Netdev List
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Paolo Abeni <pabeni@redhat.com>
To: "Asbjørn Sloth Tønnesen" <ast@fiberby.net>,
	"Donald Hunter" <donald.hunter@gmail.com>,
	"Jakub Kicinski" <kuba@kernel.org>
Cc: "David S . Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>,
	Eric Dumazet <edumazet@google.com>,
	Simon Horman <horms@kernel.org>,
	Felix Maurer <fmaurer@redhat.com>,
	Danielle Ratson <danieller@nvidia.com>,
	Fernando Fernandez Mancera <fmancera@suse.de>,
	netdev@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	stable@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH net] netlink: specs: rt-link: fix ipv6 devconf doc
Date: Thu, 27 Aug 2026 12:55:04 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <08c53736-eaaa-47b9-a65c-b920d21b2993@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260824103816.40040-1-ast@fiberby.net>

On 8/24/26 12:38 PM, Asbjørn Sloth Tønnesen wrote:
> devconf is even odder than described in the blamed commit, where bpth
> IPv4 and IPv6 are described in an identical way:
> "u32 indexed by ipv?-devconf - 1 on output, on input it's a nest".
> 
> There are two issues with that line for IPv6:
> 
> 1) The subtraction is an IPv4 specific quirk, to avoid having an unused
>    u32 at index 0, thus saving 4 bytes per net device being dumped:
> 
>    - In include/uapi/linux/ip.h the IPV4_DEVCONF_* enum begins with
>      IPV4_DEVCONF_FORWARDING = 1, so the enum starts at 1, which is
>      the reason for the subtraction in the IPv4 variant.
> 
>    - In include/uapi/linux/ipv6.h the DEVCONF_* enum begins with
>      DEVCONF_FORWARDING = 0, so subtraction would underflow.
> 
>    - ipv6_store_devconf() in net/ipv6/addrconf.c also doesn't do the
>      subtraction in the output path.
> 
> 2) Setting IPv6 devconf through Netlink is not yet supported, as
>    IFLA_INET6_CONF is not handled in inet6_set_link_af().
> 
> Fixes: 720447bd0b24 ("netlink: specs: rt-link: remove implicit structs from devconf")
> Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
> Signed-off-by: Asbjørn Sloth Tønnesen <ast@fiberby.net>
Nowadays net PRs are already too big due more-or-less security-relevant
changes. I think this is better suited for net-next, with no 'fixes' tag
nor stable cc, WDYT?

/P


  parent reply	other threads:[~2026-08-27 10:55 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2026-08-24 10:38 [PATCH net] netlink: specs: rt-link: fix ipv6 devconf doc Asbjørn Sloth Tønnesen
2026-08-24 10:42 ` Fernando Fernandez Mancera
2026-08-27 10:55 ` Paolo Abeni [this message]
2026-08-27 11:39   ` Asbjørn Sloth Tønnesen

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=08c53736-eaaa-47b9-a65c-b920d21b2993@redhat.com \
    --to=pabeni@redhat.com \
    --cc=ast@fiberby.net \
    --cc=danieller@nvidia.com \
    --cc=davem@davemloft.net \
    --cc=donald.hunter@gmail.com \
    --cc=edumazet@google.com \
    --cc=fmancera@suse.de \
    --cc=fmaurer@redhat.com \
    --cc=horms@kernel.org \
    --cc=kuba@kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=stable@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox