From: Jon Masters <jonathan@jonmasters.org>
To: Thomas Graf <tgraf@suug.ch>
Cc: Rick Jones <rick.jones2@hp.com>,
"Kok, Auke" <auke-jan.h.kok@intel.com>,
Jan Engelhardt <jengelh@medozas.de>,
johnathan@jonmasters.org, netdev@vger.kernel.org,
dwmw2@infradead.org
Subject: Re: network interface *name* alias support?
Date: Sat, 24 May 2008 00:25:55 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1211603155.11907.79.camel@perihelion> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20080523225435.GT20815@postel.suug.ch>
On Sat, 2008-05-24 at 00:54 +0200, Thomas Graf wrote:
> * Jon Masters <jonathan@jonmasters.org> 2008-05-23 15:06
> > My intention is to also allow for:
> >
> > ifcfg-slot_<whatever>
> >
> > Where the configuration is based entirely upon what vendor <XYZ> says is
> > the first, second, or third card. Then, those who want to use the older
> > names can continue to do so, but those who prefer to base their
> > configuration upon the order the vendor states, can do so.
>
> I'd propose to extend the netlink configuration interface, f.e. introduce a
> new netlink attribtue IFLA_SLOT which can be provided to select the device
> to be changed based on the slot number instead of the name/ifindex. That
> would also make it trivial to write a small app using RTM_GETLINK to
> translate a slot number to the corresponding interface name.
I guess that would also work quite nicely for what I want to do, but the
problem is that this will require either:
*). The kernel decodes the DMI extension directly.
*). We can first inform each device which slot it is in (set the slot).
My intention is to implement whatever seems reasonable, and my reason
for asking is that I am not a networking maintainer, so I want to know
what seems reasonable :)
Cheers,
Jon.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2008-05-24 4:26 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 25+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2008-05-23 16:31 network interface *name* alias support? Jan Engelhardt
2008-05-23 17:14 ` Kok, Auke
2008-05-23 17:44 ` Rick Jones
2008-05-23 19:06 ` Jon Masters
2008-05-23 19:11 ` Jon Masters
2008-05-23 20:46 ` Jan Engelhardt
2008-05-23 20:55 ` Jon Masters
2008-05-23 22:54 ` Thomas Graf
2008-05-24 4:25 ` Jon Masters [this message]
2008-05-24 4:53 ` Jan Engelhardt
2008-05-24 5:16 ` Matt Domsch
2008-05-24 9:15 ` James Chapman
2008-05-24 9:33 ` David Woodhouse
2008-05-24 10:37 ` James Chapman
2008-05-24 20:31 ` Patrick McHardy
2008-05-24 20:54 ` Jan Engelhardt
2008-05-25 3:07 ` Patrick McHardy
2008-05-25 12:17 ` David Miller
2008-05-27 19:03 ` Matt Domsch
2008-05-27 21:49 ` Jan Engelhardt
2008-05-27 22:11 ` Thomas Graf
2008-05-24 18:12 ` Stephen Hemminger
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2008-05-21 22:47 Jon Masters
2008-05-23 13:07 ` David Woodhouse
2008-05-23 14:50 ` Jon Masters
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1211603155.11907.79.camel@perihelion \
--to=jonathan@jonmasters.org \
--cc=auke-jan.h.kok@intel.com \
--cc=dwmw2@infradead.org \
--cc=jengelh@medozas.de \
--cc=johnathan@jonmasters.org \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=rick.jones2@hp.com \
--cc=tgraf@suug.ch \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox