From: Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@gmail.com>
To: William Allen Simpson <william.allen.simpson@gmail.com>
Cc: Dan Carpenter <error27@gmail.com>,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
Linux Kernel Developers <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
Linux Kernel Network Developers <netdev@vger.kernel.org>,
David Miller <davem@davemloft.net>,
Michael Chan <mchan@broadcom.com>,
Simon Horman <horms@verge.net.au>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 2/7] net: remove old tcp_optlen function
Date: Sat, 13 Mar 2010 12:24:30 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1268479470.2947.33.camel@edumazet-laptop> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4B9B7312.80301@gmail.com>
Le samedi 13 mars 2010 à 06:12 -0500, William Allen Simpson a écrit :
> Since you agree with David, perhaps you could kindly point out exactly
> how your statement is true? Proof by assertion is generally not good
> argumentation.
>
You have to bring proof of your claims, not the reverse.
You started the whole game, adding whole universe into this minor netdev
discussion for an obscure and yet to be aknowledged bug, not me.
Therefore, I wont continue this trolling. You apparently want some
public exposure I have no idea why.
Have a good week end.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2010-03-13 11:24 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 22+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2010-03-11 11:35 [PATCH 0/7] tcp: bugs and cleanup for 2.6.34-rc1 William Allen Simpson
2010-03-11 11:41 ` [PATCH v3 1/7] net: tcp_header_len_th and tcp_option_len_th William Allen Simpson
2010-03-11 11:53 ` [PATCH v4 2/7] net: remove old tcp_optlen function William Allen Simpson
2010-03-11 11:54 ` William Allen Simpson
2010-03-12 0:26 ` Simon Horman
2010-03-12 13:21 ` William Allen Simpson
2010-03-12 13:25 ` William Allen Simpson
2010-03-12 17:46 ` Dan Carpenter
2010-03-12 23:05 ` William Allen Simpson
2010-03-13 9:11 ` Eric Dumazet
2010-03-13 11:12 ` William Allen Simpson
2010-03-13 11:24 ` Eric Dumazet [this message]
2010-03-11 12:08 ` [PATCH v6 3/7] tcp: harmonize tcp_vx_rcv header length assumptions William Allen Simpson
2010-03-11 12:24 ` [PATCH v6 4/7] tcp: input header length, prediction, and timestamp bugs William Allen Simpson
2010-03-11 12:31 ` [PATCH v3 5/7] TCPCT part 2e: accept SYNACK data William Allen Simpson
2010-03-11 12:48 ` [PATCH v6 6/7] TCPCT part 2f: cleanup tcp_parse_options William Allen Simpson
2010-03-11 13:06 ` [PATCH v8 7/7] TCPCT part 2g: parse cookie pair and 64-bit timestamp William Allen Simpson
2010-03-11 15:01 ` [PATCH 0/7] tcp: bugs and cleanup for 2.6.34-rc1 Eric Dumazet
2010-03-11 17:38 ` William Allen Simpson
2010-03-11 18:14 ` Joe Perches
2010-03-12 13:27 ` William Allen Simpson
2010-03-13 5:29 ` Américo Wang
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1268479470.2947.33.camel@edumazet-laptop \
--to=eric.dumazet@gmail.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=error27@gmail.com \
--cc=horms@verge.net.au \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mchan@broadcom.com \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=william.allen.simpson@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox