From: Eric Joyner <eric.joyner@amd.com>
To: "D H, Siddaraju" <siddaraju.dh@intel.com>,
Maxime Chevallier <maxime.chevallier@bootlin.com>,
Andrew Lunn <andrew@lunn.ch>, Michal Kubecek <mkubecek@suse.cz>,
"netdev@vger.kernel.org" <netdev@vger.kernel.org>
Cc: "Chintalapalle, Balaji" <balaji.chintalapalle@intel.com>,
"Das, Shubham" <shubham.das@intel.com>,
"Srinivasan, Vijay" <vijay.srinivasan@intel.com>,
"Samudrala, Sridhar" <sridhar.samudrala@intel.com>,
"Keller, Jacob E" <jacob.e.keller@intel.com>,
"Nguyen, Anthony L" <anthony.l.nguyen@intel.com>,
"singhai.anjali55@gmail.com" <singhai.anjali55@gmail.com>,
"Brandeburg, Jesse" <jbrandeburg@cloudflare.com>
Subject: Re: Ethtool is missing C2C link modes
Date: Mon, 13 Jul 2026 16:18:23 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <0d410deb-c670-4837-a87f-d4e8f3c73259@amd.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <SN7PR11MB6900E94E718175AACB2309109AFD2@SN7PR11MB6900.namprd11.prod.outlook.com>
On 7/10/2026 2:45 PM, D H, Siddaraju wrote:
> Hello Linux Ethernet team, Maxime, Andrew & Michal,
>
> The IEEE AUI chip-to-chip (C2C) is the accepted standard for connecting
> chips that handle subfunctions within the OSI physical layer. Just to
> pick, the C2C is widely used when connecting Ethernet SoCs with retimers
> and PCS SerDes terminated external-phys to offload PHY sublayer functions.
>
> With the existing ethtool link modes, we were not able to fit these C2C
> interfaces on any others (we fitted **SGMII interfaces to baseT link modes)
> and we see this as a gap. If you acknowledge this, we plan to send an
> RFC patch to define below listed C2C link modes to ethtool.
>
> 10G_SFI_C2C SFF-8418
> 25G_AUI_C2C IEEE 802.3 Annex 109A
> CAUI4 C2C IEEE 802.3 Annex 83D
> LAUI2-C2C IEEE 802.3 Annex 135B
> 50GAUI-1 C2C IEEE 802.3 Annex 135F
> 200GAUI-4 C2C IEEE 802.3 Annex 120D
> 100GAUI-1 C2C IEEE 802.3ck Annex 120F
> 200GAUI-2 C2C IEEE 802.3ck Clause 162
> 400GAUI-4 C2C IEEE 802.3ck Clause 163
>
> - Thank you,
> Siddaraju D H
>
I'll piggyback on this thread because I have a related question about missing
ethtool link modes: what about entries for various Active Cable types? e.g. AOC,
ACC, and AEC for the appropriate speeds.
I see some drivers (like i40e and ice) detect these and map them to SR or DA/CR
types, but I don't see them do it in a consistent pattern, either. I couldn't
find anything that suggested a precedent on how to handle these.
- Eric
prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-07-13 23:18 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-07-10 21:45 Ethtool is missing C2C link modes D H, Siddaraju
2026-07-10 22:54 ` Andrew Lunn
2026-07-11 6:31 ` David Laight
2026-07-11 8:42 ` Maxime Chevallier
2026-07-13 23:18 ` Eric Joyner [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=0d410deb-c670-4837-a87f-d4e8f3c73259@amd.com \
--to=eric.joyner@amd.com \
--cc=andrew@lunn.ch \
--cc=anthony.l.nguyen@intel.com \
--cc=balaji.chintalapalle@intel.com \
--cc=jacob.e.keller@intel.com \
--cc=jbrandeburg@cloudflare.com \
--cc=maxime.chevallier@bootlin.com \
--cc=mkubecek@suse.cz \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=shubham.das@intel.com \
--cc=siddaraju.dh@intel.com \
--cc=singhai.anjali55@gmail.com \
--cc=sridhar.samudrala@intel.com \
--cc=vijay.srinivasan@intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox