From: jamal <hadi@cyberus.ca>
To: Stephen Hemminger <shemminger@osdl.org>
Cc: "David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>,
rhee@eos.ncsu.edu, jheffner@psc.edu, Yee-Ting.Li@nuim.ie,
baruch@ev-en.org, netdev@oss.sgi.com
Subject: Re: netif_rx packet dumping
Date: 03 Mar 2005 16:24:25 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1109885065.1098.285.camel@jzny.localdomain> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20050303132143.7eef517c@dxpl.pdx.osdl.net>
On Thu, 2005-03-03 at 16:21, Stephen Hemminger wrote:
> My plan is to keep netif_max_backlog but bump it up to something bigger
> by default. Maybe even autosize it based on memory available. But
> get rid of the "dump till empty" behaviour that screws over TCP.
Ok, this does sound more reasonable. Out of curiosity, are packets being
dropped at the socket queue? Why is "dump till empty" behaviour screwing
over TCP.
cheers,
jamal
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2005-03-03 21:24 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 51+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2005-03-03 20:38 netif_rx packet dumping Stephen Hemminger
2005-03-03 20:55 ` David S. Miller
2005-03-03 21:01 ` Stephen Hemminger
2005-03-03 21:18 ` jamal
2005-03-03 21:21 ` Stephen Hemminger
2005-03-03 21:24 ` jamal [this message]
2005-03-03 21:32 ` David S. Miller
2005-03-03 21:54 ` Stephen Hemminger
2005-03-03 22:02 ` John Heffner
2005-03-03 22:26 ` jamal
2005-03-03 23:16 ` Stephen Hemminger
2005-03-03 23:40 ` jamal
2005-03-03 23:48 ` Baruch Even
2005-03-04 3:45 ` jamal
2005-03-04 8:47 ` Baruch Even
2005-03-07 13:55 ` jamal
2005-03-08 15:56 ` Baruch Even
2005-03-08 22:02 ` jamal
2005-03-22 21:55 ` cliff white
2005-03-03 23:48 ` John Heffner
2005-03-04 1:42 ` Lennert Buytenhek
2005-03-04 3:10 ` John Heffner
2005-03-04 3:31 ` Lennert Buytenhek
2005-03-04 19:52 ` Edgar E Iglesias
2005-03-04 19:54 ` Stephen Hemminger
2005-03-04 21:41 ` Edgar E Iglesias
2005-03-04 19:49 ` Jason Lunz
2005-03-03 22:01 ` jamal
2005-03-03 21:26 ` Baruch Even
2005-03-03 21:36 ` David S. Miller
2005-03-03 21:44 ` Baruch Even
2005-03-03 21:54 ` Andi Kleen
2005-03-03 22:04 ` David S. Miller
2005-03-03 21:57 ` David S. Miller
2005-03-03 22:14 ` Baruch Even
2005-03-08 15:42 ` Baruch Even
2005-03-08 17:00 ` Andi Kleen
2005-03-08 18:01 ` Baruch Even
2005-03-08 18:09 ` David S. Miller
2005-03-08 18:18 ` Andi Kleen
2005-03-08 18:37 ` Thomas Graf
2005-03-08 18:51 ` Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
2005-03-08 22:16 ` Andi Kleen
2005-03-08 18:27 ` Ben Greear
2005-03-09 23:57 ` Thomas Graf
2005-03-10 0:03 ` Stephen Hemminger
2005-03-10 8:33 ` Andi Kleen
2005-03-10 14:08 ` Thomas Graf
2005-03-31 16:33 ` Baruch Even
2005-03-03 22:03 ` jamal
2005-03-03 22:31 ` Baruch Even
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1109885065.1098.285.camel@jzny.localdomain \
--to=hadi@cyberus.ca \
--cc=Yee-Ting.Li@nuim.ie \
--cc=baruch@ev-en.org \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=jheffner@psc.edu \
--cc=netdev@oss.sgi.com \
--cc=rhee@eos.ncsu.edu \
--cc=shemminger@osdl.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox