Netdev List
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@gmail.com>
To: Changli Gao <xiaosuo@gmail.com>,
	David Miller <davem@davemloft.net>,
	Tom Herbert <therbert@google.com>
Cc: netdev <netdev@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: [PATCH net-next-2.6] rps: shortcut net_rps_action()
Date: Mon, 19 Apr 2010 17:07:33 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1271689653.3845.73.camel@edumazet-laptop> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1271686957.3845.49.camel@edumazet-laptop>

Le lundi 19 avril 2010 à 16:22 +0200, Eric Dumazet a écrit :

> 
> Hmm, I just read again, and I now remember Tom used a single bitmap,
> then we had to add a second set because of a possible race.
> 
> A list would be enough.
> 

Here is the updated patch, using a single list instead of bitmap

RFC status becomes official patch ;)

Thanks Changli for your array suggestion !


[PATCH net-next-2.6] rps: shortcut net_rps_action()

net_rps_action() is a bit expensive on NR_CPUS=64..4096 kernels, even if
RPS is not active.

Tom Herbert used two bitmasks to hold information needed to send IPI,
but a single LIFO list seems more appropriate.

Move all RPS logic into net_rps_action() to cleanup net_rx_action() code
(remove two ifdefs)

Move rps_remote_softirq_cpus into softnet_data to share its first cache
line, filling an existing hole.

In a future patch, we could call net_rps_action() from process_backlog()
to make sure we send IPI before handling this cpu backlog.

Signed-off-by: Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@gmail.com>
---
 include/linux/netdevice.h |    9 ++--
 net/core/dev.c            |   79 ++++++++++++++----------------------
 2 files changed, 38 insertions(+), 50 deletions(-)

diff --git a/include/linux/netdevice.h b/include/linux/netdevice.h
index 649a025..83ab3da 100644
--- a/include/linux/netdevice.h
+++ b/include/linux/netdevice.h
@@ -1381,17 +1381,20 @@ static inline int unregister_gifconf(unsigned int family)
 }
 
 /*
- * Incoming packets are placed on per-cpu queues so that
- * no locking is needed.
+ * Incoming packets are placed on per-cpu queues
  */
 struct softnet_data {
 	struct Qdisc		*output_queue;
 	struct list_head	poll_list;
 	struct sk_buff		*completion_queue;
 
-	/* Elements below can be accessed between CPUs for RPS */
 #ifdef CONFIG_RPS
+	struct softnet_data	*rps_ipi_list;
+
+	/* Elements below can be accessed between CPUs for RPS */
 	struct call_single_data	csd ____cacheline_aligned_in_smp;
+	struct softnet_data	*rps_ipi_next;
+	unsigned int		cpu;
 	unsigned int		input_queue_head;
 #endif
 	struct sk_buff_head	input_pkt_queue;
diff --git a/net/core/dev.c b/net/core/dev.c
index 7abf959..f6ff2cf 100644
--- a/net/core/dev.c
+++ b/net/core/dev.c
@@ -2346,21 +2346,6 @@ done:
 	return cpu;
 }
 
-/*
- * This structure holds the per-CPU mask of CPUs for which IPIs are scheduled
- * to be sent to kick remote softirq processing.  There are two masks since
- * the sending of IPIs must be done with interrupts enabled.  The select field
- * indicates the current mask that enqueue_backlog uses to schedule IPIs.
- * select is flipped before net_rps_action is called while still under lock,
- * net_rps_action then uses the non-selected mask to send the IPIs and clears
- * it without conflicting with enqueue_backlog operation.
- */
-struct rps_remote_softirq_cpus {
-	cpumask_t mask[2];
-	int select;
-};
-static DEFINE_PER_CPU(struct rps_remote_softirq_cpus, rps_remote_softirq_cpus);
-
 /* Called from hardirq (IPI) context */
 static void trigger_softirq(void *data)
 {
@@ -2403,10 +2388,12 @@ enqueue:
 		if (napi_schedule_prep(&queue->backlog)) {
 #ifdef CONFIG_RPS
 			if (cpu != smp_processor_id()) {
-				struct rps_remote_softirq_cpus *rcpus =
-				    &__get_cpu_var(rps_remote_softirq_cpus);
+				struct softnet_data *myqueue;
+
+				myqueue = &__get_cpu_var(softnet_data);
+				queue->rps_ipi_next = myqueue->rps_ipi_list;
+				myqueue->rps_ipi_list = queue;
 
-				cpu_set(cpu, rcpus->mask[rcpus->select]);
 				__raise_softirq_irqoff(NET_RX_SOFTIRQ);
 				goto enqueue;
 			}
@@ -2911,7 +2898,9 @@ int netif_receive_skb(struct sk_buff *skb)
 }
 EXPORT_SYMBOL(netif_receive_skb);
 
-/* Network device is going away, flush any packets still pending  */
+/* Network device is going away, flush any packets still pending
+ * Called with irqs disabled.
+ */
 static void flush_backlog(void *arg)
 {
 	struct net_device *dev = arg;
@@ -3340,24 +3329,33 @@ void netif_napi_del(struct napi_struct *napi)
 }
 EXPORT_SYMBOL(netif_napi_del);
 
-#ifdef CONFIG_RPS
 /*
- * net_rps_action sends any pending IPI's for rps.  This is only called from
- * softirq and interrupts must be enabled.
+ * net_rps_action sends any pending IPI's for rps.
+ * Note: called with local irq disabled, but exits with local irq enabled.
  */
-static void net_rps_action(cpumask_t *mask)
+static void net_rps_action(void)
 {
-	int cpu;
+#ifdef CONFIG_RPS
+	struct softnet_data *locqueue = &__get_cpu_var(softnet_data);
+	struct softnet_data *remqueue = locqueue->rps_ipi_list;
 
-	/* Send pending IPI's to kick RPS processing on remote cpus. */
-	for_each_cpu_mask_nr(cpu, *mask) {
-		struct softnet_data *queue = &per_cpu(softnet_data, cpu);
-		if (cpu_online(cpu))
-			__smp_call_function_single(cpu, &queue->csd, 0);
-	}
-	cpus_clear(*mask);
-}
+	if (remqueue) {
+		locqueue->rps_ipi_list = NULL;
+
+		local_irq_enable();
+
+		/* Send pending IPI's to kick RPS processing on remote cpus. */
+		while (remqueue) {
+			struct softnet_data *next = remqueue->rps_ipi_next;
+			if (cpu_online(remqueue->cpu))
+				__smp_call_function_single(remqueue->cpu,
+							   &remqueue->csd, 0);
+			remqueue = next;
+		}
+	} else
 #endif
+		local_irq_enable();
+}
 
 static void net_rx_action(struct softirq_action *h)
 {
@@ -3365,10 +3363,6 @@ static void net_rx_action(struct softirq_action *h)
 	unsigned long time_limit = jiffies + 2;
 	int budget = netdev_budget;
 	void *have;
-#ifdef CONFIG_RPS
-	int select;
-	struct rps_remote_softirq_cpus *rcpus;
-#endif
 
 	local_irq_disable();
 
@@ -3431,17 +3425,7 @@ static void net_rx_action(struct softirq_action *h)
 		netpoll_poll_unlock(have);
 	}
 out:
-#ifdef CONFIG_RPS
-	rcpus = &__get_cpu_var(rps_remote_softirq_cpus);
-	select = rcpus->select;
-	rcpus->select ^= 1;
-
-	local_irq_enable();
-
-	net_rps_action(&rcpus->mask[select]);
-#else
-	local_irq_enable();
-#endif
+	net_rps_action();
 
 #ifdef CONFIG_NET_DMA
 	/*
@@ -5841,6 +5825,7 @@ static int __init net_dev_init(void)
 		queue->csd.func = trigger_softirq;
 		queue->csd.info = queue;
 		queue->csd.flags = 0;
+		queue->cpu = i;
 #endif
 
 		queue->backlog.poll = process_backlog;



  reply	other threads:[~2010-04-19 15:07 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 86+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2010-02-07 18:42 rps: question jamal
2010-02-08  5:58 ` Tom Herbert
2010-02-08 15:09   ` jamal
2010-04-14 11:53     ` rps perfomance WAS(Re: " jamal
2010-04-14 17:31       ` Tom Herbert
2010-04-14 18:04         ` Eric Dumazet
2010-04-14 18:53           ` jamal
2010-04-14 19:44             ` Stephen Hemminger
2010-04-14 19:58               ` Eric Dumazet
2010-04-15  8:51                 ` David Miller
2010-04-14 20:22               ` jamal
2010-04-14 20:27                 ` Eric Dumazet
2010-04-14 20:38                   ` jamal
2010-04-14 20:45                   ` Tom Herbert
2010-04-14 20:57                     ` Eric Dumazet
2010-04-14 22:51                       ` Changli Gao
2010-04-14 23:02                         ` Stephen Hemminger
2010-04-15  2:40                           ` Eric Dumazet
2010-04-15  2:50                             ` Changli Gao
2010-04-15  8:57                       ` David Miller
2010-04-15 12:10                       ` jamal
2010-04-15 12:32                         ` Changli Gao
2010-04-15 12:50                           ` jamal
2010-04-15 23:51                             ` Changli Gao
2010-04-15  8:51                 ` David Miller
2010-04-14 20:34               ` Andi Kleen
2010-04-15  8:50               ` David Miller
2010-04-15  8:48             ` David Miller
2010-04-15 11:55               ` jamal
2010-04-15 16:41                 ` Rick Jones
2010-04-15 20:16                   ` jamal
2010-04-15 20:25                     ` Rick Jones
2010-04-15 23:56                     ` Changli Gao
2010-04-16  5:18                       ` Eric Dumazet
2010-04-16  6:02                         ` Changli Gao
2010-04-16  6:28                           ` Tom Herbert
2010-04-16  6:32                           ` Eric Dumazet
2010-04-16 13:42                             ` jamal
2010-04-16  7:15                           ` Andi Kleen
2010-04-16 13:27                             ` jamal
2010-04-16 13:37                               ` Andi Kleen
2010-04-16 13:58                                 ` jamal
2010-04-16 13:21                         ` jamal
2010-04-16 13:34                           ` Changli Gao
2010-04-16 13:49                             ` jamal
2010-04-16 14:10                               ` Changli Gao
2010-04-16 14:43                                 ` jamal
2010-04-16 14:58                                   ` Changli Gao
2010-04-19 12:48                                     ` jamal
2010-04-17  7:35                           ` Eric Dumazet
2010-04-17  8:43                             ` Tom Herbert
2010-04-17  9:23                               ` Eric Dumazet
2010-04-17 14:27                                 ` Eric Dumazet
2010-04-17 17:26                                   ` Tom Herbert
2010-04-17 14:17                               ` [PATCH net-next-2.6] net: remove time limit in process_backlog() Eric Dumazet
2010-04-18  9:36                                 ` David Miller
2010-04-17 17:31                             ` rps perfomance WAS(Re: rps: question jamal
2010-04-18  9:39                               ` Eric Dumazet
2010-04-18 11:34                                 ` Eric Dumazet
2010-04-19  2:09                                   ` jamal
2010-04-19  9:37                                   ` [RFC] rps: shortcut net_rps_action() Eric Dumazet
2010-04-19  9:48                                     ` Changli Gao
2010-04-19 12:14                                       ` Eric Dumazet
2010-04-19 12:28                                         ` Changli Gao
2010-04-19 13:27                                           ` Eric Dumazet
2010-04-19 14:22                                             ` Eric Dumazet
2010-04-19 15:07                                               ` Eric Dumazet [this message]
2010-04-19 16:02                                                 ` [PATCH net-next-2.6] " Tom Herbert
2010-04-19 20:21                                                 ` David Miller
2010-04-20  7:17                                                   ` [PATCH net-next-2.6] rps: cleanups Eric Dumazet
2010-04-20  8:18                                                     ` David Miller
2010-04-19 23:56                                                 ` [PATCH net-next-2.6] rps: shortcut net_rps_action() Changli Gao
2010-04-20  0:32                                                   ` Changli Gao
2010-04-20  5:55                                                     ` Eric Dumazet
2010-04-20 12:02                                   ` rps perfomance WAS(Re: rps: question jamal
2010-04-20 13:13                                     ` Eric Dumazet
     [not found]                                       ` <1271853570.4032.21.camel@bigi>
2010-04-21 19:01                                         ` Eric Dumazet
2010-04-22  1:27                                           ` Changli Gao
2010-04-22 12:12                                           ` jamal
2010-04-25  2:31                                             ` Changli Gao
2010-04-26 11:35                                               ` jamal
2010-04-26 13:35                                                 ` Changli Gao
2010-04-21 21:53                                         ` Rick Jones
2010-04-16 15:57             ` Tom Herbert
2010-04-14 18:53       ` Stephen Hemminger
2010-04-15  8:42       ` David Miller

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=1271689653.3845.73.camel@edumazet-laptop \
    --to=eric.dumazet@gmail.com \
    --cc=davem@davemloft.net \
    --cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=therbert@google.com \
    --cc=xiaosuo@gmail.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox