From: Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@gmail.com>
To: hadi@cyberus.ca
Cc: Changli Gao <xiaosuo@gmail.com>, Rick Jones <rick.jones2@hp.com>,
David Miller <davem@davemloft.net>,
therbert@google.com, netdev@vger.kernel.org, robert@herjulf.net,
andi@firstfloor.org
Subject: Re: rps perfomance WAS(Re: rps: question
Date: Sun, 18 Apr 2010 13:34:36 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1271590476.16881.4925.camel@edumazet-laptop> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1271583573.16881.4798.camel@edumazet-laptop>
Le dimanche 18 avril 2010 à 11:39 +0200, Eric Dumazet a écrit :
> No, only one packet per IPI, since I setup my tg3 coalescing parameter
> to the minimum value, I received one packet per interrupt.
>
> The specific app is :
>
> for f in `seq 1 8`; do while :; do :; done& done
>
An other interesting user land app would be to use a cpu _and_ memory
cruncher, because of caches misses we'll get.
$ cat nloop.c
#include <stdlib.h>
#include <string.h>
#include <unistd.h>
#define SZ 4*1024*1024
int main(int argc, char *argv[])
{
int nproc = 8;
char *buffer;
if (argc > 1)
nproc = atoi(argv[1]);
while (nproc > 1) {
if (fork() == 0)
break;
nproc--;
}
buffer = malloc(SZ);
while (1)
memset(buffer, 0x55, SZ);
}
$ ./nloop 8 &
echo 00 >/sys/class/net/eth3/queues/rx-0/rps_cpus
4861ms
echo 01 >/sys/class/net/eth3/queues/rx-0/rps_cpus
4981ms
echo 02 >/sys/class/net/eth3/queues/rx-0/rps_cpus
7191ms
echo 04 >/sys/class/net/eth3/queues/rx-0/rps_cpus
7128ms
echo 08 >/sys/class/net/eth3/queues/rx-0/rps_cpus
7107ms
echo 10 >/sys/class/net/eth3/queues/rx-0/rps_cpus
5505ms
echo 20 >/sys/class/net/eth3/queues/rx-0/rps_cpus
7125ms
echo 40 >/sys/class/net/eth3/queues/rx-0/rps_cpus
7022ms
echo 80 >/sys/class/net/eth3/queues/rx-0/rps_cpus
7157ms
Maximum overhead is 7191-4861 = 23.3 us per packet
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2010-04-18 11:34 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 86+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2010-02-07 18:42 rps: question jamal
2010-02-08 5:58 ` Tom Herbert
2010-02-08 15:09 ` jamal
2010-04-14 11:53 ` rps perfomance WAS(Re: " jamal
2010-04-14 17:31 ` Tom Herbert
2010-04-14 18:04 ` Eric Dumazet
2010-04-14 18:53 ` jamal
2010-04-14 19:44 ` Stephen Hemminger
2010-04-14 19:58 ` Eric Dumazet
2010-04-15 8:51 ` David Miller
2010-04-14 20:22 ` jamal
2010-04-14 20:27 ` Eric Dumazet
2010-04-14 20:38 ` jamal
2010-04-14 20:45 ` Tom Herbert
2010-04-14 20:57 ` Eric Dumazet
2010-04-14 22:51 ` Changli Gao
2010-04-14 23:02 ` Stephen Hemminger
2010-04-15 2:40 ` Eric Dumazet
2010-04-15 2:50 ` Changli Gao
2010-04-15 8:57 ` David Miller
2010-04-15 12:10 ` jamal
2010-04-15 12:32 ` Changli Gao
2010-04-15 12:50 ` jamal
2010-04-15 23:51 ` Changli Gao
2010-04-15 8:51 ` David Miller
2010-04-14 20:34 ` Andi Kleen
2010-04-15 8:50 ` David Miller
2010-04-15 8:48 ` David Miller
2010-04-15 11:55 ` jamal
2010-04-15 16:41 ` Rick Jones
2010-04-15 20:16 ` jamal
2010-04-15 20:25 ` Rick Jones
2010-04-15 23:56 ` Changli Gao
2010-04-16 5:18 ` Eric Dumazet
2010-04-16 6:02 ` Changli Gao
2010-04-16 6:28 ` Tom Herbert
2010-04-16 6:32 ` Eric Dumazet
2010-04-16 13:42 ` jamal
2010-04-16 7:15 ` Andi Kleen
2010-04-16 13:27 ` jamal
2010-04-16 13:37 ` Andi Kleen
2010-04-16 13:58 ` jamal
2010-04-16 13:21 ` jamal
2010-04-16 13:34 ` Changli Gao
2010-04-16 13:49 ` jamal
2010-04-16 14:10 ` Changli Gao
2010-04-16 14:43 ` jamal
2010-04-16 14:58 ` Changli Gao
2010-04-19 12:48 ` jamal
2010-04-17 7:35 ` Eric Dumazet
2010-04-17 8:43 ` Tom Herbert
2010-04-17 9:23 ` Eric Dumazet
2010-04-17 14:27 ` Eric Dumazet
2010-04-17 17:26 ` Tom Herbert
2010-04-17 14:17 ` [PATCH net-next-2.6] net: remove time limit in process_backlog() Eric Dumazet
2010-04-18 9:36 ` David Miller
2010-04-17 17:31 ` rps perfomance WAS(Re: rps: question jamal
2010-04-18 9:39 ` Eric Dumazet
2010-04-18 11:34 ` Eric Dumazet [this message]
2010-04-19 2:09 ` jamal
2010-04-19 9:37 ` [RFC] rps: shortcut net_rps_action() Eric Dumazet
2010-04-19 9:48 ` Changli Gao
2010-04-19 12:14 ` Eric Dumazet
2010-04-19 12:28 ` Changli Gao
2010-04-19 13:27 ` Eric Dumazet
2010-04-19 14:22 ` Eric Dumazet
2010-04-19 15:07 ` [PATCH net-next-2.6] " Eric Dumazet
2010-04-19 16:02 ` Tom Herbert
2010-04-19 20:21 ` David Miller
2010-04-20 7:17 ` [PATCH net-next-2.6] rps: cleanups Eric Dumazet
2010-04-20 8:18 ` David Miller
2010-04-19 23:56 ` [PATCH net-next-2.6] rps: shortcut net_rps_action() Changli Gao
2010-04-20 0:32 ` Changli Gao
2010-04-20 5:55 ` Eric Dumazet
2010-04-20 12:02 ` rps perfomance WAS(Re: rps: question jamal
2010-04-20 13:13 ` Eric Dumazet
[not found] ` <1271853570.4032.21.camel@bigi>
2010-04-21 19:01 ` Eric Dumazet
2010-04-22 1:27 ` Changli Gao
2010-04-22 12:12 ` jamal
2010-04-25 2:31 ` Changli Gao
2010-04-26 11:35 ` jamal
2010-04-26 13:35 ` Changli Gao
2010-04-21 21:53 ` Rick Jones
2010-04-16 15:57 ` Tom Herbert
2010-04-14 18:53 ` Stephen Hemminger
2010-04-15 8:42 ` David Miller
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1271590476.16881.4925.camel@edumazet-laptop \
--to=eric.dumazet@gmail.com \
--cc=andi@firstfloor.org \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=hadi@cyberus.ca \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=rick.jones2@hp.com \
--cc=robert@herjulf.net \
--cc=therbert@google.com \
--cc=xiaosuo@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox