previous status change was done due to a
> + *   failure, this provides information of dpll device lock status error. Valid
> + *   values for DPLL_A_LOCK_STATUS_ERROR attribute
> + */
> +enum dpll_clock_quality_level {
> +	DPLL_CLOCK_QUALITY_LEVEL_PRC = 1,
> +	DPLL_CLOCK_QUALITY_LEVEL_SSU_A,
> +	DPLL_CLOCK_QUALITY_LEVEL_SSU_B,
> +	DPLL_CLOCK_QUALITY_LEVEL_EEC1,
> +	DPLL_CLOCK_QUALITY_LEVEL_PRTC,
> +	DPLL_CLOCK_QUALITY_LEVEL_EPRTC,
> +	DPLL_CLOCK_QUALITY_LEVEL_EEEC,
> +	DPLL_CLOCK_QUALITY_LEVEL_EPRC,

I think it would be great to provide some explanation of levels here.
People coming from SDH area may not be familiar with some of them. Or at
least mention ITU-T/IEEE recommendations documents to get the meanings
of these levels.

> +
> +	/* private: */
> +	__DPLL_CLOCK_QUALITY_LEVEL_MAX,
> +	DPLL_CLOCK_QUALITY_LEVEL_MAX = (__DPLL_CLOCK_QUALITY_LEVEL_MAX - 1)
> +};
> +
>   #define DPLL_TEMP_DIVIDER	1000
>   
>   /**
> @@ -180,6 +200,7 @@ enum dpll_a {
>   	DPLL_A_TEMP,
>   	DPLL_A_TYPE,
>   	DPLL_A_LOCK_STATUS_ERROR,
> +	DPLL_A_CLOCK_QUALITY_LEVEL,
>   
>   	__DPLL_A_MAX,
>   	DPLL_A_MAX = (__DPLL_A_MAX - 1)


  reply	other threads:[~2024-10-09 13:33 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 16+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2024-10-09 12:25 [PATCH net-next 0/2] dpll: expose clock quality level Jiri Pirko
2024-10-09 12:25 ` [PATCH net-next 1/2] dpll: add clock quality level attribute and op Jiri Pirko
2024-10-09 13:33   ` Vadim Fedorenko [this message]
2024-10-09 13:39     ` Jiri Pirko
2024-10-09 13:38   ` Kubalewski, Arkadiusz
2024-10-09 14:06     ` Jiri Pirko
2024-10-10  9:53       ` Kubalewski, Arkadiusz
2024-10-10 11:36         ` Jiri Pirko
2024-10-10 13:48           ` Kubalewski, Arkadiusz
2024-10-10 14:36             ` Jiri Pirko
2024-10-10 16:02               ` Kubalewski, Arkadiusz
2024-10-11  6:45                 ` Jiri Pirko
2024-10-11 14:25                   ` Kubalewski, Arkadiusz
2024-10-11 15:57                     ` Jiri Pirko
2024-10-11 19:50                       ` Kubalewski, Arkadiusz
2024-10-09 12:25 ` [PATCH net-next 2/2] net/mlx5: DPLL, Add clock quality level op implementation Jiri Pirko

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=0655aa46-498d-4e8e-be6c-be5fb630c006@linux.dev \
    --to=vadim.fedorenko@linux.dev \
    --cc=arkadiusz.kubalewski@intel.com \
    --cc=davem@davemloft.net \
    --cc=donald.hunter@gmail.com \
    --cc=edumazet@google.com \
    --cc=jiri@resnulli.us \
    --cc=kuba@kernel.org \
    --cc=leon@kernel.org \
    --cc=maciek@machnikowski.net \
    --cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=pabeni@redhat.com \
    --cc=saeedm@nvidia.com \
    --cc=tariqt@nvidia.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox